Issue 
A&A
Volume 510, February 2010



Article Number  A6  
Number of page(s)  9  
Section  Stellar structure and evolution  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/00046361/200913221  
Published online  29 January 2010 
Solarlike oscillations in massive mainsequence stars
I. Asteroseismic signatures of the driving and damping regions
K. Belkacem  M. A. Dupret  A. Noels
Institut d'Astrophysique et de Géophysique, Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août 17, 4000 Liège, Belgium
Received 31 August 2009 / Accepted 27 October 2009
Abstract
Motivated by the detection of stochastically excited modes in the massive star V1449 Aql, which is already known to be a
Cephei star, we theoretically investigate the driving by turbulent
convection. By using a full nonadiabatic computation of the damping
rates, together with a computation of the energy injection rates, we
provide an estimate of the amplitudes of modes excited by both the
convective region induced by the iron opacity bump and the convective
core. Despite the uncertainties in the dynamical properties of these
convective regions, we demonstrate that both regions are able to
efficiently excite p
modes above the CoRoT observational threshold and the solar amplitudes.
In addition, we emphasise the potential asteroseismic diagnostics
provided by each convective region, which we hope will help us to
identify the region responsible for solarlike oscillations, and to
place constraints on this convective zone. A forthcoming work will be
dedicated to an extended investigation of the likelihood of solarlike
oscillations across the HertzsprungRussell diagram.
Key words: convection  waves  stars: oscillations
1 Introduction
Cepheitype stars are known to pulsate with large amplitude oscillations (Gautschy & Saio 1995,1996). The mechanism is at the origin of those large amplitude oscillations and is related to the iron opacity bump at (e.g; Pamyatnykh 1999). Those modes are linearly unstable. In contrast, lowamplitude modes have been observed in the Sun for years and are thought to be intrinsically stable but stochastically excited by turbulent convection. Their excitation is attributed to turbulent convection and takes place in the uppermost part of the Sun, which is a place of vigourous and turbulent motion. Since the pioneering work of Lighthill (1952), we know that a turbulent medium generates incoherent acoustic pressure fluctuations (also called acoustic ``noise''). In the past decade, solarlike oscillations have been detected in numerous FG type main sequence and red giant stars, in different evolutionary stages and with different metallicities (see the recent review by Bedding & Kjeldsen 2007).
As in the Sun, massive stars have convective regions, namely the convective core, and two regions associated with the helium and iron opacity bumps. The inner convective region (i.e., the convective core) has an important impact on both the internal structure and the subsequent evolution of the star by means of, for instance, the extent of the region where the chemical elements are mixed (e.g; Kippenhahn & Weigert 1990). In contrast, the external convective zones associated with opacity bumps are generally thought to be unimportant since they transport only a very small fraction of the energy flux, which is dominated by radiation. It is only since the revision of the opacities (Iglesias et al. 1992), which led to an enhancement of the iron opacity bump and could thus account for the instability in Cephei stars, that a convective zone related to the iron opacity bump has been understood to be present in massive stars. Much attention is now drawn to this convective region associated with the iron opacity bump^{}, because it is of interest for the understanding of surface effects such as microturbulence or wind clumping (e.g; Cantiello et al. 2009). However, both the convective core and the iron convection zone are poorly understood. In particular, the typical length scale and time scale of turbulent motions associated with these regions can only be inferred from mixinglength arguments, as well as dynamical properties such as the convective velocities.
Solarlike oscillations (linearly damped and stochastically excited modes) are closely related to those dynamical properties, so their detection in these massive stars is a promising way to infer them. Stochastically excited modes have only been predicted and detected in solarlike and red giant stars (see Bedding & Kjeldsen 2007; de Ridder et al. 2009; Michel et al. 2008, for details). The data gathered by the CoRoT mission has allowed us to report the first detection of solarlike oscillations in a massive star, V1449 Aql (Belkacem et al. 2009b). Those oscillations exhibit mode amplitudes greater than solar, hence the issue of their excitation is of interest. Investigation of unstable modes can place constraints on the internal structure of massive stars (e.g. Dupret et al. 2004; Thoul et al. 2003; Pamyatnykh et al. 2004; Aerts et al. 2003) as well as the underlying excitation mechanisms (e.g; Dziembowski et al. 1993; Dziembowski & Pamiatnykh 1993; Dziembowski & Pamyatnykh 2008; Moskalik & Dziembowski 1992). The discovery of solarlike oscillations is thus an opportunity to go a step further in the understanding of those stars that still challenge theory (Dziembowski 2007).
Our objective in this work is to assess the excitation of solarlike oscillations in massive mainsequence stars, such as Cephei type stars, by turbulent convection. We aim to determine which convective region is able to excite modes above the observational threshold, as well as emphasising the possible asteroseismic diagnostic that would permit us to identify the excitation region and place constraints on this region. Since the amplitude of stochastically excited modes is a balance between driving and damping, both must be modelled. In this work, we use the formalism proposed by Samadi & Goupil (2001) and extended by Belkacem et al. (2008,2006a,b). Damping rates are computed using the MAD code (Grigahcène et al. 2005; Dupret 2002), which is based on a full nonradial nonadiabatic treatment. This first paper of the series focuses on a benchmark model. An extended investigation of the mode amplitude through the HertzsprungRussell diagram will be the subject of the second paper in this series.
