Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 527, March 2011
Article Number A101
Number of page(s) 19
Section Catalogs and data
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015642
Published online 02 February 2011

© ESO, 2011

1. Introduction

The impact of the cluster environment on galaxy properties has been extensively investigated during recent decades. Observational studies starting with the Virgo cluster observations of Robinson (1965) have established that cluster galaxies are depleted in Hi gas mass when compared with isolated galaxies (Haynes & Giovanelli 1984). This deficiency is a strong function of distance from the X-ray centre of the cluster (Gavazzi 1989; Boselli 1994), and the mass deficit is accompanied by a smaller scale-size of the Hi extents for cluster galaxies, relative to optical diameters, than is found for isolated galaxies (Warmels 1988; Cayatte et al. 1994; Boselli et al. 2002). Some cluster disk galaxies appear “anemic” with low disk surface densities of atomic gas (Cayatte et al. 1994). Unsurprisingly, this gas deficiency is also reflected in lower star formation activity in cluster galaxies. This was shown by the pioneering Hα work undertaken by Kennicutt (1983b), who found lower star formation rates and redder colours for Virgo Cluster galaxies than for their field counterparts. Many studies have extended this work to other clusters, with for example Gavazzi et al. (2006) looking at 545 galaxies within the Virgo, Coma and Abell 1367 clusters. Evidence for spatial truncation of disk star formation, again as traced by Hα emission, has been found by Koopmann & Kenney (1998, 2004a,b) and Koopmann et al. (2006).

Many mechanisms have been proposed to explain the observed impacts of the cluster environment on the gas content and star formation activity of cluster galaxies. The interstellar medium can be removed from galaxies by ram pressure stripping, due to the galaxy motion with a velocity of  ~1000 km s-1 as it falls through the hot (~107−108   K) and dense (~10-4 − 10-3   atom/cm3) intra-cluster medium (Gunn & Gott 1972). Simulations suggest that at least part of the interstellar gas can be stripped out by ram pressure on timescales of a few billion years, comparable to the cluster crossing time (Boselli & Gavazzi 2006). This has been proposed as a mechanism for the transformation of spiral galaxies into lenticular galaxies in cluster environments. However, ram pressure stripping as the sole mechanism for the transformation of spiral galaxies into lenticulars has received significant criticism. Dressler (2004) concludes that the age of most lenticulars, and their emergence in relatively low-density environments, argues rather for interaction, merger and accretion processes. These latter can also thicken disks, and enhance bulge-to-disk ratios, producing galaxies with the observed properties of lenticulars, overcoming another shortcoming of ram pressure stripping scenarios (Boselli et al. 2006).

Tidal interactions between galaxy pairs moving at low relative velocities can contribute to the enhancement of star formation rates, depending on the gravitational potential between them (Boselli & Gavazzi 2006). Both simulations (Mihos et al. 1992; Iono et al. 2004) and observations (Condon et al. 1982; Keel et al. 1985; Kennicutt et al. 1987) of galaxy-galaxy interactions indicate that they are particularly efficient at triggering star formation in circumnuclear regions via the compression and inflow of gas, with moderate, if any, increase in star formation in the disk. If the encounter between the interacting galaxies is sufficiently close, they can evolve into a merger by dynamical friction.

The molecular gas of infalling galaxies can induce both nuclear and disk star formation, under the tidal effects of the cluster potential (Henriksen & Byrd 1996; Fujita 1998). This effect is more effective than ram pressure stripping at enhancing star formation activity. However, it is also possible to remove outer gas, resulting in HI deficiency of the cluster spiral galaxies (Byrd & Valtonen 1990). Supernova-driven winds from the enhanced star formation could also expel the weakly gravitationally bound HI from the galactic disks (Byrd & Valtonen 1990; Henriksen & Byrd 1996). A process termed “galaxy harassment” by Moore et al. (1996, 1999) involves multiple high speed encounters among galaxies as they move within the cluster potential, and can affect the evolution of cluster galaxies. They suggested that galaxy harassment is very distinct in its effects from other merger processes. This mechanism causes the transformation of low mass disk galaxies to dwarf spheroidal and dwarf elliptical galaxies, and also leaves debris tails. Their simulations have shown that galaxies on elongated orbits undergo more harassment than galaxies on circular orbits. These processes will affect directly the luminosity-weighted mean stellar ages and abundances of heavy elements, which are some of tracers to be used in subsequent papers of this study to trace the evolution of galaxies in a nearby cluster.

One of the most interesting nearby galaxy clusters in terms of its dynamical state is Abell 1367, a spiral-rich system identified in the cluster catalogue of Abell (1958). The cluster centre is located at α(J2000)  =    11h44m29.5s, δ(J2000)  =  +19°50′21′′. The average cluster redshift and velocity dispersion are 0.022 and 879 km s-1, respectively (Struble & Rood 1999). We adopt a value of 1.31° for the Abell radius of the cluster, taken from NED, and note that this is completely consistent with the value of 1.29° obtained using the R200 approximation to the virial radius, from Finn et al. (2005).

This study aims to investigate the evolution of galaxies in the cluster environment, using Abell 1367 as a test case. The main tracers of this study are Hα emission, integrated galaxy stellar masses, luminosity-weighted mean stellar ages and metallicities of the cluster members. The results will provide understanding of the effect of the cluster environment on stellar population properties of the galaxies, i.e. chemical enrichment histories and star formation activity.

