Free Access
Volume 529, May 2011
Article Number A155
Number of page(s) 8
Section Stellar structure and evolution
Published online 22 April 2011

© ESO, 2011

1. Introduction

GS 1826−238  is a persistent low-mass X-ray binary (LMXB) harbouring a neutron star (NS). Discovered during a manoeuvre of the Ginga satellite (Makino et al. 1988) and previously regarded as a transient source, GS 1826−238  is actually a persistent emitter at least since the BeppoSAX era, and always observed in a low-hard spectral state (LHS) with its high-energy emission extending well above 100 keV.

Wide band LHS spectra of weakly magnetised NS are traditionally best described by two main components, each of them connected to a distinct soft photon population: 1) a Compton-modified blackbody radiation with electron plasma temperatures in the range ~15–30 keV, accounting for most of the source energy output and dominating in the hard X-rays; and 2) a directly observed blackbody (possibly a multicolour disk emission) with a different colour temperature with respect to the previous one that, though bolometrically weaker, becomes important in the soft X-rays characterising the spectral shape below ~10 keV. In the LHS the blackbody seed photon population facing the inverse Compton scattering is usually hotter than the directly emerging one. It is supposedly located in the close vicinity of the NS (in the so-called boundary layer and/or in the photosphere of the NS itself), while the colder pseudo-blackbody population likely originates in the inner accretion disk.

This picture fits well into an eastern-like scenario (Mitsuda et al. 1989) for NS-LMXBs: in this traditional model the cold photon population is described by multicolour disk blackbody and is directly observed. The hotter population is (almost) completely Comptonised by a hot electron plasma. The opposite occurs in the (also traditional) western model (White et al. 1988): the cold, disk, population is Compton-upscattered by a radially wide electron corona, while the hotter, NS, population, modelled by pure blackbody, is directly detected. Both the models deal with two separate blackbody (or multicolour) distributed photon populations and a single Comptonising region. Here we term eastern-like a scenario where the NS population is Comptonised and western-like a scenario with Comptonised disk population, regardless of the energy distribution of the population themselves, which is likely non-ideal (multicolour) in its nature. Nowadays eastern-like models, having the advantage of keeping the X-ray emitting region very compact (hence naturally meeting the fast variability requirements set by the timing observations), are more popular, at least for NS-LMXBs in an LHS, where the coronal height scale is supposedly at its maximum. The previously reported spectral properties of GS 1826−238  make no exception.

Early, band-limited observations of GS 1826−238  were obtained by TTM (in ’t Zand 1992), and ROSAT (Barret et al. 1995) at low energies, and by CGRO-OSSE (Strickman et al. 1996), in the hard X-rays, while the history of relatively recent, sensitive, wide band studies of GS 1826−238, which is in basic agremeent with the above two-component picture, mainly includes results from BeppoSAX  (in ’t Zand et al. 1999; Del Sordo et al. 1999), RXTE  (Barret et al. 2000), combined Chandra-RXTE  (Thompson et al. 2005) and XMM-RXTE  (Thompson et al. 2008) observations. Though the high-energy data of GS 1826−238  are acceptably fit by a simple exponentially-cutoff power-law model with Ec ~ 50 keV (e.g. Del Sordo et al. 1999), a less empirical Comptonisation model, comptt  (Titarchuk 1994), yields a better, physically robust scenario where soft seed photons, whose distribution is approximated by a Wien law, are up-scattered to high energies by a hot (kTe ~ 20 keV) electron plasma. Along with Comptonisation, either a pure blackbody (BB) spectral component (in ’t Zand et al. 1999) or another low-temperature (~5 keV) Comptonised component (Thompson et al. 2005) are included in the spectral fits.

Recent INTEGRAL  results (Cocchi et al. 2010) partly contradict the above results, as only the main, high-energy, Comptonised component was observed. But, as already pointed out by the same authors, the non-detection of the softer component is likely due to the limited passband of JEM-X (E > 3−4 keV).