The paper is organised as follows. Section 2 introduces the general formalism used to compute mode amplitudes. In Sect. 3, we focus on mode damping rates and emphasise their frequency dependence. Excitation by the convective region associated with the iron convective region is also studied and a possible diagnostic is inferred. Section 4 presents the computation of the mode amplitude excited by the convective core. Our conclusions are formulated in Sect. 5.
2 Modelling mode amplitudes
2.1 Equilibrium stellar structure: a 10 M model as a benchmark
Our objective is to explore the potential of convective regions to drive oscillations. As a benchmark, we investigate the driving of radial acoustic modes by turbulent convection zones in a mainsequence star, which is typical of Cephei stars (Pamyatnykh 1999). A more systematic exploration of the HR diagram is dedicated to the second paper of this series.
2.1.1 Physical input
The stellar structure models used in this work were obtained using the stellar evolution code CLÉS (Scuflaire et al. 2008). In the interior model, we used the OPAL opacities (Iglesias & Rogers 1996) that were extended to low temperatures with the opacities of Alexander & Ferguson (1994) and the CEFF equation of state (ChristensenDalsgaard & Däppen 1992). The metallicity was assumed to be Z=0.02 for the metal mixture derived by Grevesse & Noels (1993). Convection was included according to a BöhmVitense mixinglength (MLT) formalism and no overshoot was allowed. The effect of the mixinglength parameter is discussed in Sects. 3.3 and 4.3. We note, however, that the default value of the mixinglength is 1.8 (the Solar value) and in the convective region associated with the iron opacity bump, the mixinglength is of the same order as the extent of the convective region, i.e., of the star radius.
The location of the benchmark model on the HertzsprungRussell diagram is plotted in Fig. 1. The model has an effective temperature of , and a surface gravity of .
Figure 1: HertzsprungRussell diagram for a ten solar mass model computed with the CLÉS code (see Sect. 2.1). The diamond corresponds to the benchmark model described in Sect. 2.1.1, and the triangle symbols corresponds to another model used for comparison in Sect. 3.2.2. Star symbols correspond to the different evolutionary stages displayed in Fig. 6 (bottom). Eventually, the square and triangle symbols are used to identify the models presented in Fig. 6 (top). 

Open with DEXTER 
Figure 2: The difference between the temperature gradient and the adiabatic one ( ) versus the temperature. In the convective core, the difference vanishes since convection is efficient and transport almost all the energy flux. In contrast, in the outer convective regions, we see significant gradients which means that convective transport is not efficient there. 

Open with DEXTER 
2.1.2 Convective zones
In these massive stars, one can distinguish three convective regions, namely:
 
 the convective zone associated with the helium II opacity bump. This region is located at K (Fig. 2), and is very weak in the sense that it is inefficient in transporting energy with a negligible ratio of the convective heat flux to the radiative one. In addition, this region is located close to the stellar surface, where the density is low, and velocities are in the 10 to 20 m s^{1} range (low heat capacity is the cause of effective smoothing of the temperature contrast and reduction of the buoyant acceleration). Hence, the kinetic energy that could feed modes is small.
 
 the convective zone associated with the iron opacity bump, located at
K (Fig. 2).
It has been shown (Cantiello et al. 2009)
that the occurrence of convection in the iron opacity peak is strongly
dependent on the luminosity and metallicity of the star. At a given
luminosity, a lower metallicity implies a lower opacity, which means
that a larger fraction of the total flux can be transported by
radiation. On the other hand, increasing the luminosity at a given Z
leads to a more important contribution of convection in the energy
transport. For a given metallicity, there is a luminosity threshold (of
the order of
for Z=0.02) above which a convective zone is associated with the iron peak.
As for the helium convective region, the transport of energy by convection is very low. However, this region is located deeper than the helium one, where density is higher, with convective velocities of up to . The kinetic energy flux is still negligible compared to the total flux but the ratio of the kinetic energy flux of the iron convective zone to the helium one is .
 
 the convective core. Convection is fully adiabatic (Fig. 2) and a significant part of the total flux is transported by convection. The kinetic energy is four order of magnitudes higher than for the iron convective region, because of the high densities, with velocities around 300 m s^{1}.
2.2 Computation of mode amplitudes
We compute the meansquared surface velocity for each radial mode as described in Belkacem et al. (2009a,2006b), i.e.,
where denotes the mode mass, I the mode inertia, the damping rate, the energy injection rate, and h is the height in the stellar atmosphere. In this section, we consider the level of the photosphere h=R, where R is the radius at the photosphere.
The mode amplitude in terms of intensity is then deduced at the photosphere to be, as proposed by
Dziemblowski (1977) and Pesnell (1990), i.e.,
(4) 
where is the bolometric mode intensity fluctuation and is the mode effective temperature fluctuation. The relation between the variation in effective temperature and the mode displacement is obtained from MAD (see Dupret 2002; Dupret et al. 2002, for details). Eventually, since the mode amplitude is a balance between driving ( ) and damping (), both should be determined and computed.
