Issue |
A&A
Volume 507, Number 2, November IV 2009
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 1005 - 1014 | |
Section | The Sun | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912651 | |
Published online | 15 September 2009 |
A&A 507, 1005-1014 (2009)
Observations of a solar flare and filament eruption in Lyman
and X-rays
F. Rubio da Costa1,2 - L. Fletcher1 - N. Labrosse1 - F. Zuccarello2
1 - Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow,
Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
2 -
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Catania,
via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy
Received 8 June 2009 / Accepted 10 September 2009
Abstract
Context. L
is a strong chromospheric emission line, which has been relatively
rarely observed in flares. The Transition Region and Coronal Explorer
(TRACE) has a broad ``Lyman
''
channel centered at 1216 Å used primarily at the beginning of the
mission. A small number of flares were observed in this channel.
Aims. We aim to characterise the appearance and behaviour of a
flare and filament ejection which occurred on
8th September 1999 and was observed by TRACE in L,
as well as by the Yohkoh
Soft and Hard X-ray telescopes. We explore the flare energetics and its
spatial and temporal evolution. We have in mind the fact that the L
line
is a target for the Extreme Ultraviolet Imaging telescope (EUI) which
has been selected for the Solar Orbiter mission, as well as the LYOT
telescope on the proposed SMESE mission.
Methods. We use imaging data from the TRACE 1216 Å, 1600 Å and 171 Å channels, and the Yohkoh hard and soft X-ray telescopes. A correction is applied to the TRACE data to obtain a better estimate of the pure L
signature. The L
power is obtained from a knowledge of the TRACE response function, and
the flare electron energy budget is estimated by interpreting Yohkoh/HXT emission in the context of the collisional thick target model.
Results. We find that the L
flare is characterised by strong, compact footpoints (smaller than the
UV ribbons) which correlate well with HXR footpoints. The L
power radiated by the flare footpoints can be estimated, and is found to be on the order of 1026 erg s-1
at the peak. This is less than 10% of the power inferred for the
electrons which generate the co-spatial HXR emission, and can thus
readily be provided by them. The early stages of the filament eruption
that accompany the flare are also visible, and show a diffuse, roughly
circular spreading sheet-like morphology, with embedded denser blobs.
Conclusions. On the basis of this observation, we conclude that flare and filament observations in the L line
with the planned EUI and LYOT telescopes will provide valuable insight
into solar flare evolution and energetics, especially when accompanied
by HXR imaging and spectroscopy.
Key words: Sun: activity - Sun: filaments - Sun: X-rays, gamma rays - Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs)
1 Introduction
Early observations of solar flares, prior to the advent of space-based
astronomy, recognised them as chromospheric phenomena. Since the 1990s,
coronal observations show dramatic evidence of heating particle,
acceleration and magnetic field reorganisation, but it is clear that
most of the flare energy (as distinct from the kinetic energy of
any possible coronal mass ejection) is ultimately radiated away as
chromospheric emission, predominantly hydrogen Balmer
(more generally known as H
), hydrogen Lyman
(L
)
and the UV to infrared continuum. Observations at extreme UV and X-ray
wavelengths are essential and show exciting and dynamic coronal
evolution, but to form a complete picture of the flare phenomenon we
must integrate them with the perhaps less glamorous L
,
H
and broadband observations of the chromosphere.
One of the overriding questions in solar flare physics remains the
conversion of magnetic energy stored in the corona to non-thermal
electrons and ions, heat and mass motion. In the context of the
chromosphere, the standard model for a flare (particularly the
`collisional thick target' electron beam heating model) proposes that
the chromospheric flare heating and enhanced radiation arises as a
result of energy deposition and ionisation by a beam of electrons
accelerated in the corona. In terms of the timing relationship and the
energetics the two are compatible, although explaining the broadband
white light emission proves problematic since it is not clear how an
electron beam can penetrate to the depths required for the
enhanced H-. However, the electron beam model has thus far proved reasonably successful in the context of
both L
and H
observations (e.g. Radziszewski et al. 2007) and we use this as a working hypothesis in interpreting the observations presented here.
Hydrogen lines (L
and H
)
and continua are a significant source of chromospheric cooling during flares, together with H- and heavy ion lines and continua (Canfield et al. 1980a), accounting for a few percent of the overall chromospheric cooling. A few observations of flares in L
exist, but these are mostly in spectroscopic mode, with no spatial information. Canfield et al. (1980b), studied a flare of soft X-ray importance M1 and H
class 1N, which occurred on 5 September 1973, and was observed by two spectrometers on Skylab, and reported a L
radiative power output of 2.2
.
This accounted for on the order of 5% of the total radiative
output at the maximum of the flare. Using data from the
OSO-8 satellite, Lemaire et al. (1984) measured a maximum L
intensity of 2.1
106 erg cm-2 s-1 sr-1 in a flare of GOES class M1.0 on 15 April 1978. Machado (1978)
observed a number of events with the Harvard College Spectroheliometer
on Skylab, which had a slit width of 5'', and reported L
line flux integrated over the line of
106 erg s-1 cm-2 sr-1, averaged over bright L
patches in a 2B flare on September 7 1973.
