Issue |
A&A
Volume 510, February 2010
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A61 | |
Number of page(s) | 10 | |
Section | Stellar atmospheres | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912619 | |
Published online | 10 February 2010 |
Near-infrared survey of high mass X-ray binary candidates
J. M. Torrejón1,2 - I. Negueruela1 - D. M. Smith3 - T. E. Harrison4
1 - Departamento de Física, Ingeniería de Sistemas y Teoría de la
Señal, Universidad de Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain
2 - Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Kavli Institute for
Astrophysics and Space Research, Cambridge MA 02139, UK
3 - Physics Department and Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics,
University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High St., Santa Cruz, CA
95064, USA
4 - Astronomy Department, New Mexico State University, Box
30001/Department 4500, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
Received 2 June 2009 / Accepted 18 October 2009
Abstract
Context. The INTEGRAL
satellite is detecting a large population of new X-ray sources that
were missed by previous missions because of high obscuration and, in
some cases, very short duty cycles. The nature of these sources must be
addressed by characterizing their optical and/or infrared counterparts.
Aims. We investigate the nature of the optical
counterparts to five of these newly discovered X-ray sources.
Methods. We combine infrared spectra in the I,
J,H, and K
bands with JHK photometry to characterize the
spectral type, luminosity class, and distance to the infrared
counterparts to these systems. For IGR J19140+0951, we present
spectroscopy from the red to the K band and new red
and infrared photometry. For SAX J18186-1703 and
IGR J18483-0311, we present the first intermediate-resolution
spectroscopy to be published. Finally, for IGR J18027-2016, we
present new I and K band
spectra.
Results. We find that four systems harbour
early-type B supergiants. All of them are heavily obscured,
with E(B-V)
ranging between 3 and 5, implying visual extinctions
of
9 to 15 mag. We refine the published classifications
of IGR J18027-2016 and IGR J19140+0951 by
constraining their luminosity class. In the first case, we confirm the
supergiant nature but exclude a class III. In the second case, we
propose a slightly higher luminosity class (Ia instead of Iab) and
provide an improved value of the distance based on new optical
photometry. Two other systems, SAX J18186-1703 and
IGR J18483-0311 are classified as supergiant fast X-ray
transients (SFXTs). XTE J1901+014, on the other hand, contains
no bright infrared source in its error circle.
Conclusions. Owing to their infrared and X-ray
characteristics, IGR J18027-2016 and IGR J19140+0951,
emerge as supergiant X-ray binaries with X-ray luminosities of the
order of
erg s-1,
while SAX J1818.6-1703 and IGR J18483-0311, are found
to be SFXTs at 2 and 3 kpc, respectively. Finally,
XTE J1901+014 emerges as a puzzling source: its X-ray
behaviour is strongly reminiscent of SFXTs, but a supergiant nature is
firmly excluded for the counterpart. We discuss several alternative
scenarios to explain its behaviour.
Key words: binaries: close - supergiants - infrared: stars - X-rays: binaries
1 Introduction
Table 1:
infrared photometry for the
sources included in our survey.
![[*]](/icons/foot_motif.png)



Since the majority of these sources are
located in the Galactic plane, and concentrated towards the Galactic
center
region, they are affected by high extinction (
mag). Thus, their
detection in the optical is often very difficult, and other strategies
must
be adopted. The detection and study of counterparts in the infrared,
however, is possible with 4 m class telescopes. An important
caveat,
though, is that the spectral classification of hot stars
using infrared spectra is far more uncertain than using the well
established MK standard 3950-4750 Å wavelength region. For
example, a
spectral classification based on a K band
spectrum cannot be completed
without fundamental ambiguities because of the lack of adequate
spectral
features in that range (Hanson
et al. 1996). This problem can be, at least
partially, circumvented by combining data for several
spectral bands. However, this is often impossible to achieve within a
single observing campaign.
Following the discovery of X-ray binaries by INTEGRAL,
intense observing
campaigns have been undertaken (Chaty et al. 2008; Negueruela
et al. 2009; Masetti et al. 2008; Nespoli
et al. 2008, amongst
others). As these discoveries proceed,
it is fundamental to refine and establish the nature of these new
sources. In particular, a very important parameter is the distance to
the system which, in turn, infers the X-ray luminosity, the main
observable used to constrain the
theoretical models. Most of the work done, however, has
been based on H and/or K band
spectra to avoid the problems caused by the high
extinction. Classification based on a single infrared spectrum (in many
cases of an intermediate or low spectral resolution) allows only
approximations. For example, the difference in MV
between a B1 Ib
and a B1 Ia supergiant (which are difficult or even impossible
to distinguish based on an intermediate resolution H
or K spectrum)
results in an uncertainty of an order of magnitude error in (Negueruela et al. 2009). In
this paper, we combine new spectroscopy in several bands
with new JHK photometry (also RI
for
one source) to refine the spectral classification of a sample
of these sources.
2 The observations
2.1 Photometry
band photometry data were
obtained with the 3.5 m Telescopio
Nazionale Galileo (TNG) at the island of La Palma (Canary Islands,
Spain) during the nights of 2006 July 7 and
2007 May 1. In both runs, the configuration was the
same. The instrument used was the Near
Infrared Camera and Spectrograph (NICS) in its Large Field
configuration, equipped with a Rockwell
HgCdTe
Hawaii
array detector, which provides a spatial scale of
/pixel
and
covers a field of view of
.
During the night of 2006 July 7, the seeing
was
in the J band and very stable throughout
the entire night,
while on 2007 May 1, the seeing was
.
Each observation consisted of a mosaic of five images
constructed from
a dithering pattern that maintained the frame always on-source, using
an
automatic script available at the telescope. From this mosaic,
flat-field correction, bad pixel map, sky
subtraction, and image coaddition where performed with the SNAP
software. The photometry was
subsequently performed using Starlink GAIA
on the final coadded frame.
