Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 521, October 2010
Article Number A59
Number of page(s) 39
Section Extragalactic astronomy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913912
Published online 21 October 2010
A&A 521, A59 (2010)

Kinematics of galaxies in compact groups

Studying the B-band Tully-Fischer relation[*],[*]

S. Torres-Flores1,2 - C. Mendes de Oliveira1 - P. Amram2 - H. Plana2,3 - B. Epinat4 - C. Carignan5,6 - C. Balkowski7

1 - Departamento de Astronomia, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas da USP, Rua do Matão 1226, Cidade Universitária, 05508-090 São Paulo, Brazil
2 - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, OAMP, Université de Provence & CNRS, 38 rue F. Joliot-Curie, 13388 Marseille Cedex 13, France
3 - Laboratório de Astrofísica Teórica e Observacional, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilheus, Brazil
4 - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Toulouse-Tarbes, Université de Toulouse & CNRS, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
5 - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique Expérimentale (LAE), Observatoire du Mont Mégantic, and Département de Physique, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, H3C 3J7, Montréal, QC, Canada
6 - Observatoire d'Astrophysique de l'Université de Ouagadougou (UFR/SEA), 03 BP 7021 Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso
7 - GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, Paris University Denis Diderot & CNRS, 5 place Jules Janssen, Meudon, France

Received 18 December 2009 / Accepted 26 February 2010

Abstract
We obtained new Fabry-Perot data cubes and derived velocity fields, monochromatic, and velocity dispersion maps for 28 galaxies in the Hickson compact groups 37, 40, 47, 49, 54, 56, 68, 79, and 93. We also derived rotation curves for 9 of the studied galaxies, 6 of which are strongly asymmetric. Combining these new data with previously published 2D kinematic maps of compact group galaxies, we investigated the differences between the kinematic and morphological position angles for a sample of 46 galaxies. We find that one third of the unbarred compact group galaxies have position angle misalignments between the stellar and gaseous components. This and the asymmetric rotation curves are clear signatures of kinematic perturbations, probably because of interactions among compact group galaxies. A comparison between the B-band Tully-Fisher relation for compact group galaxies and for the GHASP field-galaxy sample shows that, despite the high fraction of compact group galaxies with asymmetric rotation curves, these lay on the TF relation defined by galaxies in less dense environments, although with more scatter. This agrees with previous results, but now confirmed for a larger sample of 41 galaxies. We confirm the tendency for compact group galaxies at the low-mass end of the Tully-Fisher relation (HCG 49b, 89d, 96c, 96d, and 100c) to have either a magnitude that is too bright for its mass (suggesting brightening by star formation) and/or a low maximum rotational velocity for its luminosity (suggesting tidal stripping). These galaxies are outside the Tully Fisher relation at the 1$\sigma$ level, even when the minimum acceptable values of inclinations are used to compute their maximum velocities. Including such galaxies with v < 100 km s-1 in the determination of the zero point and slope of the compact group B-band Tully-Fisher relation would strongly change the fit, making it different from the relation for field galaxies, which has to be kept in mind when studying scaling relations of interacting galaxies, especially at high redshifts.

Key words: galaxies: evolution - galaxies: interactions - galaxies: kinematics and dynamics - galaxies: groups: general

1 Introduction

Compact groups of galaxies are environments in which tidal encounters are thought to be common. It is, therefore, expected that interactions have stripped or disturbed such systems at some level. Mendes de Oliveira et al. (2003) studied the Tully-Fisher (TF) relation for 25 compact group galaxies and highlighted the importance of having 2D velocity fields, as derived from the H$\alpha$ line, in the study of TF of interacting galaxies. They find similar TF relations for compact group and field galaxies and stress that a fine tuning of the kinematic parameters is needed to have meaningful rotation curves for interacting galaxies. This is highly relevant for studying the evolution of the TF relation as a function of redshift, given that at high redshifts the numbers of interacting galaxies raise considerably. We are gathering a large dataset of Fabry-Perot velocity maps for interacting galaxies at low redshifts which allows the study of the effects of the environment on galaxy evolution in high density structures like compact groups of galaxies[*]. With this goal in mind, we studied the properties of the galaxies in these systems in previous papers, pointing out interaction indicators for individual galaxies (e.g. Mendes de Oliveira et al. 1998), the evolution of the B-band TF relation (Mendes de Oliveira et al. 2003), the distribution of luminous and dark mass profiles of compact group galaxies (Plana et al. 2010).

The present study complements the sample of compact group galaxies with measured velocity maps presented by Plana et al. (1998, 2000, 2003), Mendes de Oliveira et al. (1998), Amram et al. (2003, 2004, 2007), and Torres-Flores et al. (2009). We present for the first time velocity maps for galaxies in nine Hickson compact groups (HCGs 37, 40, 47, 49, 54, 56, 68, 79, and 93.) and we revisit the B-band TF relation for a sample of 41 Hickson compact group galaxies, including a comparison with the GHASP sample of field galaxies, for which 2D velocity fields, derived from the H$\alpha$ line, are also available (Epinat et al. 2008b).

2 Observation and data reduction

2.1 The sample

We obtained new Fabry-Perot data for galaxies in the following Hickson compact groups (HCG) HCG 37, HCG 40, HCG 47, HCG 49, HCG 54, HCG 56, HCG 68, HCG 79, and HCG 93. This sample is composed of nearby groups from the sample of Hickson et al. (1992), with radial systemic velocities lower than 10 500 km s-1. To study the relation between kinematic and morphological parameters, we considered the galaxies in this study for which it was possible to determine the kinematic parameters (11 galaxies of a total of 28). In addition, we considered the systems studied in Torres-Flores et al. (2009, 7 galaxies) and those of Mendes de Oliveira et al. (2003, 32 galaxies), for which kinematic and morphological measurements could be made or were already available in the literature. In some cases, there was no information about the kinematic position angle and inclination of the galaxies (HCG 10a, 88c and 2c, 10a, 22c, 40e, 88c, respectively). In other cases, no error bars for the position angle and inclinations were quoted (HCG 7c and 79d). All these objects were excluded from our analysis. Finally, we compared kinematic and morphological position angles for 46 galaxies and kinematic and morphological inclinations for 43 galaxies.

In the case of the B-band TF relation, we considered the galaxies of this study (9 galaxies with measured rotation curves of a total of 28), 7 galaxies from Torres-Flores et al. (2009) and 25 galaxies (of a total of 32 galaxies) studied by Mendes de Oliveira et al. (2003). For HCG 79d, we did not derive its rotation curve and kinematic parameters, given that they had already been published in Mendes de Oliveira et al. (2003).

2.2 Observations

The observations were carried out using a Fabry-Perot instrument mounted either on the Canada France Hawaii telescope (MOSFP, Amram et al. 2003) or on the European Southern Observatory 3.6 m telescope (CIGALE, Amram et al. 1991), using a CCD or a photon counting system respectively. The observed compact groups, exposure times, and scanning wavelengths are listed in Table 1. A journal of the observations is given in Table 2.

