Table 2
Best-fit results for our sample of Chandra clusters obtained with a free redshift parameter.
| ID | zo | zX | T(zX) (keV) | ZFe(zX)/Z⊙ | Cts (0.5–7 keV) | SN | Rext(′′) | ΔCstat |
|
|
||||||||
| Abell907 | 0.160 |
|
|
|
48230 ± 238 | 202.5 | 162.4 | 220.56 |
| Abell1689 | 0.187 |
|
|
|
34008 ± 200 | 170.3 | 93.5 | 31.59 |
| 1E0657-56 | 0.296 |
|
|
|
35384 ± 204 | 173.1 | 211.6 | 24.65 |
| MS1008.1-1244 | 0.306 |
|
|
|
8993 ± 103 | 87.2 | 108.2 | 24.32 |
| MS2137.3-2353 | 0.313 |
|
|
|
29509 ± 176 | 167.9 | 76.3 | 171.03 |
| Abell1995 | 0.319 |
|
|
|
27217 ± 178 | 152.9 | 103.3 | 47.46 |
| ZW1358.1+6245 | 0.328 |
|
|
|
18322 ± 149 | 123.2 | 88.6 | 51.1 |
| MACSJ0404.6+1109 | 0.355 |
|
|
|
2368 ± 59 | 39.9 | 120.5 | 3.67 |
| RXJ0027.6+2616 | 0.367 |
|
|
|
702 ± 31 | 22.7 | 81.2 | 5.15 |
| MACSJ1720.2+3536 | 0.387 |
|
|
|
6370 ± 84 | 75.9 | 91.0 | 50.46 |
| ZW0024.0+1652 | 0.395 |
|
|
|
2671 ± 59 | 45.3 | 59.0 | 29.0 |
| RXJ1416.4+4446 | 0.400 |
|
|
|
2120 ± 51 | 41.9 | 76.3 | 31.91 |
| MACSJ0159.8-0849 | 0.405 |
|
|
|
7852 ± 93 | 84.5 | 113.2 | 20.98 |
| MACSJ2228.5+2036 | 0.412 |
|
|
|
6004 ± 86 | 69.4 | 137.8 | 18.47 |
| MS0302.7+1658 | 0.424 |
|
|
|
652 ± 27 | 24.0 | 68.9 | 8.48 |
| MACSJ0417.5-1154 | 0.44 |
|
|
|
7544 ± 95 | 79.4 | 132.8 | 9.84 |
| MACSJ1206.2-0847 | 0.44 |
|
|
|
11267 ± 112 | 100.2 | 127.9 | 7.8 |
| RXJ1701.3+6414 | 0.453 |
|
|
|
2731 ± 59 | 46.1 | 68.9 | 27.75 |
| RXJ1641.8+4001 | 0.464 |
|
|
|
983 ± 35 | 28.4 | 46.7 | 12.91 |
| MACSJ1824.3+4309 | 0.483 |
|
|
|
469 ± 26 | 17.9 | 78.7 | 7.9 |
| MACSJ1311.0-0311 | 0.494 |
|
|
|
2083 ± 48 | 43.6 | 78.7 | 7.8 |
| RXJ1524.6+0957 | 0.516 |
|
|
|
1974 ± 52 | 37.7 | 73.8 | 8.63 |
| 4.6+0957 MS0015.9+1609 | 0.541 |
|
|
|
16826 ± 139 | 121.0 | 118.1 | 49.81 |
| MACSJ1423.8+2404 | 0.543 |
|
|
|
3518 ± 62 | 57.2 | 76.3 | 14.07 |
| MACSJ1149.5+2223 | 0.544 |
|
|
|
9095 ± 109 | 83.3 | 150.1 | 7.13 |
| SC1120-1202 | 0.562 |
|
|
|
714 ± 33 | 21.7 | 51.7 | 6.48 |
| MS2053.7-0449 | 0.583 |
|
|
|
1884 ± 49 | 38.5 | 49.2 | 3.69 |
| RXJ0956.0+4107 | 0.587 |
|
|
|
467 ± 24 | 19.0 | 64.0 | 3.78 |
| MACSJ2129.4-0741 | 0.589 |
|
|
|
2918 ± 59 | 49.1 | 100.9 | 18.33 |
| MACSJ0647.7+7015 | 0.591 |
|
|
|
2899 ± 58 | 49.9 | 78.7 | 3.52 |
| RXJ0542.8-4100 | 0.634 |
|
|
|
1908 ± 50 | 38.5 | 64.0 | 2.04 |
| MACSJ0744.9+3927 | 0.698 |
|
|
|
5669 ± 79 | 71.4 | 81.2 | 17.68 |
| RXJ1221.4+4918 | 0.70 |
|
|
|
2828 ± 61 | 46.6 | 73.8 | 10.39 |
| RXJ2302.8+0844 | 0.722 |
|
|
|
1387 ± 44 | 31.8 | 46.7 | 3.27 |
| RXJ1113.1-2615 | 0.725 |
|
|
|
1135 ± 38 | 29.9 | 39.4 | 13.42 |
| MS1137.5+6624 | 0.782 |
|
|
|
3957 ± 67 | 59.1 | 44.3 | 10.59 |
| RXJ1350.0+6007 | 0.804 |
|
|
|
622 ± 31 | 20.3 | 51.7 | 9.09 |
| RXJ1317.4+2911 | 0.805 |
|
|
|
230 ± 20 | 11.4 | 29.5 | 3.05 |
| RXJ1716.4+6708 | 0.813 |
|
|
|
1341 ± 40 | 33.8 | 44.3 | 19.28 |
| MS1054.4-0321 | 0.832 |
|
|
|
8637 ± 103 | 83.8 | 68.9 | 12.46 |
| WGA1226.9+3332 | 0.89 |
|
|
|
2353 ± 51 | 45.8 | 66.4 | 2.55 |
| CLJ1415.1+3612 | 1.013 |
|
|
|
1275 ± 39 | 33.0 | 36.9 | 8.53 |
| RXJ0910+5422 | 1.106 |
|
|
|
419 ± 24 | 17.2 | 24.6 | 3.69 |
| RXJ1252-2927 | 1.235 |
|
|
|
780 ± 33 | 23.4 | 32.0 | 14.56 |
| RXJ0849.9+4452 | 1.261 |
|
|
|
327 ± 22 | 14.6 | 22.1 | 2.87 |
| XMM2235.3-2557 | 1.393 |
|
|
|
1433 ± 45 | 31.7 | 24.6 | 4.25 |
Notes. The focus is on the best-fit X-ray redshift zX, compared to the optical value zo. We also list the X-ray temperature T(zX) and the abundance ZFe(zX). Net photons (0.5–7 keV band) and S/N within the extraction radius Rext are also shown. The value of ΔCstat corresponding to the best-fit zX value is shown in the last column.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.