The Arnica standard star fields AS33 and AS27 (Hunt et al. 1998) were observed throughout the night at a range of airmasses. Transformation equations were applied to the program star giving the magnitudes listed in Table 1.
Comparison with previously published values show some discrepancies that can be readily explained. In particular, for IGR J19140+0951, comparison with 2MASS magnitudes shows a discrepancy. This is because of the close proximity of the bright star 2MASS J19149417+0952538, located very close to the south-east, which contaminates the 2MASS photometry (cf. in't Zand et al. 2006b). Any photometry performed using data from a 3.5 m telescope in good seeing conditions must certainly be contaminated. However, careful attention must be paid here to the extraction to minimize this effect, making the magnitudes listed above rather more reliable than those of the 2MASS catalogue.
For IGR J19140+0951, RI band
photometry was obtained
with the Andalucia Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (ALFOSC) on
the 2.6 m Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) in La Palma, on the
night of
2006 June 18. The instrument was equipped with the
thinned
pixel E2V CCD,
covering a field of view of
with
a spatial scale 0.19 arcsec/pixel. Standard
Bessel R and interference i
filters were used to observe both the
target and the standard star fields. We obtain
and
.
2.2 Spectroscopy
Infrared spectroscopy of several sources was performed with
NICS. Medium-resolution infrared spectroscopy in the K band
was also obtained on 2006 July 7. The instrument was
equipped with the grism,
which covers the
1.95-2.34
m
spectral region,
and provides a resolution of 4.3 Å/pixel. A slit of
was
chosen, providing a resolving power of R=1250.
To estimate the sky background level, we observed the target
stars, integrating on four
positions along the slit. We used the ABBA script
that automatically
moves the telescope, nodding the source along the slit, thereby
producing a set of four images with typical exposure times ranging
from 100 to 300 s for the programme stars
and minimising the sky variability throughout each observation. The
four images
were median averaged and this median, subtracted from each individual
image of the set. This method, together with the use of the
slit,
also minimizes any possible nebular contamination. These
sky-subtracted images were flat-fielded and
the resulting spectra averaged. The wavelength calibration was
performed using
the Ar lamps available at the telescope. Analysis was subsequently
performed with Starlink FIGARO and DIPSO.
Table 2: Equivalent widths ( Å) of the main diagnostic lines in the JHK bands observed in our sample.
A number of A0 V and G2 V stars were selected from the list available at the telescope and observed throughout the night at airmasses and positions as close as possible to the target fields.
For the telluric subtraction, two methods were used. The first
one,
described in Hanson et al.
(1996), assumes that spectra of
A0 V stars are featureless in the K band
except for the Brline.
A spectrum from the Sun was retrieved from the ESO
archives. This spectrum was rebinned to match the sampling of our
target spectra, wavelength shifted for the different radial velocities,
and, finally, the lines rotationally broadened to match the profiles
of our G2 V standard stars. The spectrum of our G2 V
stars was then
divided by this corrected spectrum of the Sun. The resulting spectrum
was subsequently used to correct the Br
zone in the spectrum
of the A0 V standard star, isolating the true Br
profile of the
early-type star. We then, fitted this line only and removed it from
the A0 V spectrum, leaving a pure telluric spectrum which was
subsequently applied to the program stars.
The second method is described in Maiolino et al. (1996), which uses the G2 V star spectrum divided by the modified solar spectrum directly to correct the whole spectrum of the program star. At the resolution of our spectra, these two methods provide almost indistinguishable results. Where appropriate, we averaged the final spectra, of each source, obtained by both methods. The resulting spectra were normalised to unity to allow comparison with standard atlases.
In addition, infrared spectroscopy of the counterpart to
IGR J19140+0951 was obtained using SPEX on the Infrared
Telescope
Facility (IRTF) on Mauna Kea on 2005 September 3. The
J, H, and K band
spectra presented in Fig. 4 were
constructed from medians of six
10 s exposures. The observing and data reduction procedure are
fully described in Harrison
et al. (2004). SPEX was used in single-order
mode with a
slit,
giving a dispersion of 5.51 Å/pixel. Unfortunately, the
conditions at the IRTF were not photometric, despite the seeing being
excellent.
We employed a script with which data at six separate positions along the slit were obtained. To remove the sky background and dark current from each SPEX exposure, we subtracted the median of the other five exposures obtained in an observing sequence. This process resulted in six background-subtracted exposures from which the spectra were extracted using the normal IRAF methods. The spectra were wavelength calibrated by the extraction of an Ar arc spectrum at the position (aperture) of each spectrum. We observed the G2 V star HD 150698 (in an identical fashion) to correct for telluric features as described above.
Finally, I-band spectra of IGR J18027-2016 and IGR J18483-0311 were obtained on 2008 May 16 using the 4.2-m William Herschel Telescope (WHT), in La Palma (Spain) equipped with the ISIS double-beam spectrograph, during a service run. We used the red arm fitted with the R316R grating and the RED+ CCD, a configuration that results in a nominal dispersion of 0.85 Å/pixel (the resolution element is approximately 3 pixels). We also observed the counterpart to IGR J19140+0951 on 2008 May 18 using the same instrument, but this time fitted with the R158R grating, which results in a nominal dispersion of 1.8 Å/pixel.
3 Results
For the line identification and spectral classification, we used the following atlases: Andrillat et al. (1995) for the I band; Wallace et al. (2000) for the J band; Blum et al. (1997), Meyer et al. (1998) and Hanson et al. (1998) for the H band; Hanson et al. (1996) and Hanson et al. (2005) for the K band.
