Issue |
A&A
Volume 510, February 2010
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A70 | |
Number of page(s) | 10 | |
Section | Stellar structure and evolution | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913367 | |
Published online | 11 February 2010 |
The spectroscopic evolution of the symbiotic star AG Draconis
I. The O VI Raman, Balmer, and helium emission line variations during the outburst of 2006-2008
S. N. Shore1,2 - G. M. Wahlgren3,4 - K. Genovali1 - S. Bernabei5 - P. Koubsky6 - M. Slechta6 - P. Skoda6 - A. Skopal7 - M. Wolf8
1 - Dipartimento di Fisica ``Enrico Fermi'', Università di Pisa, largo B. Pontecorvo 3, 56127 Pisa, Italy
2 -
INFN - Sezione di Pisa, Italy
3 -
Catholic University of America, Dept. of Physics, 620 Michigan Ave NE, Washington DC, 20064, USA
4 -
NASA-GSFC, Code 667, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA
5 -
INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy
6 -
Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Ondrejov, Czech Republic
7 -
Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 059 60 Tatranskna Lomnica, Slovakia
8
- Astronomical Institute, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles
University Prague, 180 00 Praha 8, V Holesovickách 2, Czech
Republic
Received 29 September 2009 / Accepted 23 November 2009
Abstract
Context. AG Dra is one of a small group of low metallicity
S-type symbiotic binaries with K-type giants that undergoes occasional
short-term outbursts of unknown origin.
Aims. Our aim is to study the behavior of the white dwarf during
an outburst using the optical Raman lines and other emission features
in the red giant wind. The goal is to determine changes in the envelope
and the wind of the gainer in this system during a major outburst event
and to study the coupling between the UV and optical during a major
outburst.
Methods. Using medium and high resolution groundbased optical spectra and comparisons with archival FUSE and HST/STIS
spectra, we study the evolution of the Raman O VI features and the
Balmer, He I, and He II lines during the outburst from 2006
Sep. through 2007 May and include more recent observations (2009) to
study the subsequent evolution of the source.
Results. The O VI Raman features disappeared completely at
the peak of the major outburst and the subsequent variation differs
substantially from that reported during the previous decade. The
He I and He II lines, and the Balmer lines, vary in phase
with the Raman features but there is a double-valuedness to the
He I 6678, 7065 relative to the O VI Raman 6825 Å
variations in the period between 2006-2008 that has not been previously
reported.
Conclusions. The variations in the Raman feature ratio through
the outburst interval are consistent with the disappearance of the
O VI FUV resonance wind lines from the white dwarf and of the
surrounding O+5 ionized region within the red giant wind provoked by the expansion and cooling of the white dwarf photosphere.
Key words: stars: individual: AG Draconis - binaries: symbiotic - radiation mechanisms: general - atomic processes
1 Introduction
Although as a class, the symbiotic stars are enigmatic, the S-type star
AG Draconis is unusually full of surprises. The system has an orbital period of approximately 550 days (Meinunger 1979; Fekel et al. 2000) and consists of a low metallicity K0-K3 giant (see, e.g., Smith et al. 1996)
and a hot white dwarf (WD), whose effective temperature is estimated to
be between 100 kK and 170 kK. Although there are no eclipses,
the ultraviolet (UV) variations are consistent with orbital modulation
due to wind absorption of the WD continuum and its associated ionized
region by the giant (Gonzalez-Riestra et al. 1999, hereafter G99; Young et al. 2005).
The archival photometric history of AG Dra is particularly interesting.
For instance, ten major outbursts have been recorded for AG Dra, with a
V of 2 mag, between 1890 and 1960 (Robinson 1969) at intervals of roughly 14 to 15 years (Viotti et al. 1983; Mikolajewska et al. 1995; Tomov & Tomova 2002; Leedjärv et al. 2004, hereafter L04; Gális et al. 2004; Viotti et al. 2007; Skopal et al. 2007). The major events are double-peaked, with interburst intervals of 1 yr.
Since the outburst of 1980, additional bursts of weaker magnitude have
been recorded that show a similar inter-outburst timescale. It is the
strongest ``supersoft'' X-ray source known among the symbiotics
(Greiner et al. 1997; Gonzalez-Riestra et al. 2008, hereafter G08) and is strongly variable with two characteristic states of hardness. Gonzalez-Riestra et al. (1999)
distinguish between ``cool'' and ``hot'' outbursts, where the major
outbursts of 1980 and 1994 were ``cool'' according to the He II
Zanstra temperatures. These were interpreted as a cooling of the WD as
its radius increases, leading to higher luminosity with envelope
nuclear burning. Observations of AG Dra taken over the lifetime of IUE, and including the outburst episodes of 1980 and 1994, have been published by Gonzalez-Riestra et al. (1999).
They note that the long wavelength UV continuum flux decreased by 20%
over the observation baseline. Zanstra temperatures are in the range
90 kK to 110 kK. Eriksson et al. (2006) determined WD wind velocities of 120 to 150 km s-1 based on a re-analysis of the IUE high resolution spectra.
There is also a significant far ultraviolet flux (FUV) archive for AG Dra (
Å), virtually all of it from quiescent intervals. ORFEUS spectra, obtained in 1993 with BEFS, show a broad O VI 1031 Å line with peak flux of
erg s-1 cm-2 Å-1 along with strong narrow red giant wind components (>10-11). TUES spectra from 1996 showed a broad O VI line with peak flux
(Schmid et al. 1999). HUT spectra obtained in 1995 show the broad line with peak flux
but at comparatively low resolution (Birriel et al. 2000). FUSE
spectra were taken during quiescent periods from March 2000 to December
2004 and in April 2007 during the decay of the 2006 outburst. In these
data, Young et al. (2006) identified emission lines from highly ionized species, consistent with an electron temperature
kK.
