Effects of rotation on the evolution and asteroseismic properties of red giants
P. Eggenberger^{1,2}  A. Miglio^{1,}^{}  J. Montalban^{1}  O. Moreira^{1}  A. Noels^{1}  G. Meynet^{2}  A. Maeder^{2}
1  Institut d'Astrophysique et de Géophysique de l'Université de Liège,
17 Allée du 6 Août, 4000 Liège, Belgium
2 
Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 Ch. des Maillettes,
1290 Sauverny, Switzerland
Received 15 July 2009 / Accepted 27 October 2009
Abstract
Context. The recent observations of solarlike oscillations
in many red giant stars with the CoRoT satellite stimulated the
theoretical study of the effects of various physical processes on the
modelling of these stars.
Aims. The influence of rotation on the properties of red giants
is studied in the context of the asteroseismic modelling of these
stars.
Methods. The effects of rotation on the global and asteroseismic
properties of red giant stars with a mass larger than the mass limit
for degenerate He burning are investigated by comparing rotating models
computed with a comprehensive treatment of shellular rotation to
nonrotating ones.
Results. While red giants exhibit low surface rotational
velocities, we find that the rotational history of the star has a large
impact on its properties during the red giant phase. In particular, for
stars massive enough to ignite He burning in nondegenerate conditions,
rotational mixing induces a significant increase of the stellar
luminosity and shifts the location of the core helium burning phase to
a higher luminosity in the HR diagram. This of course results in a
change of the seismic properties of red giants at the same evolutionary
state. As a consequence the inclusion of rotation significantly changes
the fundamental parameters of a red giant star as determined by
performing an asteroseismic calibration. In particular rotation
decreases the derived stellar mass and increases the age. Depending on
the rotation law assumed in the convective envelope and on the initial
velocity of the star, nonnegligible values of rotational splitting can
be reached, which may complicate the observation and identification of
nonradial oscillation modes for red giants exhibiting moderate surface
rotational velocities. By comparing the effects of rotation and
overshooting, we find that the mainsequence widening and the increase
of the Hburning lifetime induced by rotation (
km s^{1})
are well reproduced by nonrotating models with an overshooting
parameter of 0.1, while the increase of luminosity during the postmain
sequence evolution is better reproduced by nonrotating models with
overshooting parameters twice as large. This illustrates the fact that
rotation not only increases the size of the convective core but also
changes the chemical composition of the radiative zone.
Key words: stars: rotation  stars: oscillations  stars: fundamental parameters
1 Introduction
The solar fiveminute oscillations have provided a wealth of information on the internal structure of the Sun. These results stimulated various attempts to detect a similar signal on other stars. In past years, solarlike oscillations have been observed for a handful of stars either from the ground by using stabilized spectrographs developed for extrasolar planet searches or from photometric data obtained from space (see e.g. Bedding & Kjeldsen 2007). While these asteroseismic observations mainly focused on solartype stars, solarlike oscillations have also been detected for a few red giants (Barban et al. 2004,2007; De Ridder et al. 2006; Frandsen et al. 2002). These first detections together with the recent clear identification of nonradial oscillations for many red giant stars (GK giants) with CoRoT (De Ridder et al. 2009) stimulated the theoretical study of the asteroseismic properties of red giant stars and of the effects of various physical processes on the modelling of these stars. Rotation is one of the key processes that changes all outputs of stellar models with a peculiarly strong impact on the physics and evolution of massive stars (see e.g. Maeder & Meynet 2000). In this paper, we focus on the effects of rotation on the asteroseismic modelling of red giants massive enough to ignite He burning in nondegenerate conditions by comparing stellar models including shellular rotation (i.e. a strongly anisotropic turbulence leads to an essentially constant angular velocity on the isobars, see Sect. 2 for more details) to nonrotating models. The influence of rotation on the asteroseismic features of red giants and on the determination of the global properties of a red giant star obtained by performing an asteroseismic modelling is studied.
The physical description of rotation is first briefly presented in Sect. 2. The results of the comparisons between rotating and nonrotating models of red giants are discussed in Sect. 3, while the conclusion is given in Sect. 4.
