Issue |
A&A
Volume 518, July-August 2010
Herschel: the first science highlights
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A52 | |
Number of page(s) | 16 | |
Section | Interstellar and circumstellar matter | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014317 | |
Published online | 02 September 2010 |
Chemical study of intermediate-mass (IM) Class 0 protostars
CO depletion and N2H+ deuteration
T. Alonso-Albi1 - A. Fuente1 - N. Crimier2 - P. Caselli3 - C. Ceccarelli2 - D. Johnstone4,5 - P. Planesas1,6 - J. R. Rizzo7 - F. Wyrowski8 - M. Tafalla1 - B. Lefloch2 - S. Maret2 - C. Dominik9
1 - Observatorio Astronómico Nacional (OAN, IGN), Apdo 112, 28803
Alcalá de Henares, Spain
2 - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique, Observatoire de Grenoble, BP 53, 38041
Grenoble Cedex 9, France
3 - School of Physics & Astronomy, E.C. Stoner Building, The
University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
4 - Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Victoria,
Victoria, BC, V8P 1A1, Canada
5 - National Research Council of Canada, Herzberg Institute of
Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC, V9E 2E7, Canada
6 - Joint ALMA Observatory, El Golf 40, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
7 - Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC/INTA), Laboratory of Molecular
Astrophysics, Ctra. Ajalvir km. 4, 28850, Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain
8 - Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121
Bonn, Germany
9 - Anton Pannekoek Astronomical Institute, University of Amsterdam, PO
Box 94249, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The
Netherlands
Received 24 February 2010 / Accepted 16 April 2010
Abstract
Aims. We are carrying out a physical and chemical
study of the protostellar envelopes in a representative sample of IM
Class 0 protostars. In our first paper we determined the
physical structure (density-temperature radial profiles) of the
protostellar envelopes. Here, we study the CO depletion and N2H+
deuteration.
Methods. We observed the millimeter lines of C18O,
C17O, N2H+
and N2D+ towards the
protostars using the IRAM 30m telescope. Based on these observations,
we derived the C18O, N2H+
and N2D+ radial abundance
profiles across their envelopes using a radiative transfer code. In
addition, we modeled the chemistry of the protostellar envelopes.
Results. All the C18O 1
0 maps are
well fit when assuming that the C18O abundance
decreases inwards within the protostellar envelope until the gas and
dust reach the CO evaporation temperature,
20-25 K,
where the CO is released back to the gas phase. The N2H+
deuterium fractionation in Class 0 IMs is [N2D+]/[N2H+]=0.005-0.014,
two orders of magnitude higher than the elemental [D/H] value in the
interstellar medium, but a factor of 10 lower than in prestellar
clumps. Chemical models account for the C18O and
N2H+ observations if we
assume the CO abundance is a factor of
2 lower than the canonical value in the inner
envelope. This could be the consequence of the CO being
converted into CH3OH on the grain surfaces prior
to the evaporation and/or the photodissociation of CO by the
stellar UV radiation. The deuterium fractionation is not
fitted by chemical models. This discrepancy is very likely caused by
the simplicity of our model that assumes spherical geometry and
neglects important phenomena like the effect of bipolar outflows and
UV radiation from the star. More important, the deuterium
fractionation is dependent on the ortho-to-para H2
ratio, which is not likely to reach the steady-state value in the
dynamical time scales of these protostars.
Key words: ISM: abundances - ISM: clouds - stars: formation - circumstellar matter
1 Introduction
Intermediate-mass young stellar objects (IMs) share many
characteristics
with high-mass stars (clustering, PDRs) but their study presents an
important advantage: many are located closer to the Sun ( kpc)
and in less complex regions than massive star-forming regions. On the
other hand, they are also important for understanding planet formation
since Herbig Ae stars are the precursors of Vega-type systems. Despite
this, IMs have been studied very little so far. A few works on HAEBE
stars have been carried out
at millimeter wavelengths (Fuente et al. 1998, 2002; Henning
et al. 1998),
but almost nothing has been done for their precursors, the
Class 0 IM objects.
Chemistry has been successfully used to determine the physical
structure and investigate the formation and evolution of low-mass YSOs.
Chemical diagnostics have also been shown to be good indicators of
the protostellar evolution in these objects
(see e.g. Maret et al. 2004;
Jørgensen et al. 2005).
However, very few works deal with IMs.
Fuente et al. (2005a)
present a chemical study of the
envelopes of the Class 0 IM protostar
NGC 7129-FIRS 2 and the young
Herbig Be star LkH 234.
They find that the changes in the physical conditions of the envelope
during its evolution from the Class 0 to the Class I
stage (the envelope is dispersed and warmed up) strongly influence the
molecular chemistry.
The Class 0 object NGC 7129-FIRS 2 presented
evidence of H13CO+
depletion. Moreover, the deuterium fractionation, measured as the DCO+/H13CO+ratio,
decreases by a factor of 4 from the Class 0 to the
Herbig Be star, very likely
owing to the increase in the kinetic temperature. Regarding the
abundance of complex molecules, the beam-averaged abundances of CH3OH
and H2CO increase
from the Class 0 to the Herbig Be star. A hot core
was also detected
in NGC 7129-FIRS 2 (Fuente et al. 2005a,b).
Although two objects are not enough to establish
firm conclusions, these pioneering results suggest that chemistry is
also a good indicator of the evolution of IMs.
We are carrying out a chemical study of a representative
sample of IM Class 0 YSOs This is the first systematic
chemical study of IM Class 0 objects that has been carried out
so far. Some properties like the temperature of the protostellar
envelope
and the clustering degree depend on the final stellar mass, so the
results for
low-mass stars cannot be directly extrapolated to intermediate-mass
objects.
In the first paper (Crimier et al. 2010, hereafter
C10), we determined the physical structure (density-temperature radial
profiles) by modeling the
dust continuum emission.
We now present the observations of the millimeter lines of C18O,
C17O, N2H+,
and N2D+ in the same
sample. Our goal is to investigate the CO depletion and N2H+
deuteration in these Class 0 YSOs. For comparison, we also
include
2 Class I objects, LkH 234,
and S140.
Table 1: Selected sample.
2 Observational strategy
Our selection was made to have a representative sample of
Class 0 IM YSOs, including targets with different luminosities
(40-10
)
and evolutionary stages. An important complication
in the study of massive stars is that they are located in complex
regions
and are therefore difficult to model. The targets in this sample were
chosen to lie preferentially in isolated areas with respect to the
30 m telescope beam. We also selected sources for which
continuum maps at
submillimeter and/or millimeter wavelengths are available in order
to be able to model their envelopes.
The list of sources and their coordinates are shown in Table 1.
To provide a comparison with Class I sources, we added S140
and LkH
234
to the sample.
Most of the observations reported here were carried out with
the IRAM 30 m telescope at Pico de Veleta (Spain)
during three different observing periods in June 2004 in position
switching mode. Our strategy was to first make long integration
single-pointing observations towards the star position and
then to make 96
maps around the center position. The maps were sampled with a spacing
of 12'' in the inner 48'' regions
and 24'' outside. The only exceptions were L1641 S3 MMS1 and S140.
In L1641 S3 MMS1, we only observed a radial strip in
C17O and C18O.
We did not observe C17O and C18O maps
in
S140. A summary of the observations for each source is shown in
Table 1,
and the list of observed lines and the telescope characteristics is
shown in Table 2.
During the observations, lines of the same species
were observed simultaneously using the multireceiver capability of the
30 m telescope.
In this way, we minimized relative pointing and calibration errors. As
backends we used in parallel an autocorrelator split into several parts
providing a spectral resolution that was always
better than
78 kHz
and a 1 MHz-channel-filter-bank.