We present the results of our study of Abell 1367 in two papers. This paper contains a description of the photometric and spectroscopic observations and data analysis, as follows. Photometric observations and data reduction of optical and near-infrared imaging are described in Sect. 2. Section 3 contains the sample selection made from our imaging. Spectroscopic observations, data reduction and results are described in Sects. 4 and 5. Section 6 explains the extraction of the final photometry from the optical and near-infrared data. Classifications of morphological types and disturbance classifications are detailed in Sect. 7. Section 8 contains a description of the determination of Hα emission line properties. A summary of our results is presented in Sect. 9.

Paper II (M. Mouhcine et al., submitted) will provide a description of the determination of luminosity-weighted mean stellar ages and metallicities, along with integrated galaxy stellar masses of cluster members, using the data presented in the current paper. Analysis of those parameters associated with Hα emission line properties will also be presented.

Table 1

INT observations.

2. Photometric observations and data reduction

U, B, R and Hα imaging was obtained to enable luminosities, colours, diameters and current star formation rates of cluster galaxies to be estimated. Near-infrared J- and K-band imaging was also obtained, with the aim of estimating integrated stellar masses, and mean stellar ages and metallicities for investigation of star formation history of those galaxies. The data were observed between 2001 and 2006 using several different telescopes as outlined below.

2.1. UBR and Hα data

U- and B-band imaging observations of Abell 1367 were carried out on the 2.5 m INT at La Palma. The images covered a 34′ × 90′ field over the area delimited by 11h42m27s < α(J2000) < 11h44m53s, +19°38′50′′ < δ(J2000)  <  +21°07′35′′. This covers the cluster centre, and extends to a clustercentric radius of about 1.0 Abell radius (rA) or  ~2.2 Mpc, assuming H0 = 70 km s-1 Mpc-1, to the north direction. These observations were done on 16 April 2001, under the INT service programme. The exposure times in the U and B filters were 3 × 300 and 3 × 150 s respectively, in each of the 3 pointings needed to cover the target field. These data were obtained using the Wide Field Camera (WFC), which contains 4 EEV 2048 × 4096 CCDs. Each CCD has 13.5 μm-squared pixels, corresponding to 0.33′′ on the sky.

Further R and Hα images were later observed, again using the INT and WFC. These observations were done on 20 March 2005, and covered the same 3-pointing field as was used for the U- and B-band imaging. The R-band observations used an exposure time of 300 s per pointing, whereas the Hα images used exposure times of 3 × 400 s per pointing. The Hα imaging was taken through what is nominally a [Sii] filter, centred on 6725 Å, which was used because it covers the redshifted Hα emission line from galaxy members of the cluster Abell 1367, with a central recession velocity of 6595 km s-1. The transmission of this filter falls to 50% of the peak value for wavelengths corresponding to Hα redshifted by 6040 and 9430 km s-1 at the short and long wavelength ends respectively, and to 10% for velocities of 5200 and 10 500 km s-1. The high end of these ranges accommodates all likely cluster members, but the low velocity cutoff only extends to  ~0.6 times the velocity dispersion (σ) with good sensitivity, and galaxies beyond 1.6σ are very unlikely to be detected in our narrow-band imaging. Thus some true cluster members may be missed from the Hα emission line catalogue, if they lie in the low-velocity wing of the cluster distribution. Table 1 gives a summary of all the INT observations.

thumbnail Fig. 1

The layout of the optical (bright shaded area) and near-infrared (dark shaded area) images covering the central cluster region in J2000 coordinate system.

The layout of the optical image field is shown as the lighter shaded field elongated N-S in Fig. 1. Each pointing of INT/WFC covers a field of view with an overall envelope of 34′ × 34′, but with a missing corner and 1′ gaps between the 4 CCD chips. The observation was done in 3 pointings, with the first pointing on the cluster central area and the other two fields offset to the North. There are 2 overlap areas; galaxies in these regions were used to propagate the photometric zero-points between the 3 pointings.

Table 2

UKIRT observations at a tile position of 11h43m39.6s+20°05′40′′ (J2000).

2.2. JK data

Near-infrared images were obtained from the 3.8 m United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) on Mauna Kea, Hawaii with the wide field camera (WFCAM) using 4 Rockwell Hawaii-II (HgCdTe 2048 × 2048) arrays. These J- and K-band images covered 0.75 square degrees with 0.4′′ pixels, focussed on the cluster centre field that contains the majority of our sample galaxies. There are usually 4 sub-pointings per tile which covers a 53′ × 53′ field of view. For this study, the J- and K-band images covered the region 11h41m46.3s < α(J2000)  < 11h45m34.0s, +19°38′05′′ < δ(J2000)  <  +20°31′27′′ as shown in Fig. 1. The J observations were made on 13 May 2006, and there is one tile with only 3 sub-pointings and hence somewhat lower sensitivity than the rest of the surveyed area. The K-band images were obtained for 2 tiles in the same night as the J-band images, with one more tile being observed on 10 June 2006, as shown in Table 2. All near-infrared images were taken with exposure times of 20 × 10 s.

2.3. Data reduction

Both optical and near-infrared images were initially reduced by the Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit (CASU) of the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge University. U, B, R and Hα images were processed using the pipeline constructed by CASU for the INT Wide Field Camera, and J and K images were processed using the equivalent pipeline for UKIRT/WFCAM images. Although a preliminary astrometric solution was calculated by the pipeline, the accuracy for our INT images was only about 2′′, so an additional astrometric calibration was applied using the Starlink ASTROM package, applied to the B-band images. This astrometry was entirely satisfactory for determining galaxy positions, with the fit to the astrometric star positions having residuals of typically about 0.2′′.