2 Physical description of rotation
In the radiative interiors of rotating stars, meridional circulation is generated as a result of the thermal imbalance induced by the breaking of the spherical symmetry (Vogt 1926; Eddington 1925). This large scale circulation transports matter and angular momentum. Differential rotation then takes place in the radiative zones, making the stellar interior highly turbulent. The turbulence is very anisotropic, with a much stronger geostrophiclike transport in the horizontal than in the vertical direction (Zahn 1992). The horizontal turbulent coupling favours an essentially constant angular velocity on the isobars. With this hypothesis of shellular rotation, every quantity depends solely on pressure and can be split into a mean value and its latitudinal perturbationwhere is the second Legendre polynomial. In this context, the transport of angular momentum obeys an advectiondiffusion equation written in Lagrangian coordinates (Zahn 1992; Maeder & Zahn 1998):
r being a characteristic radius, the mean density on an isobar and the mean angular velocity at level r. The vertical component of the velocity of the meridional circulation at a distance r to the center and at a colatitude can be written
(3) 
Only the radial term U(r) appears in Eq. (2); its expression is given by (Maeder & Zahn 1998)
P is the pressure, the specific heat, and are terms depending on the  and distributions respectively, up to the third order derivatives and on various thermodynamic quantities (see Maeder & Zahn 1998, for more details).
Meridional circulation and shear mixing are considered as the main mixing mechanisms in radiative zones.
The first term on the righthand side of Eq. (2) describes the advection of angular momentum by
meridional circulation, while the second term accounts for the transport of angular momentum by shear instability
with
.
The expression of this diffusion coefficient is given by
with K the thermal diffusivity (Maeder & Meynet 2001). is the diffusion coefficient associated to horizontal turbulence. The usual expression for this coefficient is, according to Zahn (1992),
where U(r) is the vertical component of the meridional circulation velocity, V(r) the horizontal component, a constant of order unity and . The full solution of Eq. (2) taking into account U(r) and D gives the nonstationary solution of the problem. We recall here that meridional circulation is treated as a truly advective process in the Geneva evolution code.
The vertical transport of chemicals
through the combined action of vertical advection and strong
horizontal diffusion
can be described as a pure diffusive process (Chaboyer & Zahn 1992).
The advective transport is thus replaced by a diffusive term,
with an effective
diffusion coefficient
The vertical transport of chemical elements then obeys a diffusion equation which, in addition to this macroscopic transport, also accounts for (vertical) turbulent transport:
where c_{i} is the mean concentration of element i and represents the variations of chemical composition due to nuclear reactions.
3 Results
The stellar evolution code used for these computations is the Geneva code that includes a comprehensive treatment of shellular rotation as briefly described in the preceding section (see Eggenberger et al. 2008, for more details).3.1 Effects of rotation in the HR diagram
To investigate the effects of rotation on the properties of red giants, we first compute the evolution of a star with and without rotation. These models are computed with a solar chemical composition as given by Grevesse & Noels (1993), a solar calibrated value for the mixinglength parameter ( with the input physics used for these computations) and without overshooting from the convective core into the surrounding radiatively stable layers. Both models share therefore exactly the same initial parameters except for the inclusion of shellular rotation. The rotating model is computed with an initial velocity of 150 km s^{1} on the zero age main sequence (ZAMS).
Figure 1 shows the evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram for both models. During the red giant phase, the star spends most of its lifetime in the loop corresponding to the core heliumburning phase. Consequently, it is much more likely to observe a red giant star during the heliumburning phase than during its rapid evolution on the red giant branch in the hydrogen shellburning phase. The inclusion of rotation is found to significantly change the evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram. Rotating models indeed exhibit larger luminosities than nonrotating ones. In the red giant branch, the core heliumburning phase is thus located at a larger luminosity when rotation is included.
In order to investigate whether these differences are mainly due to rotational mixing or to hydrostatic corrections due to rotation, another rotating model of with an initial velocity of 150 km s^{1} on the ZAMS is computed by including only the effects of rotational mixing. Figure 2 compares the mainsequence evolution of this model with the ones shown in Fig. 1. The evolutionary track in the HR diagram corresponding to the rotating model including only rotational mixing is very similar to the track of the model computed with a full treatment of rotation. The change of the evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram induced by rotation for red giants is thus mainly due to rotational mixing with only a very limited contribution from the effects of the centrifugal force. This is due to the fact that the kinetic rotational energy of the star is much lower than its gravitational energy (typical ratio of 0.1% in the present case).
Figure 1: Evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram for models. The continuous and dashed lines correspond to models computed with and without rotation, respectively. Dots indicate time intervals of 5 Myr. 