Examples of the single-pointing observations are shown in
Figs. 1
and 2.
The intensity scale is the main brightness temperature.
Observations of the N2H+
line
(
GHz)
were carried out towards Cep E-mm, IC 1396 N,
NGC 7129-FIRS 2, and L1641 S3 MMS1 using the JCMT
telescope at the Mauna Kea (Hawaii). In all these sources, we carried
out small maps
of 75
with a spacing of 25'', but the emission was only detected towards the
star position (see Fig. 3).
All the lines were observed with a spectral resolution of
0.488 MHz. The spectra of the
line are
shown in Fig. 3.
In this paper, we also use the C18O, N2H+
and N2D+ data
towards NGC 7129-FIRS 2 and LkH 234, which has
already been published by Fuente et al. (2005b).
Table 2: Description of the observations.
![]() |
Figure 1: Examples of the single-pointing observations towards the Serpens-FIRS 1, Cep E-mm, L1641 S3 MMS1, and IC 1396 N. All the spectra were observed with the 30 m telescope. The intensity scale is the main brightness temperature. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: The same as Fig. 1 for CB3, OMC2 FIR 4, NGC 7129-FIRS 2, and S140. |
Open with DEXTER |
3 Results
The spectra of the C18O 1
0, C17O 1
0,
N2H+ 1
0 and N2D+ 2
1 lines
towards the star
position are shown in Figs. 1
and 2.
The integrated intensity maps of the C18O 1
0, N2H+ 1
0,
and N2D+ 2
1 lines are shown in
Figs. 4
(Class 0) and 5
(Class I).
In all the Class 0 sources, the
emission of the N2H+ 1
0 line is
compact and peaks towards the star position, revealing a dense core
around the star. However, towards the Class I sources, the
peaks of the N2H+
emission are offset from the far-IR source.
For
the Herbig Be star LkH
234, the emission peak of
the N2H+ 1
0 line is located
at an offset (-6'',18'') from the star position (see Fuente
et al. 2005a
and Fig. 5).
In S140, the N2H+
emission peaks in an arc-shaped feature surrounding the sources IRS 1,
2 and 3. In Class I sources, either the N2H+
is destroyed by the evaporated CO or the outflow, or the
UV radiation from the star has
already disrupted the parent core.
The emission in the C18O 1
0 line usually presents a
different morphology
from that of N2H+ 1
0 line. In
CB3 and IC 1396N, the emission in the C18O
line has an elongated shape, much more extended than that of N2H+
(see Fig. 4).
In OMC2 FIR 4 and NGC 7129-FIRS 2, the
emission of the
C18O line surrounds the star position
instead
of having a maximum towards it (see also
Fuente et al. 2005a).
Only in the low-luminosity sources Serpens-FIRS 1 and Cep E-mm
does the
emission from the C17O and C18O lines
peak at
the star position and present a morphology similar to that of
the N2H+ emission.
For the sources in which the signal-to-noise ratio of the N2D+
map
is high enough, Serpens-FIRS 1 and NGC 7129
FIRS 2, we compared
the N2D+ 2
1 and N2H+ 1
0 maps. In
Serpens-FIRS 1, the N2D+ 2
1 emission
does not peak towards the star, but does in
the case of NGC 7129-FIRS 2.
In Fig. 6,
we show the mean integrated intensity emission of the C18O 1
0, N2H+ 1
0,
and N2D+ 2
1 lines in concentric rings
around the protostar.
In all the sources, the emission of the N2H+ 1
0 line
decreases outwards from the
star. The radial profiles of the C18O 1
0 line, however, greatly
differ from one source to the next.
The presumably youngest sources, OMC2 FIR 4 and
NGC 7129-FIRS 2, show a flat profile. This is the
expected picture when the CO abundance decreases towards the
center, mainly because the molecules are frozen onto the grain
surfaces.
In Serpens-FIRS 1, Cep E-mm, IC 1396 N, and CB3, the C18O 1
0 emission
decrease with the distance from the star, similar to N2H+
but with a less steep profile.
Intense emission of the C18O 1
0 line is detected at the
edges of the protostar envelopes, which shows that a lower density
envelope also contributes to the emission of this
line. This envelope contribution is especially important for
Serpens-FIRS 1. In fact, we must model the envelope
contribution in order to fit the C18O 1
0 emission from this
protostellar core (see Appendix A1).
One could interpret the different radial profiles of the C18O 1
0 emission
as an evolutionary
trend, with the youngest protostars having flat profiles while the
oldest have steep profiles.
Given the complexity of these regions, however, one should be cautious
and use multiple evolutionary tracers to define relative age.
For instance, a lack of C18O emission
towards the star position could come from CO depletion in the
case of a
very young object or to photodissociation for a borderline
Class 0/I.
The radial profiles of the N2D+ 2
1 (3
2 for
NGC 7129-FIRS 2) are
more uncertain because of the low S/N ratio of the maps.
![]() |
Figure 3:
Spectra of the N2H+ 4
|
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Continuum maps at 850 |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Integrated intensity maps of the C18O 1
|
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Radially integrated intensity profiles of the C18O 1
|
Open with DEXTER |
4 LTE column densities
We have derived the C18O column densities using the rotation diagram method. This method gives an accurate estimate of the column density provided that the emission is optically thin, is thermalized, and arises from a homogeneous and isothermal slab. In the case of a density and temperature distribution, the derived column density represents an average value over the observational beam.
The excitation of C18O and C17O are
very similar, and we have better signal-to-noise spectra for
the more intense C18O lines. For this
reason, we derived the C17O column
density by assuming
optically thin emission and the rotation temperature derived from the C18O data.
The molecule N2H +
presents hyperfine splitting. This allows
us to estimate the line opacity directly from the hyperfine line
ratios. We derived the total N2H+
column density from the opacity of the N2H+ 1
0 line, and
assumed the rotation temperatures derived from N2D+data
when there was no N2H+ 4
3
observations. The same rotation temperature was always used for both N2H+
and N2D+.
We assumed a beam filling factor of 1 for all the lines regardless of
the observational beam size. This approach overestimates the rotation
temperature when the emission is centrally peaked.
In Table 3
we present the derived C18O, C17O,
N2H+, and N2D+
column densities. We also show
the N(C18O)/N(C17O)
(hereafter R1) and the N(N2D+)/N(N2H+)
(hereafter R2) ratios.
For the whole sample, we obtain a value for R1
around 3.3+/-0.3, the expected value for optically thin emission. In
the worst case, R1=2.5, the
correction to the C18O column density
because of the opacity is only a factor
1.3. Thus, opacity effects are not important in
our C18O column density estimates.
Table 3: LTE column densities.
4.1 N2D+ and N2H+
The deuterium fractionation of N2H+
(R2)
strongly depends on the CO depletion factor and the gas
temperature (Caselli et al. 2002;
Ceccarelli & Dominik 2005; Daniel
et al. 2007).
In our sample of IM Class 0 protostars, we derive values of R2
ranging from 0.005 to 0.014. These values are 3 orders of magnitude
higher than 10-5, the elemental value in the
interstellar medium (Oliveira et al. 2003).
Nevertheless, the R2 values
are
a factor of 10 lower than those found in prestellar clumps by Crapsi
et al. (2005).
According to the values of R2,
we can classify our sources into two groups:
(i) highly deuterated sources that have values of R2
>0.01 and (ii) moderately deuterated sources with R2
<0.01. Cep E-mm, CB3, and
NGC 7129-FIRS 2 belong to the first group. Assuming
that the N(N2D+)/N(N2H+)
ratio is a good gas temperature indicator,
these protostars should be the coldest and very likely the youngest of
our
sample. We have to be cautious with CB3, however. Since this source is
the most distant (d=2500 pc), our
single-pointing observations
trace a larger fraction of the envelope. The sources
Serpens-FIRS 1,
IC 1396 N, OMC2-FIR 4, and S140 belong to
the second group. S140 is a Class I
YSO and IC 1396 N is considered a borderline
Class 0/I YSO. The results are thus consistent with our
interpretation of the objects in this group as being more evolved.