The high ionization Ne lines indicate a higher temperature closer to
the WD. The broad O VI line was clearly variable even during
periods with the
same U magnitude; the difference appears to be when the
observations occurred relative to the outbursts and the type of
outburst. Spectra were obtained with a range from (<0.5 to 5)
,
the weak line occurred at the last epoch. Notably, BEFS and FUSE detected P Cyg components from the K star wind whenever the broad line was strong. One HST/STIS Ly
spectrum shows a broad, strong emission profile with P Cyg absorption at greater than -2000 km s-1 at about the same time as the 2003 FUSE spectrum, a feature unobservable with IUE. The Lyman decrement is very large: no emission is ever detectable at Ly
and it is weak at Ly
in all FUV spectra.
The latest major outburst of AG Dra began in late August 2006 (around
MJD 53900), earlier than anticipated from the average time between
major outbursts, and reached a maximum of
.
This outburst was followed by a second, smaller one in October 2007 that showed a more rapid decline and reached a maximum
.
Unlike the previous two major outburst events, the UV spectrum (900 to
3000 Å) was not accessible with spectroscopy. However, the optical
O VI
6825, 7080 Å features are formed by Raman scattering on Ly
of the FUV O VI resonance doublet. As such, they provide a window
into the behavior of the WD during an outburst that is not affected by
orbitally modulated absorption. AG Draconis is particularly notable for
the extreme conversion efficiencies previously derived for the Raman
scattering, of order 50% (Schmid et al. 1999; see, however, Birriel et al. 2000).
With our optical spectroscopic monitoring, which began at the peak of
the 2006 outburst and continues to the present, we can correlate the
behavior of spectral variations and quantify flux variations in the UV
from the peak of the outburst through its subsequent decay. Here we
concentrate on the most significant new result, the variation of the
O VI Raman features during the outburst, how it compared with the
helium and Balmer line variations, and what it may reveal about the
high energy continuum and activity of the WD.
2 Observations
Our optical observational data set consists of spectra taken with
the Cassini 1.5 m at Loiano Observatory with all four grisms
(covering 700-8500 Å, resolution between 0.4 Å to 4 Å
per pixel, exposure times from 10 to 1200 s), and the 2.0 m
Ondrejov Observatory with the RETICON spectrograph (6400-6950 Å,
resolution 0.24 Å per pixel, exposure time was typically
1200 s). The journal of observations and the tables of
measurements are included in the online material. All spectra were
reduced using IRAF and our own special purpose routines written in IDL.
In several instances, contemporaneous spectra allow us to correlate and
cross-calibrate the data from the three sites. The continuum variations
were checked based on measurements of absorption line equivalent widths
from the K star photosphere and the fluxes were corrected for continuum
variations using contemporary CCD photometry.
For phasing we have used the orbital ephemeris of Fekel et al. (2000) based on the K star radial velocities,

with an amplitude of


These new observations were supplemented by archival spectra. An archival HST/STIS
medium resolution observation covering much of the UV and optical
(1150-8000 Å with some gaps in spectral coverage) is available
(program O6KY, 2003 Apr. 19, MJD 52 748) at orbital phase 0
34. Wavelengths were checked for the HST/STIS spectra and registered using the interstellar velocities measured for the Na I D lines and the published IUE velocities. The FUSE spectra were wavelength corrected using the interstellar H2
absorption lines. We also used a Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG)
spectrum, obtained at high resolution on 2005 Aug. 14 (MJD 53 596)
at orbital phase 0
89. It nearly coincides with the peak of a minor outburst, with
mag, and
mag (Skopal et al. 2007). Continuum points were chosen, in part, based on this spectrum in comparison with the HST/STIS spectrum. It has also been essential for understanding the profiles of the neutral and ionized helium and Balmer lines
. Classical photoelectric
measurements
in the standard Johnson-Cousins system were carried out by
single-channel photometers mounted in the Cassegrain foci of 0.6-m
reflectors at the Skalnaté Pleso and Stará Lesná (pavilion G2)
observatories (see Skopal et al. 2004, for details). The star SAO 16952 (V = 9.88,
B-V = 0.56,
U-B = -0.04,
)
and SAO 16935 (V = 9.46,
B-V = 1.50,
U-B = 1.89) were used as the comparison and check, respectively. More recently
CCD photometry was obtained with the 0.5-m telescope at the Stará Lesná Observatory (pavilion G1). The SBIG ST10 MXE CCD camera with the chip
pixels was mounted at the Newtonian focus.
The size of the pixel is 6.8
m and the scale 0.56
/pixel, corresponding to the field of view of a CCD frame about of
arcmin. Other details of the CCD photometric reduction were described by Parimucha & Vanko (2005). The same comparison stars were used as in Skopal et al. (2007).
3 Analysis
The majority of our data set, listed in Tables 1 and 2,
consists of low and moderate resolution optical spectra, which include
emission lines of the H Balmer series, He I/II, and O VI
Raman features. Cross calibration of the data sets is possible since we
have overlap during late 2006 between the Loiano and the higher
resolution Ondrejov spectra, all of which were during either the
decline or inter-outburst phases, and of all three sites in early 2007.