2.3 Data reduction

The reduction method we used was the same as the one applied to the GHASP sample in Epinat et al. (2008a,b), who used the reduction package developed by Daigle et al. (2006). The output of this package consists of monochromatic, continuum, dispersion, and radial velocity maps. This procedure includes several improvements with respect to the data reduction and analysis performed to the data presented in Plana et al. (2003) and Amram et al. (2003), listed in the following. First, the present procedure uses an adaptive spatial binning to the data based on the 2D Voronoi tessellation method (see Cappellari & Copin 2003) applied to the 3D data cubes, optimizing the determination of the spatial resolution. In this process, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of a bin is computed every time a new pixel is added to the bin. When a required SNR (previously defined by the user) is reached, no more pixels are added to the analyzed bin. Second, the velocity field is automatically cleaned; i.e., all the residual features that are not linked with emission lines in the objects in the groups are removed. Third, we compute the astrometric correction comparing stars in DSS images with the continuum image generated from the cube using KOORDS task in KARMA software. In the present work, the SNR was estimated using the square root of the flux. When the addition of pixels gave an SNR of 6 or 8 (for photon counting system or CCD, respectively), no more pixels were added to the bin. We used Gaussians to achieve spectral smoothing. Wavelength calibrations were obtained by scanning the narrow Ne 6599 $\rm {\AA}$ line under the same conditions as the observations. The OH subtraction was performed by estimating the sky using the medium spectrum of the data cube.

Table 1:   Journal of observations.

Table 2:   Instrumental setup.

Table 3:   Kinematic properties of the sample

3 Data analysis

3.1 Morphological and kinematic parameters

Inclinations, position angles, and galactic centers can be determined either from the morphology (using broad-band imaging) or from the kinematics (using the velocity field). The morphological inclinations have been computed using the axial ratio ${\rm cos}(b/a)=i$, where b and a are the optical diameters at the 25 mag arc-2 isophote (Hickson 1993). Because of distorted morphologies of the compact group galaxies, we avoided using the morphological type of the galaxy for computing the inclinations. The morphological centers we estimated using either the center of best ellipse fitting or the flux peak in the continuum image. Due to the asymmetries in the morphology, we used the second method. The morphological PAs were estimated using best ellipse fitting on the continuum image at the isophote of 25 mag arcsec-2 (R25).

Kinematic centers, inclinations, PAs, and systemic velocities were estimated from the velocity fields using the procedure developed in Epinat et al. (2008a). We list these parameters in Table 3. The procedure we used to determine these parameters follows three different steps. In a first attempt, all the kinematic parameters were estimated automatically. In a second one, we fixed the center using the morphological center and we allowed the inclination and position angle of the galaxies to be automatically measured in the computation process (from the velocity fields). In a final attempt, we left only the position angle free, to be obtained from the velocity map, and we fixed the center and the inclination, using the morphological values. From these three steps, we concluded that by using the morphological inclination and center and the kinematic PA we obtain more symmetrical rotation curves than in other cases.

In Figs. 1 to 3 we plot comparisons of the kinematically- and morphologically-derived position angles, inclination, and centers of the compact group galaxies. We included HCG 91c1 and 91c2 as two differents points in the diagrams, as studied by Mendes de Oliveira et al. (2003). In Fig. 3 we did not plot galaxies HCG 47a and 47d, given that the automatic routine was not able to find the correct kinematic centers for these galaxies.

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{13912fg1.eps}\par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{13912fg2.eps}
\end{figure} Figure 1:

Top panel: kinematic versus morphological inclination for the 43 HCG galaxies with measured inclinations. Open circles correspond to the barred and filled ones to the unbarred galaxies respectively. Bottom panel: histogram of the differences between the kinematically and morphologically-derived inclinations. Unbarred galaxies are represented by a dotted line (open histogram). Dashed lines represent barred galaxies (filled histogram).

Open with DEXTER

Figure 1 (top panel) shows that there is relatively good agreement between the kinematically and morphologically derived inclinations, except in a few cases. Nevertheless, because the velocity fields are not regular enough, the inclination can't be safely determined from the kinematics. Thus, in the following analysis, we preferred to use the morphological inclination deduced from the optical images, which are usually more symmetric.

In Fig. 1 (bottom panel), the histogram shows 11 galaxies having a difference in inclination between the morphologically and kinematically derived values (delta i) of more than 15 degrees. These are HCG 2b, 10c, 16d, 19b, 37d, 47a, 47d, 49c, 89b, and 89c.

The position angle for the GHASP galaxies (Epinat et al. 2008a) was determined through an automatic procedure using the velocity fields of the galaxies, which worked well for isolated galaxies. We made similar tests for the compact group sample and concluded that the automatic estimates using the velocity fields are robust. We checked the quality of the kinematic position angle determination by visual inspection.

Figure 2 (top panel) shows that optical PAs have large error bars. On the other hand, kinematic PAs present error bars smaller than 10 degrees. This led us to use the kinematic PA in this study.

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{13912fg3.eps}\par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{13912fg4.eps}
\end{figure} Figure 2:

Top panel: kinematic versus morphological position angle for the 46 HCG galaxies with measured position angles. Open circles correspond to the barred and the filled ones to the unbarred galaxies respectively. Bottom panel: histogram of the differences between the kinematically and morphologically-derived position angles. Unbarred galaxies are represented by a dotted line (open histogram). Dashed lines represent barred galaxies (filled histogram).

Open with DEXTER

In Fig. 2 (bottom panel) we show the histogram of the differences between the kinematically- and photometrically-determined position angles. Most of the unbarred galaxies have delta PA lower than 20 degrees, while the barred galaxies do not show any trend in the plot. The delta PA for barred galaxies span from 0 to 80 degrees with no peak in the distribution. Peirani et al. (2009) find that given specific initial conditions, an interaction between two galaxies having a mass ratio of 1:3 could produce a bar. In view of this result, we can't exclude as interacting objects the barred galaxies that present a misalignment between the optical and kinematic position angles lower than 20 degrees. In the case of galaxies with delta PA higher than 20 degrees, it could be easily associated with galaxy-galaxy interactions.

In Fig. 3, the histogram shows the difference (in arcsec) between the kinematic and morphological center for each galaxy, when all parameters (inclination, position angle and center) are not fixed, i.e., are left for the program to fit. These values are listed in Table 3. For HCG 2a, HCG 7d, and HCG 49c, there is a high shift between the kinematic and morphologic center, suggesting the inadequacy of the automatic fit. It can be noted in Fig. 3, that these three galaxies have delta center higher than 10 arcsec. We exclude HCG 47a and 47d from this analysis, given that it was impossible to derive the kinematic center of these objects. As expected, the most symmetrical rotation curves were obtained by fixing the center and inclination (from the morphology) and letting the position angle be determined automatically.

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{13912fg5.eps}
\end{figure} Figure 3:

Histogram of the differences between kinematically- and morphologically-derived centers for 48 HCG galaxies with measured centers. Unbarred galaxies are represented by a dotted line (open histogram). Dashed lines represent barred galaxies (filled histogram).

Open with DEXTER

No kinematic analysis was performed for galaxies in HCG 54, owing to their anomalous nature (Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2002).