Following these early reports, L
observations lay relatively dormant. A fortuitous observation by Brekke et al. (1996) from the Solar Stellar Irradiance Comparison Experiment
(SOLSTICE, Rottman et al. 1993; Woods et al. 1993) showed strong enhancements in UV lines, apart from L
,
the irradiance of which (i.e. the total flux density from the
entire solar disk) only increased by 6% above its non-flaring
value, compared to resonance lines of S IV and C IV which had irradiance increases of a factor 12. However, the L
line was observed at the end of the impulsive phase, whereas the S IV and C IV lines were observed near the impulsive peak. The L
radiance
(specific intensity of a resolved feature) was estimated to be some
75 times stronger than its pre-flare average disk value, and
despite the small increase L
was found to be more energetically important than the other resonance lines. The strongest L
enhancement
was in the line wings, with the blue wing somewhat more enhanced. The
changes in irradiance were found to lie between the values predicted by
the F1 and F2 flare models of Machado et al. (1980).
More recently, ``Sun as a star'' measurements were made with the VUSS
instrument onboard the CORONAS-F satellite, and the total L irradiance increase estimated to be about 10% (Nusinov & Kazachevskaya 2006) in an X-class flare. Comparing with data from the SONG instrument on the same spacecraft, the L
peaks are shown to be ``synchronous'' with hard X-ray emission at tens to hundreds of keV (Nusinov et al. 2006),
although the degree of synchronisation is not discussed. By comparison,
``Sun as a star'' measurements performed by SOHO/SUMER gave a relative
signal increase of 70% at the head of the hydrogen Lyman continuum
(910 Å) for an X5.3 flare (Lemaire et al. 2004).
The Transition Region and Coronal Explorer (TRACE, Handy et al. 1999b) has four UV channels, one of which includes the L transition. Though usually called the L
channel,
it has a broad spectral response, from just below 1100 Å to
somewhat above 1600 Å, and thus has a significant contribution
from the C IV lines at 1548 Å. In the quiet Sun, this can be corrected to yield the ``pure'' L
intensity based on an empirical method developed for the quiet Sun (Handy et al. 1999b). A small number of flares observed in the L
passband early in the TRACE mission have been reported in the literature. For example Schrijver et al. (1999) and Schrijver (2001) discuss the downflows observed in L
during the late phase of a flare, and Fletcher et al. (2001) examine 1216 Å ejecta and chromospheric source movements at low cadence, just after the impulsive phase. Warren & Warshall (2001) mention that L
pre-flare brightenings are not co-spatial with subsequent flare hard
X-ray emission sites. However, to our knowledge no detailed analysis of
TRACE L
channel
observations spanning the impulsive phase have been presented. We will
explore the information available from the TRACE 1216 Å channel
alone, and in combination with the TRACE 1600 Å channel,
estimating the flare L
intensity for comparison with previous work.
The L
line has been of interest in flares as a possible diagnostic of proton beams. Orrall & Zirker (1976)
proposed that charge exchange between beam protons and chromospheric
hydrogen, and emission from the moving hydrogen atoms that result,
would lead to enhanced emission in the wings of the chromospheric
lines. More refined calculations (e.g. Canfield & Chang 1985; Zhao et al. 1998; Fang et al. 1995) suggested that this should be an observable effect. Early Skylab observations of the L
line profile by Canfield & van Hoosier (1980) detected a slight red asymmetry in the early phase of a flare, however the profiles were not in agreement with models of Canfield & Chang (1985), and the SOLSTICE observations of Brekke et al. (1996) showed a stronger L
blue wing. (A related search for
alpha-particle beams using He II L
emission by Brosius (2001)
also had a null result.) These discrepancies could be explained in
terms of various inclinations of the proton beam with respect to the
magnetic field and of the line-of-sight (Zhao et al. 1998). Henoux et al. (1995) and Zhao et al. (1998) conclude from their theoretical studies that non-thermal charge-exchange L
(and Ly
)
emission due to proton beams could be detected best at the very early
stages of the flare when the coronal column mass is small. Later in the
flare, the proton energy at the layers emitting the hydrogen spectrum
is reduced by collisions.
On this basis, it seems plausible that line shifts and wing enhancements in the L line
profiles observed at later stages are due to bulk velocities of
hydrogen atoms in the flaring atmosphere. There are few examples of
theoretical studies incorporating both the effects of a non-thermal
electron beam and of flows on the shape of the L
line profile. We refer the reader to the radiative hydrodynamic models of Allred et al. (2005).
This paper aims to characterise the appearance and behaviour of a flare and filament ejection observed by TRACE in L
as well as by the Yohkoh Soft and Hard X-ray telescopes.
In Sect. 2 we review the observations and describe the data processing, and in Sect. 3 we give an overview of the flare event. Energy diagnostics in L
and hard X-ray from the impulsive phase are discussed in Sects. 4 and 5 respectively. The flare was accompanied by highly structured ejecta, and this is presented in Sect. 6. We present our discussion and conclusions in Sect. 7.