Open with DEXTER 
Comparing the dotted and continuous lines in Fig. 2, we see that the inclusion of the hydrostatic effects of rotation results in a slight shift of the track towards lower luminosities and effective temperatures. This is caused by the effective gravity of the star being reduced by the inclusion of the centrifugal acceleration term. The evolutionary track of a star including the hydrostatic effects of rotation is thus similar to the one of a star computed with a slightly lower initial mass and without these effects, hence the shift to the red part of the HR diagram. By comparing the nonrotating track (dashed line) in Fig. 2 to the one including the full treatment of shellular rotation (continuous line), we note that only hydrostatic effects of rotation are observed at the beginning of the main sequence. As the evolution proceeds, rotational mixing begins to play a dominant role though by bringing fresh hydrogen fuel into the convective core and by transporting helium and other Hburning products into the radiative zone. This mixing results in a widening of the main sequence with a significant increase of the stellar luminosity for rotating models compared to nonrotating ones.
Figure 2: Zoom on the mainsequence evolution corresponding to the evolutionary tracks shown in Fig. 1. The dotted line shows the evolutionary track for a model of including only rotational mixing. 

Open with DEXTER 
3.2 Rotational velocities
During the mainsequence evolution, the surface rotational velocity slowly decreases. The model computed with an initial velocity of 150 km s^{1} on the ZAMS exhibits a surface velocity of 115 km s^{1} at the end of the main sequence. Then the surface velocity rapidly decreases during the quick evolution from the blue to the red part of the HR diagram. At the bottom of the red giant branch, the velocity equals and reaches a mean value of about during the evolution as a red giant star. For a model computed with a lower initial velocity of , a surface velocity of is reached at the bottom of the red giant branch with a mean value of about 2 km s^{1} during the red giant phase. It is worthwhile to note here that these values are obtained by assuming a solid body rotation in the convective zones. While this assumption seems reasonable during the mainsequence evolution as indicated by the solar case, it becomes questionable during further evolution in the red giant phase where the star is characterised by an extended convective envelope (see e.g. Palacios & Brun 2007; Denissenkov & Tout 2000; Sweigart & Mengel 1979; Palacios et al. 2006).Following the work of Sweigart & Mengel (1979) and Palacios et al. (2006), another limiting case for the rotation law in the convective envelope is taken into account in addition to the assumption of solid body rotation: the assumption of uniform specific angular momentum. A model of a red giant star with an initial velocity of is then computed by assuming solid body rotation in the convective envelope during the main sequence and uniform specific angular momentum after the main sequence. For this model, the assumption of uniform specific angular momentum in the convective envelope after the main sequence leads to a decrease of the surface velocities. At the bottom of the red giant branch, the velocity equals and reaches a mean value of about during the core helium phase on the red giant branch. We see that for both limiting assumptions on the rotation law in the convective envelope, a stellar model computed with a significant initial rotational velocity will have a low surface velocity during the red giant phase in good agreement with the observed rotational velocities of red giants (e.g. Massarotti et al. 2008; de Medeiros & Mayor 1999). We consequently conclude that while a red giant exhibits a low surface rotational velocity, it may have been rotating much more rapidly during the main sequence. Since rotation significantly changes the stellar properties during the main sequence, the further evolution in the red giant phase is found to significantly depend on the rotational history of the star.
Figure 3: Evolution of the internal rotation profile in a star with an initial velocity of . is the hydrogen mass fraction at the center. The triangle indicates the border of the convective envelope for the model at the bottom of the red giant branch. A constant angular velocity is assumed in the convective zone. 

Open with DEXTER 
Figure 4: Internal rotation profile for a red giant with a luminosity of . Continuous and dasheddotted lines correspond to a model computed with the assumption of solid body rotation and conservation of specific angular momentum in the convective envelope after the mainsequence phase, respectively. Both models are computed with an initial velocity of 150 km s^{1}. Triangles indicate the border of the convective envelope. 

Open with DEXTER 
Figure 3 shows the evolution of the internal rotation profile for the model with an initial velocity of computed with the assumption of solid body rotation in the convective envelope. During the main sequence, a small degree of differential rotation is found as a result of the transport mechanisms at work in stellar interiors. Near the end of the main sequence, the angular velocity in the central layers grows rapidly, since the central contraction dominates the evolution of the angular momentum. After the main sequence and during the red giant phase, the evolution of the internal rotation profile is mainly dominated by the local conservation of angular momentum. This is due to the fact that secular transport mechanisms have little time to operate.
Figure 4 compares the internal rotation profile of red giant models of with a luminosity of computed with two different assumptions regarding the rotation law in the convective envelope. When a constant angular velocity is assumed in the convective zone, the rotation profile is approximately flat between the surface and about 0.2 M, where M is the total mass of the star. With the assumption of a uniform specific angular momentum in the convective envelope, a slight monotonic decrease of the angular velocity is observed in the same region when the distance to the stellar centre increases.