2.2.1 Computation of the damping rates
As shown by Eq. (1), the computation of mode amplitudes requires the knowledge of both energy injection ( ) and damping () rates. The latter has been computed using the full nonadiabatic pulsation code MAD (Dupret 2002). This code includes a timedependent convection (TDC) treatment described by Grigahcène et al. (2005) that allows us to take into account the role played by the variations in the convective flux, the turbulent pressure, and the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy.
The damping of acoustic modes is found to be dominated by the perturbation of the radiative flux. We note that, although crucial for the excitation, the upper convective regions do not affect the damping rates of the stars that we are considering. Convection is indeed very inefficient at transporting energy (compared to radiative transport) and the feedback of the convective background on the pulsation remains small. We numerically verified that the interaction between convection and pulsation does not affect damping rates as well as the effect of both the turbulent pressure and the dissipation rate of the turbulent kinetic energy.
Hence, the dominant contribution to the damping rate can be written as
where is the perturbation of entropy, the perturbation of density, T_{0} the mean temperature, the mode frequency, the mean density, m the local mass, M the total mass, and the star represents the complex conjugate.
Keeping only the radial contribution of the radiative flux in the energy equation
because of its dominant contribution, and neglecting the production of nuclear energy (
),
one obtains
where and is the radiative flux. In addition, in the diffusion approximation, one can write
Finally, in the quasiadiabatic approximation (which is valid inside the deep layers) one has
and
(9) 
2.2.2 Energy injection rates ( )
The formalism that we use to compute energy injection rates of radial modes was developed by Samadi & Goupil (2001) and extended by Belkacem et al. (2006b,a). It takes two sources into account, the Reynolds stress tensor and the advection of the turbulent fluctuations of entropy by the turbulent motions (the entropy source term). The entropy contribution is found to be around ten percent of the Reynolds one.
The energy injection rate,
,
then mainly arises from the Reynolds stresses and can
be written as (see Eq. (21) of Belkacem et al. 2008)
where
where is the source function, E(k) is the spatial kinetic energy spectrum, is the eddytime correlation function, and k is the wavenumber.
Figure 3: Damping rates () of radial modes as a function of frequency, computed as described in Sect. 2.2.1 using the stellar model introduced in Sect. 2.1. The fundamental radial mode is found to be unstable (), while the overtones are to be found stable (). 

Open with DEXTER 
The rate ( ) at which energy is injected into a mode is then computed according to Eq. (8). Eigenfrequencies and eigenfunctions are computed using the nonadiabatic pulsation code MAD. In addition to the eigenfunctions and the density stratification, Eq. (8) involves both the convective velocity and the turbulent kinetic energy spectrum. The typical convective lengthscales are poorly known for mainsequence massive stars. Hence, the classical mixinglength theory is used to find the injection lengthscale (i.e., the scale on which the turbulent kinetic energy spectrum reaches a maximum) and a parameter is introduced (see Samadi & Goupil 2001, for details) such that the associated wavenumber is , where is the mixinglength. One also has to specify the way in which turbulent eddies are temporallycorrelated by defining an eddytime correlation function. A Lorentzian function had been successfully used: in the solar case (Samadi et al. 2003b; Belkacem et al. 2006b), as well as for Cen A, and HD49933 (Samadi et al. 2008; Samadi 2009), it indeed reproduces the observational data. Consequently, if not explicitly mentioned, this modelling will be used in the following.
3 Driving by the iron convective region
3.1 Damping rates
3.1.1 Efficiency of the damping
In Fig. 3, the fundamental mode is found to be linearly unstable with respect to the mechanism associated with the iron opacity bump (Pamyatnykh 1999). Higher radialorder modes are found to be linearly stable. The damping rates range between one and three Hz for Hz, while they nearly vanish around the unstable mode. They are found to be dominated by the first two terms of Eq. (5).
Concerning the first contribution ( ), as described for instance by Pamyatnykh (1999), the region where increases outwards tends to drive the mode while the region where decreases outwards damps the mode. This contribution then mainly determines the damping rates of loworder modes, while the second term of Eq. (5) begins to be important for higher order modes.
Figure 4: Top: Cumulative work integral integrals (W) versus the logarithm of the temperature for the n=7, n=9 and n=12, modes. An increases outward of W corresponds to a driving while a decrease inward, to a damping. The surface values give the final values of the work integral. By convention, the mode is found stable if the surface value of W is negative and unstable if positive. Bottom: Real part of the perturbation of pressure ( ) related to the n=7, n=9 and n=12, modes versus the logarithm of the temperature. The horizontal dots lines permits to visualise the nodes of the eigen modes, and the vertical lines delimit the damping region. 

Open with DEXTER 
3.1.2 Periodic variations
For high frequency modes, the damping in the range dominates over the driving region ( ). This can be seen in Fig. 4, in which the work integral is plotted, for three modes, which correspond to the first and the second maxima and the minimum inbetween the damping rate (see Fig. 3).