3.2 Maximum rotational velocities

Rotation curves and error bars were computed using the parameters derived in Sect. 3.1 and following the same procedure as in Epinat et al. (2008a). In order to study the TF relation for the compact group galaxies, we estimated the maximum rotational velocity from each rotation curve. To enlarge the statistics, we also included all galaxies studied by Mendes de Oliveira et al. (2003), for which maximum rotational velocities were defined as the maximum values for the average velocities for the approaching and receding sides, similar to Epinat et al. (2008a) for edge-on galaxies.

For several galaxies (HCG 2b, 7a, 7d, 37d, 40c, 40e, 49a, 49b, 49c, NGC 92), the rotation curves do not reach the optical radius (R25). In these cases we fit an arctan function (V=V0 $\times$ $(2/\rm {\pi})$ $\times$ $\rm {arctan}(\it {r/r_{t}})$, Courteau 1997) in order to estimate the velocity at R25, which will be used as the maximum rotational velocity. Owing to the inner shape of the rotation curve, in two cases (HCG 2b and HCG 40e), this fit gives us extremely overestimated (and clearly erroneous) maximum rotational velocities (see Appendix B). In those cases, we take the average between the velocity at R25 from the arctan fit and the maximum velocity measured in the rotation curve. All these values were checked by eye on the rotation curves. At the end, 41 galaxies are available to study the TF relation in compact groups. Table 4 lists the observed and modeled rotational velocities for the unpublished galaxies.

3.3 Comparison with field galaxies

To investigate if the TF relation of compact group galaxies is similar to field galaxies, we used the galaxies of the GHASP survey as a control sample. Epinat et al. (2008a,b) find that the galaxies in this sample lie on the B-band TF relation, in good agreement with previous determinations of TF for field galaxies (Tully & Pierce 2000). We exclude from their sample all the galaxies with radial systemic velocities lower than 3000 km s-1, for which no other individual measurements of distances were available (the references are indicated in Epinat et al. 2008b). We also removed galaxies with inclinations lower than 25 degrees from the list, because of the large uncertainties in the velocities. Finally, we did not use galaxies for which the maximum velocities were not reached (Epinat et al. 2008b). This left us with 93 galaxies in the GHASP sample.

3.4 Magnitudes

The absolute magnitudes were obtained using $M=B_{\rm {cor}}-5$ $\times$ $(\rm {log}(\it {vvir}_{\rm {group}}\rm {/75))-25}$, where  $\it {vvir}_{\rm {group}}$ corresponds to the heliocentric radial velocity of the group to which the galaxy belongs, corrected for local group infall onto Virgo, from HyperLeda (Paturel et al. 2003)[*]. B-band magnitudes ( $B_{\rm {cor}}$) were taken from  $B_{\rm {T}}$, from Hickson et al. (1989). For 44$\%$ of the galaxies used in our analysis, the magnitude errors are lower than 0.1 and for 93$\%$ it is lower than 0.2 mag. For HCG 7c, 22c, and 89a, the errors are larger, so, we checked their magnitudes in the Hyperleda database. The magnitude for HCG 22c agrees with the value reported by Hyperleda; however, for 7c and 89a, the difference in magnitudes between Hickson et al. (1989) and Hyperleda is large (0.7 and 0.5 mag, respectively). These differences are consistent with the errors of 0.7 and 0.5 mag given in Hickson et al. (1989), for both galaxies. The $B_{\rm {T}}$ magnitudes were then corrected by Galactic extinction (Schlegel et al. 1998) and by the extinction due to the inclination (Bottinelli et al. 1995). Values for the galactic extinction and extinction due to the inclination were taken directly from HyperLeda. Details on the B-band magnitudes for the GHASP sample are given in Epinat et al. (2008a,b). Table 4 lists the corrected B-band absolute magnitudes for all HCG galaxies.

Table 4:   Rotational velocities of the sample.

3.5 Analysis of individual galaxies

In the three Appendices (A-C) to this paper, we present the optical B-band images from DSS, velocity fields, monochromatic images, velocity dispersion maps (Figs. B.1 to B.10) and rotation curves (Figs. B.11-B.13, and Appendix C for rotation curves tables) for 11 galaxies in eight Hickson compact groups. Velocity dispersion maps presented are not corrected for instrumental nor thermal broadening. We analyze each individual galaxy using these new data together with literature data as listed in the following. We list in Table 3 the kinematic parameters obtained from the velocity fields (Cols. 3 and 8), the systemic velocities taken from the literature (Cols. 9 and 11) and the systemic velocities resulting from our analysis (Col. 10). In Table 4 we list the different rotational velocities that we obtained, from the observations and from the arctan model (Courteau 1997). In Col. 6, we show the rotational velocties at R25. Only 38$\%$ of the galaxies listed in Table 4 reach R25 (we noted that no rotation curve was computed for HCG 47a and 47d). Column 8 shows the observed maximum rotational velocity for each galaxy. Column 9 gives the modeled velocity at R25. Column 10 corresponds to the rotational velocity used in the TF relation. We noted that for 39$\%$ of the sample $V_{\rm {max}}^{\rm {RC}}$ = $V_{\rm {max}}^{\rm {TF}}$. Finally, in Col. 11 we flag the galaxies that reached, probably reached, probably did not reach, or did not reach the maximum rotational velocity. We found that 38$\%$ of the galaxies in the sample did not reach their maximum rotational velocities.

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg6.eps}
\end{figure} Figure 4:

B-band Tully-Fisher relation for galaxies in compact groups (Mendes de Oliveira et al. 2003, and this work, filled circles) and a field galaxy sample (Epinat et al. 2008b, small squares). For each rotation curve, we derived the PA automatically, from the velocity field, using IDL routines. We fixed the center using the morphological center and we fixed the inclination using the morphological inclination.

Open with DEXTER

4 Results and discussion

4.1 The Tully-Fisher relation

In Fig. 4 we show the B-band TF relation for the HCG galaxies and the GHASP sample. Maximum rotational velocities were derived as described in Sect. 3.2. The dashed line in Fig. 4 (Eq. (1)) represents the best least-squares bisectors fit on the GHASP data and 1$\sigma$

\begin{displaymath}%
M_{\rm B}=(-3.47\pm1.21)-(7.35\pm0.53)\times[{\rm log}({\it V}_{{\rm max}})].
\end{displaymath} (1)

The slope of this fit agrees with the value obtained by Epinat et al. (2008b) for the complete GHASP sample. Galaxies with radial velocities lower than 3000 km s-1 (and no independent distance measurement) were removed from our analysis. The TF relation derived here for the GHASP sample is in agrees with the results from Tully & Pierce (2000), who found a slope of -7.27. To compare our results with other ones from the literature, an inverse least-square fit was applied to the GHASP sample. We find a slope of -9.11 $\pm$ 0.85. Kannappan et al. (2002) and Verheijen (2001) find slopes of -10.09 $\pm$ 0.39 (using an unweighted inverse fit) and -9.0 $\pm$ 0.4 (RC/FD sample, excluding NGC 3992), respectively. These agree with the ones found in this paper.