3.3 Lifetimes
In addition to changing the evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram, rotation has also a large impact on the age of a given stellar model. As briefly mentioned in Sect. 3.1, rotational mixing is indeed found to bring fresh hydrogen fuel to the central stellar core. Figure 5 shows the evolution of the central mass fraction of hydrogen () as a function of the age for a star computed with and without rotation. At a given age, the central hydrogen mass fraction is larger for the rotating model than for the model without rotation.
Figure 5: Hydrogen mass fraction at the center of the star () as a function of the age. The continuous line corresponds to a rotating model of with an initial velocity of , while the dashed line corresponds to a model computed without rotation. 

Open with DEXTER 
Figure 6: Evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram for models. The continuous and dashed lines indicate models with an initial velocity of and without rotation, respectively. Both models are computed without overshooting. The dasheddotted and the dotted lines correspond to nonrotating models with an overshoot parameter of 0.1 and 0.2, respectively. 

Open with DEXTER 
As a result of rotational mixing, the mainsequence lifetime is larger for stellar models including rotation. For instance, a star with an initial velocity of exhibits an age of 0.34 Gyr at the end of the main sequence, while the corresponding nonrotating model has a lower age of 0.31 Gyr.
3.4 Rotation and overshooting
The effects of rotation and overshooting from the convective core into the surroundings layers on a distance (Maeder & Meynet 1989) are compared by computing the evolution of nonrotating models of with an overshoot parameter of 0.1 and 0.2. The evolutionary tracks of these models in the HR diagram are shown in Fig. 6. The inclusion of overshooting results in an increase of the luminosity of the star. The turnoff point at the end of the mainsequence occurs at a lower effective temperature and a higher luminosity, thereby increasing the mainsequence width. These effects are due to the increase of the mass of the convective core when overshooting is included in the computation as shown in Fig. 7. As a result of the larger convective cores, the main sequence lifetime is increased by about 10% and 20% for models with an overshoot parameter of 0.1 and 0.2, respectively.
Figure 7: Ratio of the mass of the convective core to the total mass of the star ( ) as a function of the age for models of . The continuous and dashed lines indicate models with an initial velocity of 150 km s^{1} and without rotation, respectively. Both models are computed without overshooting. The dasheddotted and the dotted lines correspond to nonrotating models with an overshoot parameter of 0.1 and 0.2, respectively. 

Open with DEXTER 
As discussed in Sect. 3.1, rotation is also found to increase the luminosity of the star and to extend the main sequence tracks towards lower effective temperatures. This is essentially due to two effects. First, rotational mixing brings fresh hydrogen fuel into the convective core, slowing down its decrease in mass during the evolution on the mainsequence. Secondly, rotational mixing transports helium and other Hburning products into the radiative zone. The first effect can be clearly seen in Fig. 7 and results in a shift of the turnoff point at the end of the mainsequence to lower effective temperatures. The second effect is illustrated in Fig. 8. As shown in Figs. 6 and 7, the mainsequence widening as well as the increase of the Hburning lifetime due to rotational mixing is well reproduced by a nonrotating model with an overshoot parameter . Figure 6 also clearly shows that the increase of the luminosity is larger for the rotating model than for the nonrotating model with an overshoot parameter of . In particular, the luminosity during the postmain sequence phase of evolution of the rotating model is better reproduced by a nonrotating model with a larger overshoot parameter of 0.2. This is due to the multiple effects of rotational mixing (i.e. an increase of the size of the convective core and a change of the chemical composition in the radiative zone) that lead to a significant increase of the stellar luminosity. Indeed, Fig. 8 shows that the chemical composition of the internal layers of the radiative zone is changed when rotational effects are included. In particular, the transport of helium into the radiative zone leads to a larger mean molecular weight and hence to a larger luminosity for the rotating model.
Figure 8: Hydrogen abundance profile for models with the same effective temperature ( ) during the postmain sequence phase of evolution. 

Open with DEXTER 
We thus conclude that the inclusion of overshooting has a similar effect on the global stellar parameters as rotation. In particular, both processes lead to an increase of the stellar luminosity and age together with an extension of the mainsequence to lower effective temperatures. It is however interesting to note that all the changes of the stellar global properties induced by rotation cannot be reproduced by a single nonrotating model with a given value of the overshooting parameter. Indeed, we find that the increase of the age and the mainsequence widening due to rotation is approximately reproduced by a nonrotating model with a moderate overshooting , while the increase of the stellar luminosity induced by rotational mixing (in particular during the postmain sequence phase of evolution) is better reproduced by a nonrotating model with a larger value of the overshooting parameter .