The oscillation of the damping rates for highfrequency modes ( Hz) is related to the location of the node of with respect to the damping region. By considering the pressure fluctuations ( ) of three modes, namely n=7, n=9, and n=12, Fig. 4 shows that the damping reaches a minimum when there is a node in the damping region and a maximum when the nodes are located at the edges of those layers. The second maximum arises when two nodes of straddle the damping region.
This is easily explained by the set of equations Eqs. (3)(6), since a node in pressure fluctuations lowers the opacity fluctuations, which appear to be given by the main damping term in Eq. (5). We note also that the second derivative of is negative when is positive, which strengthens the radiative losses.
It then creates the periodic variations observed in Fig. 3 for Hz. Hence, the detection of this oscillation of mode linewidth (damping) would be a signature of the iron opacity bump and also an opportunity to place constraints on the mode pressure perturbation in this region.
3.2 Energy injection rates
The poor knowledge of the dynamical properties of convective regions associated with the iron opacity bump leads us to use a simple description based on the MLT as explained in Sect. 2.2.2. In terms of energy injection rates, two major features are to be determined: the convective velocity and the injection lengthscale. As for the superficial convective layers of the Sun, the iron convection region is inefficient since it transports a negligible part of the energy flux by means of convection. The Mach number ( ) is similar to that found in the upper convective layers of the Sun in which . The extent to which one can use the values of the parameters obtained for the Sun is however difficult to assess and only numerical simulations will provide a firm answer. By default, for the iron convective region, we use the values of the convective velocity provided by MLT using the assumed solar value ( ). In addition, the injection length scale is deduced from the numerical simulations of the upper part of the solar convection zone as derived by Samadi et al. (2003b), i.e., using (see Sect. 2.2.2).
3.2.1 Efficiency of the excitation
A common feature of every modelling of stochastic excitation by
turbulent convection is that the energy injection rate is locally
proportional to the kinetic energy flux (e.g., Samadi & Goupil 2001; Goldreich et al. 1994). The contribution due to the Reynolds stresses can be approximated by (Samadi 2009)
where is a characteristic length, is the sound speed, and is the specific kinetic energy flux defined as
(13) 
where is the density, and is the root mean square velocity given by the MLT.
The helium convective region is very inefficient in exciting modes because the kinetic energy flux is low (see Sect. 2.1.2). The more favourable convective regions for exciting modes, in this star, are the convective core and the one induced by the iron opacity bump. Excitation of radial acoustic modes by the iron convective region is found to be efficient for two reasons. First, the iron opacity bump is located deeper inside the star compared to the helium bump, where both density and turbulent velocities are higher. Thus, the energy available for p modes is then higher. Second, the efficiency of the excitation depends on the timescales involved, i.e., the convective timescale and the modal period. The latter is several hours and, using mixinglength arguments (i.e., ), we find that the convective timescale is also several hours. Hence, excitation is nearly resonant.
Figure 5: Top: Rates ( ) at which energy is supplied to the modes, computed as detailed in Sect. 2.2.2, for a mainsequence model (see Sect. 2.1). Note that only the contribution of the iron convective region is included in P. Bottom: Square of the radial derivative of the radial component of the eigenfunction for radial orders n=4, n=6 and n=8 that correspond in the top panel of the first maximum, minimum and the second maximum of the energy injection rates. The vertical lines delimit the location of the convective region induced by the iron opacity bump. 

Open with DEXTER 
3.2.2 Periodic variation and seismic diagnostic
The power supplied to the mode by the iron convection zone exhibits periodic variations with frequency (Fig. 5, top). This behaviour is explained by the location of the iron convection zone relative to the radial component of the displacement. As shown by Eq. (8), the energy injection rate depends on the radial derivative of the radial component of the displacement in the driving regions. Hence, the location of the displacement nodes relative to the iron convective zone determines its derivative, and subsequently the efficiency of the excitation. This is oscillation is therefore a signature of the excitation by the iron convective region. Observational evidence would lead us to associate the driving with this region since, as will be shown in Sect. 4, no similar results are obtained if we assume that the convective core drives the modes.
The location of the iron convective zone can be inferred from the
energy injection rates by identifying the radial order of the first
maximum, which corresponds to the mode whose last node is located at
the bottom of the convective region (see Fig. 5, bottom). A second way to proceed is to use the frequencies of two of the maxima.
The successive maxima of the energy injection rates satisfy the relation
(14) 
where m is an integer, is the radial wavenumber, is the phase, R is the star radius, and r_{b} is the location of the node, which we identify with the upper limit of the depth of the iron convective region. Hence, by considering the frequencies of two maxima of the energy injection rates (denoted by the subscripts 1 and 2), the location of the bottom of the iron convective region can be deduced from the integral expression
From Eq. (13), one immediately sees that only the frequencies of the two consecutive maxima are needed to determine the depth of the bottom of the iron convective region. To illustrate this, we consider the limit of pure radial acoustic waves, such that Eq. (13) becomes
(16) 
Furthermore, by assuming that the sound speed is constant, one obtains the very simple analytic relation
Using the benchmark model described in Sect. 2.1, one then obtains and from Fig. 5 we have Hz and Hz. From Eq. (15), we obtain , while from Fig. 5 one has (Rr_{b})/R = 0.04. This order of magnitude estimate then illustrates that the detection of solarlike oscillations excited by the iron convective region could provide information about the structure of the iron convective region.