In Serpens-FIRS 1, however, the N2D+ 1
0 emission
comes mainly from the
lower density envelope and the ratio cannot be considered a tracer of
the evolutionary stage
of the protostar. OMC2 FIR 4 is also difficult to classify.
The deuterium fractionation suggests an
evolved object but the morphology of the C18O map
is more consistent with a
young Class 0 star. The peculiarity of this protostellar
envelope has
already been pointed out by Crimier et al. (2009). They
find that the envelope of OMC2 FIR 4 is peculiarly flat
and warm with a radial density power-law index of 0.6.
We present the N2H+ deuterium fractionation as a function of the N(C18O)/N(N2H+) ratio in Fig. 7. An excellent correlation between these two quantities is found in prestellar cores with the deuterium fractionation decreasing with increasing N(C18O)/N(N2H+) ratio (see Crapsi et al. 2005). This correlation is not valid for IM Class 0 protostars. As discussed in the following sections, this is due to the complexity of these intermediate mass star-forming regions. In prestellar cores the chemistry of these species is only driven by the CO depletion. In IMs, other phenomena like photodissociation and shocks are also playing important roles.
Table 4: Temperature-density (T-n) profiles from Crimier et al. (2010).
Table 5: Abundance profiles derived from the observations.
5 Radiative transfer model
We utilized a general ray-tracing radiative transfer code to derive the fractional
abundance profiles of C18O, N2H+
and N2D+ across the
envelopes. Assuming appropriate radial profiles for the temperature,
density, molecular abundance, and turbulence velocity, this model
calculated the brightness temperature distribution on the sky.
The model map was then convolved with the telescope beam profile.
The underlying source geometry was assumed to be a sphere, with the
inner and outer radii, and temperature-density (T-n)
profiles derived by C10. The size of the grid was set to
cells.
The cells have different sizes along the line of sight to account for
the different slopes in the density and temperature profiles. We used
very small cells (
100 AU)
near the center, where the temperature and density gradients are
highest. In the outer regions, the cells reach several thousand AU in
size. The turbulent velocity was assumed to be fixed at
1.5 km s-1, consistent with
the linewidths of the observed lines. Finally,
in each cell, the excitation temperature was calculated with the RADEX
code (van der Tak et al. 2007), which uses
the slab LVG approximation at each shell. We used the collisional rates
provided by the LAMDA database
(Schöier et al. 2005).
For N2D+, we used the
same collisional rates as for N2H+.
With these assumptions, we searched for the best fit on every
source and molecule observed. The fitting process consisted of
averaging the observed and modeled fluxes in concentric rings around
the center position using GILDAS software. The center position was
selected to be the continuum emission peak
at 850 m.
The radius of the first ring was set to HPBW/4, and
incremented by the same amount in consecutive rings. As a first step we
searched for the best fit using a constant abundance. Since this
approach seldom produced good fits, we next searched for the best fit
using radial power functions and step functions. These functions were
not selected arbitrarily but were selected to mimic the predictions of
chemical models. The step function accounts for the abrupt sublimation
of the CO ices thanks to the increase in the dust temperature
going inwards, whereas the power-law profile accounts for a smoother
change in the abundance of the species. The angular resolution of our
observations (
16''-27''
depending on the frequency, i.e,
16 000-27 000 AU at a
distance of 1000 pc) prevents us from tracing the inner region
(
a few
1000 AU) of the protostellar envelope.
For this reason, we assume a constant abundance in the inner part.
We fit the integrated intensity maps of the C18O 1
0, N2H+ 1
0, N2H+ 4
3, and N2D+ 2
1 lines,
when possible. The maps of the C18O 2
1 and C17O 1
0
and 2
1 lines are of less quality so
we did not use them in our fits.
Some sources show deviations from the spherical symmetry because of the
contribution of the surrounding molecular cloud
(Serpens-FIRS 1, CB3) or because of the cavity excavated by
the outflow (IC 1396 N). In these cases we masked
part of the map to avoid this contamination in the rings. A short
description of earch source and the individual details about the
modeling are given in Appendix A. The areas masked are shown in
Fig. 4,
and the abundance profiles obtained from the model are listed in
Table 5.
We did not model the Class I sources S140 and LkH
234.
The modeling of OMC2 FIR 4 will be the subject of a
forthcoming paper.
6 Limitations of our model: CO evaporation temperature
The model used here is not a reliable predictor of the chemical and physical properties within the inner envelope for several reasons. First of all we only considered the low-J rotational molecular lines. The emission of these transitions arises mainly from the outer envelope. This fact, together with the limited spatial resolution of our single dish observations, prevent us from determining the variation in the abundance in the inner envelope. Additionally, in our modeling we use the n-T profiles derived by C10. These profiles are a reasonable approximation for the outer envelope but are relatively unconstrained in the inner region. Some parameters, like the inner radius of the envelope and the dust temperature at this radius, are thus poorly determined.
Another important source of uncertainty is the degeneracy of the solutions. For instance, in the case of C18O we can obtain similar results by varying the molecular abundance in the inner region (X0) or the CO evaporation radius (R0), as long as the line is optically thin and the number of molecules in the beam remains constant. Here we discuss the impact of this degeneracy in the derived CO evaporation radius.
We ran a grid of models for Cep E-mm,
IC 1396 N, and
CB3. These are the sources in which the ratio between the angular
diameter of the envelope and the HPBW of the
telescope is greatest, so we are more sensitive to the spatial
variations of the chemical abundances. In all these models, we assume
that the C18O abundance profile is X=X0
for radii less than the evaporation radius, R0,
and )
for radii larger than R0.
For each value
of X0, we fit R0
and
.
X0 is the un-depleted C18O abundance,
R0 the evaporation radius,
and
measures the
gradient in the C18O abundance due to
depletion. The canonical abundance of C18O in
principle depends on the Galactocentric distance (DGC). Following
Wilson & Matteucci (1992),
the CO abundance is given by
![]() |
(1) |
Following Wilson & Rood (1994), the oxygen isotope ratio 16O/18O depends on DGC according to the relationship 16O/18O = 58.8

















![]() |
Figure 7:
Deuterium fractionation of N2H+(R2)
vs. the N(C18O)/N(N2H+)
ratio in the studied YSOs. Inverted empty triangles are upper limits
for L1641 S3 MMS1, IC 1396 N, and
S140, where we did not detect the N2D+ 2
|
Open with DEXTER |
In Fig. 9
we show the results for IC 1396 N. The best fit is ,
R0=2000 AU, and
with rms = 0.36 K km s-1.
We consider that the models with values of
rms < 0.5 are acceptable. Following this
criterion,
we only find solutions for
and R0
<3000 AU; i.e., the CO evaporation
temperature should be >23 K. Again, the fit can be
significantly improved
if values of X0 lower than
are considered. This is similar to
the case of Cep E. Finally, in Fig. 10, we show the same
grid of models for CB3.
The best fit is for
,
R0=4000 AU, and
with rms = 2.0 K km s-1,
which corresponds to a CO evaporation temperature of
30 K.
However, this is not a good fit. In fact, we obtain a much better
solution when assuming
a step function and
K
(see Table 5).
