12CO | 13CO | CS | HCN | CN | SiO | SiS | SO | SO2 | |
Lindqvist et al. (1988)a |
![]() |
- |
![]() |
![]() |
- | - |
![]() |
- | - |
Omont et al. (1993)b | - | - | - | - | - |
![]() |
- |
![]() |
![]() |
Bujarrabal et al. (1994)c |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
- |
Kim et al. (2010)d (``case A'') |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Kim et al. (2010)d (``case B'') |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
González Delgadoe | |||||||||
et al. (2003) |
![]() |
- | - | - | - |
![]() |
- | - | - |
Schöier et al. (2007a)f |
![]() |
- | - | - | - | - |
![]() |
- | - |
-
![]() |
|||||||||
this work |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
-
![]() |
-
![]() |
-
![]() |
|||||||
Duari et al. (1999)h |
![]() |
- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
- |
Cherchneff (2006)i |
![]() |
- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Willacy & Millar (1997)j |
![]() |
- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Notes. In
the first part of the table, observational results are listed based on
the assumption of optically thin emission and a population distribution
which is thermalized at one excitation temperature. The second part
gives observational results based on a non-LTE radiative transfer
analysis. Theoretical predictions for either the inner envelope (Cherchneff
2006; Duari et al. 1999)
or outer envelope (Willacy
& Millar 1997) fractional abundances are given in the
last part.
All fractional abundances are given relative to the total H-content. In
cases where values found in literature were given relative to H2,
they were re-scaled relative to the total H-content by assuming that
all hydrogen is in its molecular form H2.
References. (a) No
information on used distance and mass-loss rate; (b) distance
is 270 pc, =
4.5
10-6
/yr; (c) distance
is 270 pc,
=
4.5
10-6
/yr; (d) distance
is 250 pc, assumed
of 4.7
10-6
/yr, LTE is assumed,
``case B'' represents a solution with a larger outer radius
than ``case A''; (e)
in Gaussian distribution for SiO is 2.5
1016 cm, distance is 250 pc
and
=
3
10-5
/yr; (f)
in Gaussian distribution for SiS, distance is 260 pc and
=
1
10-5
/yr. For 2-component model:
is
5.5
10-6 and taken constant out to 1.0
1015 cm and the lower abundance
Gaussian component has f0
of 5.0
10-9 and
of 1.6
1016 cm. Using one (Gaussian) component
distribution, f0 is
5
10-8 and
is 1.6
1016 cm; (g) only
value at 5
is given; (h) predicted
values at 2.2
in the envelope for IK Tau; (i) predicted
values at 2
in the envelope for TX Cam; (j) predicted
peak fractional abundances in the outer envelope.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.