2.3.1. Photometric zero-point calibrations

The imaging observations presented here were obtained on nights with average to good seeing (1.3 − 1.0′′) and probably photometric conditions. However, there was some cloud at the start of the night in which the U- and B-band imaging was taken. Given this, and given the availability of high-quality published photometry for many of the brighter galaxies in our fields, the latter were used for photometric calibration and the determination of zero-points in each passband. Systematic variations in the sky level (due to, e.g., flat-fielding errors) were estimated using 5 sky regions around each of the calibrator galaxies. Photometric errors including photon shot noise from the objects and from the sky background, extracted from the GAIA package, were averaged and used as one source of the errors of calibrator zero-points. The standard errors of the instrumental magnitudes obtained using 5 sky regions were taken as errors resulting from sky level uncertainty. These 2 sources of error were combined to obtain overall random magnitude errors of each calibrator galaxy. The instrumental magnitudes were averaged from the 5 measurements and subtracted from the published magnitudes to obtain calibrator zero-points. The pointing zero-points are the mean of the calibrator zero-points for that pointing. The standard errors of calibrator zero-points and the average of the random errors of the calibrator magnitudes were combined to give the total errors on the zero-points. These total errors will be used as the systematic errors of magnitudes for each band.

Magnitudes quoted in specific apertures were preferred for this calibration. This requires sources of published galaxy photometry using defined apertures in each band. For example, the zero-points of the U- and B-band images used multiple fixed aperture sizes, clearly specified in arcseconds, by Buta (1996). No such aperture photometry was found for R-band calibration, and here image zero-points were calculated using photometric data from de Vaucouleurs & Longo (1988) and Taylor et al. (2005), which are estimated total magnitudes in the Johnson R filter. As a result, the apertures for the R-band images were made as large as possible to obtain total fluxes of those galaxies without contamination from other objects. J- and K-band magnitudes of calibrating galaxies were published by the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS; Jarrett et al. 2000, 2003). Three types of magnitudes from 2MASS were considered for our calibration purposes: total magnitudes, magnitudes within the μK = 20.0 isophote and those measured in 14 arcsec diameter apertures. Because 14 arcsec diameter is a well-defined aperture, this was used to measure fluxes of the galaxies to calibrate zero-points for the near-infrared bands. Flux zero-point calibration will be described in Sect. 8.2.

2.3.2. Galactic extinction and K-correction

The measured magnitudes of galaxies in all bands are always fainter than their intrinsic values due to the effect of Galactic extinction. Although this effect is small for this cluster, which is at a Galactic latitude of 73°, E(B − V) = 0.023, it still affects galaxy colours to a non-negligible extent. In particular, the (B − K) and (J − K) colours are important parameters for the stellar population analysis to be presented in later papers, and so these magnitudes and colours need to be corrected to achieve the accuracy needed to fit to models. The Galactic extinction corrections for all bands were obtained from NED, derived by Schlegel et al. (1998), using the RV = 3.1 extinction laws of Cardelli et al. (1989) and O’Donnell (1994).

Furthermore, measured galaxy colours are also changed from the intrinsic colours, due to redshift effects. Abell 1367 is a nearby cluster, which means the effects are small, but it is still the case that detected fluxes correspond to slightly shorter emitted wavebands, corresponding to the redshift z = 0.022. This effect can cause colours to become bluer or redder, depending on which colours are considered. K-corrections to remove this effect for optical and near-infrared wavebands were calculated by Poggianti (1997), who also considered the variations in the required corrections depending on galaxy morphological type (and hence intrinsic colour). For this study, 2 different corrections from those produced by Poggianti (1997) were applied, one corresponding to early types (applied to elliptical and lenticular galaxies) and one to late types (applied to spiral and irregular galaxies). The corrections applied are 0.077, 0.107, 0.023,  −0.007 and  − 0.033 mag for early-type galaxy in the UBRJK bands, respectively; and 0.065, 0.072, 0.012,  −0.014 and  −0.035 mag for late-type galaxies.

Table 3

WHT/WYFFOS observations.

However, Galactic extinction and K-corrections are not applied to the data in the Table 9. These corrections are required in the analysis of stellar properties of the cluster galaxies, using optical/near-infrared colours, and will thus be applied in analysis presented in later papers.

2.3.3. Isophotal apertures

Galaxy diameters are normally determined at isophotal surface brightnesses. In this study, the best-fit ellipse corresponding to a surface brightness of 24 magnitude/arcsecond2 in the R band, R24, was determined using a standard surface photometry package and adopted as our standard galaxy aperture. Thus the isophotal semi-major axis, ellipticity and position angle values for each galaxy were used to set the aperture sizes for measurements of photometric magnitudes and fluxes in all bands. Sky background uncertainty will considerably affect the surface photometry, especially for faint magnitude levels. Thus close attention was paid to sky subtraction and associated uncertainties.