For Serpens-FIRS 1 and NGC 7129 FIRS2, the protostars are barely resolved by our single-dish observations. In addition, the contribution of the surrounding cloud is very significant. For these reasons, we did not carry out a study similar to what is described above. We looked only for abundance profiles that fit our observations and are consistent with the behavior predicted by chemical models (see Table 5). In these two cases, we can fit the observations when assuming that the CO is evaporated at temperatures around 20-25 K. We conclude, therefore, that our C18O observations towards the Class 0 stars are better fit assuming CO evaporation temperatures of 20-25 K that are consistent with the CO being bound in a CO-CO matrix.
The fits to the N2H+ and N2D+ emission profiles have been done by hand. For N2H+ we tried two options:(i) constant N2H+ abundance and (ii) an abundance profile with a radial variation similar to that of C18O. Option (ii) follows the expectation that the N2H+ abundance is strongly dependent on the CO abundance. In the case of CB3 and NGC 7129 FIRS 2, we are able to fit the N2H+ observations by assuming a constant abundance. For the rest of sources, the N2H+ observations are better fit by assuming that the N2H+ is depleted in the cold regions similarly to CO.
One expects an annular distribution for the N2D+
abundance, with the maximum N2D+
abundance in the region with the greatest CO depletion.
The morphology observed in the integrated intensity map of the N2D+ 2
1 line
towards Serpens-FIRS 1 suggests that the
N2D+ emission is
dominated by the foreground molecular cloud. For this reason we
selected a one-step function with a constant
abundance inside and outside the protostellar core. In the case of
NGC 7129-FIRS 2, we detected a clump of N2D+ 3
2 emission
towards the star. However, interferometric observations show that on
scales of a few 1000 AU, there is a lack of emission towards
the star (Fuente et al. 2005a). We thus
fit the N2D+ emission
assuming an annular abundance distribution.
![]() |
Figure 8:
Plots of the rms, defined as |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: The same as Fig. 8 for IC 1396 N. The solution with the lowest rms, 0.36, is indicated by a cross. We consider acceptable solutions those with rms less than 0.5. Contour levels are 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 K km s-1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10: The same as Fig. 8 for CB 3. The solution with the lowest rms, 2.5, is indicated by a cross. Contour levels are 2.5, 4, 6, and 10 K km s-1. |
Open with DEXTER |
7 Chemical model
The chemical composition was modeled with the simple chemical code
originally described in Caselli et al. (2002),
and updated following Caselli et al. (2008) with new
measurements of the CO and N2 binding
energies (Collings et al. 2003;
Öberg et al. 2005)
and sticking coefficients (Bisschop et al.
2006),
thermal desorption, and the detailed physical structure.
The clouds are assumed to be spherically symmetric, with the density
and temperature profiles derived from the dust continuum emission. An
interpolation procedure has been included in
the code in order to have smooth profiles. The chemical network
contains the neutral species CO and N2,
which can freeze out
onto dust grains and desorb owing to cosmic ray impulsive heating (as
in Hasegawa & Herbst 1993)
and by thermal evaporation (following Hasegawa et al. 1992). The
initial abundances
of CO and N2 have been fixed to
(Frerking et al.
1982) and
,
respectively. The abundances of molecular and atomic nitrogen are
difficult to determine in dense cores, but recent works suggest low
values in low-mass, star-forming regions: X(N) = n(N)/n(H
(Hily-Blant
et al. 2010),
and X(N
(Maret et al. 2006).
Our adopted value is consistent with 25% of the total abundance
of N (n(N)/n(H
,
see Anders & Grevesse 1989)
locked in N2 and with the pseudo-time dependent
models of Lee et al. (1996),
after the chemistry reaches steady state.
Although atomic oxygen can affect the amount of deuterium fractionation
(see discussion in Caselli et al. 2002), no
atomic oxygen is included in the code because of the large
uncertainties associated with its value (see e.g. Caux et al. 1999 and
Melnick & Bergin 2005).
This issue is discussed further at the end of this section.
The abundances of the molecular ions (HCO+,
N2H+, H3+,
and all their deuterated forms) were calculated in terms of the
instantaneous abundances of neutral species, assuming that the
timescale for ion chemistry is much shorter than for freeze-out
(Caselli et al. 2002).
The rate coefficients are adopted from the UMIST database
(http://www.udfa.net). For the proton-deuteron exchange reactions (such
as H3+ + HD
H2D+ + H2),
we used the rates measured by Gerlich et al. (2002), which
better fit the deuterium fractionation in low-mass Class 0
sources, as recently found by Emprechtinger et al. (2009).
Hugo et al. (2009)
have recently measured the proton-deuteron rate coefficients again,
finding average values of total rates (for H3+
and its deuterated isotopologues, the total rate refers to the average
of multiple rates weighted according to the fraction of ortho and para
forms; Sipilä et al. 2010)
about 4-5 times more than those derived by Gerlich
et al. (2002;
see also Sipilä et al. 2010).
Although this difference could affect our results by increasing the
deuterium fractionation by a similar factor (thus worsening the
comparison with observations), we decided not to include the new values
because the nuclear spin variants of all H3+
isotopologues and H2 have not been distinguished
in the current model. In fact, as Pagani et al. (1992) and Flower
et al. (2004)
showed, small temperature variations significantly alter the
ortho-to-para ratio of H2, which in turn
strongly affects the D-fractionation (ortho-H2
being more efficient than para-H2 in driving
back the proton-deuteron exchange reactions thus decreasing the
D-fractionation), even in the temperature regime between 9 and
20 K, where CO is mostly frozen onto dust grains (see
also the discussion about the drop in ortho-H2D+
column density at temperatures above 10 K in Caselli
et al. 2008).
Such temperature variations are definitely present in the envelopes of
intermediate-mass Class 0 protostars (see also Emprechtinger
et al. 2009),
so that a simple increase in the rate coefficients without accounting
for nuclear spin variants and, in particular, the possible increase in
the H2 ortho-to-para ratio may overestimate the
D-fractionation calculated by our models. A more detailed chemical
network is currently under development.
The electron fraction has been computed using a simplified version of
the reaction scheme of Umebayashi & Nakano
(1990),
where a generic molecular ion mH+ is formed via
proton transfer with H3+,
and it is destroyed by dissociative recombination with electrons and
recombination on grain surfaces (using rates from Draine &
Sutin 1987).
Dust grains follow a Mathis et al. (1977; MRN) size
distribution, but the minimum size has been increased to
cm
to simulate possible dust coagulation, as in the best-fit model of the
prestellar core L1544 shown by Vastel et al. 2006 (see also
Flower et al.
2005 and
Bergin et al. 2006).
The initial abundance of metals (assumed to freeze out with a rate
similar to that of CO) is 10-6 (see McKee 1989).
Table 6: Model results.
The cosmic ray ionization rate is fixed at s-1
(van der Tak &
van Dishoeck 2000).
The adopted CO binding energy is 1100 K, a weighted
mean of the CO
binding energy on icy mantles (1180 K; Collings
et al. 2003)
and CO mantles (885 K; Öberg et al. 2005), assuming
that solid water is about four times more abundant than solid CO. The
models are computed for envelope lifetimes of 106 yr,
although solutions do not appreciably change after
105 yr.
![]() |
Figure 11:
Left: results of our chemical model for
Cep E-mm assuming a binding energy of 1100 K
(standard
value, model 1). The C18O abundance is
shown in black, N2H+ in
red, and N2D+ in blue.