2 Data analysis
In this section we discuss observations of an M1.4-class flare on 1999 September 08, in active region NOAA 8690, which was observed by the Transition Region and Coronal Explorer (TRACE; Handy et al. 1999a) and the Yohkoh Soft X-ray Telescope (SXT; Tsuneta et al. 1991) and Hard X-ray Telescope (HXT; Kosugi et al. 1991). The flare onset was 11:58 UT with a peak at 12:13 UT.
2.1 TRACE data
The TRACE telescope primary and secondary mirrors are divided into
quadrants, three of which are coated with multilayers for imaging at
EUV wavelengths. The fourth quadrant is coated with aluminium and
magnesium fluoride for imaging very broad ultraviolet wavelength ranges
near 1216, 1550, 1600 and 1700 Å. Images in all the
wavelengths are projected onto a single CCD detector with pixels
of 0.5'' on a side, corresponding to a 1.0'' spatial
resolution. Our flare was observed with an image size of 768
768 pixels, and 1216 and 1600 Å images were interleaved
with a cadence of approximately 5 s per image. At the very
beginning and end of the event we also have some
171 Å images.
The original images taken by the TRACE telescope must be corrected for instrumental effects. The standard procedures included in the Solar Software (SSW; Freeland & Handy 1998) IDL routine trace_prep provided by the TRACE team are subtraction of the dark pedestal (Analog-Digital-Converter ADC); flat-field correction; correction for exposure time; image normalisation to DN per s; and alignment and pointing correction between the two UV channels. The TRACE data were also corrected for solar rotation. In order to compare TRACE images with Yohkoh data, we made a TRACE pointing correction, based on co-aligning the strongest TRACE and Yohkoh HXT sources, assumed to be flare footpoints. We estimate that this can be done with an accuracy of 5''. The SXT pointing with respect to HXT is accurate within 1''.
![]() |
Figure 1: Response of the TRACE 1216 Å and 1600 Å channels. The 1600 Å filter curve has been normalised to the response of 1216 Å filter for comparison of the respective bandpasses. |
Open with DEXTER |
As shown in Fig. 1, the 1216 Å channel has a broad spectral response, having approximately the same sensitivity in the 1500-1600 Å range as it does at
1216 Å (see Handy et al. 1999a).
This unusual spectral response results from the convolution of a
narrowband UV coating on the primary mirror at 1550 Å and a filter
near the focal plane centered at 1216 Å. Much of the contribution
to the 1216 Å channel in the quiet Sun is continuum. The
1500-1600 Å range, for which the 1600 Å channel is optimised,
includes the strong C IV pair, as well as lines of Si II and continuum. It has essentially no response at wavelengths less than 1400 Å.
As we can see in Fig. 1, around 60% of the response in the 1216 Å channel is from the L 1216 Å emission line while the balance is from UV emission near 1550 Å and longer wavelengths. Handy et al. (1999b) provide a simple method to remove this contamination by using a large number of solar irradiance data samples from Solar-Stellar Irradiance Comparison Experiment (SOLSTICE; Rottman et al. 1993), and by comparing TRACE 1216 Å images with L
images from the Very-high resolution Advanced ULtraviolet Telescope (VAULT; Korendyke et al. 2001) sounding rocket flight of May 7, 1998. Their result is that pure L
intensity can be obtained by a linear combination of TRACE 1216 Å and 1600 Å channels:
where




2.2 Yohkoh data
The soft X-ray telescope (SXT) on Yohkoh is a
grazing-incidence telescope with a nominal spatial resolution of about
5'' (2.46'' pixels). It makes images in six different filters; we
will present images from the Be 119 m filter and the Al 12 filter. The Yohkoh
Hard X-ray telescope (HXT) uses a Fourier-synthesis technique to make
images in four hard X-ray (HXR) energy bands i.e.,
L (14-23 keV), M1 (23-33 keV),
M2 (33-53 keV) and H (53-93 keV). The spatial
resolution of HXT is described by the collimator response FWHM of about 8''. For our event, Yohkoh entered flare mode at about 12:13:36 UT. The flare response provided full-resolution SXT images of a region 2.6
2.6 arcmin2
at a cadence of about 2 s. High-cadence HXT data was
also taken. Unfortunately, coverage stops at 12:14:30, shortly
after the flare mode onset, due to a data downlink. However there are
sufficient data to reconstruct three images.
The Yohkoh/SXT data are prepared using the SolarSoft sxt_prep routine to correct the saturated pixels, subtract the dark current, despike and correct for the vignette loss in the off-axis signal. Exposure normalisation is performed, resulting in images normalised to DN/s/image pixel. Saturated pixels are flagged. Data are separated by channel and image resolution. The resulting counts per second per image pixel are used to produce both images and light curves for the event.