These permit a test of the effect of reduced spectral resolution on the
measurements of the narrow lines, particularly those of He I. We
find that the Loiano data systematically overestimate the equivalent
width by about 20% and, in creating the full time sequence, we include
this correction in the plots. There is essentially no effect for the
broader lines. The majority of the Loiano H
profiles are saturated, but several obtained near optical maximum and
during the first stages of the decline, taken with 10 s exposure
times, yielded reliable measurements and are included in Table 1b.
Although the Ondrejov spectra missed the peak of the 2006 event, they
provide sufficient coverage of the subsequent evolution. The equivalent
width uncertainty was never above 10%, being largest for the O VI
7080 Å feature and 5-10% for all He I measurements.
Table 1a: Journal of Observations. Loiano: He I/II and O VI Raman emission line equivalent widths (Å).
Table 1b: Journal of Observations. Loiano: Balmer emission line equivalent widths (Å).
The previously mentioned archival HST/STIS medium
resolution observation was absolutely calibrated. The fluxes and
equivalent widths were measured for comparison with our data (units of:
F(H
=
erg s-1 cm-2 (
EW = 111.6 Å); F(He I 6678) =
(EW=-2.08 Å), F(Raman 6825) =
(EW=7.29 Å); F(He I 7065) =
(EW=2.45 Å); F(Raman 7080) =
(EW=3.44 Å).
The Raman 7080 Å/6825 Å line ratio was 0.47, higher than our
outburst values but consistent with other observations taken during
quiescence. The 6825 Å line profile was similar to most quiescent
spectra, with an intermediate equivalent width (see below).
3.1 O VI Raman features
As mentioned in the introduction, AG Dra has one of the strongest O VI Raman pairs of any known symbiotic system. The variations of these lines are discussed at length in, e.g. L04, G08. Although the disappearance of the features in symbiotics has been noted sporadically in the literature (e.g. Tomov et al. 2000; Burmeister & Leedjärev 2007, and references therein), to our knowledge this is the first time such an event has been observed in AG Dra or any other system during an outburst that has been followed with sufficient coverage to provide details of the phenomenon. The minimum line strength coincided with the optical peak of the outburst, although we have no spectra prior to optical (
![]() |
Figure 1: Comparison of Loiano 4 Å resolution spectra from 2006 Sep. 9 ( top) and 2006 Nov. 9 ( bottom). The first taken at the peak of the outburst, shows the He I 6678 Å line about as strong as the second spectrum - taken in the decline phase - but with no detectable O VI Raman 6825 Å feature (see text for discussion). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
( Top) U (plus) and V (diamond) CCD photometry for AG Dra throughout the observing interval; ( bottom) equivalent width (Å) variations of the O VI Raman features: |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Comparison of the full data set of blue O VI Raman |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Variations of the O VI Raman |
Open with DEXTER |
Table 2: Journal of Observations. Ondrejov: emission line equivalent widths (Å).
The variation of the Raman 6825/7080 ratio, based on the equivalent widths, is shown in Fig. 4.
The change is statistically significant and systematic, the first
maximum corresponding to the maximum source brightness in our observing
interval. Since the last FUSE spectrum from 2007 Mar. 15 nearly
coincided with the absolutely calibrated Loiano spectrum of 2007 Feb.
27 we can make some further quantitative statements. The flux ratio of
the O VI
1031, 1037 lines in 2007 was approximately the same as the optical Raman features,
0.45, which is considerably lower than the peak value that was also characteristic of the earlier FUSE
data. Note that although the Raman line varied monotonically with
visual magnitude during the 2006 outburst, this trend has not
continued, especially during the weaker outburst in 2007 and only now
is the emission returning toward its historical quiescent level. Our
most recent Ondrejov data, from spring 2009, show that the
6825 Å
feature has remained below the minimum equivalent width reported in the
time series in L04 while maintaining essentially the same profile as
Fig. 5. One additional measurement is available for the ratio for MJD 54 703 from the Ondrejov spectra, EW(O VI Raman 7080) = 0.94 Å. This corresponds to a 6825/7080 ratio of
3.7, the highest value we observed.
![]() |
Figure 5: Comparison of O VI Raman line profiles for HST/STIS spectrum (MJD 52 755) ( top) and Ondrjov (MJD 54 704) ( bottom). The two spectra were obtained during similar quiescent epochs of AG Dra. The strong emission line blueward of O VI 7080 Å is He I 7065 Å. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: Comparison of the FUSE O VI doublet spectra (D0090106, 2007 Mar. 15) ( top panel: 1031.9 Å solid, 1037.6 Å dot-dash) with the Ondrejov spectrum shown in Fig. 5 ( bottom panel: 6825 Å solid, 7080 Å dot-dash). Fluxes are normalized, and the radial velocities for the optical lines have been scaled by the Raman frequency shift (see text for discussion). The narrow emission feature in the bottom panel is He I 7065 Å. |
Open with DEXTER |
An interesting point that emerges from the HST/STIS observation is the separation of the peak of the emission and the ``notch'' in the two features. The velocity difference,
km s-1,
was quite similar despite the different profiles. This is compatible
with from the Ondrejov spectrum obtained during our interval when for
the 6825 Å feature the separation was
200 km s-1. We discuss possible origins of this structure in the last section. Figure 6 compares the line profiles for the O VI resonance lines from the last FUSE
spectrum with the Ondrejov spectrum of the Raman features (MJD
54 703). The velocities have been corrected for the Raman effect
wavelength shift (a factor of 6.6) in the optical spectra.