As has been pointed out, the classification of massive stars using the 2 micron spectral range is difficult because of the lack of spectral features in this domain. In the case of HMXB, the situation is still worse because the spectra of the infrared counterparts might be altered by the presence of the compact object in the system. Little progress has been made in obtaining near-infrared observations of HMXBs (see, for example, Clark et al. 1999; Fig. 7, for some BeXs). In the pioneering work by Hanson et al. (1996) a number of HMXB are included (cf. Fig. 29 in that reference). In almost all of them, the relevant diagnostic lines appear in emission, in both BeXs and SGXBs. However, isolated supergiants tend to exhibit these lines in absorption (Hanson et al. 1996). No HMXBs are included in the higher S/N survey of Hanson et al. (2005). Notwithstanding, this last work has been used to classify the infrared counterparts of some HMXBs (Mason et al. 2009). In the abscence of a comprehensive scheme for classifying HMXB counterparts on the basis of near-infrared spectra, we use the previously cited available atlases. We estimate that the uncertainty caused by the above-mentioned effects alone could be equivalent to half a spectral subtype.
In Table 2,
we provide the equivalent widths of the main diagnostic lines found in
our spectra. Typical errors are always less than 1 Å.
Numbers beside chemical species are the laboratory wavelengths in
m.
I band equivalent widths have not been
measured due to the line blending. Due caution must be exercised,
however, in using them only for spectral classification purposes, as
stated by Hanson et al.
(2005, ;see their Sect. 5.2) because only the
comparison between different classes appears to be meaningful.
Table 3: Derived parameters for stars in our sample, calculated using the observed data.
![]() |
Figure 1: Left: WHT I-band spectrum of IGR J18027-2016 normalised to flux unity bracketted between comparison standard stars. Right: TNG K-band spectrum normalised to flux unity. |
Open with DEXTER |
In order to compute their distance and ,
we will use the infrared distance modulus computed from the following
equation:
![]() |
(1) |
where K0=K-AK are the infrared magnitudes corrected for extinction, and the K magnitudes are taken from Table 1. We compute the MK band absolute magnitudes from the (V-K)0 colors given by Ducati et al. (2001), taking into account the MV values from Schmidt-Kaler (1982). To compute the total-to-selective absorption A, we first compute the corresponding IR color excess E(J-K)=(J-K)-(J-K)0, where the intrinsic IR colors are taken from Ducati et al. (2001) for the appropriate spectral type. These excesses are converted to E(B-V)by means of the following relation E(J-K)=0.50E(B-V). Finally AK=0.36E(B-V) (Fitzpatrick 1999), assuming the standard extinction law (RV=3.1). We compute the distance for the two extremes of the range in spectral type compatible with our observations, namely, the cold-faint and hot-luminous ends. The range of possible distances deduced in this way and the corresponding X-ray luminosities are given in Table 3. The quoted errors refer only to the dispersion in these estimated values. The final uncertainties in the distance are dominated by the intrinsic dispersion of the calibration of the order of 0.5 mag.
3.1 IGR J18027-2016
This source was discovered by Revnivtsev
et al. (2004) using
INTEGRAL. The source has a very high hydrogen column
(
).
It has been identified with SAX J1802.7-2017, which was
discovered serendipitously by Augello
et al. (2003) with BeppoSAX.
Using XMM-Newton, Walter
et al. (2006) localised
the source position at
,
with
a
positional
accuracy. Its 2-10 keV unabsorbed flux during the primary
pulse is
.
It is an eclipsing
X-ray pulsar (
s),
which orbits around
the donor star each 4.6 d (Hill
et al. 2005).
Based on the orbital solution, Hill
et al. (2005) proposed that
the mass donor should be an early-type supergiant with most likely
parameters
and
.
Masetti et al. (2008)
identified the counterpart as 2MASS J18024194-2017172 and
obtained a low-resolution optical spectrum
that showed it to be a very reddened early-type star. Using the mass
and radius deduced by Hill
et al. (2005), they argued that the counterpart
should be a B-type
giant. Chaty et al. (2008)
confirmed the identity of the counterpart. Their infrared spectrum
seems typical of an
early-B supergiant, displaying prominent Brackett lines in the Hband,
even though these authors claimed the detection of He I
and
He II lines in the optical spectrum. They
favor a B type supergiant based on a
K
deduced
from a fit to the SED. Based on the R*/D
value of the normalization,
and assuming a stellar radius
,
they estimated a distance
of
12 kpc.
Chaty et al. (2008)
estimated that
mag,
while
Masetti et al. (2008)
estimated
8.3 mag.
In the following, we
use our TNG K-band and WHT I-band
spectra
(Fig. 1)
to refine
the classification of the counterpart and establish the nature of the
system.
K BAND SPECTRUM.
The presence of He I lines and the
absence
of He II (which is seen up to O9) points
towards a B type
star. The Br
line is in emission. This line seems to be
blended with the blueward absorption of the He I 2.161
m
line. This morphology is more pronounced in high luminosity
B stars
(Hanson et al. 2005,
Fig. 12). We also observe He I 2.058
m in
emission, with a possible P-Cygni profile, a feature also noted by
Chaty et al. (2008)
on their lower resolution spectrum. In the atlas of Hanson et al. (2005), no
luminosity class III star shows
He I 2.058
m in
emission. In contrast, this line is in
emission in B supergiants and Be
stars. However, He I 2.113
m is not
seen in Be stars, while it is
very prominent in our object, a feature of B supergiants (see
Figs. 13 to 16 in Hanson
et al. 2005). We therefore conclude
that the counterpart is an early B supergiant star.