2.3 Co-alignment between TRACE and Yohkoh observations
We co-align TRACE images with SXT to examine the distribution of high-temperature plasma (Fig. 6). It is well known that TRACE has a pointing drift during its orbit. To compare the high energy data from SXT and HXT on TRACE, the SSW routine TRACE_MDI_ALIGN was used, which correlates TRACE white light and the nearest-in-time MDI white light data. It is then assumed that MDI and SXT are well aligned, and that the relative pointing of the two spacecraft does not drift significantly before the flare observation starts. The nearest in time TRACE and MDI white light images occur at 12:01:22 UT and 12:00:00 UT respectively, and the start of the flare observation is 5 min later. There will likely be some relative drift in the intervening period but we do not expect this to be significant.
3 Overview of the event
3.1 Time evolution
![]() |
Figure 2: Temporal variation of the 3-s X-ray flux measured with GOES. The upper curve corresponds to the GOES 1.0-8.0 Å data, and the lower to the 0.5-4.0 Å data. Hashed regions indicate Yohkoh night. |
Open with DEXTER |
The flare studied here was catalogued as an M1.4 class flare, beginning on 1999 September 08 at 11:58:00 UT. The GOES maximum was detected at 12:13:20 UT and the duration was around 50 min. The GOES light curves for the event are presented in Fig. 2. It is possible to differentiate three different phases of the flare:
- Pre-flare phase from 12:10:00 to 12:13:00 UT: The soft X-ray and UV emission begins to increase. Hard X-ray emission is not yet detected.
- Impulsive phase from 12:13:00 to around 12:16:00 UT: The soft X-ray flux emission rises more rapidly; the hard X-ray emission increases with several spikes over ten of seconds (See Fig. 4 inset for more detail). The UV emission peaks.
- Post-flare phase from 12:16:00 UT onwards: The soft X-ray flux rises to a peak at 12:16:00, then decays exponentially during several hours. No hard X-ray emission is seen during this time.









![]() |
Figure 3:
Temporal evolution of the TRACE 1216 Å, TRACE 1600 Å and the L |
Open with DEXTER |
The HXT light curves from the early impulsive phase and in the decay phase are shown in Fig. 4. Only the earliest part of the impulsive phase was observed before the Yohkoh data downlink, followed by spacecraft night. The flare was in its decay phase when observations started again. The Yohkoh/SXT light curve (not shown) demonstrates the usual steep rise in soft X-rays at the beginning of the flare, and then the slow decay as the spacecraft comes out of eclipse.
![]() |
Figure 4:
Time profile of corrected TRACE L |
Open with DEXTER |
3.2 Morphology of the event
Active region NOAA 8690 appeared on 05-September-1999 as a small beta
region on the north east of the limb of the Sun with arch type
filaments and bright H plage, and small sunspots. Figure 5 (upper left panel) shows its configuration before the M1.4 flare, which is a sunspot group characterised by a
magnetic
configuration (from the BBSO Solar Activity Report). TRACE images in
the 171 Å and 195 Å wavelengths from just before the flare
show two small filaments (Fig. 5, lower panels). The more eastern of these filaments is visible also in emission in the L
channel, unlike the eastern filament, which is not clear either in emission or absorption.
![]() |
Figure 5: Upper panels: TRACE WL image showing the photospheric configuration of NOAA 8690 on Sep. 8, 1999 and the TRACE 1216 Å image from the same time. Lower panels: TRACE EUV images showing the two small filaments present in the active region just before the flare, indicated by the arrows on the lower left panel. |
Open with DEXTER |
The event starts around 12:05 UT with bright ejecta seen in TRACE 1216 Å. A pair of TRACE ribbons start brightening approximately 12:13:07, with a maximum at 12:14:23. The ribbons visible in Fig. 6 spread apart, and the ejecta remain bright until around 12:16:30 UT, after which they become faint and diffuse, and difficult to distinguish from the background plage (see difference images in Fig. 11). Between the brightest ejecta, seen in the left and middle columns of Fig. 6, and the footpoints there appears to be a void with a well-defined upper boundary, implying the ejection of a discrete structure rather than a continuous outflow. The cloud of ejecta, most clearly visible to the south and east of the ribbons, does not appear like expanding loops or a confined jet, or a coherent dense filament. It has the appearance of a spreading semi-circular sheet of material with embedded ``blobs''. This type of morphology is also seen in around 25% of flares observed in soft X-rays, and was classified as a spray by Kim et al. (2004). In the final phase of the flare, TRACE 1216 Å images show two obvious ribbons slowly separating.
Figure 6 shows the overlay of soft X-ray emission on 1216 Å images. The first two images in each row are from the impulsive phase, at 12:13:42 UT and 12:14:02 UT, and the third is from the gradual phase. The bright emission seen in the TRACE 1216 Å channel is spatially well correlated with the strongest emission seen in the SXT images. As the main emission in TRACE appears to come from footpoints, this is suggestive of early phase soft X-ray footpoints (as observed previously by Hudson et al. 1994). Also apparent from these images is a faint SXR emission to the south-east of the strong footpoints, and co-spatial with the brightest part of the ejecta. This might imply that both hot and cool plasma are present in the ejecta. Later in the event the brightest SXR emission is co-spatial with the eastern ribbon. However, its position is also consistent with what would be expected of emission from the top of an arcade of hot flare loops joining the two sets of footpoints, as is usually found in the later phase of flares.