3.1.1 Raman conversion efficiency
We attempted to use the last FUSE data to determine the
Raman conversion efficiency that, for AG Dra, has been studied based on
data taken in the 1990s. For the Raman features, the measured fluxes
from Loiano were F(6825) =
erg s-1 cm-2 and F(7080) =
.
It should be noted that these are almost identical to the values from the HST/STIS spectrum, see above. For the FUSE spectrum, the measured fluxes were F(1031) =
erg s-1 cm-2 and F(1037) =
.
Thus, the doublet ratio was similar for the O VI lines, 0.44 for the Raman features and 0.42 for the FUV doublet. The FUSE fluxes are, however, not directly usable for deriving the Raman conversion efficiency,
Y=N(6825)/N(1031), based on the comparison in both
line and continuum fluxes and the Science Data Assessment form for
observation D0090106. If, however, the continuum fluxes scale then it
is possible to at least place a limit on Y. Using the Hutchings & Gaisson (2001) and Sofia et al. (2005) FUV extinction curves for the Galaxy, and the mean visual extinction
E(B-V)=0.11 from Schegel et al. (1998)
maps, the extinction correction for AG Dra at the FUV O VI doublet
is 6.9. The spectrum was taken around quiescence following the major
outburst. If the actual continuum level was approximately the same, we
find an additional correction factor of
for the continuum level and
and 0.4 for the two components, respectively. If, instead, we adopt
E(B-V)=0.08 (see Young et al. 2005; Birriel et al. 2000) we find
and 0.3 for the two components applying the differential H2
absorption correction factors from Birriel et al. (respectively
0.97 and 0.64 for the two components of the FUV doublet).
This tentative efficiency is similar to that obtained by Schmid et al. (1999), Y=0.5 for 6825 and between 0.3 and 0.5, with an uncertainty of order 50%, from the two observations of
7080 using ORFEUS
data obtained in 1993 and 1996; neither was obtained during an
outburst. In contrast, this value is larger than found by Birriel
et al. (2000), who obtained
for the two Raman features using contemporaneous HUT
and groundbased spectra from 1995 Mar. 16 when the source was,
according to AAVSO data, declining after a sequence of outbursts. The
ratio of the O VI FUV doublet lines during the HUT observations, 3.23, is quite different from ours and about the minimum value obtained during the FUSE era. We do not have coincident FUV data for the peak of the outburst when the O VI Raman feature was undetectable.
3.1.2 O VI Raman line profiles
The O VI

![]() |
Figure 7: Ratio of the equivalent widths of the two O VI Raman 6825 Å components obtained by Gaussian decomposition as a function of the line strength (in Å). The blue component is both weaker and consistently broader, the broadest profile corresponding to the strongest integrated flux and optical minimum. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Flux ratio of the FUV O VI doublet components ( bottom) and the optical Raman features ( top) as a function of orbital phase based on the Fekel et al. (2000) radial velocity ephemeris; phase 0
|
Open with DEXTER |
For the interval 1997 to 2003, L04 report a correlation of H
emission equivalent width with orbital period. For comparison, using a different measurement, we show, in Fig. 8,
the variation of the O VI FUV doublet and optical Raman line
ratios phased on the radial velocity ephemeris (Fekel et al. 2000).
The FUV spectra were obtained mainly in quiescence, while our spectra
were taken during outbursts so any search for orbital modulation of the
line strengths is hindered by the outburst, which lasted about 0
2.
This dominates the relatively brief time interval of these equivalent
width measurements and we regard any variations as being due to the
outbursts. A dedicated monitoring of this system is needed to assure
that a dense enough coverage is available during any quiescent phase to
disentangle the effects. If the orbital modulation of the line ratio is
real, being a single wave with minimum at K star elongation may
indicate a slight eccentricity in the system or an asymmetry in the WD
environment.
![]() |
Figure 9: Equivalent width variations of the He I and He II lines. Upper left: He II 4686 (diamond, Loiano only), He I 6678 (square, Loiano; plus: Ondrejov) and He II 7065 (cross, scaled by 1/5, Loiano only); upper right: He I 6678 Å vs. He II 4686 Å (Loiano); lower left: O VI 6825 Å vs. He II 4686 Å (Loiano only); lower right: O VI 6825 Å vs. He I 6678 Å (square: Loiano, plus, Ondrejov). See text for discussion. |
Open with DEXTER |
3.2 Helium lines
Figure 9 shows the variation of the helium lines through the outburst. The He I 7065 Å line showed similar variations but our coverage is not as complete. To highlight the qualitative change in the AG Dra variations, we also show the comparison between the Raman 6825 Å feature and He I 6678 Å (lower right panel). This highlights the difference between the outburst and post-outburst variations, already visible from the time series. The difference is real, the same relative behavior is seen in the H
The strongest He I lines (
5875,
6678, and 7065 Å) all show a peak coinciding with the He II
and Raman features, at the minimum of the visual flux. As reported by
L04 and G99, we find
EW(He II 4686)/EW(H
)
;
at no epoch did this exceed 1.0, but we emphasize that these spectra
did not coincide with the peak of the major event. Notably, none of our
spectra displayed a He II 4686 Å line as strong as the most
extreme reported by L04. The line strength during the declining phase
of the outburst was strongly correlated with that of the Raman
6825 Å feature but at line minimum light appears to vary
relatively less. There is, in addition, a single late measurement, MJD
54 703, of He I 7065 Å from Ondrejov, EW(He I 7065) = 0.89 Å, which is the weakest recorded during this observing interval. Birriel (2004)
reports the detection of Raman scattered He II in the spectra of
HM Sge and V1016 Cyg. We find no evidence for this feature in any AG
Dra spectra, neither the lower resolution Loiano data taken during the
outburst nor the high resolution TNG spectra taken outside of outburst.