3.5 Effects of rotation on asteroseismic properties of red giants
Red giant stars in the helium burning phase are characterised by a deep convective envelope with a very small convective core resulting from helium burning in the center. The large density near the centre of the star results in very large values of the BruntVäisälä frequency in the central layers. This is illustrated in Fig. 9 which shows the characteristic frequencies in the interior of a star in the helium burning phase. N and correspond to the BruntVäisälä and the Lamb frequencies, respectively. We recall here that the asymptotic analysis of the oscillation equations shows that an oscillating solution is found when one of the two following conditions is fullfilled: the angular mode frequency is larger than N and , or its frequency is lower than both N and (e.g. Osaki 1975). The first condition corresponds to acoustic or p modes, while the second one corresponds to gravity or g modes.
Figure 9: Characteristic frequencies of a star in the helium burning phase. N and correspond to the BruntVäisälä and the Lamb frequencies, respectively. 

Open with DEXTER 
Due to the large increase of the BruntVäisälä frequency in the central layers, the situation is somewhat complex in the case of a red giant star. Figure 9 indeed shows that a mode can simultaneously exhibit a gmodelike behaviour in the core (its frequency being lower than N and ) and pmodelike behaviour in the envelope (frequency larger than both N and ). Oscillation modes of mixed pmode and gmode properties are thus expected in red giants. As can been seen in Fig. 10, these nonradial modes are dominated in most cases by the gmode behaviour, and therefore exhibit a high inertia. Indeed, most of the and modes have an inertia significantly larger and hence surface amplitudes significantly smaller than the purely acoustic radial modes. However, for nonradial modes trapped in the acoustic cavity the inertia decreases and can become similar to the one of the radial modes. For modes, Fig. 9 shows that the evanescent region (where the mode frequency is larger than N but lower than ) is narrow, so that the p and gmode regions are not well separated. Consequently, modes are not efficiently trapped in the acoustic cavity, and the inertia of modes remains larger than for radial modes. For modes, the evanescent region is broader and the separation between the p and gmode region is then sufficient to obtain oscillation modes, which in terms of inertia are very similar to purely acoustic modes. As a result, Fig. 10 shows that there is a trapped mode with a dominant amplitude close to every radial mode, defining thereby the small separation between and modes (ChristensenDalsgaard 2004). Note that this discussion is only based on inertia consideration independently from the fact that nonradial modes in red giants could be more strongly damped than the radial modes (see e.g. Dziembowski et al. 2001). This important aspect of solarlike oscillations in red giant stars is examined in detail in Dupret et al. (2009).
Figure 10: Mode inertias for the model in the helium burning phase shown in Fig. 9. Dots, triangles and squares correspond to modes with , and , respectively. 

Open with DEXTER 
3.5.1 Models with the same initial mass
In the precedings sections, the effects of rotation on the global properties of red giants have been discussed. As shown in Fig. 1, a red giant star spends most of its time in the loop corresponding to the core heliumburning phase. In order to study the effects of rotation on the asteroseismic properties of red giants, we thus compare rotating and nonrotating models during the heliumburning phase. The main effect of rotation is then to shift the location of this phase to larger luminosities. Let us compare the asteroseismic features of rotating and nonrotating models computed with exactly the same initial parameters and situated at the same evolutionary stage during the central helium burning phase (i.e. with the same value of the central helium mass fraction ).
For this purpose, a red giant model of with an initial velocity of 150 km s^{1} located in the middle of the helium burning phase ( ) is compared to the corresponding nonrotating redgiant model computed with the same initial parameters except for the inclusion of shellular rotation. The rotating red giant model is characterised by an age of 0.41 Gyr, a luminosity and an effective temperature K. The red giant model computed without rotation has a lower age and luminosity of respectively 0.40 Gyr and , with an effective temperature K. The theoretical low frequencies of the models are then computed by using the Aarhus adiabatic pulsation code (ChristensenDalsgaard 1997). The asteroseismic properties of both red giant models are compared in Fig. 11. The values of the large separation are calculated from the radial modes, while the small separations between and modes are determined by considering only the modes with an inertia close to the radial modes which are trapped in the acoustic cavity.
Figure 11: Large separation for radial modes and small separation between and trapped modes versus frequency for two red giant models of at the same evolutionary stage during the helium burning phase. The continuous and dashed lines correspond to a model computed with an initial velocity of and without rotation, respectively. 

Open with DEXTER 
Figure 11 shows that the inclusion of rotation results in a clear decrease of the large separation. The rotating red giant model exhibits a mean large separation of Hz, while the nonrotating model has a larger mean separation of Hz. The mean large separation is mainly proportional to the square root of the star's mean density. Both models sharing the same mass, this difference of about 20% is due to the larger radius of the rotating model ( instead of 11.9 for the nonrotating model). Since the effective temperatures of the models computed with and without rotation are very similar (the difference is about 1%), the decrease of the mean large separation with rotation can be directly related to the large increase of the stellar luminosity induced by rotational mixing (a difference of about 25% between both models).