Figure 7 shows the
hard X-ray flare sources overlaid on 1216 Å (upper panel) and
1600 Å (lower panel) TRACE emission. The HXR images are
produced using the MEM algorithm in the Yohkoh/HXT software,
integrating HXR counts from 14-93 keV. The HXR and TRACE
1216 Å footpoints again coincide well. Figure 8 also shows an overlay of HXR emission on the nearest L images, this time corrected for the UV contamination using Eq. (1).
The use of the corrected images allows us to better visualise the
correspondence between HXR source and the flare ribbons seen
in L
.
Figure 9 shows the evolution of the flare at 171 Å. A few hours after the flare, a post-flare arcade is visible at coronal temperatures. As one would expect, the post-flare loops bridge the ribbons that are observed at 1216 and 1600 Å, expanding into and beyond the ``void'' region that appeared below the UV ejecta, even taking the same shape as this void - compare loops in Figs. 9 left panel with void in 7 top right.
![]() |
Figure 6: Temporal evolution of the Yohkoh/SXT source (green contours), superposed on the nearest TRACE 1216 Å imges. The upper panels show Be filter images, and the lower panels show Al 12 filter images. The contour levels are 1%, 5%, 10% and 50% of the peak counts in each SXT image. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: The 14-93 keV HXR source (blue contours), superposed on the nearest TRACE 1216 Å ( upper) and 1600 Å ( lower) images. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Temporal evolution of the 14-93 keV source (blue contours), superposed on the nearest L |
Open with DEXTER |
4 Flare Energetics from TRACE 1216 Å and 1600 Å observations
We use the corrected and normalised L
images (i.e. with the UV contamination removed) to infer the total L
power in the flare footpoints. Using IDL SolarSoft routine trace_uv_resp we can convert the corrected L
DN s-1 into an intensity measured in photons cm-2 s-1 sr-1.
We assume that correction removes the 1600 Å component, leaving
only the peak around 1216 Å, where the response function gives us
1 DN s-1 pixel-1 = 1.25
1014 photons cm-2 s-1 sr-1. Using a characteristic photon energy corresponding to a L
photon with
10-11 erg we can then convert from DN s-1 pixel-1 to erg cm-2 s-1 sr-1.
As the intensity measured in the TRACE image also includes a contribution from the background, it is advisable to repeat the previously mentioned steps for a quiet sun region, in order to measure the background and subtract the intensity of the background from the intensity of the footpoints. This also gives an idea of how close the results are to the previous spectrally-resolved measurements of Lemaire et al. (1981). Results are presented in Table 1.
![]() |
Figure 9: 171 Å TRACE images from later on in the event. |
Open with DEXTER |
Using this empirical correction method, we determine the intensity of the quiet Sun at L
to be 1.63
105 erg cm-2 s-1 sr-1. In spectroscopic observations, Lemaire et al. (1981) found the intensity of the quiet Sun at L
to be 6.55
104 erg cm-2 s-1 sr-1
over a 2 Å passband, so our quiet Sun measurements are
overestimating the intensity by a factor of 2.5. The reason for
this is not clear, since in the quiet Sun the Kim et al.
correction should be acceptable. It may be due to a changing
calibration of the TRACE 1600 Å and 1216 Å channels due to
degradation of the lumogen with time, or an incomplete removal of the
continuum. It is likely that the flare measurements are also
overestimates by about the same factor. The flare footpoint intensity
in this event (GOES class M1.4) was 1.35
107 erg cm-2 s-1 sr-1. If this is also corrected by the factor 2.5, the resulting value of 5.4
106 erg cm-2 s-1 sr-1 compares reasonably well with the value of 2.1
106 erg cm-2 s-1 sr-1 measured by Lemaire et al. (1984)
for an M1.0 event (which was a factor 1.4 less powerful
than the 08-Sep.-99 flare in terms of its soft X-ray flux).
However, the discrepancy does suggest that the Kim et al. (2006) correction does not sufficiently correct for enhanced C IV emission under flare conditions.
Assuming isotropic emission, the L
power per unit area in the footpoint regions is 1.7
108 erg s-1 cm-2 (or 6.8
107 erg s-1 cm-2 applying the correction factor of 2.5). The area of a TRACE pixel is about (325 km)2, so that the emission is 1.8
1023 erg s-1 pixel-1, or around 1026 erg s-1 integrated over the entire footpoint region. As will be shown in Sect. 5, this is consistent with the electron beam power calculated from the Yohkoh/HXT observations assuming a collisional thick target.
The VAL3C model of Vernazza et al. (1981) and the F1 and F2 models of Machado et al. (1980) give a flare to quiet Sun ratio for L
at Sun centre of about 50 and 350 respectively. Our values given in Table 1 seem to be more consistent with the F1 model which describes faint to moderate flares. Machado et al. (1980) note that in their F1 model, the L
line
is the most important contributor to the radiative losses at the top of
the flare chromosphere. This underlines the need for more detailed
modelling (such as done by Allred et al. 2005), and moreover, for high spatial and spectral resolution observations. We plan to investigate more closely the TRACE L
emission in our observations with respect to semi-empirical models of the flare atmosphere in a separate study.