Figure 4 does not exhibit large differences in the TF of HCG galaxies and the GHASP sample. Only one galaxy is off by more than 2$\sigma$ from the TF relation (HCG 49b). Only one galaxy (HCG 40e) is more than 1$\sigma$ lower than the TF relation. Several cases are possible: it could have a high rotational velocity for its magnitude or a faint magnitude for its velocity or both. In the first case, the high maximum velocity we computed may be overestimated. Indeed, the maximum rotational velocity is only observed at $\sim$R25/3 (146 km s-1), and we extrapolated to 186 km s-1 at R25 (see Sect. 3.2). If the actual velocity is 146 km s-1, this galaxy falls on the 1$\sigma$ TF relation. On the other hand, if the maximum rotational velocity is 186 km s-1 no inclination could push the galaxy on the 1$\sigma$ relation. In the second case, the problem is linked to the extinction. We can't rule out the possibility that the extinction of this galaxy may have been underestimated, given the difficulty in making such measurements in an edge-on galaxy. That underestimated value would lead to pushing the galaxy out of the TF relation. The galaxy has a B-band internal extinction of 0.41 (determined using Bottinelli et al. 1995). To lie on the 1$\sigma$ relation, this galaxy should have an internal extinction of $\sim$1.3 mag, which is a very unlikely value. In conclusion, it is most likely that the maximum rotational velocity was overestimated for HCG 40e, owing to the extrapolation in the rotation curve.

In the low-mass regime, galaxy HCG 49b appears to have lower rotational velocity than the value expected from the TF relation, or alternatively it appears to have a higher B luminosity than that expected from its observed maximum rotational velocity. This galaxy should have a velocity of 151 km s-1 to lie on the TF relation. An inclination of 17 degrees could give us that rotational velocity. However, this value is too low considering the kinematic and morphological inclinations given in Table 3. This effect was also noted by Mendes de Oliveira et al. (2003), for other galaxies at the low-mass end of the relation, e.g. HCG 96d and HCG 89d.

4.2 Outliers from the TF relation

Compact groups of galaxies are environments where interactions between galaxies take place frequently. This is confirmed by a number of studies that have shown distorted kinematics and morphologies of compact group galaxies (e.g. Presotto et al. 2010; Amram et al. 2007; Coziol & Plauchu-Frayn 2007; Amram et al. 2003; Plana et al. 2003, 1998; and Mendes de Oliveira et al. 1998), also by studies of groups containing HI tidal debris (Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2001) and newly formed stars forming systems outside the luminous member galaxies (e.g. de Mello et al. 2008), as well as studies of diffuse light presumably originated from stripped material from the outskirts of galaxies in compact groups (e.g. da Rocha et al. 2008). From these studies, it is clear that galaxy interactions represent an effective mechanism to remove some of the stars and neutral gas from the member galaxies. However, another important question arises: can interactions remove some of the dark halo of the compact groups galaxies? Mendes de Oliveira et al. (2003) found a few low-mass galaxies that had a lower maximum velocity than expected from the TF relation. In this paper we find one more galaxy, HCG 49b. Given that these studies focus on the the B-band TF relation, we can't tell whether these galaxies have been brightened by star formation or if they have truncated profiles. In the latter case, if HCG 49b sometime in the past lay on the TF relation sometime in the past (defined by the best fit to the GHASP data), this object would have had to lose 85$\%$ of its possible initial mass to move to its observed position on the TF relation. The K-band TF relation and mass profile decomposition into luminous and halo components are necessary to address this issue (Torres-Flores et al. 2010a,b, in prep.).

To quantify the possible similarities/differences between the HCG and the GHASP samples, we applied a least square bisector fit to the HCG sample. In this case we obtain $M_{\rm {B}}=(-8.40\pm1.20)-(5.30\pm0.53)$ $\times$ $[\rm {log}(\it {V}\rm {_{max}})]$. From these values and from inspecting Fig. 4, it is clear that low-mass galaxies strongly influence this result for the TF relation of compact groups. To confirm that, we removed galaxies with rotational velocities lower than 100 km s-1. In this case, the TF relation for HCG galaxies is $M_{\rm {B}}=(-4.26\pm1.73)-(7.07\pm0.74)$ $\times$ $[\rm {log}(\it {V}\rm {_{max}})]$, and for GHASP it is $M_{\rm {B}}=(-4.28\pm1.39)-(6.98\pm0.60)\times[\rm {log}(\it {V}\rm {_{max}})]$. We also fitted an ordinary least square fit and a least square bisector fit to the HCG and GHASP samples, excluding objects fainter than $M_{\rm {B}}$ = -18, and again we obtain very similar results; i.e., there are no significative differences in the slopes and zero points of the TF for the two samples. If we add GHASP and HCG galaxies (excluding HCG galaxies with rotational velocities lower than 100 km s-1), we obtain: $M_{\rm {B}}=(-3.44\pm1.09)-(7.38\pm0.48)$ $\times$ $[\rm {log}(\it {V}\rm {_{max}})]$. This result fully agrees with the fit obtained for the GHASP sample. From this analysis we concluded that low-mass galaxies in compact groups lie off the B-band TF relation while for galaxies with rotational velocities higher than 100 km s-1, the TF relations for HCGs and GHASP galaxies have very similar slopes and zero points. If we take the error bars into account in the inclination and we remove galaxies for which no error bars were quoted or having extremely large error bars that produced errors in the computation (HCG 7c, 47d, 49a, 79d, and 87a), we found that 75$\%$ of the HCG sample is inside 1$\sigma$ of the relation defined by GHASP (Eq. (1)). A fraction of 25$\%$of the compact group sample could not reach the TF relation inside 1$\sigma$ (HCG 40e, 49b, 88c, 89d, 91c, 96c, 96d, 100c, and NGC 92). Interestingly, HCG 49b, 89d, 96c, 96d, and 100c have rotational velocities lower than 100 km s-1.

We study the dispersion that our samples present in the TF relation with respect to the fit derived from GHASP and HCG together (without the galaxies with v < 100 km s-1, in the case of HCG galaxies). We found that a total of 32$\%$ of the HCG and 25$\%$ of the GHASP galaxies are outside the 1$\sigma$ TF relation. This suggests a higher dispersion presented by the HCG galaxies, although the main result here is that 98$\%$ and 97$\%$ of the HCG and GHASP samples are within the same relation at the 2$\sigma$ level, showing complete agreement at this level. The higher dispersion for HCGs could stem from the frequent interactions in this environment. Puech et al. (2008) find that galaxies at z $\sim$ 0.6 having a complex kinematics produced a high dispersion in the TF relation. This result agrees with the results of compact groups of galaxies.

Table 5:   Interaction indicators.

In the low-mass regime, a few field galaxies producing high dispersion in the TF relation display lower B-band luminosities than expected, and therefore, low stellar masses, because the gaseous component is not negligible for low-mass galaxies in the field. If the gas mass is included, field low-mass galaxies are shifted towards the TF relation (as already shown in McGaugh et al. 2000). For HCG galaxies, however, adding the gas component moves their positions upwards, off the TF relation. The compact groups outliers have enhanced luminosities (probably due to star formation), which is not the case for field galaxies. In this sense, it could be dangerous to quantify and compare the dispersions in the TF relation for HCG and GHASP galaxies in the low-mass regime, given that the physical reason for such dispersion may be different.