Center: comparison between the predicted C18O 1
|
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12: The same as Fig. 11 for model 2. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 13: The same as Fig. 11 for model 3. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14: The same as Fig. 11 for model 4. |
Open with DEXTER |
In Figs. 11
to 14,
we show the fits for Cep E-mm. We adopt this protostar as a fiducial
example because it is the one with the best spatial sampling of the
envelope, its geometry looks spherical, and the contribution of the
surrounding molecular cloud is negligible. It is impossible to
reproduce the observations towards Cep E-mm using the standard
chemical model. With the standard model, i.e., assuming a
CO binding energy of 1100 K, we are able to reproduce the
qualitative behavior of the C18O and N2H+
emission (see Fig. 11),
but the model reproduces the line integrated intensities poorly. The
line intensity predictions are a factor of 2-4 higher than the
observations
(see Fig. 11).
Increasing the CO binding energy (e.g. assuming that a large
fraction of CO is trapped in water ice) does not improve the
fit (see model 2 in Table 6 and Fig. 12).
The abundance profiles given in Table 5 suggest that the fit to the C18O emission would improve by lowering the CO abundance in the inner part of the core. As pointed out there, this low CO abundance has some physical justification. One possibility is that a significant fraction of CO is converted into CH3OH on the grain surfaces before evaporation, in agreement with observations of solid methanol along the line of sight toward embedded young stellar objects (e.g. Boogert et al. 2008). We mimic this situation with model 3. In this model, only 10% of the CO is released back to the gas phase at the CO evaporation temperature. Another possibility is that CO is either destroyed by the stellar UV radiation and/or X-rays close to the star or transformed into more complex molecules via hot core chemistry. This case corresponds to our model 4, where only 10% of the CO survives when the temperature is higher than 100 K. The two models, 3 and 4, fit the C18O and N2H+ emission better than the standard model (see Figs. 13 and 14), with model 3 being a slightly better fit to the Cep E-mm observations. Thus, we applied these most successful models, model 3 and 4, to all the other sources and have obtained reasonable fits (line integrated intensities fitted within a factor of 2) to the C18O and N2H+ emission in all of them. For both IC 1396 N and Serpens-FIRS 1, model 4 gives a better fit, while model 3 is better for the rest.
While we obtain reasonable fits for C18O and
N2H+, our models do not
succeed in reproducing the N2D+
data towards
Serpens-FIRS 1 and IC 1396 N. In fact, the
chemical models predict intensities higher by a factor of 10 than the
observed intensities for these sources. All the considered models
predict that the spatial distribution of N2D+
is similar to that of N2H+
and that the deuteration fraction [N2D+]/[N2H
.01 in most
of the envelope.
This is not true for our low-deuterated sources,
Serpens-FIRS 1 and IC 1396 N, in which the [N2D+]/[N2H+]
ratio is a few 0.001. This discrepancy could have different origins.
First of all, the models assume a spherical geometry. It is clear that
bipolar outflows have excavated large cavities in these protostellar
envelopes (see e.g. Fuente et al. 2009). The walls
of these cavities are warmed by the stellar UV radiation and
shocks. Moderate temperatures, UV radiation, and shocks would
lower the abundance of N2H+
and change the [N2D+]/[N2H+]
ratio.
In fact, the large linewidths observed (
1.5 km s-1)
are hard to maintain without
shocks and dissipation. The role of UV radiation and shocks is
expected to be greater in IM Class 0 objects than in low-mass
ones.
This simple model ignores many other important parameters that
could decrease the deuterium fractionation in warmer sources. These
include
(i) an increased abundance of atomic O in the gas
phase, possibly coming from the release of water from the icy dust
mantles. Atomic oxygen is an efficient destruction partner for all the H3+
isotopologues, and lowers the D-fractionation, as discussed by Caselli
et al. (2002).
(ii) The ortho-to-para H2 ratio, which
in systems out of equilibrium (such as free-falling) can exceed the
steady-state value by more than an order of magnitude (Flower
et al. 2006;
Pagani et al. 2009).
A larger fraction of ortho-H2 leads to a lower
D-fractionation, given that the more energetic ortho-H2
can more easily drive the proton-deuteron exchange reactions (e.g. H3+
+ HD
H2D+ + H2)
backward and reduce the H2D+/H3+
abundance ratio (Gerlich et al. 2002).
(iii) A higher ionization rate,
,
which may be due to the presence of X-rays. A larger
implies a larger electron fraction and thus a higher dissociative
recombination rates for molecular ions, including H3+
isotopologues (e.g. Caselli et al. 2008). (iv) The
presence of small grains (in particular PAHs; see discussion in Caselli
et al. 2008,
Sect. 5.1) may arise from the interaction of outflow lobes and
UV radiation with the molecular envelope. The associated
shocks will partially destroy dust grains along the way (e.g. Jones
et al. 1996;
Caselli et al. 1997;
Guillet et al. 2009)
and increase the surface area for recombination of molecular ions onto
dust grains.
Because of the low angular resolution of the present observations, it is hard to disentangle the influences of the above parameters. Both more detailed observations and more comprehensive models are needed for a deeper understanding of the chemical and physical evolution of the envelopes surrounding young intermediate-mass stars.
![]() |
Figure 15: The same as Fig. 11 for IC 1396 N and model 4. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 16: The same as Fig. 11 for CB 3 and model 3. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 17: The same as Fig. 11 for NGC 7129-FIRS 2 and model 3. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 18: The same as Fig. 11 for Serpens-FIRS 1 and model 3. |
Open with DEXTER |
8 Summary and conclusions
We carried out a study of the CO depletion and N2H+ deuteration in a sample of representative IM Class 0 protostars. Our results can be summarized as follows.- We observed the millimeter lines of C18O,
C17O,
N2H+, and N2D+
using the IRAM 30m telescope in a sample
of 7 Class 0
and 2 Class I IM stars. We have found a clear evolutionary
trend that
differentiates Class 0 from Class I sources. While
the emission of the N2H+ 1
0 peaks towards the star position in Class 0 protostars, it surrounds the FIR sources in the case of Class I stars. This occurs because the recently formed star has heated and disrupted the parent core in the case of Class I objects. The deuterium fractionation, R2, is low, below a few 0.001 in all Class I sources. There is, however, a wide dispersal in the values of R2 in Class 0 sources ranging from a few 0.001 to a few 0.01. This at least two orders of magnitude greater than the elemental value in the interstellar medium, although a factor of 10-100 lower than in prestellar clumps.
It is impossible, however, to establish an evolutionary trend among Class 0 sources based on simple parameters such as the average CO depletion and the average N2H+ deuterium fractionation. This stems from the complexity of these regions (multiplicity) and the limited angular resolution of our observations, which prevents us from tracing the inner regions of the envelope. Interferometric observations are required to provide a more precise picture of the evolutionary stage of these objects.
- We used a radiative transfer code to derive the C18O,
N2H+, and N2D+
radial
abundance profiles in 5 IM Class 0 stars. In particular, we
fit the C18O 1
0 maps by assuming that the C18O abundance decreases inwards within the protostellar envelope until the gas and dust reach the CO evaporation temperature,
. Our observational data are better fit with values of
K, consistent with the binding energy of 1100 K, which is the measured in the laboratory for a CO-CO matrix.
- We determined the chemistry of the protostellar
envelopes using the model by Caselli et al. (2002). A
spherical envelope and steady-state chemical model cannot account for
the observations. We had to introduce modifications to better fit the C18O and
N2H+ maps. In particular
the CO abundance in the inner envelope seems to be lower than
the canonical value. This could be due to the conversion of
CO into CH3OH
on the grain surfaces, the photodissociation of CO by the
stellar UV radiation, or even
geometrical effects. Likewise, we have problems fitting the low values
of the deuterium fractionation
(
a few 0.001) measured for some Class 0 IMs. Several explanations have been proposed to account for this discrepancy.
This Paper was partially supported by MICINN, within the program CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010, under grant ``Molecular Astrophysics: The Herschel and ALMA Era - ASTROMOL'' (ref.: CSD2009-00038)
Appendix A:
Below we discuss the details of the modeling for each individual source.