5 Flare Hard X-ray energetics
Yohkoh/HXT observed this flare only for the first minute of
the impulsive phase. However this provides enough data to calculate the
electron beam power under the assumption of a chromospheric collisional
thick target. The four HXT energy channels L, M1, M2
and H showed strong impulsive bursts. We fit the photon spectrum
with
where I is the photon flux at the energy



where B is the beta function and A is the normalization constant of the photon spectrum

In Fig. 10, we show the X-ray photon spectrum derived from the Yohkoh/HXT data at the maximum of the hard X-ray flare. The spectrum is well fitted by a power law with index 3.40 which indicates a very hard spectrum. This result suggests that the hard X-ray emission above 14 keV was produced by nonthermal electrons. We tried fitting both a power law plus thermal spectrum and a single thermal spectrum, but the single power-law provided a significantly better fit.
Table 1:
Value of the corrected Lintensity measured in a quiet Sun region and over a region in the flare footpoints.
![]() |
Figure 10: Hard X-ray spectra derived from the channel M2 of Yohkoh/HXT data at the maximum of the flare. |
Open with DEXTER |
Table 2: Parameters derived from Yohkoh/HXT data.
![]() |
Figure 11:
1216 Å base difference images showing evolution of the erupting filament. The range shown from white to black is |
Open with DEXTER |
The total energy in the electron spectrum depends on the value of
which cannot be determined from this spectrum. Instead we use three values of
and
calculate the instantaneous beam power carried by electrons above this
energy. The spectrum implies that it might be reasonable to assume a
low energy cutoff as low as 15 keV, though values of
20-25 keV are more typically assumed. In Table 2, we present the parameters derived from the single power law fit.
The values in Table 2 are reasonable for a small M-class flare such as this, and are also adequate to power the L
losses calculated in Sect. 4.
6 Large-scale dynamics - the filament ejection and chromospheric disturbance
The TRACE UV observations also let us examine the evolution of the
extended flare region at very high spatial and temporal resolution.
A series of base difference images from the 1216 Å channel is
shown in Fig. 11
(uncorrected for UV contamination). The time of the base image is
12:05:00 UT, the time at which the 1216 Å series began, and
we have selected only a subset of the images to show the overall
evolution. The flat-fielded and normalised TRACE images are first
cross-correlated to correct for drift and solar rotation, and then the
base image is subtracted from following images. Therefore, parts of the
difference image appearing bright are enhanced emission compared to the
base image. To the north west of the main flare brightening, at image
pixel location (360, 300)
there is a dark region corresponding to the disappearance of some loops
just visible in the first image. This could be due to the loops being
ejected from the field of view within a minute or so
(as no traveling bright feature is seen), losing mass in some
other way, or being heated out of the 1216 Å passband. The ejecta
appear as a ragged cloud expanding to the south east. This starts off
bright and then fades in each subsequent image, presumably as the cloud
expands. Around 12:14:41 UT and for a couple of minutes thereafter
two patches at pixel location
(400, 220) and (400, 400) become bright.
In the three images following 12:15:31 UT, the brightenings form a
rough, diffuse semicircle, reminiscent of an ``EIT wave'' but very
much fainter. The cloud expanding to the south east is structured on a
scale of 20'',
with brighter ``knots'' within a more diffuse background.
At 12:17:35, three or possibly four bright ``knots'' of emission
are apparent in the cloud, moving to the south east. These are resolved
by TRACE, and have a dimension at that time of approximately 20''.
The knots themselves also grow fainter and expand. A rough
estimate of the projected speed of the east-most knot is 300
.
Eventually the cloud of emission is no longer detectable above the
background. We interpret the expanding brightenings to the south-east
as moving, emitting gas. However the brightenings to the west are more
static (e.g. around pixel position (400, 420)), and may
include some component of network emission which has been enhanced by
the passage of the disturbance. Contour levels of
[60, 200] DN/s in Fig. 11
allow us, as previously, to estimate the surface intensity.
A value of 60 DN/s corresponds to a surface intensity of
approximately 1.2
106 erg cm-2 s-1.
The emission at L
wavelengths suggests cool plasma in the ejecta, but as noted in
Sect. 3, the ejection to the south east is also faintly visible in
soft X-rays at around 12:13-12:14 UT. Unfortunately the SXR
spatial resolution does not allow us to see in detail the spatial
distribution of the 1216 Å and SXR emitting plasma, so we
cannot say whether they are co-spatial or are there hotter and cooler
clumps. It is possible that the ejecta are primarily hot, with a small
fraction of neutral H atoms efficiently scattering the
intense radiation around 1216 Å from the flare site.