4.3 Interaction indicators

Mendes de Oliveira et al. (1998), Amram et al. (2003), and Plana et al. (2003) have devised a scheme to classify galaxies as interacting or not, based on analysis of 2D velocity fields and other indicators. Using this same scheme, Torres-Flores et al. (2009) classified HCG 2, HCG 7, HCG 22, and NGC 92 in different evolutionary stages. In a similar way, we classified the galaxies studied here as interacting or not. In Table 5 we show the main interaction indicators. Of all 11 galaxies studied in this new sample (from which we have derived rotation curves for 9 of them), 6 present at least two interaction indicators and can be classified as interacting.

One of the interaction parameters listed in Table 5 is the difference between the kinematically and morphological-derived position angles. We plot this difference for 46 compact group galaxies in Fig. 2 (bottom panel). This difference is an indicator of interactions only for unbarred galaxies given that it is common to find bars that are not aligned with kinematic major axes of galaxies. If we discard the barred galaxies we still find that almost one third of the sample of 32 galaxies studied in detail so far (this paper, Mendes de Oliveira et al. 2003; Torres-Flores et al. 2009) has a misalignment greater than 20 degrees between the kinematic and the morphological position angle, yielding even more pieces of evidence for the high incidence of interactions among galaxies in compact groups. Only one galaxy (HCG 49a) has a kinematic and morphological inclination lower than 25 degrees. This object has a small misalignment between kinematic and morphological PA (7 degrees), therefore its low inclination does not affect the determination of the position angles of this galaxy.

A new interaction indicator for the whole sample of compact groups could be associated with the number of galaxies for which it is possible to obtain the rotation curves versus the total number of observed galaxies. If we gather all the HCG galaxies that have Fabry-Perot observations, discarding elliptical and S0, we found that rotation curves could be obtained for 68$\%$ of the observed galaxies. In the case of the GHASP sample, it is possible to derive the rotation curves for 85$\%$ of the observed galaxies. This fact could be associated with the complex kinematics shown by HCG galaxies. Moreover, HCG presents a deficiency in the content of HI gas (Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2001), so we can't exclude the lack of gas in the HCG galaxies as an important bias in this comparison.

5 Summary and conclusions

We have presented new velocity fields, monochromatic H$\alpha$ images and velocity dispersion maps for galaxies in nine compact groups. We explored the B-band TF relation for a sample of 41 galaxies in compact groups and compared it with the reanalyzed TF relation for the GHASP sample. We found that galaxies in dense environments lie on the TF relation defined by field galaxies; however, some of the low-mass galaxies have either a high luminosity for their mass or a high rotational velocity for their luminosities (e.g. HCG 49b). We also found that one third of the unbarred galaxies in compact groups have a misalignment between the kinematic and morphological position angle higher than 20 degrees.

Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the anonymous referee for very useful comments and suggestions, which were very important in improving this paper. S.T.-F. acknowledges the financial support of FAPESP through a Ph.D. fellowship (2007/07973-3). S.T.-F. also acknowledges the financial support of Egide through a Eiffel scholarship. C.M.d.O. acknowledgs support from FAPESP (2006/56213-9), and CNPq. H.P. acknowledges financial support from CAPES (3656/08-0). S.T.-F., C.M.d.O., and H.P. would like to thank the staff members of the Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille for their hospitality when part of this work was developed. This research made use ofthe NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. We also acknowledge the use of the HyperLeda database (http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr).

References

  1. Amram, P., Boulesteix, J., Georgelin, Y. M., et al. 1991, Msngr, 64, 44 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amram, P., Balkowski, C., Boulesteix, J., et al. 1996, A&A, 310, 737 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amram, P., Plana, H., Mendes de Oliveira, C., Balkowski, C., & Boulesteix, J. 2003, A&A, 402, 865 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amram, P., Mendes de Oliveira, C., Plana, H., et al. 2004, ApJ, 612, L5 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Amram, P., Mendes de Oliveira, C., Plana, H., Balkowski, C., & Hernandez, O. 2007, A&A, 471, 753 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bottinelli, L., Gouguenheim, L., Paturel, G., & Teerikorpi, P. 1995, A&A, 296, 64 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cappellari, M., & Copin, Y. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 345 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Courteau, S. 1997, AJ, 114, 2402 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coziol, R., & Plauchu-Frayn, I. 2007, AJ, 133, 2630 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Coziol, R., de Carvalho, R. R., Capelato, H. V., & Ribeiro, A. L. B. 1998, ApJ, 506, 545 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Coziol, R., Iovino, A., & de Carvalho, R. R. 2000, AJ, 120, 47 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Coziol, R., Brinks, E., & Bravo-Alfaro, H. 2004, AJ, 128, 68 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Daigle, O., Carignan, C., Hernandez, O., Chemin, L., & Amram, P. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1016 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Da Rocha, C., Ziegler, B. L., & Mendes de Oliveira, C. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 1433 [Google Scholar]
  15. de Mello, D. F., Torres-Flores, S., & Mendes de Oliveira, C. 2008a, AJ, 135, 319 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Durbala, A., del Olmo, A., Yun, M. S., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 130 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Epinat, B., Amram, P., Marcelin, M., et al. 2008a, MNRAS, 388, 500 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Epinat, B., Amram, P., & Marcelin, M. 2008b, MNRAS, 390, 466 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fasano, G. & Bettoni, D. 1994, AJ, 107, 1649 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hickson, P. 1982, ApJ, 255, 382 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hickson, P. 1993, Atlas of Compact Groups of Galaxies (New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers) [Google Scholar]
  22. Hickson, P., Kindl, E., & Auman, J. R. 1989, ApJS, 7, 687 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hickson, P., Mendes de Oliveira, C., Huchra, J. P., & Palumbo, G. G. 1992, ApJ, 399, 353 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kannappan, S. J., Fabricant, D. G., & Franx, M. 2002, AJ, 123, 2358 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. McGaugh, S. S., Schombert, J. M., Bothun, G. D., & de Blok, W. J. G. 2000, ApJ, 533, L99 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mendes de Oliveira, C. 1992, Ph.D. Thesis, British Columbia Univ. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mendes de Oliveira, C., Plana, H., Amram, P., Balkowski, C., & Boulesteix, J. 1998, ApJ, 507, 691 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mendes de Oliveira, C., Amram, P., Plana, H., & Balkowski, C. 2003, AJ, 126, 2635 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Paturel, G., Petit, C., Prugniel, P., et al. 2003, A&A, 412, 45 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. Phillips, A. C. 1996, ASPC, 91, 44 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pisano, D. J., Wilcots, E. M., & Elmegreen, B. G. 2000, AJ, 120, 763 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Peirani, S., Hammer, F., Flores, H., Yang, Y., & Athanassoula, E. 2009, A&A, 496, 51 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  33. Plana, H., Mendes de Oliveira, C., Amram, P., & Boulesteix, J. 1998, AJ, 116, 2123 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Plana, H., Amram, P., Mendes de Oliveira, C., & Balkowski, C. 2000, AJ, 120, 621 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Plana, H., Amram, P., Mendes de Oliveira, C., Balkowski, C., & Boulesteix, J. 2003, AJ, 125, 1736 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Plana, H., Amram, P., Mendes de Oliveira, C., & Balkowski, C. 2010, AJ, 139, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Presotto, V., Iovino, A., Pompei, E., & Temporin, S. 2010, A&A, 510, A31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  38. Puech, M., Flores, H., Hammer, F., et al. 2008, A&A, 484, 173 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  39. Schelegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shimada, M., Ohyama, Y., Nishiura, S., Murayama, T., & Taniguchi, Y. 2000, AJ, 119, 2664 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Torres-Flores, S., Mendes de Oliveira, C., de Mello, D. F., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 723 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tully, R. B., & Pierce, M. J. 2000, ApJ, 533, 744 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Verdes-Montenegro, L., Yun, M. S., Williams, B. A., et al. 2001, A&A, 377, 812 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  44. Verdes-Montenegro, L., Del Olmo, A., Iglesias-Páramo, J. I., et al. 2002, A&A, 396, 815 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  45. Verheijen, M. A. W. 2001, ApJ, 563, 694 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vilchez, J. M., & Iglesias-Páramo, J. 1998, ApJS, 117, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Online Material

