Free Access

    

Table A.2:

Results of the oxygen abundance, in the form $12+\log({\rm O/H})$, for objects with a direct estimation of the metallicity, considering several empirical calibrations.

Region
Branch $T_{\rm e}$ EP84 MRS85 M91 ZKH94 P00 P01a PT05b KD02 KK04 D02 PP04a PP04b PP04c N06ac N06b N06c
      R23 R23 R23, y R23 R23 R23, P R23, P R23, q R23, q N2 N2 N2 O3N2 R23 N2 O3N2
HCG 31 AC H $8.22\pm0.05$ 8.25 8.89 8.67 8.74 8.47 8.15 8.09 7.99 8.12 8.40 8.34 8.29 8.30 8.05 8.16 8.22
HCG 31 B H $8.14\pm0.08$ 8.14 8.48 8.29 8.44 8.24 8.22 8.12 8.41 8.44 8.39 8.33 8.28 8.29 8.07 8.16 8.20
HCG 31 E H $8.13\pm0.09$ 8.17 8.62 8.14 8.53 8.31 8.18 8.13 8.19 8.32 8.35 8.30 8.26 8.25 8.07 8.11 8.15
HCG 31 F1 L $8.07\pm0.06$ 8.02 8.30 8.13 ... 7.86 8.12 7.99 8.46 8.33 8.05 8.07 8.09 8.03 ... 7.81 7.67
HCG 31 F2 L $8.03\pm0.10$ 7.90 8.54 8.06 8.48 7.76 8.13 7.95 8.19 8.27 8.06 8.07 8.10 8.07 8.07 7.83 7.79
HCG 31 G H $8.15 \pm 0.08$ 8.13 8.43 8.26 8.40 8.22 8.11 8.17 8.31 8.42 8.41 8.34 8.29 8.26 8.07 8.17 8.16
Mkn 1199 C H $8.75\pm0.12$ 9.37 9.26 9.00 9.18 9.19 8.71 8.54 9.14 9.14 8.92 8.74 8.90 8.81 9.18 8.78 8.94
Haro 15 A H $8.10\pm0.06$ 8.08 ... 8.14 ... 7.91 8.12 8.12 8.48 8.34 7.98 8.01 8.05 7.97 ... 7.74 7.38
Mkn 5 A1 L $8.07 \pm 0.07$ 7.90 8.54 8.04 8.48 7.76 8.13 8.13 8.19 8.26 8.18 8.17 8.16 8.12 8.07 7.94 7.89
Mkn 5 A2 L $8.08 \pm 0.07$ 7.95 8.43 8.14 8.41 7.81 7.92 8.17 8.18 8.33 8.16 8.15 8.15 8.11 8.07 7.92 7.87
IRAS 08208+2816 H $8.33\pm0.08$ 8.15 8.50 8.55 8.46 8.25 8.42 8.35 8.35 8.25 8.47 8.39 8.34 8.23 8.35 8.23 8.11
POX 4 L $8.03\pm0.04$ 8.15 ... 8.20 ... 7.97 7.92 8.06 8.48 8.40 7.78 7.86 7.91 7.87 ... 7.53 ...
UM 420 L $7.95\pm0.05$ 7.78 8.73 7.98 8.61 7.66 7.85 7.86 8.02 8.16 8.20 8.39 8.33 8.28 7.57 8.15 8.14
SBS 0926+606A L $7.94\pm0.08$ 7.88 8.57 7.97 8.50 7.75 7.77 7.80 8.17 8.20 7.97 8.00 8.05 8.02 7.71 7.73 7.64
SBS 0948+532 L $8.03\pm0.05$ 8.01 8.31 8.06 ... 7.86 7.82 8.10 8.34 8.28 7.91 7.95 8.01 7.95 ... 8.01 ...
SBS 1054+365 L $8.00\pm0.07$ 8.05 8.21 8.09 ... 7.89 7.84 7.91 8.48 8.30 7.87 7.93 7.98 7.93 ... 7.63 ...
SBS 1211+540 L $7.65\pm0.04$ 7.86 8.60 7.85 8.52 7.73 7.68 7.65 8.02 8.10 7.58 7.70 7.69 7.84 7.68 7.31 ...
SBS 1319+579A L $8.05\pm0.06$ 8.09 ... 8.13 ... 7.93 8.11 8.11 8.48 8.33 7.77 7.85 7.90 7.88 ... 7.52 ...
SBS 1319+579B L $8.12\pm0.10$ 7.85 8.62 8.01 8.53 7.72 8.13 8.12 8.13 8.23 8.14 8.14 8.14 8.11 8.07 7.90 7.89
SBS 1319+579 C L $8.15\pm0.07$ 7.85 8.62 8.02 8.53 7.72 8.13 8.13 8.12 8.23 8.18 8.17 8.16 8.13 8.06 7.94 7.93
SBS 1415+437 C L $7.58\pm0.05$ 7.63 8.91 7.72 8.76 7.53 7.57 7.55 7.86 7.99 7.79 7.86 7.92 7.99 7.39 7.55 7.55
SBS 1415+437 A L $7.61\pm0.06$ 7.58 8.96 7.64 8.80 7.49 7.50 7.48 7.82 7.92 7.72 7.81 7.86 7.97 7.34 7.48 7.41
III Zw 107 H $8.23\pm0.09$ 8.17 8.62 8.57 8.53 8.31 8.40 8.35 8.13 8.24 8.39 8.33 8.28 8.23 8.46 8.15 8.10
Tol 9 INT H $8.58 \pm 0.15$ 8.30 9.00 8.76 8.84 8.58 8.61 8.55 8.95 8.90 8.68 8.56 8.54 8.42 8.77 8.46 8.40
Tol 9 NOT H $8.55 \pm 0.16$ 8.29 8.97 8.73 8.81 8.55 8.56 8.50 8.94 8.88 8.72 8.59 8.59 8.44 8.75 8.51 8.44
Tol 1457-262A L $8.05\pm0.07$ 8.09 ... 8.26 ... 7.92 8.11 8.20 8.58 8.42 8.04 8.06 8.09 8.02 ... 7.80 7.63
Tol 1457-262B L $7.88\pm0.07$ 8.55 ... 8.21 ... 7.87 7.91 8.21 8.38 8.29 7.88 7.93 7.99 7.96 ... 7.60 ...
Tol 1457-262C L $8.06\pm0.11$ 8.48 ... 8.21 ... 7.88 8.00 8.24 8.48 8.37 8.07 8.08 8.10 8.06 ... 7.83 7.77
ESO 566-8 H $8.46\pm0.11$ 8.27 8.92 8.68 8.77 8.50 8.44 8.38 8.92 8.84 8.84 8.68 8.76 8.51 8.70 8.66 8.53
NGC 5253 A H $8.18\pm0.04$ 8.09 8.24 8.13 ... 8.15 8.11 8.13 8.53 8.33 8.40 8.34 8.28 8.17 ... 8.16 8.00
NGC 5253 B H $8.19\pm0.04$ 8.09 8.21 8.14 ... 8.14 8.11 8.13 8.48 8.34 8.34 8.29 8.25 8.14 ... 8.10 7.94
NGC 5253 C L $8.28\pm0.04$ 8.14 8.46 8.53 8.42 8.23 8.38 8.32 8.67 8.63 8.11 8.11 8.13 8.08 8.30 7.87 7.80
NGC 5253 D L $8.31\pm0.07$ 8.15 8.52 8.19 8.47 8.26 8.23 8.17 8.32 8.37 8.31 8.27 8.23 8.22 8.37 8.07 8.10