Reflection of Comptonised radiation by an optically thick accretion disk was introduced by Barret et al. (2000) to describe their RXTE  data. Detection of a ~6 keV Fe line, never observed by BeppoSAX, was also reported by the same authors. Evidence of another, transient ultrasoft blackbody component, likely related to observed time irregularities in the bursting behaviour, has recently been reported by Thompson et al. (2008).

GS 1826−238  is a peculiar type I X-ray burster. X-ray bursts were found to quasi-periodically recur in a few hours (Ubertini et al. 1999). This is fairly common among bursters, but what makes GS 1826−238  almost unique among its class is the remarkable stability of the recurrence on a timescale of several years (Cocchi et al. 2001). Burst recurrence is clearly related to the persistent emission (Cornelisse et al. 2003), the event frequency increasing with the measured X-ray flux in a limit-cycle fashion (see e.g. Galloway et al. 2004, for a review on the topic).

The lack of evidence for photospheric radius expansion during the bursts (in ’t Zand et al. 1999), together with general considerations of the characteristics of the optical counterpart (low mass, short orbital period) constrain the value of the distance to the source in the ~4–9 kpc range (Barret et al. 2000).

In this paper we present wide band spectral analysis of the whole BeppoSAX-NFI record of GS 1826−238. In the next section observations and data analysis methods and details will be given. The applied spectral models and our best-fit results will be presented in Sect. 3, and will be discussed in Sect. 4 in view of the present knowledge of LMXBs spectroscopy.

Table 1

Observation log.

2. BeppoSAX  observations and data analysis

The public database of BeppoSAX  (Boella et al. 1997a) narrow field instruments (NFI) available at the ASI–ASDC site1 includes six pointed NFI observations of GS 1826−238, for a total of 86.7 ks live time for the low-energy concentrator/spectrometer (LECS, Parmar et al. 1995), 175.6 ks for the medium-energy concentrators/spectrometers (MECS, Boella et al. 1997b), 130.9 ks for the high-pressure gas scintillator proportional counter (HPGSPC, Manzo et al. 1995), and 213.8 ks for the Phoswich detection system (PDS, Frontera et al. 1995).

The four NFI instruments (actually, MECS was a set of three concentrators and PDS a set of four detector units) allowed for a wide band energy coverage, nominally in the range 0.1–220 keV, with very good overall sensitivity, so the BeppoSAX–NFI capabilities are optimal for an unbiased study of the characteristics of the high-energy, Comptonised emission of NS-LMXBs, along with the physical parameters (temperatures, radii) of both the directly observed and the Compton-modified blackbody (or blackbody-like) seed photon populations.

In Table 1, details of the six analysed BeppoSAX  observations are given. We label the observations according to their observing period (OP) number, as already done in the BeppoSAX  archive. In this spectroscopic study, only the steady emission of GS 1826−238  was taken into account: time intervals when X-ray bursting events occurred were excluded to avoid possible low-energy spectral contamination from the burst emission. X-ray bursts typically last ~150 s in the concentrator units, much less in the PDS due to their soft (~2 keV blackbody) spectra. A number of bursts were actually detected in some of the pointings (see Table 1). Whenever the (average) burst wait time could be inferred, the period is also reported in the table.

Data analyses of four out of the six BeppoSAX  observations have already been reported in literature. Of the measurements performed in 1997, the first three (OPs 1846, 2592, 2699) have been summarised by DelSordo et al. (1999), while OP 2739–41 data were analysed in detail by in ’t Zand et al. (1999). Results concerning the last two pointings (OP 7786–7 and 8959–60), respectively performed in 1999 and 2000, were previously unreported. During these last observations GS 1826−238  was more intense than in 1997 and the pointings were longer, thus yielding better counting statistics.

Table 2

Best-fit parameters for the models described in Sect. 3. All errors are given at 90% confidence level.