Appendix A: Individual galaxy properties

A.1 HCG 37

This group is formed by five galaxies. The brighter member, HCG 37a, has a morphological type E7 (Hickson 1992). Coziol et al. (2004) classified galaxies HCG 37a, HCG 37b, HCG 37c, and HCG 37d as a dwarf LINER (dLINER), LINER, low luminosity AGN, and a star forming galaxy (SFG), respectively. HCG 37b is a near IR source (Allam et al. 1996). Verdes-Montenegro et al. (2001) report that 87% of the expected HI is missing in HCG 37. Four of the five galaxies of HCG 37 were observed (thanks to the field of view of the observations) and we detect H$\alpha$ emission only in two of them. HCG 37a shows a central H$\alpha$ emission, as was reported in Vilchez et al. (1998), however, the H$\alpha$ profiles have a low signal-to-noise ratios. For this galaxy it was impossible to perform a rotation curve.

The monochromatic map of HCG 37d shows an extension of 13 arcsec (5.2 kpc). It has two peaks in the emission, as was found in Vilchez et al. (1998), the peak located in the northwest side of the galaxy being stronger. The continuum image shows the same peaks as the monochromatic image. The velocity field of this object is regular. The kinematic position angle is aligned with the optical one (as derived by Mendes de Oliveira 1992, at 2 h-1 kpc), differing by only 2$^{\circ}$. The rotation curve of HCG 37d is not symmetric, and both sides do not match. The receding and approaching sides reach velocities of 60 km s-1 and 53 km s-1, respectively. The rotation curve does not reach the optical radius of the galaxy (R25).

A.2 HCG 40

This quintet is composed by two early-type and three late-type galaxies. HCG 40a, HCG 40d, and HCG 40e were classified as radio sources (dLNR, LNR, and Sy2, respectively) in Coziol et al. (1998) and re-classified as no-emission galaxy, SFG and SFG in Coziol et al. (2004). HCG 40b is a no-emission galaxies and HCG 40c is an SFG (Coziol et al. 2004). HCG 40e is an FIR source (Allam et al. 1996). In the evolutive scenario of Verdes-Montenegro et al. (2001), HCG 40 is a type 3a group, where 89% of the expected HI mass is missing, which converts this group into a very evolved group.

The strongest H$\alpha$ emission of the group is detected in two peaks, in the barred early-type spiral HCG 40d. This emission is very concentrated in the central region, probably associated with star formation at the end of the bar. We could not derive the rotation curve for this object.

We also detected H$\alpha$ emission in the central regions of HCG 40a, and HCG 40b. Both galaxies were classified as early-type galaxies by Hickson (1992), E3 and S0, respectively. Interestingly, no emission was detected in Coziol et al. (2000) for these objects. As for HCG 40d, we could not obtain the rotation curve for these objects.

HCG 40c displays an extended monochromatic map. We detected a peak in the H$\alpha$ emission in the southeast side of HCG 40c, coincident with the peak in the HI distribution shown in Verdes-Montenegro et al. (2001). Its velocity field is regular. The kinematic position angle does not change with radius. The rotation curve is symmetric, reaching a plateau at 6 kpc; however, this curve does not reach the optical radius R25. At radii greater than 10 kpc, there is no more H$\alpha$ emission, can be noted from the monochromatic image. HCG 40e shows a weak H$\alpha$ emission on its disk. Both sides of the rotation curve do not match.

A.3 HCG 47

This quartet is formed by two pairs of galaxies. HCG 47a is an SBb (Hickson 1993) galaxy, showing a ring-shape structure on its southwest side (Fasano et al. 1994). Shimada et al. (2000) classify HCG 47a as an absorption-line galaxy. Hickson classify HCG 47b, HCG 47c and, HCG 47d as E3, Sc and Sd galaxies. HCG 47a, and HCG 47b are radio and FIR sources (Allam et al. 1996).

We detected a strong H$\alpha$ emission in the ring of HCG 47a. On the other hand, HCG 47b shows weak intensity on its monochromatic map. The north side of HCG 47d shows the strongest H$\alpha$ emission in this galaxy. However, we also note an extended emission in its disk. HCG 47c only shows a central knot in its monochromatic image, at the same position as for the continuum peak.

The velocity field shows higher velocities in the eastern part of the approaching side than in the western region, probably due to the presence of the ring. The kinematic position angle differs from the optical one, at 2 h-1 kpc and at R25, in 14$^{\circ}$ in both cases.

HCG 47d shows a regular velocity field. However, there is an offset between the kinematic and optical position angles of 32$^{\circ}$ and 23$^{\circ}$ (Mendes de Oliveira 1992, and HyperLeda, respectively). For HCG 47a and 47d it was impossible to obtain the rotation curves. The procedure developed by Epinat et al. (2008a) does not converge for these galaxies.

A.4 HCG 49

This small and compact quartet of galaxies shows an angular diameter of 0.9 arcmin (Hickson et al. 1982) (36 kpc) and is the most distant group in this sample (140 Mpc). HCG 49a and HCG 49b are late-type spiral galaxies, HCG 49c is an Im and HCG 49d is a E5 (Hickson 1993). In the scenario proposed in Verdes-Montenegro et al. (2001), HCG 49 is a well developed group, in the 3b phase, where the HI gas forms a large cloud containing all galaxies, with a single velocity gradient.

Fasano et al. (1996) note that HCG 49a seems to be a superposition of two galaxies, but our monochromatic map shows that the emission is coming from only one object. We analyzed the H$\alpha$ profile in the region where the superposition appears, and we do not detect a defined profile. The monochromatic map of HCG 49a shows H$\alpha$ emission across the disk of this object. This emission peaks at the same place in the monochromatic and the continuum map. This object shows a regular velocity field. The kinematic position angle differs only in 7$^{\circ}$ from the optical position angle at 2 h-1 kpc. However, the difference is greater if we take the optical position angle at R25 (16$^{\circ}$). The rotation curve is symmetric, and both sides match relatively well.