The He I lines vary in phase with the He II 4686
line during the decay phase of the outburst; we have no simultaneous
spectra at peak but there is an additional, weak line is present at
6680.2 Å which coincides with the NIST listing for O IV
6682 Å (at the systemic velocity) but it is more likely He II
6682 Å. This line varies but we do not report those results since
the S/N ratio is not sufficiently high in most of the spectra to
provide accurate measurements. Its properties are the same as the
helium lines, and we thus identify this as a recombination line from
the same ionized region. It appears to be constant in the Ondrejov
spectra, where it is barely detectable; because of the low resolution
and SNR of the HST/STIS spectrum it is not visible. This line is visible in the velocity plot for He I 6678 Å (Fig. 12).
3.3 Balmer lines
All quoted equivalent widths were measured between 2000 km s-1 for consistency with previous reports of extended wings and based, in part, on continuum points selected with the TNG and HST/STIS spectra. The extended wings (from 1000 to 2000 km s-1) contribute
25% of the total flux. Figure 10 shows the variations of the equivalent widths; our coverage of the major outburst only includes H
.
Our coverage of the post-outburst period shows that H
remained below its level during the outburst and decline phase. The
minimum value we find is consistent with that reported in L04 (their
Fig. 4 shows the variations phased according to the photometric ephemeris). Their equivalent widths for both H
and H
are greater than any we observed during the recovery from the major
outburst. The effects on the interpretation of the He line variations
due to the continuum variations are, however, important and we will
return to this point presently.
![]() |
Figure 10:
Variation of the Balmer lines from the beginning of the 2006 outburst of AG Dra; H |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Sample Balmer line profiles, TNG spectra, 2005 Aug. 14 (MJD 3596). Solid: H |
Open with DEXTER |
3.4 High resolution Balmer and He I line profiles
The TNG spectrum, with a resolution of 0.1 Å,
is capable of resolving the structure on the neutral helium emission
lines; none of the Ondrejov or Loiano spectra have sufficient
resolution to detect this, nor were they resolved in the medium
dispersion HST/STIS spectra. The He I lines are all well
resolved and, more significantly, it display complex profiles with an
extended red wing and
FWZI = 150 km s-1; The absorption feature is at virtually the same radial velocity for the three lines,
km s-1, while the peak velocity is -125 km s-1 for He I 5875, -143 km s-1for He I 6678, and -130 km s-1 for He I 7065. The H
line shows strong absorption at -177 km-1, but with the peak velocity displaced to -92 km s-1, about 50 km s-1
to the red of the systemic velocity. Absorption is present on all
He I lines regardless of multiplicity; as shown in Fig. 12, the absorption decreases in order of He I
5875, 7065, and 6678. All He I lines are extremely narrow compared to the Balmer profiles, FWHM(He I)
80 km s-1. In contrast, the He II 4686 Å profile is single peaked at the system velocity with a
FWHM = 70 km s-1 in the TNG and the HST/STIS,
spectra, although taken at activity states of the AG Dra. These are
consistent with the lines being formed near the WD but with a puzzle
regarding the cause of the absorption. It cannot be from the wind of
the red giant and must, instead, arise within the embedded ionized
region around the WD In the Ondrejov spectra, the H
profiles display variable absorption (e.g. Smith & Bopp 1981; Ivison et al. 1994; and Belczynski et al. 2000). We reserve further analysis of these variations for the next paper.
![]() |
Figure 12:
Comparative line profiles for H |
Open with DEXTER |
3.5 Line flux variations based on broadband photometry
With the exception of the major outburst, line variations can be
appropriately characterized by equivalent widths alone. However, for
the outburst interval, from MJD 4000 to 4400, the continuum variations
alter the interpretation of the line strengths for the Balmer and
helium lines. We have adopted a scaling based on calibrated spectra
taken outside of outburst along with the two in this sequence, from
Loiano at the extremes of the major outburst (Sep. 2006 and Feb. 2007)
and in the B, V, and
photometry. Assuming that the visible continuum and emission lines are
independently varying, we correct the continuum level by dividing by
the continuum flux (based on the photometry), normalized to the minimum
V and R magnitudes (using V and
light curves) around 2007 Feb. 15, roughly coincident with the last FUSE spectrum and a date for which we have a flux calibrated red spectrum. In Fig. 10 (bottom panel) we show the effect on the Balmer lines, in Fig. 13 for the Raman 6825 Å feature, in Fig. 14 on the He I 6678 Å line, and in Fig. 15
for He II 4686 Å. As discussed above, the Loiano spectrum
from MJD 54159 was absolutely calibrated. The Balmer series fluxes
were, in units of 10-12 erg s-1 cm-2, F(H
)
> 62 (saturated), F(H
)
= 10.4, F(H
)
= 3.67, F(H
)
= 1.94. For the helium lines, in the same units, F(He I 5578) = 2.54, F(He I 6678) = 1.95, F(He I 7065) = 2.51, and F(He II 4686) = 9.04. All fluxes quoted are uncorrected for the (minimal) visual reddening.