The data were reduced and extracted by the standard saxdas2 pipeline. To optimise the signal, an extraction radius of 8′ was chosen for the concentrators. A total MECS spectrum was obtained by standard accumulation of the counts in each operating unit. The typical spikes occasionally polluting the PDS count rate3 were accurately removed from the good time intervals by setting dedicated thresholds in the lightcurves. For each observing epoch, the corresponding matrices and ancillary response files from the standard BeppoSAX  calibration library2 were applied. As the LECS response slightly depends on the source position in the detector coordinates, the corresponding corrections were taken into account. The background is automatically subtracted by the pipeline for the instruments with rocking collimators (HPGSPC, PDS), while the available standard background model files were used for the concentrators. The spectra were eventually analysed and best-fitted by the standard software tools of the Xspec  package4, version 12.

Systematics likely affect the spectra of the BeppoSAX  instruments outside the nominal passbands typically adopted for the fits; these are 0.12–4 keV, 1.65–10.5 keV, 7–34 keV, and 15–220 keV for LECS, MECS, HPGSPC, and PDS, respectively3. We found our spectral points in complete agreement with the above general rule. Even slight extensions of the passbands were found to be possible, e.g. down to 5 keV for HPGSPC and 13 keV for PDS. Conversely, the MECS lower limit had to be set to 2.0 keV in some cases.

Owing to cross calibration uncertainties between the four instruments, whose effects are expected to vary with the observation epoch3, a constant normalisation factor was included for each instrument in each fit. The MECS concentrator was kept as a reference, allowing the constants of the other instruments to vary. Standard, typically accepted cross calibration constant values are 0.7–0.9 (LECS), 1.0–1.1 (HPGSPC), and 0.7–0.9 (PDS). The constants we found agree with the above values. A slight, systematic increase with time of the HPGSPC constant is found, likely the effect of a less accurate cross calibration in the late (1999–2000) epochs.

No systematics, accounting for possible instrumental miscalibration, had to be included for both the concentrators and the HPGSPC detector. In the last four observations, the PDS spectra need 2% systematics, a value commonly adopted to handle intrinsic PDS calibration uncertainties.

3. Spectroscopic results

As already mentioned in Sect. 1, most of the energy output in the wide band spectra of NS–LMXBs in LHS generally comes from inverse Comptonisation of a population of soft seed photons by a hot electron plasma cloud. GS 1826−238 is no exception, because whenever non-empirical Comptonisation models were applied to its observations, electron plasma temperatures of ~20 keV were obtained (e.g. in ’t Zand et al. 1999; Thompson et al. 2005; Cocchi et al. 2010). Along with Comptonised radiation, a soft component is generally detected in GS 1826−238 spectra, not unlike the other sources of its class (the only exception are the aforementioned recent INTEGRAL results, Cocchi et al. 2010). The modelisation of such a soft component is not straightforward. In an eastern-like scenario, disk blackbody radiation (either multicolour or single temperature) was proposed (Del Sordo et al. 1999, BeppoSAX data, and Barret et al. 2000, RXTE); this agrees more with the classic BeppoSAX picture of NS-LMXB hard states (e.g. Guainazzi et al. 1998). Conversely, a western-like model was proposed by in ’t Zand et al. (1999) (hot, ~3 keV, NS-originated blackbody). Finally, Comptonised emission by a separate colder electron corona (kTe ~ 5 keV) was invoked by Thompson et al. (2005, RXTE data) and Thompson et al. (2008, Chandra + RXTE data).

Fitting the canonical model

The standard LHS eastern-like spectral model, i.e. directly observed disk blackbody plus Comptonisation of NS seed photons, was implemented by the Xspec’s formula wabs*(bbodyrad+comptt) and fit to our six observations. The wabs component takes the interstellar hydrogen absorption into account, which is modelled by a Wisconsin absorber (Morrison & McCammon 1995), while comptt  is the widely adopted Comptonisation model by Titarchuk (1994). This model adequately fits the whole data set (see Table 2, bottom). Disk blackbody colour temperatures are constrained in the 0.5–0.6 keV range, and the radii of the (assumed spherical) emitting regions are of the order of 7 km (a distance to GS 1826−238  of 7 kpc is assumed). The seed photon population of the Comptonised emission, associated to the NS or the inner regions (e.g. a boundary layer, BL) is significantly hotter (1.2–1.4 keV), as expected. The plasma temperatures decrease from ~23 keV in 1997 to ~18 keV in 2000; at the same time, the bolometric fluxes increase by ~20%. This agrees with an expected effect of coronal Compton cooling.