I BAND SPECTRUM. As seen in Fig. 1, our I-band spectrum has a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). However, it is easy to see the narrow well-defined Paschen lines, typical of a high-luminosity object. Moreover, Paschen lines are visible up to Pa 19, in spite of the moderate SNR and resolution, clearly identifying the star as a supergiant (compare to the B1 V star in the same figure). The prominent He I lines are typical of supergiants with spectral types close to B2 (compare to the earlier supergiants in the same figure). Also, as can be seen in the spectra of the O9.5 Ia star, for stars B0.5 and earlier, the C III 8502 Å is blended with Pa 16, making it stronger than the neighbouring Pa 15 and Pa 17. This is not the case in our object, suggesting it is later than B0.5. On the other hand, the red spectrum of IGR J18027-2017 does not display O I 7774 Å (which is not seen either in the spectrum of Chaty et al. (2008)). This would indicate a type earlier than B1.5 if it is a luminous supergiant or earlier than B2 if it is less luminous.
Taking all the data together, we propose a B1
Iab-B1 Ib supergiant
counterpart. Discriminating between the two luminosities is very
difficult with the available spectra. However, the eclipse duration
covers 0.25 of the
orbit (Hill et al. 2005).
With a period of only 4.6 d, a B1 Iab supergiant would not fit into the
orbit. Therefore, a luminosity class Ib is definitely assigned to the
donor.
This locates the source at a distance of
kpc,
in agreement with Chaty
et al. (2008), between the Sagittarius and Perseus
arms, well beyond the Galactic center (Fig. 8).
Given this classification, the observed color excess is
and,
assuming a standard extinction law,
the extinction in the visual band would be
.
This is
slightly higher than the value given by Chaty
et al. (2008) (
)
and by Masetti et al. (2008),
namely
.
For a standard reddening law (Fitzpatrick
1999), and typical
intrinsic colors (I-J)0=-0.15,
(R-I)0=-0.17
(Ducati et al. 2001),
our value
implies that
and
in excellent agreement with the value
measured
by Masetti et al.
(2008).
3.2 SAX J18186-1703
SAX J1818.6-1703 was discovered by BeppoSAX
during a strong
outburst with a fast rise time of 1 h, in March 1998
(in't Zand et al. 1998).
Subsequently INTEGRAL detected a double-peaked
outburst in September 2003 (Grebenev
& Sunyaev 2005) and two more in October 2003
(Sguera et al. 2005).
Other fast outbursts were observed with the ASM onboard RossiXTE
(Sguera et al. 2005).
Its counterpart, 2MASS J18183790-1702479, was identified using
a
Chandra localization (in't
Zand et al. 2006a). Using INTEGRAL,
Zurita-Heras & Chaty (2009),
have reported a 22-50 keV flux of the order of
in
quiescence, which reaches
in
the strongest flares. No pulsations have been detected so far, but
an orbital period of 30 d has been established (Zurita-Heras & Chaty 2009).
![]() |
Figure 2:
K band spectrum of the counterpart to
SAX J18186-1703. Note the absence of any feature at the
position of the He II 2.1885 |
Open with DEXTER |
K BAND SPECTRUM.
In Fig. 2,
we present
the K band spectrum of the IR counterpart.
The absence of
He II 2.1885 m confirms
that this star is later than
O8.
The He I 2.0581
m line is
strongly in
emission, as is typical of early B supergiants. Along with the
morphology of the complex He I
2.1607/2.1617 - Br
,
appears to be of high luminosity. Main-sequence early B stars have
broader
lines (Hanson et al. 2005,
Fig. 12). Following the same arguments
presented for IGR J18027-2017, we assign a similar spectral
type to
this object and conclude that it is a supergiant in the B0-B1.5 range.
The
exact luminosity class is difficult to determine, but, as discussed
previously,
it is likely to be at least Iab. This would place the source at a
distance of
kpc
in the outskirts of the Sagittarius arm (Fig. 8).
3.3 IGR J18483-0311
IGR J18483-0311 is a transient X-ray source discovered by
Chernyakova et al. (2003)
during observations of the
Galactic center with INTEGRAL. Using Swift,
Sguera et al. (2007)
suggested that a suitable counterpart is the IR source
2MASS J18481720-0310168, which is confirmed by Chaty et al. (2008). The
X-ray source shows very high obscuration (
).
The system contains a pulsar (
)
in orbit around the primary with a period of
d
(Sguera et al. 2007).
The unabsorbed X-ray 20-100 keV flux, measured with
IBIS onboard INTEGRAL, is
(Sguera et al. 2007).
By comparing a low-resolution HK spectrum
to spectra of
classification standards, Rahoui
& Chaty (2008) conclude
that the counterpart is a B0.5 supergiant, and suggest a luminosity
class Ia. In Fig. 3,
we present the I band
spectrum of this object, between those of two supergiants
of well-determined spectral type. Our spectrum claerly exhibits narow
Paschen lines, typical of a high-luminosity object. Moreover,
Paschen lines are visible up to Pa 18, in spite of the
moderate SNR and
resolution, clearly identifying the star as a supergiant (compare to
the B1 V star in the same figure). The presence of
strong
He I 8779 Å is typical of
early B supergiants, while the
absence of O I 8446 Å and
N I lines makes it earlier
than B2. Pa 16 is not prominently stronger than
Pa 17, suggesting that
it does not contain an important contribution from
C III 8502 Å. As
discussed above, this suggests
a spectral type of B0.5 or later. The exact determination of the
luminosity
class is not easy with the data available. However, we
only detect Paschen lines up to P18 suggesting that the star is not a
Ia supergiant. Combining our data with the HK spectrum
of Rahoui & Chaty (2008),
we conclude that the star is a B0.5-B1
supergiant, most likely with a luminosity class Iab. This would locate
the system at kpc.