![]() |
Figure 13: Top: CCD-V magnitudes for AG Dra during outburst and recovery (see text); bottom: variations of the O VI Raman 6825 Å feature with and without correction to normalized fluxes based on the optical light curve. Diamond: combined Loiano/Ondrejov equivalent widths; plus: scaled fluxes generated based on the V photometry. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14: Comparative variations of the equivalent widths of the He I 6678 line with and without correction to normalized fluxes based on the optical light curve. Triangles, squares: Loiano/Ondrejov scaled fluxes; plus, equivalent widths uncorrected. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 15: Comparative variations of the equivalent widths of the O VI Raman 6825 Å line with He II 4686 Å based on the B and V photometric variations. Plus: equivalent widths; diamond: scaled fluxes. |
Open with DEXTER |
The main effects of the correction are to reduce the interval of
the weak Raman emission phase and to change the variations of
He II 4686 Å relative to the He I lines. During the
maximum of the major outburst, the upper limit for the EWs
of both Raman lines is more than an order of magnitude lower than the
strongest emission (quiescence). During the decline phase the ratio of
the two Raman features remains approximately constant. As reported by
L04, the He II 4686 Å line is positively correlated with the
Raman emission but once the correction is applied for the continuum
variations this is not as tight a relation, a result of the correlation
induced by the continuum variations. The neutral helium lines vary in
phase with He II 4686 Å at the strongest phases (Fig. 9). The variations of the Balmer lines are largely unaffected since our Loiano data for H-H
cover only the decline and quiescence stages of the outburst.
4 Discussion
Our results both confirm and extend previous studies of the line variations in AG Dra, especially L04 and G08, but also present important novelties. The most significant is the vanishing - and recovery - of the Raman lines during and following the peak of the major outburst. Since there is no indication that the wind of the red giant has significantly changed in velocity or density, the hydrogen line variations are consistent with the same profile although the line flux decreases, it is more likely that this signals the disappearance of the emission component of the O VI resonance lines. This observation provides further support for the Raman line as a proxy measure of the state of the highest ionization region and inner fast wind around the gainer.
The minimum Raman line equivalent width during the decade before the 2006 outburst was about 6 Å, about the same as our first Ondrejov spectrum and the HST/STIS measurement. During the entire recent outburst, we observed consistently lower values. This can not be due to continuum variations alone, although some may be present at about the 20% level based on the variations of the He I lines. If each of the Raman features consists of two components, as suggested by the decomposition, then the line variations indicate that both the WD wind and ionized region disappeared during the peak of the major outburst. Since we do not have observations prior to the photometric peak we cannot constrain the density from the time dependence alone. The recovery of the emission line was more rapid than the rate of continuum decrease, seen from the comparison of the light curve with the Raman flux variations.
The suggestion that the soft XR and UV variations are due to expansion and falling effective temperature of the gainer in this system receives support from the behavior we observe (Greiner 1997; Gonzalez-Riestra et al. 1999). The WD develops an optically thick, extended atmosphere with a large covering factor that suppresses the resonance O VI lines and the ionized region but maintains sufficient excitation to produce the emission at He I. The conversion efficiency for UV photons by Raman scattering has been obtained from previous observations of the system during quiescence and unless there is a drastic change in the structure of the wind in the accretion region we would expect it to remain roughly constant, so the disappearance of the optical Raman lines indicates an increase in the optical depth of the UV and the redistribution of the radiation to longer wavelengths. If the redistribution is essentially passive - that is, if during the outburst the bolometric luminosity of the WD does not significantly change - the maximum increase we would expect in the visible is about one magnitude. The brightest outbursts are substantially larger than this, using U and B as the proxies for the redistribution since the red giant contributes most of the flux at V and longer wavelengths. Instead, if a thermonuclear runaway is initiated on the gainer, the increase in the radius of the pseudo-photosphere will produce a substantial change in the ultraviolet spectrum, including the appearance of neutral and low ionization state lines of the iron peak (the so-called ``iron curtain'' well known from classical novae and Luminous Blue Variables) and the disappearance of the highest ionization wind lines that should normally be visible from the gainer. This antiphase behavior, so well known from LBVs, is consistent with IUE and ROSAT observations reported by Greiner et al. (1997) and G08 during the inter-outburst period preceding the latest eruption. To increase the optical depth sufficiently in the UV requires column densities of order 1024 cm-2 or higher and would be consistent with an expansion of the WD photosphere accompanied by an optically thick wind.
Lee & Kang (2007) propose an accretion disk as the source for Raman scattered photons and model the inequality of the peaks as an optical depth effect by self-absorption, in the RG wind. It is possible that this is a contributor to the spectra, hydrodynamical modeling of symbiotic wind does produce disks (e.g. Walder et al. 2008), but it is far more direct to decompose the profile into one from the scattering of the WD wind and the other from the surrounding ionized nebula of the K star wind. the intensity ratio of the presumed two peaks is slightly variable in the Ondrejov spectra, depending on the line strength. The Raman 6825 Å line profile is consistent with the interpretation by Schmid et al. (1999), based on the comparison of ORFEUS and optical spectra, that the source photons arise from the ionized region around the hot component and are scattered in the slow wind of the K giant. This would imply that the timescales for the variations should be of order the recombination time and that the outburst, extinguishing the FUV and soft XR, causes a collapse of the O+5 region around the WD. Additional changes on a shorter timescale, mainly in the broader component, could be due to the same mechanism that produces the outburst, that the cooling of the pseudo-photosphere and the increase in the fast wind optical depth emission from the Raman lines. The 7080 Å feature has a different profile. We suggest that in addition to the intrinsic WD wind absorption component, and that of the ionized region in the RG wind, there are additional absorbers - both in the ionized and neutral K star wind - that are altering the Raman profile. Several multiplets of S I ground state transitions between 1030 and 1038 Å and the C II 1036, 1037 Å doublet may not be entirely interstellar in origin. Instead, any additional absorption would not only alter the Raman line profile but also affect the line ratio. If, for instance, during a major outburst the C II absorption line varies, this will affect the conversion efficiency and the resulting optical profiles. Since, however, the region is heavily blanketed by interstellar H2 it is not possible to obtain an absorption equivalent width and lacking contemporaneous pairs of FUV and optical spectra during the peak of the outburst, this must remain an hypothesis.