A.1 Serpens-FIRS 1
Serpens-FIRS 1, located near the center of the Serpens main
core, is
the most luminous object embedded in the cloud. Several continuum
studies lead to its classification as a
Class 0 source with a bolometric luminosity estimated to range
from 46
to 84
(Harvey et al. 1984;
Casali et al. 1993;
Hurt & Barsony 1996;
Larsson et al. 2000).
The latest estimate of its
luminosity (see Table 4)
suggests that Serpens-FIRS 1 is on the low mass/IM borderline.
Serpens-FIRS 1 drives a molecular outflow that is oriented at
a position angle of 50
(Rodríguez
et al. 1989).
C10 modeled this source as a sphere with an outer radius
of 5900 AU, 25.5'' at the distance of Serpens. Convolving this
size with the observational beams,
one would expect a source diameter of 55'', 57'', and 53'' for the C18O 1
0,
N2H+ 1
0, and N2D+ 2
1 maps,
respectively. In our maps, the emission is
much more extended (>80''), showing that the dense molecular
cloud significantly contributes to the molecular emission (see also
Fig. 6).
To mimic the molecular cloud component, we increased the outer radius
in the Crimier et al. profile.
We assumed that the radius of the protostellar envelope is
15 000 AU, and the dust density and temperature
smoothly vary between the last point of the Crimier et al.
profile (r=5900 AU,
cm-3,
K) and the values
assumed at r=15 000 AU, which are
cm-3
and
K. This profile was
used for our fitting.
The integrated intensity map of C18O cannot
be fit
with a constant abundance profile. Thus, we decided to assume a step
function for the C18O abundance:
(i) a constant abundance, X0,
that is expected to be close to the canonical value (
)
for radii lower than a given radius, R0
and (ii) an abundance, X1,
that is expected to be <X0for
larger radii. Thus defined R0,
is the evaporation radius of CO. The values of
X0, R0,
and X1 were fit by the
model. This approximation was still not sufficient to produce a good
fit. We had to add another step, and two new variables, R1
and X2, in the C18O abundance
profile. The best fit is shown in Table 5. We have
(i) a warm region (R<2000 AU)
with
an C18O abundance
;
(ii) an intermediate layer with a high value for the C18O depletion,
,
and (iii) an external layer (R>6000 AU),
which is essentially
the molecular cloud component, in which the C18O abundance
is close to the canonical value again.
We followed the same procedure for N2H+. In this case the emission extends to the NE and greatly differs from spherical symmetry. For this reason we masked the NE quadrant in our fitting (see Fig. 4). Again, we conclude that the N2H+ abundance has a standard value of a few 10-10 in the inner region (R< 3000 AU) and in the molecular cloud, but decreases by at least a factor of 10 in the region between them.
Serpens-FIRS 1 is one of the three sources where we
were able to fit the N2D+ 2
1 emission.
It is clear from the map morphology that the N2D+
emission is dominated by the molecular
cloud component. Similar to the case of N2H+,
we masked the NE quadrant in our fitting. We found X(N2D
in
the molecular cloud, and obtained an upper limit
of X(N2D
for the protostellar core. Thus we have a deuterium fractionation of
0.01 in the
molecular cloud, and at least an order of magnitude lower in the core
(see Fig. 7).
A.2 Cep E
Cep E-mm was cataloged as a Class 0 protostar by Lefloch
et al. (1996).
Cep E-mm was observed with IRAM 30 m (Lefloch et al. 1996; Chini
et al. 2001),
SCUBA (Chini et al. 2001),
ISO (Froebrich et al. 2003), and
Spitzer (Noriega-Crespo et al. 2005). All
these
studies confirm the Class 0 status of Cep E-mm and constrain
the source total mass and
bolometric luminosity in the range of 7-25
and 80-120
,
respectively. A bipolar molecular outflow, first reported by Fukui
et al. (1989),
is associated with Cep E-mm. The H2 and
[FeII] study by
Eisloffel et al. (1996) shows a quadrupolar outflow morphology
suggesting that the driving source
is a binary.
C10 modeled this source as a sphere with an outer radius
of 35 800 AU, 49'' at the distance of Cepheus (see
Table 4).
Convolving this size with the observational beams,
one would expect a source diameter of 108'',
110'', and 100'' for the C18O 1
0,
N2H+ 1
0, and N2D+ 2
1 maps,
respectively. These sizes agree with those found in our maps. Of our
sources, Cep E has the largest
envelope diameter versus HPBW ratio and thus the
best spatial sampling of the varying chemical conditions in
its protostellar envelope (see Table 5).
In this source, we fit the emission
with a constant and close-to-standard abundance of
for radii below 3500 AU, and a power-law variation of the C18O abundance
for larger radii (see Table 5).
The high value of
,
10, would
occur close to R=3500 AU. The same kind of
profile was fit for the N2H+
abundance. In this case,
the quality of the N2D+ 2
1 line was
not good enough to fit the abundance profile. We
derived an averaged abundance across the envelope of
by fitting the spectrum observed towards
the center position.
A.3 IC 1396 N
IC 1396 N is the globule associated with IRAS 21391+5802. It has strong submillimeter and millimeter continuum emission (Wilking et al. 1993; Sugitani et al. 2000; Codella et al. 2001), high density gas (Serabyn et al. 1993; Cesaroni et al. 1999; Codella et al. 2001; Beltrán et al. 2004), and water maser emission (Felli et al. 1992; Tofani et al. 1995; Patel et al. 2000). IC 1396 N is thus an active site of star formation. Using BIMA interferometric millimeter observations, Beltrán et al. (2002) detected three sources (BIMA 1, BIMA 2, and BIMA 3) deeply embedded within the globule. Among the three, BIMA 2 has the strongest millimeter emission and is associated with an energetic E-W bipolar outflow (Codella et al. 2001 Beltrán 2002, 2004). Recent studies by Neri et al. (2007) and Fuente et al. (2007) using the Plateau de Bure interferometer show that BIMA 2 is itself a protocluster composed of 3 cores.
C10 modeled BIMA 2 as a sphere with an outer radius
of 29 600 AU, 39'' at the distance of
IC 1396 N (see Table 4). Together with Cep
E-mm, it is
our best-sampled protostellar envelope (large envelope diameter to HPBW
ratio). Interferometric observations published by Fuente
et al. (2009)
reveal that the outflow has already eroded a large biconical cavity in
the molecular cloud. This is very likely the reason for the scarce C18O 1
0 and N2H+ 1
0 emission
to the east of the source. We have therefore masked this region to have
a more accurate description of the toroidal envelope (see Fig. 4). This masking does
not affect our results significantly (more than a factor of 2 in the
abundances).
Similarly to Cep-E, the C18O emission
was better fit
with a constant and close-to-standard abundance of
in the inner region (R<5500 AU) and
a power-law variation of the C18O abundance
for larger radii (see Table 5).
The highest value of
is
5, and it
would occur close to R=5500 AU. The N2H+
emission was better fit with a two-step function,
for R<10 000 AU,
for R> 15 000 AU, and
in between.
The last step could be due to the vicinity of the sources
BIMA 3 and BIMA 2 that heat the outer part
of the envelope. These sources are not considered
in the (n-T) fit by C10. In
IC 1396 N, we have not detected the N2D+ 2
1 line.
We derived an upper limit to the N2D+
abundance of <
.
The lower value of
and the non-detection of N2D+
is consistent with this source being a warmer
and more evolved object.
A.4 CB3
The CB3 Bok globule is located at 2.5 kpc (Launhardt & Henning 1997; Wang
et al. 1995).