3. Sample selection

Two criteria were used for the initial selection of galaxies in our survey region: a B-band magnitude mB brighter than 21.0, and an object size greater than 7.0 pixels (~2.3 arcsec) full width half maximum (FWHM), determined by using the SExtractor package (Bertin & Arnouts 1996), adopting default parameters. These two criteria were applied to the full list of objects found by SExtractor over the whole field, with the first of them setting the faint magnitude limit of our final sample. As a first step in exploring the likely contamination from background objects, the surface number densities of objects in this magnitude-limited parent sample were used to estimate the effective cluster radius and the probable fraction of cluster members inside this radius. Figure 2 shows the cumulative radial number counts of objects satisfying the above apparent magnitude and diameter criteria, plotted against the square of the distance from the cluster centre, such that a constant surface density background will give a linear rise in counts. The plot shows the rapid central rise in counts due to true cluster members, which changes in a well-defined manner to an approximately linear rise beyond r2 ~ 0.2 on the plot, corresponding to a radius of 0.4−0.5 times the Abell radius. This implies that the extended objects distribute uniformly outside a radius of about 0.5 rA, indicating that they are dominated by background galaxies, and that 0.5 rA is an appropriate limit for the region dominated by true cluster galaxies.

thumbnail Fig. 2

The cumulative distribution of galaxy number versus the square of distance from the cluster centre.

Table 4

Comparison of radial velocities between the literature (vLit) and this study (vTS).

The final selected sample of cluster galaxy candidates, by apparent magnitude and diameter, comprises 303 galaxies. The true nature of these galaxies, whether cluster or background, will be further investigated in this paper using literature and newly obtained spectroscopic redshifts (see Sect. 5).

4. Spectroscopic observations and data reduction

The spectroscopic data were obtained using the WYFFOS multifibre spectrograph on the 4.2 m WHT. The total area covered approximately the same field as the INT/WFC imaging observations. The WHT/WYFFOS observations were done in 5 pointings on 3 nights, 30 April 2002, 25 March 2003 and 26 March 2003 as shown in Table 3. The exposure times were 4 × 1800 s for the first 4 pointings and 3 × 600 s for the last pointing. All pointings used neon arc lamps for wavelength calibration.

For these observations, the R600R grating was used, giving a dispersion of approximately 3.0 Å pixel-1, for a total spectral coverage of 3080 Å with a TEK 1024 × 1024 CCD. The spectra were centered on 6000 Å, covering Hβ λ 4861, [OIII] λ 4959, [OIII] λ 5007, Hα λ 6563, [NII] λ 6548 + 6583, [SII] λ 6717 and [SII] λ 6731 emission lines, plus MgI λ 5175 and NaD λ 5893 absorption lines.

The spectroscopic sample was selected to discriminate between cluster galaxies and background galaxies or AGN, using a criterion of B < 22, over the same sky area as the photometric data. Three hundred and twenty eight target objects were observed as shown in Table 3.

The spectroscopic data reduction was mainly done using IRAF packages. First, bias frames were median-combined and subtracted from the other frames such as science, neon arc and offset sky frames. Science frames were median-combined for each pointing which efficiently removed cosmic rays. The science, neon arc and offset sky images were used as input files for the WYFRED package, which is a special package for the extraction of multifibre spectra produced by WHT/WYFFOS. WYFRED was run including automatic aperture number identifications, to match up spectral tracks on the CCD with fibres and hence target objects. During the running of this program, the aperture numbers were identified and a neon arc frame was used for wavelength calibration in each fibre. Finally, sky subtraction was performed, one-dimensional spectra were extracted and redshifts were determined by using the ONEDSPEC package.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Comparison of radial velocities between the literature (vLit) and this study (vTS). Many galaxies have published redshifts from several papers, listed in Table 4.

5. Spectroscopic results

Most cluster members had recession velocities determined from the Hα λ 6563, [NII] λ 6548 and [NII] λ 6583 lines. For some galaxies we also found [SII] λ 6717 and [SII] λ 6731 emission, and NaD λ 5893 absorption lines. Many background galaxies out to z  ~  0.57 were strongly confirmed by not only the above lines but also Hβ λ 4861, [OIII] λ 4959 and [OIII] λ 5007 emission, and FeI λ 5269 and MgI λ 5175 absorption lines. Moreover, shorter wavelength spectral line features were also found such as [OII] λ 3727 emission, and G-band λ 4304 and CaH λ 3968 absorption lines for distant galaxies. The redshifts from several lines were averaged for each galaxy.

There are 84 out of 328 objects for which spectral lines were clearly detected, with many of the spectroscopic targets being too faint to result in spectral line detections using WHT/WYFFOS. Redshifts were determined for all galaxies with detected lines, as shown in Table 8. Of these, 80 galaxies have detected emission lines, and some of them also show absorption lines, whereas 4 galaxies were found with only absorption lines. Furthermore, many galaxies’ redshifts were collected from published papers as noted at the bottom of Table 4. Fifteen galaxies for which we have spectroscopic data also have redshifts in the literature. Some galaxies have redshifts from several different papers, as shown in Table 4 and Fig. 3. Absorption line recession velocities were calculated from estimates of individual line centre positions, and not using the cross-correlation technique. However, an analysis of the 2 objects with both emission and absorption lines showed good overall agreement in velocities. The velocities of J114324.70+194831.8 are of 13 193 km s-1 and 13 320 km s-1 for Hα and [NII] λ 6583 emission lines, and 13 241 km s-1 for NaD absorption line. The velocities of J114449.16+194742.2 are 5626 km s-1 and 5591 km s-1 for Hα and [NII] λ 6583 emission lines and 5493 km s-1 and 5605 km s-1 for MgI and NaD absorption lines.