7 Discussion and conclusions
This paper presents the first examination of a flare in TRACE
1216 Å at high spatial and temporal resolution. We applied the
empirical correction of Handy et al. (1999b) in an attempt to separate the L radiation from the UV contamination in the 1216 Å channel, and in doing so have shown that the majority of the L
emission
originates from the flare footpoints, which are compact and co-spatial
with the HXR sources. Erupting material is also visible in the
corrected L
images, as well as in the 1216 Å channel. The corrected L
peaks at approximately the same time as the HXR (within a minute
or so) but unfortunately we do not have sufficient time coverage
in HXT or time resolution in the TRACE images to say more than this.
From a knowledge of the TRACE response function we have calculated the
power radiated in the L
footpoints,
and shown that this can be provided by the electrons which produce the
observed HXR radiation, under the assumption of a collisional thick
target chromosphere.
The event was associated with the eruption of a small filament that was
visible in the active region before the flare. During the eruption, the
material emitted in soft X-rays as well as at the cooler TRACE
wavelengths. The filament before the flare was presumably at
temperatures of
K,
so the SXR emission implies that the filament heated as it
erupted. The resolution of the SXT images is not sufficient to say
whether the SXR emission is uniform or clumpy. In TRACE, the
erupting material looked sheet-like with some embedded brighter knots
which spread and fade. The erupting material could be mixed blobs of
hot and cool material, or conceivably mostly heated filament material
but still with sufficient neutral hydrogen to scatter UV flare
radiation from the chromosphere. This might be the case if the hydrogen
in the erupting filament does not have time to reach ionisation
equilibrium.
In summary, this study has confirmed much of what was previously known about flares in L,
including the typical L
power
radiated, and also demonstrated its close spatial and temporal
association with the primary sites of energy release at the
chromosphere. One of the most intriguing part of the observation is the
filament eruption, which is already well underway before the flare
footpoints brighten substantially, and which shows a morphology perhaps
quite unlike what one would expect. It is neither rope-like - such
as one might expect for the ``core'' of a classical 3-part CME, or
bubble-like, such as one might expect for the ``front'' of a classical
3-part CME. In general, the flare events which are triggered by
filament eruptions can be explained by the standard flare model CSHKP (Sturrock 1966; Hirayama 1974; Carmichael 1964; Kopp & Pneuman 1976).
The fact that the 1216 Å channel and the corrected L emission
both show the flare footpoints and the early stages of the onset of the
eruption make this a promising channel for future observation of flares
and eruptive events. Estimated L
count
rates are high from a small M flare such as this, which should
enable high cadence imaging for similar or smaller events with future
instruments. As well as its intrinsic interest, we have been in
fact motivated to perform this analysis by forthcoming instrumentation.
The Extreme Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (Hochedez et al. 2007, see http://www.sidc.be/publications/docs/EUI-AthensPaper-20061120.pdf) which has been selected for ESA's Solar Orbiter mission is intended to carry out L
imaging, as will the LYOT imager on the proposed France-China SMESE satellite (Vial et al. 2007) currently under study. These L
instruments
will provide an imaging overview of the flare evolution, both the flare
ribbons/footpoints and the initial phases of the filament ejection, and
will be particularly valuable scientifically when carried out in
conjunction with hard X-ray imaging.
This work was supported by the European Commission through the SOLAIRE Network (MRTN-CT-2006-035484) and by STFC rolling grant STFC/F002941/1. We would like to thank the referee for comments which helped to improve this paper.
References
- Allred, J. C., Hawley, S. L., Abbett, W. P., & Carlsson, M. 2005, ApJ, 630, 573 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Brekke, P., Rottman, G. J., Fontenla, J., & Judge, P. G. 1996, ApJ, 468, 418 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Brosius, J. W. 2001, ApJ, 555, 435 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Canfield, R. C., & Chang, C.-R. 1985, ApJ, 295, 275 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Canfield, R. C., & van Hoosier, M. E. 1980, Sol. Phys., 67, 339 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Canfield, R. C., Brown, J. C., Craig, I. J. D., et al. 1980a, in Skylab Solar Workshop II, ed. P. A. Sturrock, 231
- Canfield, R. C., Cheng, C.-C., Dere, K. P., et al. 1980b, in Solar flares, 451
- Carmichael, H. 1964, in The Physics of Solar Flares, ed. W. N. Hess, 451
- Fang, C., Feautrier, N., & Henoux, J.-C. 1995, A&A, 297, 854 [NASA ADS]
- Fletcher, L., Metcalf, T. R., Alexander, D., Brown, D. S., & Ryder, L. A. 2001, ApJ, 554, 451 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Fletcher, L., Hannah, I. G., Hudson, H. S., & Metcalf, T. R. 2007, ApJ, 656, 1187 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Freeland, S. L., & Handy, B. N. 1998, Sol. Phys., 182, 497 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Handy, B. N., Acton, L. W., Kankelborg, C. C., et al. 1999a, Sol. Phys., 187, 229 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Handy, B. N., Tarbell, T. D., Wolfson, C. J., Korendyke, C. M., & Vourlidas, A. 1999b, Sol. Phys., 190, 351 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Henoux, J. C., Fang, C., & Gan, W. Q. 1995, A&A, 297, 574 [NASA ADS]