Concerning the small separation between and modes trapped in the acoustic cavity of the star, a similar decrease is observed when rotation is taken into account (see bottom of Fig. 11). For mainsequence stars, the small separation is known to be mainly sensitive to the conditions in the central regions of the star. However, it also retains some sensitivity to the nearsurface structure. Roxburgh & Vorontsov (2003) therefore introduce the use of another asteroseismic quantity: the ratio of the small to large separation. This ratio constitutes a better diagnostic of the central parts of a star than the small separation, since it is essentially independent of the structure of the outer layers and is determined solely by the interior structure (Roxburgh & Vorontsov 2003; Roxburgh 2005). In the case of the present red giants models, the decrease of the values of the small separation when rotation is included is similar to the decrease of the large separation, so that the ratio between the small and large separation is approximately the same for the rotating and nonrotating model. Thus, the different values of the small separation for a red giant model computed with and without rotation mainly reflects the change of the global stellar properties and not a change in the structure of the central regions of the star.
Figure 12: Evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram for rotating and nonrotating models of red giants sharing approximately the same luminosity during the helium burning phase. The continuous line corresponds to a star computed with an initial velocity of 150 km s^{1}, while the dashed line corresponds to a nonrotating model of . Dots indicate time intervals of 5 Myr. 

Open with DEXTER 
Finally, the values of rotational splittings predicted for rotating models of red giants are discussed by comparing the two models of with a luminosity of presented in Sect. 3.2 and Fig. 4, which are computed with two different assumptions regarding the rotation law in the convective envelope. A mean rotational splitting of about 0.1 Hz is found for the model computed with a solid body rotation in the convective envelope for trapped modes, while a lower value of about 0.03 Hz is found in the case of uniform specific angular momentum. This is of course due to the lower values of the internal rotational velocity in the acoustic region of the star for the model computed with the assumption of a uniform specific angular momentum in the convective envelope (see Fig. 4). We thus see that depending on the rotation law assumed in the convective envelope (and of course on the value of the initial velocity of the star), the value of the mean rotational splitting during the red giant phase can be quite different. It is interesting to note that the splitting of about 0.1 Hz found for the model computed with a constant angular velocity in the convective zone is not negligible compared to the low values predicted for the large and small separations of red giants (see for instance Fig. 11). Indeed, a rotational splitting of 0.1 Hz leads to a frequency spacing of 0.4 Hz between modes modes with m=+2 and m=2, which is only slightly lower than the mean value of the small separation between and modes trapped in the acoustic cavity of the star (about 0.6 Hz). Due to rotational splitting, the observation and identification of nonradial oscillation modes regularly spaced in frequency will then be much more difficult in red giants exhibiting a moderate surface rotational velocity (about for the model studied here) than in red giants with lower surface velocities.
3.5.2 Models with the same luminosity
After studying the effects of rotation on asteroseismic properties of red giant stars by comparing rotating and nonrotating models computed with the same initial parameters, we are now interested in investigating the effects of rotation on the determination of the fundamental stellar parameters and asteroseismic properties for red giants sharing the same location in the HR diagram. For this purpose, another model is computed in order to obtain rotating red giants in the helium burning phase with approximately the same luminosity as the nonrotating red giant stars of . As shown in Fig. 12, the red giant branch of a star with an initial velocity of shares the same luminosity interval as the red giant branch of a nonrotating star of . In particular, the luminosity of the bottom of the red giant branch and of the central helium burning loop is approximately the same for both models. The inclusion of rotation results therefore in a decrease of the mass of the star (of approximately 10%) in order to reproduce the location of the helium burning phase of red giants in the HR diagram. At a given luminosity, a rotating red giant model exhibits also a slightly lower effective temperature than a nonrotating model (with a mean difference of about 90 K). This is due to the lower mass required by the rotating models to reach the same luminosity during the red giant phase. The lower initial mass of models including rotation results also in a large increase of the determined age for a red giant. During the core helium burning phase, rotating models exhibit indeed an age about 40% larger than nonrotating models. We thus see that rotation significantly changes the global stellar parameters required to reproduce the same location of the heliumburning red giant stars in the HR diagram.
Figure 13: Large separation for radial modes and small separation between and trapped modes versus frequency for two red giant models with the same luminosity during the helium burning phase. The continuous and dashed lines correspond to a model computed with an initial velocity of and a star without rotation, respectively. 