HCG 49b shows two strong peaks in the monochromatic map. One of them is located at the same position of the continuum maximum. The other bright knot is placed to the east of the galaxy. This knot shows an amplitude of $\sim$40 km s-1. HCG 49b shows a perturbed velocity field. The kinematic position angle changes along the radius and it differs from the optical one at 2 h-1 kpc in 17$^{\circ}$. However, at R25 the optical and kinematic position angles reach a similar value (Table 3). The rotation curve of HCG 49b extended out to 12.5 arcsec ($\sim$8.5 kpc). Both sides do not match. The receding side reaches values of 70 km s-1 and the approaching side reaches values of 75 km s-1.

The monochromatic map of HCG 49c shows a much lower intensity than HCG 49a, and b. We detected a bridge in the H$\alpha$ emission between members b and c. The velocity field seems regular. However, a disagreement of 64$^{\circ}$ is observed between the kinematic, and optical position angles. Both sides of the rotation curve match from the center out to 2.5 kpc. Beyond this radius, no H$\alpha$ emission is detected on the approaching side.

A.5 HCG 54

Hickson et al. (1989) classified this group as formed by three irregular galaxies and one Sdm galaxy. Verdes-Montenegro et al. (2002) found HI tidal tails and shells in the environment of HCG 54. They concluded that this group is a merger remnant.

From our monochromatic map, we note that HCG 54b shows the strongest H$\alpha$ emission and its velocity field shows an amplitude of 30 km s-1. HCG 54b and 54d also appear in the monochromatic map; however, it is difficult to get some information from the velocity field. HCG 54a is detected in the continuum image. Our data supports the scenario that HCG 54 is in fact one single galaxy and not a group. The nature of this object (Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2002) made us decide not to obtain any kinematic parameter of its members.

A.6 HCG 56

This quintet if formed by the late-type spiral HCG 56a, the SB0 HCG 56b, and three SO galaxies (c-e). Coziol et al. (2004) classified members a, d and e as star forming galaxies, HCG 56b as a Seyfert galaxy and HCG 56c as a no-emission line galaxy. Allam et al. (1996) detected members b-d at 25, 60, and 100 $\mu$m. This group only shows 19% of its expected HI mass (Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2001). We present Fabry-Perot data for members a-d of this group. The monochromatic map of HCG 56a shows an extended emission along the disk. Peaks in the H$\alpha$ emission are detected in the southern and northern side of this galaxy. Both peaks are located at the same distance with respect to the peak in the continuum image. The velocity field of HCG 56a seems to be regular. We noted that the approaching side is more extended than the receding side. We do not detect any misalignment between the kinematic and optical position angles for this galaxy. The rotation curve of HCG 56a is symmetric. The approaching and receding sides match from 3 to 18 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ (2 to 10 kpc), where the approaching side reaches a plateau. At radii larger than 18 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$, there is no data for the receding side; however, the approaching side reaches 35 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$.

We detected H$\alpha$ emission at the center of the S0 galaxies HCG 56b, HCG 56c, and HCG 56d. Given that we only detected H$\alpha$ emission at the center of these objects, it was not possible to obtain their rotation curves. No emission was detected in the bridge between members b, and c. Members b-d show a shift of 0.88 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ (one pixel) between their monochromatic and continuum peaks.

A.7 HCG 68

This group is formed by four early-type galaxies (HCG 68a, b, d, and e) and one barred spiral galaxy (HCG 68c) (Hikcson 1993). Shimada et al. (2000) classified members a-c as AGN; however, Coziol et al. (2004) classified HCG 68a as a no-emission galaxy. Verdes-Montenegro et al. (2001) detected only 33% of the expected HI mass for this group. We detected H$\alpha$ emission in the monochromatic map of HCG 68a and b. However, the H$\alpha$ profile is not well defined in either galaxies.

We detected several bright HII regions on the well-defined arms of HCG 68c. In the nuclear region, we detected a peak in H$\alpha$; nevertheless, no emission was detected across the bar of this object, as also reported by Vilchez et al. (1998). The maximum intensity in the monochromatic map of HCG 68c corresponds to an HII region located 60 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ from its center (northwest side of the galaxy). The velocity field of HCG 68c is quite regular. The kinematic and optical (R25) position angles are aligned. The difference between the kinematic and optical position angles at 2 h-1 is caused by the influence of the bar at this radius. The rotation curve of HCG 68c reaches 115 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ (19 kpc). In the first 10 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$, both sides of the rotation curve do not match, and we detected a bump in the approaching side, reaching 250 km s-1. Both sides of the rotation curve match from 15 to 105 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$. At 40 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$, the approaching side shows higher velocities than the receding side, showing some bumps, probably produced by the crossing of spiral arms.

A.8 HCG 79

Mendes de Oliveira et al. (2003) presented the rotation curve of HCG 79d. Inclinations for HCG 79d are 64$^{\circ}$ and 78$^{\circ}$ (depending on whether is taken from the axis ratio given in Hickson 1993, or if it is taken from HyperLeda database). Durbala et al. (2008) showed continuum-subtracted H$\alpha$ images of HCG 79 (for this group, see details in Durbala et al. 2008).

A.9 HCG 93

This quartet is formed by two barred spiral galaxies, HCG 93b, and HCG 93c, one E1 galaxy (HCG 93a), and the SB0 galaxy HCG 93d (Hickson 1993). Members a and c were classified as AGN by Shimada et al. (2000) and Coziol et al. (2004). HCG 93b is classified as an AGN by Shimada et al. (2004) but Coziol et al. (2004) classified it as a star forming galaxy. About 84% of the expected HI mass in HCG 93 is missing (Verdes-Montenegro et al. 2001). We presented Fabry-Perot data only for the barred spiral HCG 93b. Its monochromatic map shows H$\alpha$ emission across the bar and two bright knots at the end of it, produced by star formation resulting from the compression of gas in this place, in agreement with its morphological type (Phillips 1996; Pisano et al. 2000). In the arms, we detected a few HII regions. The velocity field of HCG 93b shows a twist. We detected a disagreement between optical and kinematic position angles of 17$^{\circ}$ and 134$^{\circ}$ (Mendes de Oliveira et al. 2003, and HyperLeda, respectively). Both sides of the rotation curve of HCG 93b do not match. From 20 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ (7 kpc), the approaching side falls, reaching values of $\sim$120 km s-1. The approaching side has an extension of 95 $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ (30 kpc).

Appendix B: Individual maps and rotation curves

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg7.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.1:

Maps for HCG 37. North is at the top and east to the left for all images in Figs. B.1 to B.10. HCG 37a is located to the southeast of HCG 37d. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg8.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.2:

Maps for HCG 40. HCG 40a is located close to the center of the field and to the south west of HCG 40d. HCG 40e, b and c are located to the southeast of HCG 40a. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg9.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.3:

Maps for HCG 47. HCG 47b and 47a are located at the bottom of the field. HCG 47c and 47d are located at the north of the field. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg10.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.4:

Maps for HCG 49. From east to west: HCG 49a, 49b, 49c and 49d. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg11.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.5:

Maps for HCG 54. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg12.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.6:

Maps for HCG 56. From east to west: HCG 56a, 56b, 56c, and 56d. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg13.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.7:

Maps for HCG 68. HCG 68a is located to the south of HCG 68b. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg14.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.8:

Maps for HCG 68c. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg15.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.9:

Maps for HCG 79. HCG 79b and 79c are located in the north of the field, from east to west. HCG 79a is in the center of the field and HCG 79d placed at the south of 79a. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER

\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg16.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.10:

Maps for HCG 93b. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER

\begin{figure}
\par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg17.eps}\hspace*...
...ps}\hspace*{5mm}
\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg22.eps} }\end{figure} Figure B.11:

Rotation curves in this sample. The PA was determinated automatically from the model. The center and inclination were fixed (mophological center and photometic inclination, respectively). The black vertical arrow in the x-axis represents the radius R25 while the smaller grey arrow in the x-axis represents the transition radius that is defined by the first ring that contains more than 25 uncorrelated bins in the velocity field (see Epinat et al. 2008a).

