Free Access

   

Table 1:

Submillimetre clumps identified by the clumpfind algorithm in the IRDC G304.74.
  Peak position $S_{870}^{\rm peak}$a S870a $\theta_{\rm s}$ $R_{\rm eff}$b 1.2 mm clump No.c
Name $\alpha_{2000.0}$[h:m:s] $\delta_{2000.0}$[ $\hbox{$^\circ$ }$: $\hbox{$^\prime$ }$: $\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$] [Jy beam-1] [Jy] [ $^{\prime\prime}$] [ $^{\prime\prime}$] (Beltrán et al. 2006)
SMM 1 13 06 20.5 -61 30 15 0.46 2.0 36 36  
SMM 2 13 06 26.9 -61 29 39 0.30 1.0 38 28  
SMM 3 13 06 35.8 -61 28 53 0.50 3.4 45 42 1
SMM 4 13 06 44.7 -61 28 35 0.66 4.1 38 38 3
IRAS 13037-6112 13 06 49.8 -61 28 07 0.47 1.6 24 26 2
SMM 5 13 06 49.9 -61 26 55 0.19 0.7 28 26  
SMM 6 13 06 51.1 -61 27 49 0.46 1.8 27 30 4
SMM 7 13 07 02.6 -61 26 18 0.26 0.9 24 30 8
IRAS 13039-6108 13 07 06.4 -61 24 29 0.47 2.6 37 40 5
SMM 8 13 07 08.9 -61 23 25 0.31 1.1 26 29  
SMM 9 13 07 12.7 -61 22 49 0.38 1.6 35 32 6
IRAS 13042-6105 13 07 20.3 -61 21 45 0.21 0.8 28 27 7

Notes. (a) The peak and total flux densities have estimated uncertainties of $\sim $$20{-}50\%$, depending on the intensity of negative holes around the clump (see Sect. 2.1).
(b) The effective radius, $R_{\rm eff}=\sqrt{A/\pi}$, where A is the area assigned to the clump, i.e., area contained within a $2\sigma $ contour. The radius has not been deconvolved from the beam size.
(c) Corresponding 1.2 mm clump in Beltrán et al. (2006).


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.