Our values show generally good agreement with published redshifts. There are 3 outlying galaxies. The first is SDSS J114449.16+194742.2, which has a radial velocity of 5579 km s-1, as measured in this study. There are 4 published papers with measured recession velocities for this galaxy. Three of them are in close agreement, with velocities of 5607, 5663 and 5635 km s-1 from Smith et al. (2004), Rines et al. (2003) and Gavazzi et al. (2003b), respectively, whereas the other reported value was 5000 km s-1, from Zabludoff et al. (1990). Thus all these studies apart from the last agreed with our value of  ~5600 km s-1. The other two discrepant velocities are for SDSS J114238.29+194718.1 and SDSS J114240.36+195628.0, both of which have recession velocities published in the same paper (Cortese et al. 2004). The published velocities differ from our values by 6 and 5%, respectively. However, for the other 13 galaxies, our results are in good agreement with literature values taken from several papers. Many galaxies have published redshifts from more than one paper, as listed in Table 4.

After our spectroscopic results were combined with published recession velocities, it was found that the cluster members’ radial velocities are between 4455 and 8483 km s-1, scattered over a range 2.5 times the velocity dispersion (879 km s-1) about the average cluster velocity, 6595 km s-1 (Struble & Rood 1999) as shown in Fig. 4. The B-band apparent magnitude distribution of spectroscopically-confirmed cluster members scatters mostly between 14 and 20. All galaxies within our survey field that are brighter than mB = 16 magnitudes are cluster members, whilst the distant galaxies distributed between mB = 16 and 22. Almost all galaxies fainter than mB = 20 are background galaxies. The background galaxies identified in this study have radial velocities scattered between 12 000 and 160 000 km s-1. There is strong evidence for a background cluster with an average velocity of  ~20 000 km s-1 within this field. Several background galaxies have a redshift of  ~0.34 (just over 105 km s-1 on Fig. 4), which can result in their [OIII] λ 5007 line emission being confused with Hα from Abell 1367 cluster members. This is an important consideration when using emission within narrow-band filters as a selection criterion for cluster membership.

thumbnail Fig. 4

The B-band magnitude distribution of galaxies with known redshifts: this work (open circle) and previous papers (cross).

thumbnail Fig. 5

The histogram of the cluster members, identified by spectroscopic redshifts, is overlaid by a Gaussian normal distribution, using the mean redshift and velocity dispersion, reported by Struble & Rood (1999).

Eleven of the 84 galaxies for which we have spectroscopic data are members of Abell 1367, whereas the others are background galaxies. The spectroscopic recession velocities are combined with literature data to verify cluster membership for the 303 selected galaxies from Sect. 3; we have 126 known redshifts for these galaxies. It was confirmed that 72 galaxies, 11 galaxies from this study and 61 galaxies from literature, are associated with the cluster Abell 1367, whereas 54 galaxies are background objects. A histogram of cluster members, including spectroscopic redshifts from this work and from previous studies, is plotted in Fig. 5. The overlaid curve shows a normal distribution using the mean redshift and velocity dispersion reported by Struble & Rood (1999).

6. Optical/infrared photometry

The R24 isophotal apertures, defined in Sect. 2.3.3, are used to determine UBRJK isophotal magnitudes for our galaxy sample on the Vega magnitude system, listed in Table 9. Column 1 lists SDSS identifications. Major and minor diameters at the R24 isophotes are shown in Cols. 2 − 3. Columns 4 − 8 list the UBRJK magnitudes with errors. There are two kinds of the errors; random and systematic errors. The random magnitude errors occur from photon shot noise of the objects and from the uncertainty of the sky background as discussed in Sect. 2.3.1. The main systematic error is the uncertainty of zero-points, also mentioned in Sect. 2.3.1.

The comparison of UBRJK magnitudes between the literature and this study are separately calculated for R and UBJK magnitudes. The literature R-band magnitudes were derived from the SDSS and hence were originally measured in the SDSS r filter system. Athough there is some scatter between these and our R-band measurements, there is no evidence for an overall offset, as is shown by the mean offset of just 0.04 ± 0.03 mag. For the UBJK magnitudes, the comparison was done with observations of a subset of our galaxies that are contained in the GOLDMine database (Gavazzi et al. 2003a). One complication is that the present study uses R24 isophotal diameters, whereas GOLDMine uses B25. For bright galaxies these diameters are in general comparable in size, but we found that for fainter galaxies, which can have much bluer colours, the R24 diameters tend to be substantially smaller, often by a factor of 2. This clearly precludes any direct photometric comparison for these galaxies. However, for the 9 galaxies where the R24 and B25 galaxies agree within  ± 30%, an approximate comparison can be done. For these galaxies, there is marginal evidence that this study finds magnitudes fainter than those quoted by GOLDMine, with the photometry offsets are 0.04 ± 0.03 mag in the U band, 0.14 ± 0.06 mag in the B band, 0.19 ± 0.12 mag in the J band and 0.18 ± 0.12 mag in the K band, in each case. But the offsets are not much larger than the standard errors and, due to the remaining aperture differences, a small systematic offset is not surprising.

7. The morphological types

In this study, our B-band images were used to classify galaxy types in the Hubble system, using de Vaucouleurs’s T-type. Disturbance, meaning galaxies with clearly asymmetric or peculiar morphologies, was also identified. There was, however, a problem of edge-on spirals, which could not be clearly classified into sub-types of spiral galaxies. These galaxies were classified as S types and identified as T-type 11. As a result, our galaxies were classified into 13 T-types. These cluster members are quite bright, and generally the morphological classifications were clear and unambiguous. The morphological types, T-types and disturbance classifications are listed in Table 10 (Cols. 2−4).