Notes. The empirical calibrations and the parameters used for each of them are: EP84: Edmunds & Pagel (1984) that involves the R23 parameter; MRS85: McCall et al. (1985) using R23; M91: McGaugh (1991) using R23 and y; ZKH94: Zaritsky et al. (1994) using R23; P00: Pilyugin (2000) using R23; P01: Pilyugin (2001a,b) using R23 and P; KD02: Kewley & Dopita (2002) using R23 and q; KK04: Kobulnicky & Kewley (2004) using R23 and q; D02: Denicoló et al. (2002) using the N2 parameter; PP04: Pettini & Pagel (2004), using (a) N2 with a linear fit, (b) N2 with a cubic fit, (c) the O3N2 parameter; N06: Nagao et al. (2006) using the cubic relations involving the R23 (a), N2 (b) and O3N2 (c) parameters. The value compiled in the column labeled $T_{\rm e}$ is the oxygen abundance derived by the direct method.

(a) The value listed for P01 is the average value between the high- and the low-metallicity branches for objects with $7.90<12+\log({\rm O/H})<8.20$.
(b) The value listed for PT05 is the average value between the high- and the low-metallicity branches for objects with $8.05<12+\log({\rm O/H})<8.20$.
(c) The value listed for N06 is the average value between the high- and the low-metallicity branches for objects with $8.00<12+\log({\rm O/H})<8.15$.


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.