![]() |
Figure 3: WHT - I band spectrum of IGR J18483-0311. |
Open with DEXTER |
3.4 IGR J1914.0+0951
![]() |
Figure 4: SPEX-IRTF J, H and K band spectra of IGR J19140+0951. In the K band, TNG data ( top) are also presented. |
Open with DEXTER |
IGR J19140+0951 was discovered by Hannikainen et al. (2004) with INTEGRAL. It displays X-ray characteristics typical of a SGXB. in't Zand et al. (2006b) used Chandra to pinpoint the IR counterpart, which was found to be 2MASS J19140422+0952577. A period of 13.55 d is observed with RossiXTE (Corbet et al. 2004). No pulsations have been detected so far.
in't Zand et al. (2006b) presented a low resolution red spectrum of the source, which was very badly affected by fringing. It shows no counts bluewards of 7000 Å. They also quote a magnitude of I=13.0 for the counterpart, completely at odds with our value, and the low counts in the corresponding region of the spectrum.
Unfortunately, our I-band spectrum,
although not affected by fringing
is of low resolution and SNR. We identify a few narrow, strong Paschen
lines,
which are of indicative of an early-type supergiant. We do not detect
the O I 7774 Å line,
which (given the low SNR in this part of the
spectrum) constraints it to be earlier than B3.
Hannikainen
et al. (2007) presented a low SNR K-band
spectrum and an
H-band spectrum of much better resolution and SNR.
Their analysis
led them to conclude that the star was a B0.5 Ia supergiant.
Nespoli et al. (2008)
classify it as B1 Iab, based on a K-band
spectrum. The spectrum presented by Hannikainen
et al. (2007) displays Br
weakly in absorption, while this line is more clearly in
absorption in the spectrum of Nespoli
et al. (2008). However, our TNG spectra,
taken four months later, as well as our SPEX spectra, taken one
year earlier (both of higher SNR), show a P-Cygni profile in this line.
This is an indication of high activity in this object and is consistent
with the high luminosity of the star.
No He II absorption lines are seen
in our spectra, suggesting
that the star is later than O9. The presence of a very clearly defined
series of Brackett H I lines in the H
band (see
Fig. 4,
H band panel) also points towards an early
B star, since
these lines disappear for O type stars. The narrowness and depth of
the Br lines is a clear indication of high luminosity. We also detect
them well up to Br19, at least. The narrow and deep
He I 1.7 m line is
also typical of a supergiant. It is deeper
than neighbouring Br lines, indicative of high luminosity. Its relative
depth with respect to a nearby Br 11 points clearly towards type
B0-B0.5Ia and excludes types earlier than 09.7I (Hanson
et al. 1998) (Fig. 2).
In addition, we find that He I 2.0581 m is
strongly in emission, a
characteristic of luminous early-B supergiants. This emission seems to
be variable, because it is far more pronounced in the TNG data than in
the IRTF observations (Fig. 4). We also
detect emission
in the He I 1.083
m line in
the J band, and in Pa
.
We conclude that the spectral type is B0.5 Ia,
compatible with that
given by Hannikainen et al.
(2004) and Nespoli
et al. (2008), but
infer a slightly higher luminosity class. Nespoli
et al. (2008) estimate a
distance of 1.1 kpc,
but they use the 2MASS photometry,
contaminated by the very bright star towards the upper right (see
Fig. 5),
namely 2MASS J19140417+0952538 (
mag),
as was
already recognised by in't Zand
et al. (2006b). We performed our photometry on
images of
higher spatial resolution that allowed us to clearly resolve both
stars. We used an aperture small enough to ensure that the
contribution from the bright star is minimal. We then applied an
aperture
correction to our magnitudes keeping in mind that avoiding the
contamination completely is probably impossible without adaptive
optics.
Using our photometry, rather than the 2MASS values, and the inferred
spectral type, we compute a distance of
kpc.
In Fig. 6,
we use our red and infrared
photometry for this object to plot the photometry absolute
flux calibration, dereddened with a standard
reddening law and assuming E(B-V)=5.5.
The photometry is
superimposed on a Kurucz atmosphere model for
and
,
corresponding to an early-type B supergiant
.
The acceptable fit shows that the extinction to this
source is close to standard, in spite of its high value. The
normalization constant in Fig. 6, assuming
,
would yield a distance of
3.6 kpc, in agreement
with the value computed previously. The
independent estimate by Rahoui
& Chaty (2008), based on a fit to the near- and
mid-infrared magnitudes, of
kpc, is also
consistent with our
value.
![]() |
Figure 5:
The counterpart to IGR J19140+0951. Left panel:
K-band image from 2MASS, showing the
contamination by the light of the bright star
2MASS J19140417+0952538. Right panel: TNG
|
Open with DEXTER |
3.5 XTE J1901+014
The source XTE J1901+014 was discovered by the RXTE/ASM
monitor
in 2002 during a brief outburst, after which the source went into
quiescence below detectable limits. Examination of archival data
showed that the source had undergone a previous brief outburst in 1997
(Remillard & Smith 2002)
showing a behaviour reminiscent of that of SFXTs. Smith
et al. (2007) used XMM-Newton to
obtain
accurate positions of the X-ray source, which was found to be
,
with
an error of
.
We subsequently searched the area for possible
counterparts. In Fig. 7, we
show a
-band
image of the area encompassing the error circle. Only one possible
candidate is visible within the XMM-Newton error
circle. The
object is very faint with
,
close to the limit of the
sky brightness at 2
m
at the La Palma Observatory. No
sources show up in the J- or H-band
images.
![]() |
Figure 6:
Our |
Open with DEXTER |
As the infrared observations do not provide enough
information, we must resort to X-ray
data in
order to ascertain the nature of the system. The XMM-Newton
spectra can be fitted well by a thermal
bremsstrahlung with keV
and an absorption column of
(Rampy
2009,
priv. comm.). This would correspond to
(Ryter 1996), which is higher
than the
integrated value for the Milky Way galaxy in the direction of the
source, namely
,
suggesting intrinsic
absorption, as might be expected. Assuming that all absorption is
interstellar, the corresponding infrared excess is
.
Comparing these values with those shown in Table 3, we can see that
the source is, indeed, very reddened but not
particularly so.