Open with DEXTER 
To investigate the effects of rotation on the asteroseismic properties of red giants with the same luminosity, theoretical low frequencies of the rotating red giant in the helium burning phase are computed. It is characterised by an age of 0.578 Gyr, a luminosity of and an effective temperature of 4844 K (with ). The asteroseismic features of both models are compared in Fig. 8. The rotating model exhibits a lower value of the mean large separation than the nonrotating model (5.43 instead of 5.99 Hz). This difference of about 10% mainly results from the different mean density of both models due to their different masses. There is also a small contribution from the slight change in the effective temperature of the rotating model. Both models share indeed the same luminosity, while the slightly lower effective temperature of the rotating model implies a larger value of the stellar radius resulting in a slight decrease of the mean large separation of the rotating model. The values of the small separation between and modes trapped in the acoustic cavity of the star are also found to decrease when rotation is included (see bottom of Fig. 8). As discussed above, this difference for red giant stars computed with and without rotation mainly reflects the change of the global stellar properties (particularly the mass of the star in this case) and not a change in the structure of the central regions of the star.
4 Conclusion
While red giants generally exhibit low surface rotational velocities, they may have been rotating much more rapidly during the main sequence. Since rotation significantly changes the stellar properties during the main sequence, the further evolution in the red giant phase is found to depend on the rotational history of the star. In particular, the comparison of rotating and nonrotating models computed with exactly the same initial parameters except for the inclusion of shellular rotation shows that rotation induces a significant increase of the stellar luminosity. The change of the evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram due to rotation is mainly due to rotational mixing with only a very limited contribution from hydrostatic corrections induced by rotation. In the case of red giant stars massive enough to ignite He burning in nondegenerate conditions, rotation shifts the location of the core helium burning phase to higher luminosity in the HR diagram. This of course results in a change of the global asteroseismic properties of red giants situated at the same evolutionary stage. Lower values of the large separation of radial modes as well as of the small separation between and modes trapped in the acoustic cavity of the star are then found for rotating models than for the nonrotating ones.The effects of rotation and overshooting have also been compared. We find that both processes increase the stellar luminosity and the determined age and shift also the location of the end of the main sequence to lower effective temperatures. However, the changes of the stellar global properties induced by rotation cannot be reproduced by a single nonrotating model with a given value of the overshooting parameter. This is due to the fact that, contrary to overshooting, the changes of the global stellar properties induced by rotation are not only due to the increase of the size of the convective core, but also to the transport of helium and Hburning products by shear mixing and meridional circulation in the radiative layers.
Finally, the effects of rotation on the determination of the fundamental stellar parameters and asteroseismic properties for red giants sharing the same location in the HR diagram have been studied. Rotation is then found to decrease the determined value of the mass of a red giant located at a given luminosity in the HR diagram (by about 10% for a typical value of the rotation velocity) and to increase the value of the age (by about 40% for a typical rotation rate). We thus conclude that although red giants are slow rotators, the inclusion of rotation significantly changes the fundamental parameters determined for a star from an asteroseismic calibration. This is especially interesting in the context of the recent observations of solarlike oscillations in red giants obtained with CoRoT (De Ridder et al. 2009) and of new asteroseismic data expected from ground based observations and upcoming space missions.
AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank J. ChristensenDalsgaard for providing us with the Aarhus adiabatic pulsation code. P.E. is thankful to the Swiss National Science Foundation for support.