CB3-mm is the brightest millimeter source
of the globule, first detected by Launhardt & Henning (1997) and
subsequently observed in the
sub-millimeter by Huard et al. (2000). Yun
& Clemens (1994)
detected a molecular bipolar outflow in CO, elongated in the NE-SW
direction, associated with H2O masers
(de Gregorio-Monsalvo
et al. 2006). This outflow has been mapped in various
molecular lines by Codella & Bachiller
(1999),
who concluded that it originates from CB3-mm. The same authors
concluded that CB3-mm is probably a Class 0 source.
CB3 is different from all the other sources in our sample. In
this object, the 24 m
sources are not spatially coincident with the 850
m emission
peak. CB3-mm hosts
two 24
m
sources separated by
12''
and neither of them is spatially coincident with the column density
peak. The column density peak, better traced by the 850
m continuum
emission, is located in between and almost equidistant from the two
24
m
sources (see Fig. 4).
C10 modeled the SED of this source by adding up the flux of the two
24
m
sources.
They fit the spatial distribution of the 450
m and
850
m
maps as a sphere with an outer radius
of 103 000 AU (i.e. 41'') (see Table 4). The radial density
power law in this
source is steeper,
2,
than in the others, with low densities (
a few 103 cm-3)
in the outer envelope, >50 000 AU. This means
that, although the protostellar envelope is
very large, most of the emission comes from the inner
50 000 AU.
We fit the C18O emission with
a step function.
The abundance is constant at
for radii less than 25 000 AU, decreases
to <
(
), and then increases to
for R>60 000 AU (see
Table 5).
The large C18O abundance at large radii
is very likely caused by the modeled extended low-density envelope
providing a poor approximation. More likely, there are dense clumps
immersed in a lower density cloud. The N2H+
emission is fit with a constant abundance of
.
The N2D+ emission is fit
with a constant abundance of
,
implying an average [N2D+]/[N2H+]=0.05.
A.5 NGC 7129-FIRS 2
NGC 7129 is a reflection nebula located in a complex and
active star-forming site at a distance of
1250 pc (Hartigan & Lada 1985; Miranda
et al. 1993).
NGC 7129 FIRS 2 is not detected at optical
or near-infrared wavelengths. Its position is spatially coincident with
a 13CO column
density peak (Bechis et al. 1978) and a
high-density NH3 cloudlet (Guesten &
Marcaide 1986),
and it is close to an H2O maser
(Rodríguez et al. 1980). NGC 7129-FIRS 2 has
been classified as
a Class 0 IM protostar by Eiroa et al. (1998), who
carried out a multi-wavelength study of the continuum
emission from 25 to 2000 m. Edwards & Snell (1983) detected
a bipolar CO
outflow associated with FIRS 2. The interferometric study by
Fuente et al. (2001)
reveals that
this outflow presents a quadrupolar morphology. In fact, the outflow
seems to be the superposition of two flows,
FIRS 2-out 1 and FIRS 2-out 2,
likely associated with FIRS 2 and a more evolved star
(FIRS 2-IR), respectively. Fuente et al. (2005a,b)
carried out a complete chemical study of FIRS 2 providing the first
detection
of hot core in an IM Class 0. Based on all these studies, FIRS
2 is considered the youngest IM object
known at present.
C10 modeled NGC 7129-FIRS 2 as a sphere with
an outer radius
of 18 600 AU, 15'' at the distance of
NGC 7129 (see Table 4).
Since the source is very compact and barely resolved in the maps of the
C18O 1
0 and N2H+ 1
0 lines, we
fit only an average abundance in
for these species. The average CO depletion factor is
,
consistent with the depletion factor found by Fuente et al. (2005a)
based on H13CO+
observations. The protostellar envelope is, however, resolved at the
frequency of the N2D+ 3
2
line. Since previous interferometric observations published by Fuente
et al. (2005a)
reveal that the
N2D+ emission is absent
towards the hot core, we fitted the N2D+ 3
2 emission
assuming that it arises in a ring. The best fit is for a ring with
inner radius of 9000 AU and an outer radius of
11 000 AU. Within the
ring the N2D+ abundance
is
,
and the deuterium fractionation,
0.1, is the typical
value found in prestellar cores.
References
- Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197 [Google Scholar]
- Bechis, K. P., Harvey, P. M., Campbell, M. F., & Hoffmann, W. F. 1978, ApJ, 226, 439 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Beltrán, M. T., Girart, J. M., Estalella, R., Ho, P. T. P., & Palau, A. 2002, ApJ, 573, 246 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Beltrán, M. T., Girart, J. M., Estalella, R., & Ho, P. T. P. 2004, A&A, 426, 941 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Bergin, E. A., Maret, S., van der Tak, F. F. S., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 369 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Bisschop, S. E., Fraser, H. J., Öberg, K. I., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Schlemmer, S. 2006, A&A, 449, 1297 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Boogert, A. C. A., Pontoppidan, K. M., Knez, C., et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, 985 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Casali, M. M., Eiroa, C., & Duncan, W. D. 1993, A&A, 275, 195 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Caselli, P., Hartquist, T. W., & Havnes, O. 1997, A&A, 322, 296 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Caselli, P., Walmsley, C. M., Zucconi, A., et al. 2002, ApJ, 565, 344 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Caselli, P., Vastel, C., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2008, A&A, 492, 703 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Caux, E., Ceccarelli, C., Castets, A., et al. 1999, A&A, 347, L1 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Ceccarelli, C., & Dominik, C. 2005, A&A, 440, 583 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Cesaroni, R., Felli, M., Jenness, T., et al. 1999, A&A, 345, 949 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Chini, R., Ward-Thompson, D., Kirk, J. M., et al. 2001, A&A, 369, 155 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Codella, C., & Bachiller, R. 1999, A&A, 350, 659 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Codella, C., Bachiller, R., Nisini, B., Saraceno, P., & Testi, L. 2001, A&A, 376, 271 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Collings, M. P., Dever, J. W., Fraser, H. J., McCoustra, M. R. S., & Williams, D. A. 2003, ApJ, 583, 1058 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Crapsi, A., Caselli, P., Walmsley, C. M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, 379 [Google Scholar]
- Crimier, N., Ceccarelli, C., Lefloch, B., & Faure, A. 2009, A&A, 506, 1229 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Crimier, N., et al. 2010, A&A, accepted [Google Scholar]
- Daniel, F., Cernicharo, J., Roueff, E., Gerin, M., & Dubernet, M. L. 2007, ApJ, 667, 980 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- de Gregorio-Monsalvo, I., Gómez, J. F., Suárez, O., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 2584 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Draine, B. T., & Sutin, B. 1987, ApJ, 320, 803 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards, S., & Snell, R. L. 1983, ApJ, 270, 605 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Eiroa, C., Palacios, J., & Casali, M. M. 1998, A&A, 335, 243 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Emprechtinger, M., Caselli, P., Volgenau, N. H., Stutzki, J., & Wiedner, M. C. 2009, A&A, 493, 89 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Felli, M., Palagi, F., & Tofani, G. 1992, A&A, 255, 293 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Flower, D. R., Pineau des Forêts, G., & Walmsley, C. M. 2004, A&A, 427, 887 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Flower, D. R., Pineau Des Forêts, G., & Walmsley, C. M. 2005, A&A, 436, 933 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Flower, D. R., Pineau Des Forêts, G., & Walmsley, C. M. 2006, A&A, 449, 621 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Froebrich, D., Smith, M. D., Hodapp, K.-W., & Eislöffel, J. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 163 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fuente, A., Martin-Pintado, J., Bachiller, R., Neri, R., & Palla, F. 1998, A&A, 334, 253 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Fuente, A., Neri, R., Martín-Pintado, J., et al. 2001, A&A, 366, 873 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Fuente, A., Martin-Pintado, J., Bachiller, R., Rodriguez-Franco, A., & Palla, F. 2002, A&A, 387, 977 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Fuente, A., Neri, R., & Caselli, P. 2005a, A&A, 444, 481 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Fuente, A., Rizzo, J. R., Caselli, P., Bachiller, R., & Henkel, C. 2005b, A&A, 433, 535 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Fuente, A., Ceccarelli, C., Neri, R., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, L37 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Fuente, A., Castro-Carrizo, A., Alonso-Albi, T., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 1475 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Frerking, M. A., Langer, W. D., & Wilson, R. W. 1982, ApJ, 262, 590 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fukui, Y., Iwata, T., Mizuno, A., Ogawa, H., & Takaba, H. 1989, Nature, 342, 161 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gerlich, D., Herbst, E., & Roueff, E. 2002, Planet. Space Sci., 50, 1275 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Guesten, R., & Marcaide, J. M. 1986, A&A, 164, 342 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Guillet, V., Jones, A. P., & Pineau Des Forêts, G. 2009, A&A, 497, 145 [Google Scholar]