If we assume an MK
typical of a not very luminous OB supergiant (-5.5; Martins
& Plez 2006) with
,
the distance to the source would be
47 kpc, placing it
well outside the Galaxy. This seems very unlikely. At the outskirts of
the Galaxy in the direction to the source (
22 kpc), the infrared
magnitude of the counterpart would be
.
This would
correspond to a O8 V star or a K5 III star. Therefore
the
possibility of a supergiant companion is excluded.
However, there are arguments to believe that the distance must
be far
lower. Indeed, the 2002 outburst detected with RossiXTE/ASM
reached
a luminosity of
the order of 1 Crab, which corresponds to a flux
.
At a distance
d=22 kpc, the outburst should have reached
a
.
This
is equivalent to the Eddington luminosity of a compact object of
,
and higher than ever reported for any neutron star
system. On the other hand, if we assume that the outburst luminosity
was the
Eddington luminosity for accretion onto a NS (
),
the maximum distance to the source
should be of the order of
kpc,
which would place the source at the tip
of the Long Bar in the Galactic nucleus. For such a source,
,
which would be compatible with a
G5 III star. The maximum distance at
which the primary would be compatible with a class III star is
kpc,
in which case, we would infer a class of G4III (or also B4V). Below
this distance, essentially, only main-sequence stars are allowed. For
distances around 1 kpc or less, the only compatible
companions would be G, K, or M main-sequence stars. This
raises the interesting possibility that the system is a cataclysmic
variable, since the X-ray spectrum can be described by a thermal
bremsstrahlung at 6 keV. However, in such a case,
,
which would be several orders of magnitude higher than usually found
for CV. Therefore, we conclude that, very likely,
kpc.
This is in good agreement with the conclusions obtained by Karasev
et al. (2008a,b),
who argue in favor of a distance of
5 kpc.
![]() |
Figure 7:
TNG |
Open with DEXTER |
4 Discussion and conclusions
Four of our sources have early-B supergiant
companions. All four counterparts are found to have spectra that cover
a rather narrow spectral
interval, being early-B (B0-B1.5) supergiants of moderate or high
luminosity. This identifies the nature of the X-ray source
unambiguously as HMXBs. Furthermore, they are all heavily obscured,
with ,
implying extinctions on the order of
AV=9-16mag
in the visual band. On the other hand, XTE 1901+014 has no
obvious counterpart in any band
except
.
Thus, a supergiant nature is definitely excluded, thereby setting it
apart from the other four.
IGR J18027-2017 is a persistent X-ray source with a
counterpart
around B1 Ib. It is therefore, a SGXB system. The reason why
it has
not yet been detected by earlier X-ray missions is unclear. For
example,
it was not detected by ROSAT. At a distance of
kpc,
its XMM-Newton
detected flux in the 2-10 keV band for the main pulse of
,
would yield a luminosity of
.
This is typical of
these systems albeit among the lower values. Since the detected flux
outside the primary pulse is a little bit lower, the system can
spend a fraction of its time in the upper 1035 erg s-1.
Given its high obscuration, this can explain why it was
missed by earlier surveys.
For SAX J18186-1703, the NIR counterpart is a B0.5Iab
star, confirming its nature as a SFXT. The 22-50 keV flux
reported by Zurita-Heras &
Chaty (2009) is of the order of
in
quiescence, while it reaches
for
the strongest flares. At the inferred distance of
2.1 kpc,
the X-ray luminosity of this
object would be
in
quiescence, while the peak luminosity can be as high as
.
This is lower than those found in other SFXTs (
).
Zurita-Heras & Chaty (2009)
found that this system is in a very eccentric orbit (
), with
d,
amongst the largest yet found for SFXT, reaching a periastron distance
between 2 and 3 R*. This
would
locate the compact object at a slightly larger distance from the donor
than in the SGXB systems (
)
thereby reducing the
of the outbursts slightly below
,
as observed.
IGR J18483-0311 is a transient system with a
B0-B1 Iab primary. It has been classified as an intermediate
SFXT (Rahoui & Chaty 2008).
Like many other
SFXTs, it is a nearby source at 2.8 kpc. For this distance, the
INTEGRAL/IBIS 20-100 keV flux (Sguera et al. 2007)
translates into a luminosity
,
for the strongest flares, which is typical of this kind of
object. The orbital period of this system is 18.5 d, while the
spectral type of the companion is similar to that of
SAX J18186-1703. Therefore, the compact object would be
located slightly closer to the star and, correspondingly, its average
X-ray luminosity will be higher, in agreement with the scenario
described in Negueruela et al.
(2008).
IGR J19140+0951 is a persistent X-ray source and
therefore, owing to
its counterpart, a SGXB located at
kpc,
a
little bit further than previously thought. For the bright
INTEGRAL flux in the 2-20 keV band of
(Hannikainen et al. 2004),
the
,
typical of a SGXB, albeit, again, at the fainter end. Together with IGR
18027-2017, they have lower X-ray fluxes than the average SGXB, which
explains their more recent detections in the newer, and deeper INTEGRAL
observations.