The timescale for an outburst, about four months, is
approximately the recombination time for a region with an electron
density of about 108 cm-3 for the O+5 zone, using the recombination coefficients from Nahar & Prasad (2003)
in the temperature range 15-100 kK and consistent with the
previous electron density estimates in the literature, e.g. Young
et al. (2005, 2006).
This would explain the absence of the [O III] lines in a region
sufficiently ionized to otherwise show them. The He II 6682 Å
line, weakly present in the best exposed spectra, is slightly stronger
relative to He I 6678 Å in data from 2008 June, possibly
indicating ionization has occurred. The data from the main outburst do
not have sufficient resolution to show this line, and there are no
contemporaneous UV spectra during a similar phase (although the one FUSE
spectrum, taken almost at quiescence, shows the O VI resonance
lines at about their maximum strength). This may explain the weakening
of the red component of the Raman line. The disappearance of both
components of the Raman features also challenges shocked wind models
for events during the outburst that must produce temperatures lower
than those of the photoionization source. the increase in the visual
flux, 0.3-1.0 ,
and the contemporary decrease in the ultraviolet are compatible with
simple flux redistribution from an optically thick pseudo-photosphere
mentioned above. This would easily account for the disappearance of the
high ionization features and the persistence of the He II and
He I emission during optical maximum. Further discussion of the
long term history of all emission lines and modeling of this system is
postponed to the next paper.
Note added in revision: A parallel study of the 2006-2008 outburst was published after we had submitted our paper (Munari et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 1070) that reports photometric and low resolution spectroscopic observations of the event. Their spectrum from near the peak of the outburst, 2006 Sep. 30 (MJD 54 008) is simultaneous with ours at the peak of the outburst and confirms the absence of the two O VI Raman features, identifying the event as a ``cool outburst'' in the sense of G08. Their subsequent spectra confirm the recovery of the line. They also report, based on an echelle spectrum ( R=35 000) taken on 2006 Oct. 6, the presence of P Cyg components on the He I lines with velocities similar to those we describe here. A further discussion of these results will be included in our next paper.
AcknowledgementsResearch at Loiano is supported by INAF. P.K. was supported by ESA PECS grant No. 98058. G.M.W. acknowledges support from NASA grant NNG06GJ29G. We thank the staff at Loiano for their kind help in obtaining many of the spectra used in this study as a service observing program and U. Munari, C. Rossi, and R. Viotti for use of unpublished spectra. Some spectra at Ondrejov were taken by M. Netolický, B. Kucerová, V. Votruba and D. Korcáková. M.W. was supported by the Research Program MSM0021620860 of the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic. A.S. was supported by a grant of the Slovak Academy of Sciences No. 2/7010/27. We thank T. B. Ake for collaboration on the FUSE proposal that began this observation, unfortunately not executed before the end of the mission, and for his advice on the FUSE data, and J. P. Aufdenberg, C. Rossi, and R. Viotti for valuable discussions.The HST/STIS and FUSE spectra were obtained from the MAST archive of STScI and archival visual photometric data were provided by the AAVSO.
References
- Belczynski, K., Mikoajewska, J., Munari, U., Ivison, R. J., & Friedjung, M. 2000, A&AS, 146, 407 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Birriel, J. J. 2004, ApJ, 612, 1136 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Birriel, J. J., Espey, B. R., & Schulte-Ladbeck, R. E. 2000, ApJ, 545, 1020 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Burmeister, M., & Leedjärv, L. 2007, A&A, 461, L5 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Eriksson, M., Johansson, S., & Wahlgren, G. M. 2006, A&A, 451, 157 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Fekel, C. F., Hinkle, K. H., Joyce, R. R., & Skrutskie, M. F. 2000, AJ, 120, 3255 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gális, R., Hric, L., & Petrk, K. 2004, RMxAC, 20, 242 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez-Riestra, R., Viotti, R., Iijima, T., & Greiner, J. 1999, A&A, 347, 478 (G99) [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez-Riestra, R., Viotti, R. F., Iijima, T., et al. 2008, A&A, 481, 725 (G08) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Greiner, J., Bickert, K., Luthardt, R., et al. 1997, A&A, 322, 576 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Hutchings, J. B., & Gaisson, J. 2001, PASP, 113, 1205 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ivison R. J., Bode, M. F., & Meaburn, J. 1994, A&AS, 103, 201 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H.-W., & Kang, S. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1156 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Leedjärv, L., Burmeister, M., Mikolajewski, M., et al. 2004, A&A, 415, 273 (L04) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Meinunger, L. 1979, Inf. Bull. Var. Stars, 1611 [Google Scholar]
- Mikolajewska, J., Kenyon, S. J., Mikolajewski, M., Garcia, M. R., & Polidan, R. S. 1995, AJ, 109, 1289 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nahar, S. N., & Prasad, A. 2003, ApJS, 149, 239 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Parimucha, S., & Vanko, M. 2005, CoSka, 35, 35 [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, L. 1969, Per. Sviosdi, 16, 507 [Google Scholar]
- Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schmid, H. M., Krautter, J., Appenzeller, I., et al. 1999, A&A, 348, 950 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Skopal, A., Pribulla, T., Vanko, M., et al. 2004, CoSka, 34, 45 [Google Scholar]