To illustrate this point, Fig. 6 (top) displays the energy injection rates as function of the radial order for two models at different evolution stages. The more evolved the star is, the deeper the location of the iron convective zone since the effective temperature decreases as the star evolves. The modes for which the energy injection rate reaches a maximum are found to shift toward lower radialorder. As a result, it is possible to follow and localise the depth of the convective region (see Fig. 6, bottom). We note that the energy injection rates are sensitive to the location of the bottom of the convective zone to less than one percent of the star radius, as shown in Fig. 6.
Figure 6: Top: Normalised energy injection rates for the two evolutionary stages (the two first successive models in Fig. 1) as a function of the mode radial order. Bottom: Location of the bottom of the iron convection zone, with respect to the surface, versus the radialorder of the first maximum of the energy injection rates. Each point corresponds to the modes described in Sect. 2.1 at different evolutionary stages displayed in Fig. 1. 

Open with DEXTER 
3.3 Mode amplitude
Figure 7 displays the mode amplitudes excited by the iron convective region. By using the same parameters values as for the Sun, the amplitudes are found to be above both the solar maximum and the CoRoT detection threshold. In addition, Fig. 7 also shows that those results are very sensitive to the convective velocities. It shows that a factor of two change in the velocities leads to important discrepancies for mode amplitudes, so does the mixing length, since the convective velocities depend on the mixinglength to the third power for inefficient convection.
The development of numerical simulations is then the only way to obtain more reliable values of the mode amplitudes.
4 Driving by core convection
In contrast to the uppermost convective layers of the star, the inner convective core transports a nonnegligible part of the total energy flux, convection is highly efficient at transporting energy. Hence, one cannot infer the properties of those regions by simply comparing them with those of the solar convective region. The physics in each case is different and the dynamical properties, which are of interest for computing the mode amplitude, are very uncertain. For instance, in the adiabatic regime the mixinglength has no significant impact on the determination of the star convective flux. The typical lengthscale and the convective velocities are, however, of crucial importance to determining the driving efficiency.
Recent 3D numerical simulations provide insight into those properties for massive stars. A study of convection in the efficient regime was proposed by Meakin & Arnett (2007) using compressible 3D numerical simulations. They investigated the convective regions during oxygen shell burning and during both hydrogen core burning for a 23 star and proposed an extended description of the convective properties and comparison with mixinglength theory as well as other 3D numerical simulations of convective outer layers. They found that both the velocities and the typical length scale are in good agreement with mixinglength theory with a parameter () of around 1.7.
Figure 7: Mode amplitude as a function of mode frequency, computed as described in Sects. 2.2.2 and 2.2. Diamonds correspond to the computation of the energy injection rates using and the velocities given by the MLT, while for stars the velocities have been multiplied by a factor two and divided by two for squares (note that a factor two corresponds to a variation of of the mixinglength). The solid horizontal line corresponds to the maximum mode amplitude for the Sun derived by Michel et al. (2009), and the dashed horizontal line to the CoRoT detection threshold. 

Open with DEXTER 
Figure 8: Rates ( ) at which energy is supplied to the modes, computed as detailed in Sect. 2.2.2, for our benchmark model, by the convective core. 

Open with DEXTER 
4.1 Energy injection rates
As already pointed out in Sect. 2.1.2, the kinetic energy flux in the convective core is an order of magnitude higher than in the iron convective region. This high flux is due to the high densities and ensures that the convective core is a good candidate for exciting modes. However, the excitation efficiency also depends on the matching between both the convective timescales and mode periods and on the shape of the eigenfunctions (see Eqs. (8) and (9)).
Figure 8 displays the normalised energy injection rates as a function of frequency for radial p modes. One can identify between two regions, namely at low Hz) and high Hz) frequencies. In the low frequency range, the decrease in the energy injection rates is dominated by the decrease in the ratio of the convective turnover timescale to the modal period, and also the shape of the eigenfunctions since depends on its radial derivative. In contrast, modes with higher frequencies exhibit nodes close to the interface between the convective and radiative zones explaining the modulation of energy injection rates. In terms of absolute values of the energy injection rates, as for the iron convection zone, they depend mainly on the injection lengthscale but are not very sensitive to the mixinglength since convection is efficient (see Sect. 4.3).
4.2 Diagnostic on the eddytime correlation function
Convective turnover timescales, evaluated within the MLT framework, are found to be of the order of a month, while the modal periods of acoustic standing waves are several hours. Hence, the excitation will be in an offresonance regime and will therefore crucially depend on the way eddies are timecorrelated. In this particular regime, the way that the eddies are temporallycorrelated can lead to order of magnitude differences in terms of mode amplitudes, as shown by Samadi et al. (2003a) for the solar p modes and by Belkacem et al. (2009a) for solar g modes, where the effect is far stronger.