![]() |
Figure 8: Sketch of the Galaxy showing the position of the HMXBs studied in this work (filled dots). Numbers refer to the relative order of the source in Table 3. Galaxy model from Churchwell et al. (2009). |
Open with DEXTER |
As can be seen in Fig. 8, the sources tend to concentrate in or behind the section of the Sagittarius arm projected onto the direction of the Galactic bulge, an area intensively scanned by INTEGRAL. They are, thus, relatively close to the Sun (in comparison to typical distances to HMXBs), although highly reddened. This can introduce a bias in the newly detected populations of obscured sources, which tend to harbor SG companions, since only the brighter and/or closer ones can be reached with telescopes of moderate apertures in the 4 m class. A transient system with a main-sequence companion, such as a BeXB, will be too faint to be conclusively classified (i.e.; Zurita-Heras & Chaty 2008). Remarkably, the furthest source in our sample is the least reddened one. This raises the question of the true abundance of HMXBs (and OB stars in fact) in our Galaxy. As can be seen in Table 3, the high reddening is not a sufficient condition to be an SFXT, since some SGXBs (such as IGR J19140+0951) are more reddened. On the other hand, it is not a necessary condition either, as other SFXTs exhibit rather low reddenings (for example, IGR J08408-4503 with E(B-V)=0.5 Negueruela et al. 2009). Furthermore, the position in the arms of the Galaxy of the newly discovered HMXBs (including the SFXTs) is entirely consistent with the positions of the previously known HMXBs (including SGXBs). Therefore, there is no reason to believe that they form a different population. This would be expected from a scenario similar to that discussed in Negueruela et al. (2008). In this scenario, the SFXTs are proposed to be SGXBs in which the compact object is located further out in the system, in a region where the stellar wind of the supergiant companion has become substantially clumped. The number of HMXBs in the Galaxy would then be much higher than previously thought. But so would the number of isolated OB stars, whose much lower X-ray emission will not be detected in current X-ray surveys if they are heavily obscured. This is supported by the discovery of a growing population of very massive infrared clusters (e.g., Messineo et al. 2008; Crowther et al. 2006). Therefore, in principle, there is no reason to believe that the relative abundance of HMXBs, with respect to OB stars, differs from the current values, which are well explained by theoretical models.
Finally, XTE J1901+014 emerges as a transient source
whose X-ray
behavior is characteristic of SFXTs but where the presence of a
supergiant companion is clearly ruled out. It may still be a massive
star close to the main sequence in
the outskirts of the Galaxy, perhaps with a
BH
as a
companion. In this respect, it is interesting to note the case of the
LMC transient A 0535-66
reaching
(e.g.,
Pakull & Parmar 1981). A
similar source at the edge of the Galaxy
could have a similar hard X-ray behaviour. However, taking into
account the moderate hardness (the source is observed as
1RXH J190140.1+012630) and obscuration of the source, it
seems more likely that the counterpart is a late-type star
located between 2 kpc and the Long Galactic bar
(7 kpc), somewhere between luminosity class V to class III,
but definitely not consistent with a class I
star. Whether a main sequence or giant late-type star wind can produce
the instabilities necessary to produce the observed outbursts via
accretion onto a compact object remains an open issue.
This research has been funded by grants AYA2008-06166-C03-03 and Consolider-GTC CSD-2006-00070 from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN). JMT also acknowledges the research grant PR2007-0176. The authors would like to thank the referee, Dr. Alex Kaper, for his useful comments and suggestions.The Nordic Optical Telescope is operated on the island of La Palma jointly by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias. The data were taken with ALFOSC, which is owned by the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA) and operated at the Nordic Optical Telescope under agreement between IAA and the NBIfAFG of the Astronomical Observatory of Copenhagen.
The WHT is operated on the island of La Palma by the Isaac Newton Group in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de Los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias. The WHT data presented here have been obtained as part of the service programme. We thank the support astronomers for their dedication during the service nights.
Partly based on observations made with the Italian Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG) operated on the island of La Palma by the Fundación Galileo Galilei of the INAF (Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica) at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias.
This research has made use of the Simbad data base, operated at CDS, Strasbourg (France) and of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation.
References
- Andrillat, Y., Jaschek, C., & Jaschek, M. 1995, A&AS, 112, 475 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Augello, G., Iaria, R., Robba, N. R., et al. 2003, ApJ, 596, 63 [Google Scholar]
- Bird, A. J., Malizia, A., Bazzano, A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 170, 175 [Google Scholar]
- Blum, R. D., Raymond, T. M., Conti, P. S., Figer, D. F., & Sellgren, K. 1997, AJ, 113, 1855 [Google Scholar]
- Chaty, S., Rahoui, F., Foellmi, C., et al. 2008, A&A, 484, 783 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Churchwell, E., Babler, B. L., Meade, M. R., et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 213 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chernyakova, M., Lutovinov, A., & Capitanio, F. 2003, ATel, 157 [Google Scholar]
- Clark, J. S., Steele, I. A., Fender, R. P., & Coe, M. J. 1999, A&A, 348, 888 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Corbet, R. H. D., Hannikainen, D. C., & Remillard, R. 2004, ATel, 269 [Google Scholar]
- Crowther, P. A., Hadfield, L. J., Clark, J. S., Negueruela, I., & Vacca, W. D. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1407 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ducati, J. R., Bevilacqua, C. M., Rembold, S. B., & Ribeiro, D. 2001, ApJ, 558, 309 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Grebenev, S. A., & Sunyaev, R. A. 2005, Ast. Lett., 31, 672 [Google Scholar]
- Halpern, J. P., & Gotthelf, E. V. 2004, ATel, 344 [Google Scholar]
- Halpern, J. P., & Gotthelf, E. V. 2007, ApJ, 669, 579 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hannikainen, D. C., Rodriguez, J., Vilhu, O., et al. 2005, A&A, 435, 995 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Hannikainen, D. C., Rawlings, M. G., Muhli, P., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 665 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hanson, M. M., Conti, P. S., & Rieke, M. J. 1996, ApJS, 107, 281 [Google Scholar]
