Table 2:

The input values of the simulated CB planets (``Examiner'' rows) and their respective solution (``Solver'' rows).
Test dataset Attribute Detection[*] Period [d] Baricenter crossing [CoRoT JD] Depth (primary[*]) [mmag] In-transit points $\alpha_{\rm single}$ Comment
Test0 Examiner   13.54 2594.54 4.683      
  Solver +++ 13.545 2594.525 4.768 148 44.0 Not blind.
Test1 Examiner   12.673 2563.567 2.749      
  Solver +++ 12.667 2595.251 2.494 145 22.8 A bug (since then fixed) caused the detected reference time to be when the planet crossed the baricenter behind the EB system, causing a half-integer difference (2.5 periods) from the correct one.
Test2 Examiner   13.08 2594.54 1.853      
  Solver +++ 13.091 2594.513 1.560 248 18.6  
Test3 Examiner   17.748 2597.54 1.901      
  Solver +++ 17.738 2597.571 1.349 132 11.7  
Test4 Examiner   12.673 2563.567 2.749      
  Solver +++ 12.652 2595.295 2.579 143 23.4 See comment to Test1
Test5 Examiner no planet - - -      
  Solver no planet - - - 0 0 A very weak signal was initially suspected before using the single-depth analysis. That periodogram peak completely disappeared when this feature was added and used.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.