Open with DEXTER

\begin{figure}
\par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg23.eps}\hspace*...
...ps}\hspace*{5mm}
\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg28.eps} }\end{figure} Figure B.12:

See caption of Fig. B.11.

Open with DEXTER

\begin{figure}
\par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg29.eps}\hspace*...
...ps}\hspace*{5mm}
\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg32.eps} }\end{figure} Figure B.13:

See caption of Fig. B.11.

Open with DEXTER

Appendix C: Rotation curve tables (long tables are placed at the end of this Appendix)

Table C.1:   HCG 2b rotation curve.

Table C.2:   HCG 7d rotation curve.

Table C.3:   HCG 22c rotation curve.

Table C.4:   HCG 37d rotation curve.

Table C.5:   HCG 40c rotation curve.

Table C.6:   HCG 40e rotation curve.

Table C.7:   HCG 49a rotation curve.

Table C.8:   HCG 49b rotation curve.

Table C.9:   HCG 49c rotation curve.

Table C.10:   HCG 56a rotation curve.

Table C.11:   HCG 79d rotation curve.

Table C.12:   HCG 93b rotation curve.

Table C.13:   NGC 92 rotation curve.

Table C.14:   HCG 2a rotation curve.

Table C.15:   HCG 2c rotation curve.

Table C.16:   HCG 7a rotation curve.

Table C.17:   HCG 68c rotation curve.

Footnotes

... relation[*]
Based on observations collected at the European Southern Obervatory, La Silla, Chile.
...[*]
Appendices are only available in electronic form at http://www.aanda.org
... galaxies[*]
http://fabryperot.oamp.fr
...2003)[*]
http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr

All Tables

Table 1:   Journal of observations.

Table 2:   Instrumental setup.

Table 3:   Kinematic properties of the sample

Table 4:   Rotational velocities of the sample.

Table 5:   Interaction indicators.

Table C.1:   HCG 2b rotation curve.

Table C.2:   HCG 7d rotation curve.

Table C.3:   HCG 22c rotation curve.

Table C.4:   HCG 37d rotation curve.

Table C.5:   HCG 40c rotation curve.

Table C.6:   HCG 40e rotation curve.

Table C.7:   HCG 49a rotation curve.

Table C.8:   HCG 49b rotation curve.

Table C.9:   HCG 49c rotation curve.

Table C.10:   HCG 56a rotation curve.

Table C.11:   HCG 79d rotation curve.

Table C.12:   HCG 93b rotation curve.

Table C.13:   NGC 92 rotation curve.

Table C.14:   HCG 2a rotation curve.

Table C.15:   HCG 2c rotation curve.

Table C.16:   HCG 7a rotation curve.

Table C.17:   HCG 68c rotation curve.

All Figures

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{13912fg1.eps}\par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{13912fg2.eps}
\end{figure} Figure 1:

Top panel: kinematic versus morphological inclination for the 43 HCG galaxies with measured inclinations. Open circles correspond to the barred and filled ones to the unbarred galaxies respectively. Bottom panel: histogram of the differences between the kinematically and morphologically-derived inclinations. Unbarred galaxies are represented by a dotted line (open histogram). Dashed lines represent barred galaxies (filled histogram).

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{13912fg3.eps}\par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{13912fg4.eps}
\end{figure} Figure 2:

Top panel: kinematic versus morphological position angle for the 46 HCG galaxies with measured position angles. Open circles correspond to the barred and the filled ones to the unbarred galaxies respectively. Bottom panel: histogram of the differences between the kinematically and morphologically-derived position angles. Unbarred galaxies are represented by a dotted line (open histogram). Dashed lines represent barred galaxies (filled histogram).

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{13912fg5.eps}
\end{figure} Figure 3:

Histogram of the differences between kinematically- and morphologically-derived centers for 48 HCG galaxies with measured centers. Unbarred galaxies are represented by a dotted line (open histogram). Dashed lines represent barred galaxies (filled histogram).

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg6.eps}
\end{figure} Figure 4:

B-band Tully-Fisher relation for galaxies in compact groups (Mendes de Oliveira et al. 2003, and this work, filled circles) and a field galaxy sample (Epinat et al. 2008b, small squares). For each rotation curve, we derived the PA automatically, from the velocity field, using IDL routines. We fixed the center using the morphological center and we fixed the inclination using the morphological inclination.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg7.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.1:

Maps for HCG 37. North is at the top and east to the left for all images in Figs. B.1 to B.10. HCG 37a is located to the southeast of HCG 37d. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg8.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.2:

Maps for HCG 40. HCG 40a is located close to the center of the field and to the south west of HCG 40d. HCG 40e, b and c are located to the southeast of HCG 40a. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg9.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.3:

Maps for HCG 47. HCG 47b and 47a are located at the bottom of the field. HCG 47c and 47d are located at the north of the field. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg10.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.4:

Maps for HCG 49. From east to west: HCG 49a, 49b, 49c and 49d. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg11.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.5:

Maps for HCG 54. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg12.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.6:

Maps for HCG 56. From east to west: HCG 56a, 56b, 56c, and 56d. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg13.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.7:

Maps for HCG 68. HCG 68a is located to the south of HCG 68b. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg14.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.8:

Maps for HCG 68c. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg15.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.9:

Maps for HCG 79. HCG 79b and 79c are located in the north of the field, from east to west. HCG 79a is in the center of the field and HCG 79d placed at the south of 79a. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=17cm,clip]{13912fg16.eps}
\end{figure} Figure B.10:

Maps for HCG 93b. Top left: B band image from DSS. Top right: velocity field. Bottom left: monochromatic image. Bottom right: velocity dispersion map.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg17.eps}\hspace*...
...ps}\hspace*{5mm}
\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg22.eps} }\end{figure} Figure B.11:

Rotation curves in this sample. The PA was determinated automatically from the model. The center and inclination were fixed (mophological center and photometic inclination, respectively). The black vertical arrow in the x-axis represents the radius R25 while the smaller grey arrow in the x-axis represents the transition radius that is defined by the first ring that contains more than 25 uncorrelated bins in the velocity field (see Epinat et al. 2008a).

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg23.eps}\hspace*...
...ps}\hspace*{5mm}
\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg28.eps} }\end{figure} Figure B.12:

See caption of Fig. B.11.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure}
\par\mbox{\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg29.eps}\hspace*...
...ps}\hspace*{5mm}
\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{13912fg32.eps} }\end{figure} Figure B.13:

See caption of Fig. B.11.

Open with DEXTER
In the text


Copyright ESO 2010

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.