A western-like model with hot (NS) direct blackbody emission and colder (disk) Comptonised seed photons (as the one proposed in in ’t Zand 1992) also yields acceptable fits to the data, apart from the case of the 2000 observation (reduced χ2 of 1.27, 335 d.o.f.). But the resulting blackbody parameters (NS colour temperatures well in excess of 3 keV and emitting regions of ~0.1–0.3 km) look unlikely, if not unphysical. Also the NH  parameter looks systematically underestimated (~0.6–0.9 × 1021   cm-2) with respect to the interpolated one (~1.7 × 1021   cm-2) obtained by the nh ftool (Dickey & Lockman 1990).

The presence of a second, colder, Comptonising region was claimed by Thompson et al. (2005). Applying their model to our data also yields acceptable fits, but this, as already discussed in detail in Cocchi et al. (2010) for the case of INTEGRAL  data of GS 1826−238, is not unexpected, because this double-Compton model has more free parameters than the spectra request. And, actually, a canonical model with just one Compton corona could describe the spectra in Thompson et al. (2005) just as well (see Table 3 in the cited paper).

A two-seed Comptonisation model

These BeppoSAX  data clearly indicate that there are two distinct soft photon populations in GS 1826−238. Assuming just one population (by imposing the same value to the kTBB and the kTs parameters in the model above) leads to unacceptable best fits. Nevertheless, whether the disk blackbody is totally unaffected by Comptonisation is a questionable hypothesis. Actually, a model that assumes both the populations (NS-BL and disk) to be Compton-modified by the plasma corona fits the whole data set with even slightly better χ2 statistics. The best-fit parameters of this model, implemented as wabs*(comptt+comptt), are displayed in Table 2. Here we assume the electron cloud parameters of the two comptt  components (kTe and τ) to be identical, similar to what was already done in Titarchuk & Shaposhnikov (2005). In that paper, the spectral evolution of the NS LMXB 4U 1728−34 was described by a bmc+bmc model with tied α indexes and different seed photon temperatures.

The physical parameters of the best fits are in good agreement with those of the classic model discussed above. The NS-BL population temperature is not well constrained by this model in four observations, with best-fit values in excess of 2 keV (~2.2–2.9 keV) but also with the fit not very sensitive to lower, more likely, kTs values. In these cases, we therefore froze the NS-BL temperature to 1.8 keV. It is important to stress that this two-seed Comptonisation model has the same number of free parameters as the canonical one, thus keeping the problem’s degrees of freedom constant. This is an intrinsically different model with respect to the one proposed in Thompson et al. (2005) and Thompson et al. (2008), in which two separate Compton plasmas with different temperatures, optical depths, and geometries are hypothesised.

Applying the COMPTB model

The use of comptt, which assumes Wien-distributed seed photons, could explain the above difficulties in constraining the NS-BL population temperature. The recently developed Comptonisation model by Farinelli et al. (2008, comptb) is a valid tool to deal with Planck-distributed or even pseudo-blackbody distributed seed photons. In fact, in comptb  the form of the seed photons energy distribution is given by (1)where x ≡ E/kTBB is the adimensional energy, and γ is an index empirically modelling non-ideal blackbody distributions. For γ = 3, which is comptb’s default, Eq. (1) reduces to a pure Planckian. We therefore replaced comptt  with comptb  in our double-seed Compton model. Actually, comptb  is a more general model including, in a self-consistent way, the seed photons emission along with the Comptonised one, the latter being either purely thermal (as in comptt) or mixed thermal plus dynamical (bulk Comptonisation). This is characterised by the model’s free parameters log A and δ (Farinelli et al. 2008). But in this work we use comptb  in a purely thermal, Compton-dominated way, which makes it substantially equivalent to comptt  (apart from the assumption on the distribution of the soft seed photons, which is Wien in comptt). In particular, the data do not require direct blackbody emission (i.e. we can assume complete coverage of the two seed regions), and no dynamical effects are to be expected. This means, in practice, to freeze the model parameters log A = 8 and δ = 0, respectively. This restricted use of comptb, which is ideal for NS-LMXBs in LHS, is detailed in Cocchi et al. (2010).

thumbnail Fig. 1

The six absorption-corrected BeppoSAX-NFI spectra of GS 1826−238. The two Comptonised photon populations of the best fit model (see Table 2, top, and Sect. 3.3) are also plotted: disk seed photons (dots) and NS-BL seed photons (dashes).