- Hirayama, T. 1974, Sol. Phys., 34, 323 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Hochedez, J. F., Appourchaux, T., Defise, J. M., et al. 2007, in Proceedings of the 2nd Solar Orbiter Workshop, Athens, 16-26 October 2006, ed. L. Conroy, ESA SP-641
- Hudson, H. S., Strong, K. T., Dennis, B. R., et al. 1994, ApJ, 422, L25 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Kim, S. S., Roh, H.-S., Cho, K.-S., & Shin, J. 2006, A&A, 456, 747 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Kim, Y.-H., Moon, Y.-J., Cho, K.-S., Bong, S.-C., & Park, Y.-D. 2004, J. Korean Astron. Soc., 37, 171
- Kopp, R. A., & Pneuman, G. W. 1976, Sol. Phys., 50, 85 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Korendyke, C. M., Vourlidas, A., Cook, J. W., et al. 2001, Sol. Phys., 200, 63 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Kosugi, T., Masuda, S., Makishima, K., et al. 1991, Sol. Phys., 136, 17 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Lemaire, P., Gouttebroze, P., Vial, J. C., & Artzner, G. E. 1981, A&A, 103, 160 [NASA ADS]
- Lemaire, P., Choucq-Bruston, M., & Vial, J.-C. 1984, Sol. Phys., 90, 63 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Lemaire, P., Gouttebroze, P., Vial, J.-C., et al. 2004, A&A, 418, 737 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Machado, M. E. 1978, Sol. Phys., 60, 341 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Machado, M. E., Avrett, E. H., Vernazza, J. E., & Noyes, R. W. 1980, ApJ, 242, 336 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Nusinov, A. A., & Kazachevskaya, T. V. 2006, Solar System Res., 40, 111 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Nusinov, A. A., Kazachevskaya, T. V., Kuznetsov, S. N., Myagkova, I. N., & Yushkov, B. Y. 2006, Solar System Res., 40, 282 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Orrall, F. Q., & Zirker, J. B. 1976, ApJ, 208, 618 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Radziszewski, K., Rudawy, P., & Phillips, K. J. H. 2007, A&A, 461, 303 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Rottman, G. J., Woods, T. N., & Sparn, T. P. 1993, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 10667 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Schrijver, C. J. 2001, Sol. Phys., 198, 325 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Schrijver, C. J., Title, A. M., Berger, T. E., et al. 1999, Sol. Phys., 187, 261 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Sturrock, P. A. 1966, Nature, 211, 695 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Tsuneta, S., Acton, L., Bruner, M., et al. 1991, Sol. Phys., 136, 37 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Vernazza, J. E., Avrett, E. H., & Loeser, R. 1981, ApJS, 45, 635 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Vial, J.-C., Auchère, F., Chang, J., et al. 2007, Adv. Space Res., 40, 1787 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Warren, H. P., & Warshall, A. D. 2001, ApJ, 560, L87 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Woods, T. N., Rottman, G. J., & Ucker, G. J. 1993, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 10679 [CrossRef] [NASA ADS]
- Zhao, X., Fang, C., & Henoux, J.-C. 1998, A&A, 330, 351 [NASA ADS]
All Tables
Table 1:
Value of the corrected Lintensity measured in a quiet Sun region and over a region in the flare footpoints.
Table 2: Parameters derived from Yohkoh/HXT data.
All Figures
![]() |
Figure 1: Response of the TRACE 1216 Å and 1600 Å channels. The 1600 Å filter curve has been normalised to the response of 1216 Å filter for comparison of the respective bandpasses. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 2: Temporal variation of the 3-s X-ray flux measured with GOES. The upper curve corresponds to the GOES 1.0-8.0 Å data, and the lower to the 0.5-4.0 Å data. Hashed regions indicate Yohkoh night. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Temporal evolution of the TRACE 1216 Å, TRACE 1600 Å and the L |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Time profile of corrected TRACE L |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 5: Upper panels: TRACE WL image showing the photospheric configuration of NOAA 8690 on Sep. 8, 1999 and the TRACE 1216 Å image from the same time. Lower panels: TRACE EUV images showing the two small filaments present in the active region just before the flare, indicated by the arrows on the lower left panel. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 6: Temporal evolution of the Yohkoh/SXT source (green contours), superposed on the nearest TRACE 1216 Å imges. The upper panels show Be filter images, and the lower panels show Al 12 filter images. The contour levels are 1%, 5%, 10% and 50% of the peak counts in each SXT image. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 7: The 14-93 keV HXR source (blue contours), superposed on the nearest TRACE 1216 Å ( upper) and 1600 Å ( lower) images. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Temporal evolution of the 14-93 keV source (blue contours), superposed on the nearest L |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 9: 171 Å TRACE images from later on in the event. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 10: Hard X-ray spectra derived from the channel M2 of Yohkoh/HXT data at the maximum of the flare. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 11:
1216 Å base difference images showing evolution of the erupting filament. The range shown from white to black is |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
Copyright ESO 2009
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.