References
 Barban, C., de Ridder, J., Mazumdar, A., et al. 2004, in SOHO 14 Helio and Asteroseismology: Towards a Golden Future, ed. D. Danesy, ESA SP, 559, 113 [Google Scholar]
 Barban, C., Matthews, J. M., de Ridder, J., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, 1033 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Bedding, T. R., & Kjeldsen, H. 2007, Commun. Asteroseismol., 150, 106 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Chaboyer, B., & Zahn, J.P. 1992, A&A, 253, 173 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 ChristensenDalsgaard, J. 1997, http://astro.phys.au.dk/ jcd/adipack.n/ [Google Scholar]
 ChristensenDalsgaard, J. 2004, Sol. Phys., 220, 137 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 de Medeiros, J. R., & Mayor, M. 1999, A&AS, 139, 433 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 De Ridder, J., Barban, C., Baudin, F., et al. 2009, Nature, 459, 398 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 De Ridder, J., Barban, C., Carrier, F., et al. 2006, A&A, 448, 689 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Denissenkov, P. A., & Tout, C. A. 2000, MNRAS, 316, 395 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Dupret, M., Belkacem, K., Samadi, R., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 57 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Dziembowski, W. A., Gough, D. O., Houdek, G., & Sienkiewicz, R. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 601 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Eddington, A. S. 1925, The Observatory, 48, 73 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Eggenberger, P., Meynet, G., Maeder, A., et al. 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 43 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Frandsen, S., Carrier, F., Aerts, C., et al. 2002, A&A, 394, L5 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Grevesse, N., & Noels, A. 1993, in Origin and evolution of the elements: Proceedings of a symposium in honour of H. Reeves, held in Paris, June 2225, 1992 (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press), ed. N. Prantzos, E. VangioniFlam, & M. Casse, 14 [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A., & Meynet, G. 1989, A&A, 210, 155 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A., & Meynet, G. 2000, ARA&A, 38, 143 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A., & Meynet, G. 2001, A&A, 373, 555 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A., & Zahn, J.P. 1998, A&A, 334, 1000 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Massarotti, A., Latham, D. W., Stefanik, R. P., & Fogel, J. 2008, AJ, 135, 209 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Osaki, J. 1975, PASJ, 27, 237 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Palacios, A., & Brun, A. S. 2007, Astron. Nachr., 328, 1114 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Palacios, A., Charbonnel, C., Talon, S., & Siess, L. 2006, A&A, 453, 261 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Roxburgh, I. W. 2005, A&A, 434, 665 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Roxburgh, I. W., & Vorontsov, S. V. 2003, A&A, 411, 215 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Sweigart, A. V., & Mengel, J. G. 1979, ApJ, 229, 624 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Vogt, H. 1926, Astron. Nachr., 227, 325 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Zahn, J.P. 1992, A&A, 265, 115 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
Footnotes
 ...^{}
 Postdoctoral Researcher, Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique  FNRS, Belgium.
All Figures
Figure 1: Evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram for models. The continuous and dashed lines correspond to models computed with and without rotation, respectively. Dots indicate time intervals of 5 Myr. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 2: Zoom on the mainsequence evolution corresponding to the evolutionary tracks shown in Fig. 1. The dotted line shows the evolutionary track for a model of including only rotational mixing. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 3: Evolution of the internal rotation profile in a star with an initial velocity of . is the hydrogen mass fraction at the center. The triangle indicates the border of the convective envelope for the model at the bottom of the red giant branch. A constant angular velocity is assumed in the convective zone. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 4: Internal rotation profile for a red giant with a luminosity of . Continuous and dasheddotted lines correspond to a model computed with the assumption of solid body rotation and conservation of specific angular momentum in the convective envelope after the mainsequence phase, respectively. Both models are computed with an initial velocity of 150 km s^{1}. Triangles indicate the border of the convective envelope. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 5: Hydrogen mass fraction at the center of the star () as a function of the age. The continuous line corresponds to a rotating model of with an initial velocity of , while the dashed line corresponds to a model computed without rotation. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 6: Evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram for models. The continuous and dashed lines indicate models with an initial velocity of and without rotation, respectively. Both models are computed without overshooting. The dasheddotted and the dotted lines correspond to nonrotating models with an overshoot parameter of 0.1 and 0.2, respectively. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 7: Ratio of the mass of the convective core to the total mass of the star ( ) as a function of the age for models of . The continuous and dashed lines indicate models with an initial velocity of 150 km s^{1} and without rotation, respectively. Both models are computed without overshooting. The dasheddotted and the dotted lines correspond to nonrotating models with an overshoot parameter of 0.1 and 0.2, respectively. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 8: Hydrogen abundance profile for models with the same effective temperature ( ) during the postmain sequence phase of evolution. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 9: Characteristic frequencies of a star in the helium burning phase. N and correspond to the BruntVäisälä and the Lamb frequencies, respectively. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 10: Mode inertias for the model in the helium burning phase shown in Fig. 9. Dots, triangles and squares correspond to modes with , and , respectively. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 11: Large separation for radial modes and small separation between and trapped modes versus frequency for two red giant models of at the same evolutionary stage during the helium burning phase. The continuous and dashed lines correspond to a model computed with an initial velocity of and without rotation, respectively. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 12: Evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram for rotating and nonrotating models of red giants sharing approximately the same luminosity during the helium burning phase. The continuous line corresponds to a star computed with an initial velocity of 150 km s^{1}, while the dashed line corresponds to a nonrotating model of . Dots indicate time intervals of 5 Myr. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Figure 13: Large separation for radial modes and small separation between and trapped modes versus frequency for two red giant models with the same luminosity during the helium burning phase. The continuous and dashed lines correspond to a model computed with an initial velocity of and a star without rotation, respectively. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Copyright ESO 2010