The results of our wabs*(comptb+comptb) fits are also reported in Table 2 (top). The six best-fit spectra of GS 1826−238  are displayed in Fig. 1, while in Fig. 2 the residuals to the best fits are shown. In Fig. 3 a model comparison with respect to the classic one is also displayed.

One of the main outcomes of the use of comptb  is the evidence of non-ideal distribution of the seed photon populations. In fact, freezing the γ index to 3 (pure BB) does not yeld acceptable best fits. On the other hand, when γ is a free parameter, the fit is rather insensitive to its value (γ ~ 3.5−4.5 are acceptable), though it tends to cluster around 3.8. We thus decided to freeze the index of both the seed populations to γ = 4. This value yields a pseudo-blackbody distribution that behaves like a Wien law at the lowest energies, making this assumption consistent with what is obtained using the comptt  model. Moreover, the number of free parameters of the whole model is still the same as for the classic one.

As expected, the main comptb  parameter values are in good agreement with the comptt  ones. The χ2 statistics we obtain are systematically (even though slightly) better than in the other models. Besides that, in this way the NS-BL population temperature is well constrained in all the observations, with values of kTs in the range 1.5–2.2, which are physically acceptable for NS colour temperatures (Ebisuzaki 1986). The disk photon population has kTs ~ 0.4−0.5, while the decreasing trend in the plasma kTe temperatures is confirmed. The disk population temperature is remarkably stable troughout the observations, while the NS-BL one oscillates significantly. With comptb, the disk temperature is found to be systematically lower with respect to the one obtained by the traditional bb+comptt; conversely, the NS-BL temperatures are systematically higher.

Most of the energy output (>70%) comes from the Comptonised disk radiation. The relative weight of the two Comptonised components is constant with time, though a stronger NS contribution is observed in 2000 in good correlation with the increased source intensity. A more variable ratio is obtained by the two-seed comptt  model, but this is likely a bias from the freezing of the NS kTs in four observations. (Not surprisingly, they are the ones with the lowest resulting NS contributions.)

The energy index of the Compton Green function, α, is well constrained in the 0.94–0.98 range. An α value of ~1 is typically observed in NS-LMXB systems (e.g. Cocchi et al. 2010 for the case of GS 1826−238), and the theoretical reasons for this peculiarity have recently been addressed in Farinelli & Titarchuk (2011).

Interestingly, the best-fit column absorption NH values as obtained by the wabs absorber are slightly, but systematically, lower than the predicted one (Dickey & Lockman 1990, see above). This is more evident for the double-seed Comptonised models than for the canonical eastern-like one and could testify a limitation of this kind of model. On the other hand, the nh ftool, based on a table interpolation, could overestimate the absorption in the particular case of the GS 1826−238  direction. Actually, the wabs component, based on rather outdated relative abudances, was adopted in order to directly compare our results with the ones already reported in BeppoSAX  literature. Indeed, the application of the more up-to-date Tuebingen-Boulder absorption model (tbabs) and corresponding abundances (Wilms et al. 2000) to our data leads to higher, more likely, NH values. Such values are also reported in Table 2.

comptb  best fits allow us to derive additional interesting information about some physical parameters. For example, the plasma cloud optical depths τ, derived by the Eqs. (17)–(24) in Titarchuk & Lyubarskij (1995) with assumed spherical geometry, are included in Table 2. The amount of the energy amplification due to the Compton scattering, expressed by the Compton amplification factor (CAF), is also tabulated for both the seed populations. Approximated values for the radii of the (assumed spherical) blackbody seed photon regions were also calculated as in Cocchi et al. (2010): radii of ~0.2–0.5 km and ~13–15 km were obtained for the NS-BL and disk seed populations, respectively (distance of 7 kpc). A non-ideal geometry of the NS-BL emitting region (a belt or a hot spot) could explain its relatively small order of magnitude (<1 km, while NS radii are of the order of 10 km).