Therefore, we consider different types of modelling of this timecorrelation function (see
in Eq. (8)). Exponential and Lorentzian modelling are given by
with the normalisation condition
(20) 
where is the linewidth, defined to be
where is a parameter that to accounts for the uncertainties in defining (Balmforth 1992; Samadi & Goupil 2001; Chaplin et al. 2005), and the velocity u_{k} of the eddy with wavenumber k is related to the kinetic energy spectrum E(k) by (Stein 1967)
The choice of an exponential function is motivated by experimental studies of homogeneous and isotropic turbulence. For instance, Mordant et al. (2004) demonstrated that the timecorrelation of Lagrangian velocities follows an exponential decrease in agreement with the Kolmogorov (1941) phenomenology. However, the solar turbulent convection exhibits different physical conditions compared to experimental studies. The very large Reynolds numbers as well as the presence of coherent largescale structures (plumes) make it likely that a specific description of is needed. Indeed, a Lorentzian description can be adopted and has proven to reproduce more closely both the observations (Belkacem et al. 2006b) and the 3D numerical simulations for both p and g modes (Samadi et al. 2003a; Belkacem et al. 2009a).
Figure 9: Top: analytical eddytime correlation function () as a function of the ratio , where is the convective frequency at the wavenumber k. The vertical line corresponds to the ratio for the most energetic eddies and the mode n=2. Hence for higher frequencies, the ratio will increase, and the driving will be in the offresonance regime. Bottom: normalized mode amplitude computed using the eddytime correlation functions as described in the upper panel. 

Open with DEXTER 
Figure 9 (top) displays analytical versus the ratio , where is the eddy characteristic frequency at the wavenumber k. By considering the most energetic eddies, the excitation of p modes is found to occur in the offresonance regime with a ratio higher than around 20. In this regime, it appears that the choice of is essential as well as the width . We also note that a Gaussian modelling leads to a vanishing driving since for these ratios , the correlation is almost zero. Figure 9 (bottom) also shows the influence of the frequency behaviour of the mode amplitudes with frequency. The shape of the eddytime correlation function has a significant impact on the shape of mode amplitudes. A Lorentzian function, which slowly decreases with frequency, results in a relatively small decrease in mode amplitude with increasing frequency. In contrast, an exponential leads to a steeper slope in the mode amplitude that makes the detection less likely.
In conclusion, we have shown that the efficiency of the driving by core convection depends crucially on the way that the eddies are temporallycorrelated. We note that only a Lorentzian leads to efficient driving and that the resulting mode amplitudes decrease with frequency in contrast to driving by the iron convection zone. Hence, it constitutes a seismic diagnostic for identifying the driving by the convective core and also determining the way in which the eddies are temporallycorrelated, an essential constraint on the dynamical properties of turbulent convection in the cores of massive stars.
4.3 Mode amplitudes
Mode amplitudes are presented in Fig. 10. To investigate the sensitivity to the injection lengthscale, we compute the amplitude with an upper limit given by the convective core size and a lower limit, and the minimum of the pressure lengthscale in the convective core. In the more optimistic estimate, relative magnitudes are found to reach up to 90 ppm for the lowest frequency mode and tens of ppm for higher frequency modes. This result demonstrates that excitation by the convective core can lead to amplitudes well above the CoRoT detection threshold ( ) as well as the solar maximum ( ). In the pessimistic case, the amplitude is near the CoRoT threshold, which makes the detection more difficult. We note also, that these results assume a Lorentzian description of the eddytime correlation function (), and that using another prescription such as an exponential decrease or a Gaussian one lead to very small amplitudes well below one ppm.
Nevertheless, it is worthwhile to note that the frequency behaviour associated with the excitation by the convective core is very different from that obtained by excitation caused by the iron convection zone. Hence, it constitutes a seismic signature that would be a powerful tool for identifying the driving region.
Figure 10: Mode amplitude versus frequency, computed using the benchmark model (see Sect. 2.1) and a Lorentzian function to describe the eddytime correlation function (see Eq. (17)). The upper line (with diamond dots) corresponds to the upper limit to the injection lengthscale. The lower line (with stars) corresponds to an injection lengthscale that corresponds to the minimum of the pressure scale height in the convective core. 

Open with DEXTER 
5 Conclusions
We have performed an exploratory study of the driving (and damping) of acoustic modes by turbulent convection in a star. We have found that both the convective region associated with the iron opacity bump and the convective core are able to efficiently drive acoustic modes so that mode amplitudes are found above the CoRoT detection threshold ( ) as well as the solar maximum ( ).
However, uncertainties associated with the computation of mode amplitudes are important and related to the poor knowledge of the dynamical properties of those convective regions. For the iron convective region, the main uncertainties originate in the convective velocities as well as the injectionlength scale. For the convective core, the way that eddies are temporallycorrelated is crucial since excitation occurs in the offresonance regime.
