EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 500 / No 2 (June III 2009) A&A, 500 2 (2009) 763-768 Full HTML
Free Access
   

Table E.1:

Comparison of existing CIRB estimates in the FIR range. The error estimates quoted by the authors are shown in parenthesis. In our case, we include only the statistical uncertainty.
$\lambda$ $I_{\nu}$ Reference Instrument
($\mu $m) (MJy sr-1)    
90 <2.3 this paper ISO/ISOPHOT
150/180 1.08 (0.32)2 this paper ISO/ISOPHOT
100 <1.11 Hauser et al. 1998 COBE/DIRBE
  0.73 (0.20)1    
100 0.37 (0.10) Dwek et al. 1998 COBE/DIRBE
100 0.78 (0.20) Lagache et al. 2000 COBE/DIRBE
100 0.83 (0.27) Finkbeiner et al. 2000 COBE/DIRBE
140 1.49 (0.33) Schlegel et al. 1998 COBE/DIRBE
140 1.17 (0.33) Hauser et al. 1998 COBE/DIRBE
140 0.70 (0.28) Hauser et al. 1998 COBE/FIRAS
140 0.70 (0.28) Lagache et al. 1999 COBE/DIRBE
140 1.12 (0.56) Lagache et al. 2000 COBE/DIRBE
140 1.17 (0.37) Odegard et al. 2007 COBE/DIRBE
240 1.36 (0.16) Schlegel et al. 1998 COBE/DIRBE
240 1.12 (0.24) Hauser et al. 1998 COBE/DIRBE
240 1.04 (0.16) Hauser et al. 1998 COBE/FIRAS
240 0.88 (0.16) Lagache et al. 1999 COBE/DIRBE
240 0.88 (0.56) Lagache et al. 2000 COBE/DIRBE
240 1.04 (0.24) Odegard et al. 2007 COBE/DIRBE
1 Hauser et al. did not claim detection at 100 $\mu $m, because the CIRB signal failed
test for isotropy; 2 only the statistical error is quoted.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.