- Skopal, A., Vanko, M., & Pribulla, T. 2007, AN, 328, 909 (Sk07) [Google Scholar]
- Smith, S. E., & Bopp, B. W 1981, MNRAS, 195, 733 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Smith, V. V., Cunha, K., Jorissen, A., & Boffin, H. M. J. 1996, A&A, 315, 179 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Sofia, U. J., Wolff, M. J., Rachford, B., et al. 2005, ApJ, 625, 167 [Google Scholar]
- Tomov, T., Munari, U., & Marrese, P. M. 2000, A&A, 354, L25 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Tomov, N. A., & Tomova, M. T. 2002, A&A, 388, 202 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Viotti, R., Ricciardi, O., Giangrande, A., et al. 1983, A&A, 119, 285 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Viotti, R. F., Friedjung, M., & González-Riestra, R. 2007, BaltA., 16, 20 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Walder, R., Folini, D., & Shore, S. N. 2008, A&A, 484, L9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Young, P. R., Dupree, A. K., Espey, B. R., Kenyon, S. J., & Ake, T. B. 2005, ApJ, 618, 891 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Young, P. R., Dupree, A. K., Espey, B. R., & Kenyon, S. J. 2006, ApJ, 650, 1091 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Footnotes
- ... IDL
- IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the US National Science Foundation.
- ... lines
- We will present more details on these, and other, pre-outburst observations in a paper now in preparation.
All Tables
Table 1a: Journal of Observations. Loiano: He I/II and O VI Raman emission line equivalent widths (Å).
Table 1b: Journal of Observations. Loiano: Balmer emission line equivalent widths (Å).
Table 2: Journal of Observations. Ondrejov: emission line equivalent widths (Å).
All Figures
![]() |
Figure 1: Comparison of Loiano 4 Å resolution spectra from 2006 Sep. 9 ( top) and 2006 Nov. 9 ( bottom). The first taken at the peak of the outburst, shows the He I 6678 Å line about as strong as the second spectrum - taken in the decline phase - but with no detectable O VI Raman 6825 Å feature (see text for discussion). |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 2:
( Top) U (plus) and V (diamond) CCD photometry for AG Dra throughout the observing interval; ( bottom) equivalent width (Å) variations of the O VI Raman features: |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Comparison of the full data set of blue O VI Raman |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Variations of the O VI Raman |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 5: Comparison of O VI Raman line profiles for HST/STIS spectrum (MJD 52 755) ( top) and Ondrjov (MJD 54 704) ( bottom). The two spectra were obtained during similar quiescent epochs of AG Dra. The strong emission line blueward of O VI 7080 Å is He I 7065 Å. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 6: Comparison of the FUSE O VI doublet spectra (D0090106, 2007 Mar. 15) ( top panel: 1031.9 Å solid, 1037.6 Å dot-dash) with the Ondrejov spectrum shown in Fig. 5 ( bottom panel: 6825 Å solid, 7080 Å dot-dash). Fluxes are normalized, and the radial velocities for the optical lines have been scaled by the Raman frequency shift (see text for discussion). The narrow emission feature in the bottom panel is He I 7065 Å. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 7: Ratio of the equivalent widths of the two O VI Raman 6825 Å components obtained by Gaussian decomposition as a function of the line strength (in Å). The blue component is both weaker and consistently broader, the broadest profile corresponding to the strongest integrated flux and optical minimum. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Flux ratio of the FUV O VI doublet components ( bottom) and the optical Raman features ( top) as a function of orbital phase based on the Fekel et al. (2000) radial velocity ephemeris; phase 0
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 9: Equivalent width variations of the He I and He II lines. Upper left: He II 4686 (diamond, Loiano only), He I 6678 (square, Loiano; plus: Ondrejov) and He II 7065 (cross, scaled by 1/5, Loiano only); upper right: He I 6678 Å vs. He II 4686 Å (Loiano); lower left: O VI 6825 Å vs. He II 4686 Å (Loiano only); lower right: O VI 6825 Å vs. He I 6678 Å (square: Loiano, plus, Ondrejov). See text for discussion. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 10:
Variation of the Balmer lines from the beginning of the 2006 outburst of AG Dra; H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Sample Balmer line profiles, TNG spectra, 2005 Aug. 14 (MJD 3596). Solid: H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 12:
Comparative line profiles for H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 13: Top: CCD-V magnitudes for AG Dra during outburst and recovery (see text); bottom: variations of the O VI Raman 6825 Å feature with and without correction to normalized fluxes based on the optical light curve. Diamond: combined Loiano/Ondrejov equivalent widths; plus: scaled fluxes generated based on the V photometry. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 14: Comparative variations of the equivalent widths of the He I 6678 line with and without correction to normalized fluxes based on the optical light curve. Triangles, squares: Loiano/Ondrejov scaled fluxes; plus, equivalent widths uncorrected. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 15: Comparative variations of the equivalent widths of the O VI Raman 6825 Å line with He II 4686 Å based on the B and V photometric variations. Plus: equivalent widths; diamond: scaled fluxes. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
Copyright ESO 2010
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.