Table 5 shows comparison of the morphological types between this study and the literature, collected from the GOLDMine database (Gavazzi et al. 2003a). There are 31 of 72 cluster galaxies, recorded in the GOLDMine database. If the “Pec” type of the GOLDMine database is considered as equivalent to the “Disturbed” type of this study, we find that 23 galaxies show the same types, and 5 galaxies are similar (i.e., SB0 in this study and S0 in literature, or S0/a in this study and S0 in literature). Given the subjective nature of galaxy classifications, this is a strikingly good degree of agreement.

Table 5

Comparison of the morphological types between this study and the literature.

8. Hα emission

Hα emission is a powerful tracer for the study of current star formation activity in galaxies, and can be determined from Hα filter images from which an appropriate subtraction of continuum emission has been made (Kennicutt 1983a; Kennicutt et al. 1994; Gavazzi et al. 2006). The Hα emission line at 6563 Å lies between neighbouring [NII] lines (6548 and 6583 Å), which are all transmitted through the filter this study uses. Thus fluxes presented in this study correspond to Hα emission plus the associated [NII] lines; appropriate corrections for this (Kennicutt 1983a, 1998) need to be applied to these fluxes when deriving, for example, star formation rates.

8.1. Calculation of Hα equivalent widths

The Hα equivalent width, EW, is a parameter that can be used to study the star formation activity of galaxies normalised by luminosity. The EW divides the star formation activity Hα line fluxes by the continuum fluxes of the older stellar populations in the galaxy. It can be determined by Eq. (1) (Gavazzi et al. 2006): EW=Tn(λ)dλTn(6563(1+z))×CHαCC,\begin{equation} EW = \frac{\int T_{\rm n}(\lambda){\rm d}\lambda}{T_{\rm n}(6563(1+z))} \times \frac{C_{{\rm H}\alpha}}{C_{\rm C}}, \label{EW2} \end{equation}(1)where CC is continuum flux counts, obtained in this study from R-band images, CHα is the continuum-subtracted Hα emission line flux counts, and Tn(λ) is the transmissivity of the narrow band filter. The narrow band filter, [SII] 6725/80, used in this study has good transmissivity in the wavelength range between 6695 and 6769 Å.

Figure 6 shows a correlation between the Hα equivalent widths from the literature and this study; the diagonal line shows the one-to-one correlation. The symbols indicate which of the 9 literature sources listed in Table 6 provided the data for this comparison. Most of these papers published Hα + [NII] equivalent widths and fluxes, represented by blue symbols. Only the papers numbered 8 and 9 in the list determined Hα emission separate from [NII], and these are represented by red symbols.

thumbnail Fig. 6

Comparison of the Hα equivalent widths between the literature and this study. The symbols are listed in Table 6.

Table 6

Papers containing Hα equivalent widths and fluxes of galaxy members in Abell 1367.

Table 7

Flux zero-point calibration.

8.2. Calculation of Hα fluxes

Hα fluxes are determined using the following equations (Gavazzi et al. 2006): fα=CF×Zf×[CHαt×Tn(6563(1+z))]\begin{equation} f_\alpha = CF \times Z_{\rm f} \times \left[\frac{C_{{\rm H}\alpha}}{t \times T_{\rm n}(6563(1+z))}\right] \label{F1} \end{equation}(2)and CF=1+Tn(λ)dλTb(λ)dλ\begin{equation} CF = 1 + \frac{\int T_{\rm n}(\lambda){\rm d}\lambda}{\int T_{\rm b}(\lambda){\rm d}\lambda} \label{F2} \end{equation}(3)where Zf is the calibrated zero point for Hα emission line fluxes in units of erg s-1 cm-2 and t is the integration time in seconds for the narrow band Hα images. Tn and Tb are the transmissivities of narrow band and broad band filters, respectively. Tn(6563(1 + z)) was used in the same way in the calculation of equivalent widths. Because the broad band images used for continuum subtraction also included the emission line fluxes, potentially resulting in oversubtraction, an appropriate correction was applied to the fα value. This gives a small change in the correcting factor, CF in Eq. (3).

Nine papers, listed in Table 6, have reported Hα emission line fluxes of 18 galaxies in the sample of this study, whether including [NII] line fluxes or not. Only 13 galaxies have published total Hα + [NII] emission line fluxes; these are in the first 7 of these papers. These galaxies were used to calibrate the flux zero-point. For galaxies which have published fluxes in more than one paper, the Hα fluxes were averaged.

Firstly, the primary flux zero-point, Zf was set to 1.0 and instrumental Hα fluxes, fα,   Instr were calculated using Eq. (2). Calibrated flux zero-points, ZF were determined by dividing literature Hα fluxes, fα,   Lit by the instrumental Hα fluxes. The averaged zero-point was 3.32 × 10-16 erg s-1 cm-2 with standard error of 3.14 × 10-17 erg s-1 cm-2.

The parameters of this calibration are listed in Table 7 as follows: Column 1, SDSS identifications with J2000 right ascension and declination; Cols. 2 and 3 are logarithmic and decimal Hα + [NII] fluxes in units of erg s-1 cm-2, respectively; Col. 4, the reference number of the paper as listed in Table 6; Cols. 5 and 6 are the continuum-subtracted Hα + [NII] flux counts in units of ADUs and their signal to noise ratios, respectively; Col. 7, the instrumental Hα + [NII] fluxes; and Col. 8 contains the calibrated flux zero-point of each galaxy, plus the overall median, mean, standard deviation and standard error.