thumbnail Fig. 2

Fit residuals, in χ2 units, for the two-seed CompTB best fits (chronologically from top to bottom panels, OP 1846 to OP 8959-60).

thumbnail Fig. 3

An example (OP 8959–60) of our double-seed comptb  model (lower panel) compared to a typical bb+comptt  model (upper). Along with the two Comptonised components (disk and NS-BL, dashses and dots, respectively), the original pseudo-blackbody distribution of the two components is plotted with the same linestyle.

4. Discussion

Within the context of the broadband LHS emission of NS-LMXB, the main results of the present work are: a) the confirmation of the presence of two populations of soft X-ray photons; b) the possibility that both the populations are (almost) completely Comptonised by an extended electron corona; c) the evidence of non-ideal energy distribution of the seed populations. These items will be discussed below.

Two photon populations

Our results confirm that two populations of soft photons (at least one Comptonised) characterise the spectroscopic properties of GS 1826−238. The brighter population is the colder (~0.5 keV) one and can be associated to the emission of an accretion disk. The other, hotter (~1.5–2.0 keV) component, most likely Comptonised by a ~20 keV electron corona, should originate in the inner regions (a boundary/transition layer in the very inner disk or the photosphere of the NS itself) of the X-ray source. Both a directly observed disk emission combined with Comptonised NS radiation and a double-seed (disk and NS/BL) Comptonised emission are effective ways to describe the wide band spectroscopic emission of this source. In this respect GS 1826−238  does not look different from a number of sources belonging to the same class. Actually, according to Cocchi (2011), a general picture is emerging from the BeppoSAX  data archive where NS in an LHS can be divided into two main subclasses: two-photon population (2P) and single-photon population (1P) sources. The 2P sources look intrinsically brighter than the 1P ones, suggesting the accretion rate (and not, e.g., intrinsic evolutionary properties of the X-ray binary) drives their main spectral differences. In the above picture, GS 1826−238  can be regarded as a clear example of a 2P LHS source. Its luminosity, in excess of 1037   erg   s-1, is in good agreement with the above scenario.

Double-seed models and extended coronas

From the present data analysis, a double-seed Comptonised emission seems a more effective way to describe the wide band emission of GS 1826−238. Again, this agrees with the results of Cocchi (2011) obtained for a number of 2P sources. A completely (or, more likely, almost-completely) Comptonised disk blackbody-like emission requires a hot plasma corona radially extended enough to geometrically shield the disk. Extended Compton regions are not unexpected in an LHS, where sources are generally believed to accrete in a relatively low regime in which the coronal Compton cooling is far from being efficient as in the case of NS high/soft states.

According to Paizis et al. (2006) and Mainardi et al. (2010), the relative importance of thermal versus dynamical (bulk) Comptonisation is a very effective parameter in modelling the variety of NS-LMXBs spectral states and the state transitions in individual sources. In their scenario, LHS are characterised by a large height scale and radially extended hot electron plasma able to screen, to a distant observer, the bulk Compton amplification effects (occurring very close to the NS). With increasing , a state transition to an intermediate state is expected. In this brighter state, an efficient Compton cooling should significantly reduce the height scale of the electron corona, allowing for the direct observation of the bulk-Comptonised NS (and/or inner accretion disk) blackbody radiation that originates the so-called hard tail. At the same time, the disk seed photons, accounting for most of the energy output, are still Comptonised by the electron plasma. Such a description of the intermediate state recalls, in its main features, the characteristics of a western-like model. Therefore a double-seed Comptonised emission (like the one we propose for GS 1826−238) is easier to reconcile with the above framework than the classic eastern-like model, as it implies a more radially extended corona. In fact, this picture of a (relatively luminous) LHS smoothly evolves, with increasing and reduced coronal height scale, into the intermediate state picture of Paizis et al. (2006) and Mainardi et al. (2010).

