Table 1
Definitions of all sub-sets of LAE candidates.
Sample | Total | LAE best | GALEX only | AGN only | GALEX + AGN | |||
|
||||||||
Original | 187 | 156 | 12 | 14 | 5 | |||
Original (C-list) | 61 | – | – | – | – | |||
|
||||||||
Spec. obs. | 118 | 96 | 11 | 8 | 3 | |||
Spec. obs. (C-list) | 34 | – | – | – | – | |||
Included f. spec. | 96 | 83 | 8 | 4 | 1 | |||
Included f. spec. (C-list) | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
|
||||||||
Total after spec. | 171 | 149 | 9 | 10 | 3 | |||
|
||||||||
Final (after new AGN) | 171 | 141 | 7 | 18 | 5 | |||
|
||||||||
Fitted | 58 | 54 | 4 | – | – | |||
Good ![]() |
40 | 38 | 2 | – | – |
Notes. Each line defines a further sub-sample of the original Nilsson et al. (2009a) sample (first lines; divided into the originally published sample and the C-list, or “unlikely” candidates from that paper), divided into the total sample, the sample without GALEX and AGN detections, and the GALEX only, AGN only and combined GALEX and AGN detected LAEs. The “unlikely” candidates were not analysed for AGN and GALEX detections prior to spectroscopic confirmation. The third to sixth rows show the number of candidates put on slits, and those that were not excluded. The row titled “Total after spec.” indicates the resulting sample after the spectroscopy, summing those objects that are accepted by the spectroscopy with those without spectroscopic data, and the following row indicates the result of the new AGN detections (Sect. 2.3). The final rows show how many of each sub-sample were fitted for and which had good in the fit (Sect. 4.3).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.