Figure 7 shows a comparison of the Hα emission line fluxes between the literature and this study, along with the one-to-one line, with the same symbols as Fig. 6. Blue symbols represent Hα + [NII] fluxes of the 13 calibrator galaxies and red symbols represent the galaxies which have published Hα fluxes. Some galaxies have flux values from more than one paper, with or without flux errors.

thumbnail Fig. 7

Comparison of the Hα emission line fluxes between the literature and this study. The symbols are listed in Table 6.

Some scatter is seen in the comparisons of both Hα equivalent widths and fluxes between the literature and this study (Figs. 6 and 7). One possible source of scatter is differences in the apertures used between this study and the literature. Substantial errors can also result from continuum subtraction, particularly for galaxies with low EW values. Overall, the agreement between our values and those from the literature is good, with no evidence for systematic biases, and the scatter is similar to that found in other comparisons between studies.

The result of Hα + [NII] equivalent widths and fluxes of 72 cluster galaxies are listed in the Hα emission catalogue, Table 10. Column 1 is SDSS identifications. Columns 2−4 show the morphological types, T-types and disturbance. Columns 5−6 are recession velocities and references. Columns 7−8 are Hα + [NII] equivalent widths and fluxes. Table 11 shows 24 emission line galaxies in our sample, that were also reported in literature. Columns 2−5 are available Hα + [NII] fluxes from literature as follows: Gavazzi et al. (1998, 2002, 2003b, 2006), Kennicutt et al. (1984), Iglesias-Paramo et al. (2002) and Thomas et al. (2008), respectively. Column 6 is the Hα + [NII] fluxes of this study. Column 7 shows the mean fluxes and errors of Hα + [NII] from the literature and this study.

9. Summary

We present new photometric and spectroscopic data of the galaxy population of cluster Abell 1367, covering the cluster centre up to about 1.0 Abell radius (rA) or  ~2.2 Mpc to the north direction. The data are useful to investigate the photometric properties and star formation activity of galaxies in Abell 1367. This paper summarises the photometric observations and data reduction for U, B, R and Hα bands using WFC on the INT, and J and K bands using WFCAM on UKIRT. Spectroscopic data from the WYFFOS multifibre spectrograph on the WHT are also presented, along with derived recession velocities. A galaxy sample was selected using a limiting B-band apparent magnitude and minimum FWHM to limit contaminated background and foreground galaxies. The selected sample contains 303 galaxies, for which we present a photometric catalogue (Table 9). Our new spectroscopic data for 84 galaxies are presented in a spectroscopic catalogue (Table 8); after combining with published spectra, a total of 126 of our galaxies have measured recession velocities. Of these, 72 galaxies, with spectroscopically confirmed cluster membership, have measures of star formation activity in terms of Hα equivalent widths and fluxes, which are presented in a Hα emission catalogue (Table 10).

Table 8

Redshift measurements for galaxies in the region of Abell 1367.

Table 9

Photometric measurements for galaxies in the surveyed region of Abell 1367.

Table 10

Hα emission catalogue of galaxies in Abell 1367.

Table 11

Mean fluxes and errors of Hα + [NII] from the literature and this study.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit (CASU), Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge University, for the pipeline processing of the INT and UKIRT images. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The referee is thanked for many helpful comments regarding the content and presentation of this paper. W.K., P.A.J. and D.C. dedicate this paper to the memory of their respected and sadly-missed colleague Chris Moss, who died on the 12th May 2010.