As already reported in Table 2, in our double-seed Compton (comptb) model, the disk Comptonised emission dominates the overall energy budget of GS 1826−238, accounting for ~70% of the total. But this does not mean at all that the accretion disk produces most of the energy output. As the disk blackbody is Compton-amplified by a factor of ~3.8, one can easily verify that the disk seed photon population accounts for <20% of the total energy budget. Most of the output (~70%) is due to the Compton boosting and only ~10% to the NS-BL seed population. This implies that the source central engine (which the plasma cloud belongs to) produces most of the X-ray energy of GS 1826−238, as naturally expected. The total energy of the disk population is greater (by a factor of ~2) than that of the NS-BL one. This difference is even wider in terms of number of photons, as the disk colour temperature is lower. The order of magnitude of the (assumed spherical) corresponding emitting regions (see previous section and Table 2) confirm the disk nature of the cold photon population and the interior origin, NS and/or BL, of the hot photons.

Time analysis, more than spectroscopy, could possibly address the question about the nature (single or double seeded) of the Comptonised emission of GS 1826−238  and similar NS-LMXBs. According to Titarchuk & Shaposhnikov (2007), the presence of two bounded media of different sizes (namely an extended accretion disk and a more compact Compton cloud or BL region) is presumed to yield emerging power density spectra with two characteristic break frequencies, (lower) and (higher). For photon energies close to the peak of the disk seed population (E ~ 1–2 keV), a complete Comptonisation (i.e. an extended corona) could strongly reduce the disk signatures in the power spectra, because seed photons are scattered to higher energies. Thus, weak or no detection of in a relatively narrow soft X-ray band could support the proposed double-seed Comptonisation model. We plan to investigate this possibility in a forthcoming paper.

Energy and spatial distributions of the seed populations

With the statistical quality of the BeppoSAX  data, it is impossible to disentangle the actual geometry and temperature distributions of the seed photon populations. For example, the disk population is likely multicolour-distributed, but pseudo-blackbody (or, in several cases, even pure blackbody, see Cocchi 2011) suffices for fitting the observed spectra. Moreover, it is not clear whether this double-population scenario reflects the actual presence of two distinct, well-separated photon populations; in fact, the fits could mimic by two blackbody-like populations what is actually a strong and spatially wide temperature gradient between the outer and the inner (close to NS) disk (see also Cocchi 2011).

The first evidence, in our data, of non-Planckian distribution of the seed photon populations is an interesting subject. This result was obtained thanks to the excellent quality of the BeppoSAX  observations of GS 1826−238  and to the features of the recently developed comptb  model. But, actually, it is impossible to discern whether this non-ideal distribution is a characteristic of both or just one population (more likely the disk one, because it is brighter and more spacially extended). Moreover, an index γ ~ 4 could actually mimic an intrinsically multicolour disk emission whose properties are only approximated by Eq. (1). Modified and/or multicolour blackbodies are likely to be observed from X-ray binaries, and the available models are only ideal or empirical approximations: so the blackbody parameters obtained, either colour temperatures (e.g. Ebisuzaki 1986) or radii, should be always regarded as just reasonable suggestions.


The data analysis and the initial developments of this work have been supported by the grant from the INAF PRIN 2007 Bulk motion Comptonization models in X-ray Binaries: from phenomenology to physics, P.I. M. Cocchi.

The authors thank L. Titarchuk for fruitful science interaction in the early phase of this work; M. Orlandini for BeppoSAX  archive data retrieval and PDS data analysis suggestions and tips; and C. Ferrigno for help in updated HPGSPC software implementation.