Computation of mode amplitudes also permitted us to emphasise potential seismic diagnostics. First, driving by the iron convective region results in an oscillation of the energy injection rates (and mode amplitudes) versus mode frequencies.We have shown that this behaviour is potentially useful for determining the extent and the depth of this convective region, as well as the dynamical properties of the driving (e.g., turbulent velocities, injection lengthscales). Second, the way that the eddies are temporallycorrelated determines the efficiency of the driving by the convective core and the frequency behaviour. Hence, it provides an opportunity to strongly constrain .
The detection of solarlike oscillations in a massive star such as V1449 Aql (Belkacem et al. 2009b) and the determination of the mode parameter in this star are a promising way to identify the driving region, since both have very different signatures, and provides physical constraints on the still poorly known treatment of convective regions. The presence of high frequency power in SPB stars (Degroote et al. 2009) would also help us to constrain the nature of the driving zone since these stars have luminosities that are definitively below the threshold value for the presence of a convective zone associated with the iron peak (Cantiello et al. 2009). It should however be kept in mind that microscopic diffusion coupled with radiation acceleration could induce an accumulation of iron in the iron peak. A convective iron zone could thus also be present in stars whose luminosity are slightly below the threshold.
AcknowledgementsWe are indebted to J. Leibacher for his careful reading of the manuscript and to R. Samadi and M.J. Goupil for their helpful remarks. K.B. also acknowledges financial support through a postdoctoral fellowship from the ``Subside fédéral pour la recherche 2009'', University of Liège.
References
 Aerts, C., Thoul, A., Daszynska, J., et al. 2003, Science, 300, 1926 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 Alexander, D. R., & Ferguson, J. W. 1994, ApJ, 437, 879 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Balmforth, N. J. 1992, MNRAS, 255, 603 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Bedding, T. R., & Kjeldsen, H. 2007, Commun. Asteroseismol., 150, 106 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Belkacem, K., Samadi, R., Goupil, M. J., & Kupka, F. 2006a, A&A, 460, 173 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Belkacem, K., Samadi, R., Goupil, M. J., Kupka, F., & Baudin, F. 2006b, A&A, 460, 183 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Belkacem, K., Samadi, R., Goupil, M.J., & Dupret, M.A. 2008, A&A, 478, 163 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Belkacem, K., Samadi, R., Goupil, M. J., et al. 2009a, A&A, 494, 191 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Belkacem, K., Samadi, R., Goupil, M.J., et al. 2009b, Science, 324, 1540 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Cantiello, M., Langer, N., Brott, I., et al. 2009, A&A, 499, 279 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Chaplin, W. J., Houdek, G., Elsworth, Y., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 859 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 ChristensenDalsgaard, J., & Däppen, W. 1992, A&ARv, 4, 267 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 de Ridder, J., Barban, C., Baudin, F., et al. 2009, Nature, 459, 398 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 Degroote, P., Aerts, C., Ollivier, M., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 471 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Dupret, M.A. 2002, Bull. Soc. Roy. Sc. Liège, 56, 249 [Google Scholar]
 Dupret, M.A., De Ridder, J., Neuforge, C., Aerts, C., & Scuflaire, R. 2002, A&A, 385, 563 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Dupret, M.A., Thoul, A., Scuflaire, R., et al. 2004, A&A, 415, 251 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Dziemblowski, W. 1977, Acta Astron., 27, 95 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Dziembowski, W. A. 2007, Commun. Asteroseismol., 150, 175 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Dziembowski, W. A., & Pamiatnykh, A. A. 1993, MNRAS, 262, 204 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Dziembowski, W. A., & Pamyatnykh, A. A. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 2061 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Dziembowski, W. A., Moskalik, P., & Pamyatnykh, A. A. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 588 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Gautschy, A., & Saio, H. 1995, ARA&A, 33, 75 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Gautschy, A., & Saio, H. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 551 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Goldreich, P., Murray, N., & Kumar, P. 1994, ApJ, 424, 466 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Grevesse, N., & Noels, A. 1993, in Origin and Evolution of the Elements, ed. N. Prantzos, E. VangioniFlam, & M. Casse, 1525 [Google Scholar]
 Grigahcène, A., Dupret, M.A., Gabriel, M., Garrido, R., & Scuflaire, R. 2005, A&A, 434, 1055 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Iglesias, C. A., & Rogers, F. J. 1996, ApJ, 464, 943 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Iglesias, C. A., Rogers, F. J., & Wilson, B. G. 1992, ApJ, 397, 717 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Kippenhahn, R., & Weigert, A. 1990, Stellar Structure and Evolution (Berlin: SpringerVerlag) [Google Scholar]
 Lighthill, M. J. 1952, Roy. Soc. Lond. Proc. Ser. A, 211, 564 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
 Meakin, C. A., & Arnett, D. 2007, ApJ, 667, 448 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Michel, E., Baglin, A., Auvergne, M., et al. 2008, Science, 322, 558 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 Michel, E., Samadi, R., Baudin, F., et al. 2009, A&A, 495, 979 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Mordant, N., Lévêque, E., & Pinton, J.F. 2004, New J. Phys., 6, 116 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Moskalik, P., & Dziembowski, W. A. 1992, A&A, 256, L5 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Pamyatnykh, A. A. 1999, Acta Astron., 49, 119 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Pamyatnykh, A. A., Handler, G., & Dziembowski, W. A. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 1022 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Pesnell, W. D. 1990, ApJ, 363, 227 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Samadi, R. 2009, Lectures Notes in Physics, in press [Google Scholar]
 Samadi, R., & Goupil, M. . 2001, A&A, 370, 136 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Samadi, R., Nordlund, Å., Stein, R. F., Goupil, M. J., & Roxburgh, I. 2003a, A&A, 404, 1129 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Samadi, R., Nordlund, Å., Stein, R. F., Goupil, M. J., & Roxburgh, I. 2003b, A&A, 403, 303 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Samadi, R., Belkacem, K., Goupil, M. J., Dupret, M.A., & Kupka, F. 2008, A&A, 489, 291 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Scuflaire, R., Théado, S., Montalbán, J., et al. 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 83 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Stein, R. F. 1967, Sol. Phys., 2, 385 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Thoul, A., Aerts, C., Dupret, M. A., et al. 2003, A&A, 406, 287 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Footnotes
 ... bump^{}
 In the following, this convective region will be referred to as the iron convective region.
