EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 518 (July-August 2010) A&A, 518 (2010) A47 Full HTML
Free Access

 

 

Table 8:

Comparison between fluxes in different energy bands obtained in this work and found in the literature.

Instrument 		$F_{0.1-2 \rm ~keV}$ $F_{0.1-2.4 \rm ~keV}$ $F_{2-10 \rm ~keV}$ $F_{14-150 \rm ~keV}$

[ $10^{-12}\rm ~erg ~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$] [ $10^{-12}\rm ~erg ~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$] [ $10^{-11}\rm ~erg ~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$] [ $10^{-11}\rm ~erg ~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}$]

UGC 3142
EPIC/PN + MOS $0.69^{\rm +0.04}_{-0.11}$ $1.24^{\rm +0.1}_{-0.1}$ $1.7^{\rm +0.1}_{-0.2}$ -
Swift/BATa - - - $3.4 ^{\rm +0.6}_{-0.6}$
INTEGRAL IBIS/ISGRI - - - $9.42^{\rm +0.6}_{-0.8}$

ESO 383-18
EPIC/PN + MOS $0.06^{\rm +0.18}_{-0.01}$ $0.08^{\rm +0.18}_{-0.01}$ $0.6^{\rm +0.1}_{-0.1 }$ -
Swift/BATb - - - $1.9 ^{\rm +0.6}_{-0.6}$
INTEGRAL IBIS/ISGRI - - - $3.8^{\rm +1.8}_{-1.5}$

ESO 140-43
ROSATc - $21^{\rm +10}_{-10}$ - -
EPIC/PN + MOS1 $6.5^{\rm +0.1}_{-0.1}$ $8.5^{\rm +1.1}_{-0.6}$ $2.46^{\rm +0.05}_{-0.04}$ -
EPIC/PN + MOS2 $0.4^{\rm +0.1}_{-0.1}$ $0.5^{\rm +0.2}_{-0.2}$ $0.8^{\rm +0.2}_{-0.2}$ -
EXOSATd $8^{\rm +3}_{-3}$ - $2.5^{\rm +0.2}_{-0.2}$ -
Swift/BATa - - - $4.6^{\rm +0.7}_{-0.7}$
INTEGRAL IBIS/ISGRI - - - $5.3^{\rm +0.4}_{-0.5}$

Notes. The indices 1 and 2 refer to the 2005 and 2006 XMM-Newton observation of ESO 140-43, respectively. The fluxes are model fluxes, not corrected for absorption.
(a) Tueller et al. (2010); (b) Cusumano et al. (2010); (c) Boller et al. (1992); (d) Ghosh & Soundararajaperumal (1992).


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.