  1. Barret, D., Motch, C., & Pietsch, W. 1995, A&A, 305, 526 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barret, D., Olive, J. F., Boirin, L., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 329 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boella, G., Butler, R. C., Perola, G. C., et al. 1997a, A&AS, 122, 299 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boella, G., Chiappetti, L., Conti, G., et al. 1997b, A&AS, 122, 327 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cocchi, M. 2010, AIP Proc., Cesme [arXiv:1103.1757] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cocchi, M., Bazzano, A., Natalucci, L., et al. 2001, Adv. Space Res., 28, 375 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cocchi, M., Farinelli, R., Paizis, A., & Titarchuk, L. 2010, A&A, 509, A2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cornelisse, R., in ’t Zand, J. J. M., Verbunt, F., et al. 2003, A&A, 405, 1033 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. Del Sordo, S., Frontera, F., Pian, E., et al. 1999, Astrophys. Lett. Comm., 38, 125 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dickey, J., & Lockman, F. 1990, ARA&A, 28, 215 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ebisuzaki, T., & Nomoto, K. 1986, ApJ, 305, 67 [Google Scholar]
  12. Farinelli, R., & Titarchuk, L. 2011, A&A, 525, A102 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Farinelli, R., Titarchuk, L., Paizis, A., & Frontera, F. 2008, ApJ, 680, 602 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Frontera, F., Costa, E., Dal Fiume, D., et al. 1997, A&AS, 122, 357 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Galloway, D. K., Cummings, A., Kuulkers, E., et al. 2004, ApJ, 601, 466 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guainazzi, M., Parmar, A. N., Segreto, A., et al. 1998, A&A, 339, 802 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mainardi, L., Paizis, A., Farinelli, R., et al. 2010, A&A, 512, 57 [Google Scholar]
  18. Makino, F. 1988, IAU Circ., 4653 [Google Scholar]
  19. Manzo, G., Giarrusso, S., Santangelo, A., et al. 1997, A&AS, 122, 341 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mitsuda, K., Inoue, H., Nakamura, N., & Tanaka, Y. 1989, PASJ, 41, 97 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  21. Morrison, R., & McCammon, D. 1983, ApJ, 270, 119 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Paizis, A., Farinelli, R., Titarchuk, L., et al. 2006, A&A, 459, 187 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Parmar, A. N., Martin, D. D. E., Bavdaz, M., et al. 1997, A&AS, 122, 309 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Strickman, M., Skibo, J., Purcell, W., Barret, D., & Motch, C. 1996, A&AS, 120, 217 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  25. Thompson, T. W. J., Rothschild, R. E., Tomsick, J. A., & Marshall, H. L. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1261 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Thompson, T. W. J., Galloway, D. K., Rothschild, R. E., & Homer, L. 2008, ApJ, 681, 506 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Titarchuk, L. 1994, ApJ, 434, 570 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Titarchuk, L., & Lyubarskij, Y. 1995, ApJ, 450, 876 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Titarchuk, L., & Shaposhnikov, N. 2005, ApJ, 626, 298 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Titarchuk, L., Shaposhnikov, N., & Arefiev, V. 2007, ApJ, 660, 556 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ubertini, P., Bazzano, A., Cocchi, M., et al. 1999, ApJ, 514, L27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. White, N. E., Stella, L., & Parmar, A. N. 1988, ApJ, 324, 363 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. in ’t Zand, J. J. M. 1992, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utrecht [Google Scholar]
  35. in ’t Zand, J. J. M., Heise, J., Kuulkers, E., et al. 1999, A&A, 347, 891 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Observation log.

Table 2

Best-fit parameters for the models described in Sect. 3. All errors are given at 90% confidence level.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

The six absorption-corrected BeppoSAX-NFI spectra of GS 1826−238. The two Comptonised photon populations of the best fit model (see Table 2, top, and Sect. 3.3) are also plotted: disk seed photons (dots) and NS-BL seed photons (dashes).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Fit residuals, in χ2 units, for the two-seed CompTB best fits (chronologically from top to bottom panels, OP 1846 to OP 8959-60).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

An example (OP 8959–60) of our double-seed comptb  model (lower panel) compared to a typical bb+comptt  model (upper). Along with the two Comptonised components (disk and NS-BL, dashses and dots, respectively), the original pseudo-blackbody distribution of the two components is plotted with the same linestyle.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.