- Hartigan, P., & Lada, C. J. 1985, ApJS, 59, 383 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey, P. M., Wilking, B. A., & Joy, M. 1984, ApJ, 278, 156 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hasegawa, T. I., Herbst, E., & Leung, C. M. 1992, ApJS, 82, 167 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hasegawa, T. I., & Herbst, E. 1993, MNRAS, 263, 589 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Henning, T., Burkert, A., Launhardt, R., Leinert, C., & Stecklum, B. 1998, A&A, 336, 565 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Hily-Blant, P., Walmsley, M., Pineau Des forêts, G., & Flower, D. 2010, A&A, 513, A41 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Huard, T. L., Weintraub, D. A., & Sandell, G. 2000, A&A, 362, 635 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Hugo, E., Asvany, O., & Schlemmer, S. 2009, J. Chem. Phys., 130, 164302 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hurt, R. L., & Barsony, M. 1996, ApJ, 460, L45 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jones, A. P., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach, D. J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 740 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jørgensen, J. K., Schöier, F. L., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2005, A&A, 437, 501 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Larsson, B., Liseau, R., Men'shchikov, A. B., et al. 2000, A&A, 363, 253 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Launhardt, R., & Henning, T. 1997, A&A, 326, 329 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H.-H., Bettens, R. P. A., & Herbst, E. 1996, A&ASS, 119, 111 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Lefloch, B., Eisloeffel, J., & Lazareff, B. 1996, A&A, 313, L17 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Maret, S., Ceccarelli, C., Caux, E., et al. 2004, A&A, 416, 577 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Maret, S., Bergin, E. A., & Lada, C. J. 2006, Nature, 442, 425 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- McKee, C. F. 1989, ApJ, 345, 782 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Melnick, G. J., & Bergin, E. A. 2005, Adv. Space Res., 36, 1027 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Minchin, N. R., White, G. J., & Ward-Thompson, D. 1995, A&A, 301, 894 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Miranda, L. F., Eiroa, C., & Gomez de Castro, A. I. 1993, A&A, 271, 564 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Neri, R., Fuente, A., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, L33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Noriega-Crespo, A., Moro-Martin, A., Carey, S., et al. 2005, ESA Spec. Publ., 577, 453 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Öberg, K. I., van Broekhuizen, F., Fraser, H. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 621, L33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira, C. M., Hébrard, G., Howk, J. C., et al. 2003, ApJ, 587, 235 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pagani, L., Vastel, C., Hugo, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 494, 623 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Pagani, L., Salez, M., & Wannier, P. G. 1992, A&A, 258, 479 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Patel, N. A., Greenhill, L. J., Herrnstein, J., et al. 2000, ApJ, 538, 268 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez, L. F., Moran, J. M., Ho, P. T. P., & Gottlieb, E. W. 1980, ApJ, 235, 845 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez, L. F., Curiel, S., Moran, J. M., et al. 1989, ApJ, 346, L85 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schöier, F. L., van der Tak, F. F. S., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Black, J. H. 2005, A&A, 432, 369 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Serabyn, E., Guesten, R., & Mundy, L. 1993, ApJ, 404, 247 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sipilä, O., Hugo, E., Harju, J., et al. 2010, A&A, 509, A98 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Sugitani, K., Matsuo, H., Nakano, M., Tamura, M., & Ogura, K. 2000, AJ, 119, 323 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tofani, G., Felli, M., Taylor, G. B., & Hunter, T. R. 1995, A&AS, 112, 299 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Umebayashi, T., & Nakano, T. 1990, MNRAS, 243, 103 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Van der Tak, F. F. S., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2000, A&A, 358, L79 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Van der Tak, F. F. S., Black, J. H., Schöier, F. L., Jansen, D. J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2007, A&A, 468, 627 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Vastel, C., Caselli, P., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 1198 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y., Evans, N. J., II, Zhou, S., & Clemens, D. P. 1995, ApJ, 454, 217 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wilking, B., Mundy, L., McMullin, J., Hezel, T., & Keene, J. 1993, AJ, 106, 250 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, T. L., & Matteucci, F. 1992, A&AR, 4, 1 [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, T. L., & Rood, R. 1994, A&ARv, 32, 191 [Google Scholar]
- Yun, J. L., & Clemens, D. P. 1994, AJ, 108, 612 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Footnotes
- ... code
- The model is called DataCube and a link to install it is available upon request.
- ... database
- LAMDA database is available at http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/ moldata/.
All Tables
Table 1: Selected sample.
Table 2: Description of the observations.
Table 3: LTE column densities.
Table 4: Temperature-density (T-n) profiles from Crimier et al. (2010).
Table 5: Abundance profiles derived from the observations.
Table 6: Model results.
All Figures
![]() |
Figure 1: Examples of the single-pointing observations towards the Serpens-FIRS 1, Cep E-mm, L1641 S3 MMS1, and IC 1396 N. All the spectra were observed with the 30 m telescope. The intensity scale is the main brightness temperature. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 2: The same as Fig. 1 for CB3, OMC2 FIR 4, NGC 7129-FIRS 2, and S140. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Spectra of the N2H+ 4
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Continuum maps at 850 |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Integrated intensity maps of the C18O 1
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Radially integrated intensity profiles of the C18O 1
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Deuterium fractionation of N2H+(R2)
vs. the N(C18O)/N(N2H+)
ratio in the studied YSOs. Inverted empty triangles are upper limits
for L1641 S3 MMS1, IC 1396 N, and
S140, where we did not detect the N2D+ 2
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Plots of the rms, defined as |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 9: The same as Fig. 8 for IC 1396 N. The solution with the lowest rms, 0.36, is indicated by a cross. We consider acceptable solutions those with rms less than 0.5. Contour levels are 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 K km s-1. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 10: The same as Fig. 8 for CB 3. The solution with the lowest rms, 2.5, is indicated by a cross. Contour levels are 2.5, 4, 6, and 10 K km s-1. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Left: results of our chemical model for
Cep E-mm assuming a binding energy of 1100 K
(standard
value, model 1). The C18O abundance is
shown in black, N2H+ in
red, and N2D+ in blue.
Center: comparison between the predicted C18O 1
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 12: The same as Fig. 11 for model 2. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 13: The same as Fig. 11 for model 3. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 14: The same as Fig. 11 for model 4. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 15: The same as Fig. 11 for IC 1396 N and model 4. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 16: The same as Fig. 11 for CB 3 and model 3. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 17: The same as Fig. 11 for NGC 7129-FIRS 2 and model 3. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 18: The same as Fig. 11 for Serpens-FIRS 1 and model 3. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
Copyright ESO 2010
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.