All Figures
Figure 1: HertzsprungRussell diagram for a ten solar mass model computed with the CLÉS code (see Sect. 2.1). The diamond corresponds to the benchmark model described in Sect. 2.1.1, and the triangle symbols corresponds to another model used for comparison in Sect. 3.2.2. Star symbols correspond to the different evolutionary stages displayed in Fig. 6 (bottom). Eventually, the square and triangle symbols are used to identify the models presented in Fig. 6 (top). 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 2: The difference between the temperature gradient and the adiabatic one ( ) versus the temperature. In the convective core, the difference vanishes since convection is efficient and transport almost all the energy flux. In contrast, in the outer convective regions, we see significant gradients which means that convective transport is not efficient there. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 3: Damping rates () of radial modes as a function of frequency, computed as described in Sect. 2.2.1 using the stellar model introduced in Sect. 2.1. The fundamental radial mode is found to be unstable (), while the overtones are to be found stable (). 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 4: Top: Cumulative work integral integrals (W) versus the logarithm of the temperature for the n=7, n=9 and n=12, modes. An increases outward of W corresponds to a driving while a decrease inward, to a damping. The surface values give the final values of the work integral. By convention, the mode is found stable if the surface value of W is negative and unstable if positive. Bottom: Real part of the perturbation of pressure ( ) related to the n=7, n=9 and n=12, modes versus the logarithm of the temperature. The horizontal dots lines permits to visualise the nodes of the eigen modes, and the vertical lines delimit the damping region. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 5: Top: Rates ( ) at which energy is supplied to the modes, computed as detailed in Sect. 2.2.2, for a mainsequence model (see Sect. 2.1). Note that only the contribution of the iron convective region is included in P. Bottom: Square of the radial derivative of the radial component of the eigenfunction for radial orders n=4, n=6 and n=8 that correspond in the top panel of the first maximum, minimum and the second maximum of the energy injection rates. The vertical lines delimit the location of the convective region induced by the iron opacity bump. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 6: Top: Normalised energy injection rates for the two evolutionary stages (the two first successive models in Fig. 1) as a function of the mode radial order. Bottom: Location of the bottom of the iron convection zone, with respect to the surface, versus the radialorder of the first maximum of the energy injection rates. Each point corresponds to the modes described in Sect. 2.1 at different evolutionary stages displayed in Fig. 1. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 7: Mode amplitude as a function of mode frequency, computed as described in Sects. 2.2.2 and 2.2. Diamonds correspond to the computation of the energy injection rates using and the velocities given by the MLT, while for stars the velocities have been multiplied by a factor two and divided by two for squares (note that a factor two corresponds to a variation of of the mixinglength). The solid horizontal line corresponds to the maximum mode amplitude for the Sun derived by Michel et al. (2009), and the dashed horizontal line to the CoRoT detection threshold. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 8: Rates ( ) at which energy is supplied to the modes, computed as detailed in Sect. 2.2.2, for our benchmark model, by the convective core. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 9: Top: analytical eddytime correlation function () as a function of the ratio , where is the convective frequency at the wavenumber k. The vertical line corresponds to the ratio for the most energetic eddies and the mode n=2. Hence for higher frequencies, the ratio will increase, and the driving will be in the offresonance regime. Bottom: normalized mode amplitude computed using the eddytime correlation functions as described in the upper panel. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 10: Mode amplitude versus frequency, computed using the benchmark model (see Sect. 2.1) and a Lorentzian function to describe the eddytime correlation function (see Eq. (17)). The upper line (with diamond dots) corresponds to the upper limit to the injection lengthscale. The lower line (with stars) corresponds to an injection lengthscale that corresponds to the minimum of the pressure scale height in the convective core. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Copyright ESO 2010
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.