References

  1. Abell, G. O. 1958, ApJS, 3, 112 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boselli, A. 1994, A&A, 292, 1 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boselli, A., & Gavazzi, G. 2006, PASP, 118, 517 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boselli, A., Lequeux, J., & Gavazzi, G. 2002, A&A, 384, 33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boselli, A., Boissier, S., Cortese, L., et al. 2006, ApJ, 651, 811 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Buta, R. 1996, AJ, 111, 591 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Byrd, G., & Valtonen, M. 1990, ApJ, 350, 89 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Condon, J. J., Condon, M. A., Gisler, G., & Puschell, J. J. 1982, ApJ, 252, 102 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cortese, L., Gavazzi, G., Iglesias-Paramo, J., Boselli, A., & Carrasco, L. 2003, A&A, 401, 471 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cortese, L., Gavazzi, G., Boselli, A., Iglesias-Paramo, J., & Carrasco, L. 2004, A&A, 425, 429 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cayatte, V., Kotanyi, C., Balkowski, C., & van Gorkom, J. H. 1994, AJ, 107, 1003 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. de Vaucouleurs, G., & Longo, G. 1988, Catalogue of visual and infrared photometry of galaxies (1961 − 1985) [Google Scholar]
  15. Donnelly, R. H., Markevitch, M., Forman, W., et al. 1998, ApJ, 500, 138 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dressler, A. 2004, Clusters of Galaxies: Probes of Cosmological Structure and Galaxy Evolution, 206 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fujita, Y. 1998, ApJ, 509, 587 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Finn, R. A., Zaritsky, D., McCarthy, D. W., Jr., et al. 2005, ApJ, 630, 206 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gavazzi, G. 1989, ApJ, 346, 59 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gavazzi, G., Catinella, B., Carrasco, L., Boselli, A., & Contursi, A. 1998, AJ, 115, 1745 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gavazzi, G., Boselli, A., Pedotti, P., Gallazzi, A., & Carrasco, L. 2002, A&A, 386, 114 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gavazzi, G., Boselli, A., Donati, A., Franzetti, P., & Scodeggio, M. 2003a, A&A, 400, 451 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gavazzi, G., Cortese, L., Boselli, A., et al. 2003b, AJ, 597, 210 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gavazzi, G., Boselli, A., Cortese, L., et al. 2006, A&A, 446, 839 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gunn, J. E., & Gott, J. R. I. 1972, ApJ, 176, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Haynes, M. P., & Giovanelli, R. 1984, AJ, 89, 758 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Haynes, M. P., Giovanelli, R., Herter, T., et al. 1997, AJ, 113, 1197 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Henriksen, M., & Byrd, G. 1996, ApJ, 459, 82 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Iglesias-Paramo, J., Boselli, A., Cortese, L., Vilchez, J. M., & Gavazzi, G. 2002, A&A, 384, 383 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. Iono, D., Yun, M. S., & Mihos, J. C. 2004, ApJ, 616, 199 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jarrett T. H., Chester T., Cutri R., Schneider S. E., & Huchra J. P., 2003, AJ, 125, 525 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jarrett T. H., Chester T., Cutri R., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 2498 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Keel, W. C., Kennicutt, R. C., Hummel, E., & van der Hulst, J. M. 1985, AJ, 90, 708 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kennicutt, R. C. 1983a, ApJ, 272, 54 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kennicutt, R. C. 1983b, AJ, 88, 483 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kennicutt, R. C. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kennicutt, R. C., Bothun, G. D., & Schommer, R. A. 1984, AJ, 89, 1279 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kennicutt, R. C., Roettiger, K. A., Keel, W. C., van der Hulst, J. M., & Hummel, E. 1987, AJ, 93, 1011 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kennicutt, R. C., Tamblyn, P., & Congdon, C. E. 1994, ApJ, 435, 22 [Google Scholar]
  40. Koopmann, R. A., & Kenney, J. D. P. 1998, ApJ, 497, L75 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Koopmann, R. A., & Kenney, J. D. P. 2004a, ApJ, 613, 851 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Koopmann, R. A., & Kenney, J. D. P. 2004b, ApJ, 613, 866 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Koopmann, R. A., Haynes, M. P., & Catinella, B. 2006, AJ, 131, 716 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mihos, J. C., Richstone, D. O., & Bothun, G. D. 1992, ApJ, 400, 153 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Moore, B., Katz, N., Lake, G., Dressler, A., & Oemler, A. 1996, Nature, 379, 613 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Moore, B., Lake, G., Quinn, T., & Stadel, J. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 465 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Moss, C., Whittle, M., & Pesce, J. E. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 205 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. O’Donnell, J. E. 1994, ApJ, 422, 1580 [Google Scholar]
  49. Poggianti, B. M. 1997, A&AS, 122, 399 [Google Scholar]
  50. Rines, K., Geller, M. J., Kurtz, M. J., & Diaferio, A. 2003, AJ, 126, 2152 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Robinson, B. J. 1965, Nature, 208, 993 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sakai, S., Kennicutt, R. C., van der Hulst, J. M., & Moss, C. 2002, ApJ, 578, 842 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Smith, R. J., Hudson, M. J., Nelan, J. E., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 1558 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Struble, M. F., & Rood, H. J. 1999, ApJS, 125, 35 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sullivan, M., Treyer, M. A., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 312, 442 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Taylor, V. A., Jansen, R. A., Windhorst, R. A., Odewahn, S. C., & Hibbard, J. E. 2005, ApJ, 630, 784 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Thomas, C. F., Moss, C., James, P. A., et al. 2008, A&A, 486, 755 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  59. Warmels, R. H. 1988, A&AS, 72, 427 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zabludoff, A. I., Huchra J. P., & Geller M. J. 1990, ApJS, 74, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

INT observations.

Table 2

UKIRT observations at a tile position of 11h43m39.6s+20°05′40′′ (J2000).

Table 3

WHT/WYFFOS observations.

Table 4

Comparison of radial velocities between the literature (vLit) and this study (vTS).

Table 5

Comparison of the morphological types between this study and the literature.

Table 6

Papers containing Hα equivalent widths and fluxes of galaxy members in Abell 1367.

Table 7

Flux zero-point calibration.

Table 8

Redshift measurements for galaxies in the region of Abell 1367.

Table 9

Photometric measurements for galaxies in the surveyed region of Abell 1367.

Table 10

Hα emission catalogue of galaxies in Abell 1367.

Table 11

Mean fluxes and errors of Hα + [NII] from the literature and this study.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

The layout of the optical (bright shaded area) and near-infrared (dark shaded area) images covering the central cluster region in J2000 coordinate system.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

The cumulative distribution of galaxy number versus the square of distance from the cluster centre.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Comparison of radial velocities between the literature (vLit) and this study (vTS). Many galaxies have published redshifts from several papers, listed in Table 4.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

The B-band magnitude distribution of galaxies with known redshifts: this work (open circle) and previous papers (cross).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

The histogram of the cluster members, identified by spectroscopic redshifts, is overlaid by a Gaussian normal distribution, using the mean redshift and velocity dispersion, reported by Struble & Rood (1999).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Comparison of the Hα equivalent widths between the literature and this study. The symbols are listed in Table 6.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Comparison of the Hα emission line fluxes between the literature and this study. The symbols are listed in Table 6.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.