- Hanson, M. M., Rieke, G. H., & Luhman, K. L. 1998, AJ, 116, 191 [Google Scholar]
- Hanson, M. M., Kudritzki, R. P., Kenworthy, M. A., Puls, J., & Tokunaga, A. T. 2005, ApJS, 161, 154 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Harrison, T. E., Howell, S. B., Szkody, P., et al. 2004, ApJ, 614, 947 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hill, A. B., Walter, R., Knigge, C., et al. 2005, A&A, 439, 255 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Hunt, L. K., Mannucci, F., Testi, L., et al. AJ, 115, 2594 [Google Scholar]
- in't Zand, J., Heise, J., Smith, M., et al. 1998, IAUC, 6840, 2 [Google Scholar]
- in't Zand, J. J. M., Jonker, P., Mendez, M., & Markwardt, C. 2006a, ATel, 915 [Google Scholar]
- in't Zand, J. J. M., Jonker, P. G., Nelemans, G., Steeghs, D., & O'Brien, K. 2006b, A&A, 448, 1101 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Karasev, D. I., Lutovinov, A. A., & Burenin, R. A. 2008a, Astron. Lett., 34, 753 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Karasev, D. I., Lutovinov, A. A., & Burenin, R. A. 2008b, Pisma v Astron.Zh., 34 (2008), 834 [Google Scholar]
- Kleinmann, S. G., & Hall, D. N. B. 1986, ApJS, 62, 501 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Maiolino, R., Rieke, G. H., & Rieke, M. J. 1996, AJ, 111, 537 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Malizia, A., Bassani, L., Stephen, J. B., et al. 2005, ApJ, 630, 157 [Google Scholar]
- Martins, F., & Plez, B. 2006, A&A, 457, 637 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Masetti, N., Mason, E., Morelli, L., et al. 2008, A&A, 482, 113 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Mason, A. B., Clark, J. S., Norton, A. J., Negueruela, I., & Roche, P. 2009, A&A, 505, 281 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Messineo, M., Figer, D., Davies, B., et al. 2008, ApJ, 683, 155 [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, M. R., Edwards, S., Hinkle, K. H., & Strom, S. E. 1998, ApJ, 508, 397 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Negueruela, I., Smith, D. M., Reig, P., et al. 2006a, ESA SP-604, 165 [Google Scholar]
- Negueruela, I., Smith, D. M., Harrison, T. E., & Torrejón, J. M. 2006b, ApJ, 638, 982 [Google Scholar]
- Negueruela, I., Torrejón, J. M., Reig, P., et al. 2008, AIPC, 1010, 252 [Google Scholar]
- Negueruela, I., Torrejón, J. M., & Reig P. 2009, in Proceedings of the 7th INTEGRAL Workshop - An INTEGRAL View of Compact Objects, Copenhagen, Denmark, 8-11 September 2008, Proc. Science [Google Scholar]
- Nespoli, E., Fabregat, J., & Mennickent, R. E. 2008, A&A, 486, 911 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Pakull, P., & Parmar, A. 1981, A&A, 102, L1 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Rahoui, F., & Chaty, S. 2008, A&A, 492, 163 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Rahoui, F., Chaty, S., Lagage, P.-O., & Pantin, E. 2008, A&A, 484, 801 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Remillard, R., & Smith, D. 2002, ATel, 88 [Google Scholar]
- Revnivtsev, M. G., Sunyaev, R. A., Varshalovich, D. A., et al. 2004, Astron. Lett., 30, 382 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ryter, Ch. E. 1996, Ap&SS, 236, 285 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt-Kaler, T. H. 1982, in Stars and Star Clusters, Landolt-Bornstein New Series, Vol. 2b, Astronomyand Astrophysics - ed. K. Schaifers, & H. H. Voigt (New York: Springer-Verlag), [Google Scholar]
- Sguera, V., Barlow, E. J., Bird, A. J., et al. 2005, A&A, 444, 221 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Sguera, V., Bazzano, A., Bird, A. J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 452 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sguera, V., Hill, A. B., Bird, A. J., et al. 2007, A&A, 467, 249 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Smith, D. M., Heindl, W. A., Markwardt, C. A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, 974 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Smith, D. A., Rampy, R. A., Negueruela, I., & Torrejón, J. M. 2007, ATel, 1268 [Google Scholar]
- Wallace, Ll., Meyer, M. R., Hinkle, K., & Edwards, S. 2000, ApJ, 535, 325 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Walter, R., Zurita-Heras, J., Bassani, L., et al. 2006, A&A, 453, 133 [Google Scholar]
- Wegner, W. 1994, MNRAS, 270, 229 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wegner, W. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 185 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zurita-Heras, J., & Chaty, S. 2008, A&A, 489, 657 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Zurita-Heras, J., & Chaty, S. 2009, A&A, 493, L1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Footnotes
- ... sources
- http://isdcul3.unige.ch/ rodrigue/html/igrsources.html
- ...
software
- http://www.tng.iac.es/news/2002/09/10/snap/index.html
- ... supergiant
- Actually,
would be more adequate. Unfortunately, this Kurucz model is not available. The difference in slope, however, is negligible for the present purposes.
All Tables
Table 1:
infrared photometry for the
sources included in our survey.
Table 2: Equivalent widths ( Å) of the main diagnostic lines in the JHK bands observed in our sample.
Table 3: Derived parameters for stars in our sample, calculated using the observed data.
All Figures
![]() |
Figure 1: Left: WHT I-band spectrum of IGR J18027-2016 normalised to flux unity bracketted between comparison standard stars. Right: TNG K-band spectrum normalised to flux unity. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 2:
K band spectrum of the counterpart to
SAX J18186-1703. Note the absence of any feature at the
position of the He II 2.1885 |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 3: WHT - I band spectrum of IGR J18483-0311. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 4: SPEX-IRTF J, H and K band spectra of IGR J19140+0951. In the K band, TNG data ( top) are also presented. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 5:
The counterpart to IGR J19140+0951. Left panel:
K-band image from 2MASS, showing the
contamination by the light of the bright star
2MASS J19140417+0952538. Right panel: TNG
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Our |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 7:
TNG |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 8: Sketch of the Galaxy showing the position of the HMXBs studied in this work (filled dots). Numbers refer to the relative order of the source in Table 3. Galaxy model from Churchwell et al. (2009). |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
Copyright ESO 2010
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.