EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 497 / No 3 (April III 2009) A&A, 497 3 (2009) 667-676 Full HTML
Free Access
   

Table D.4:

Remarks about the individual fields.
Cluster Notes
A85  
A119  
A133 Two very bright stars in $(\alpha,\delta)_{J2000.0}$ = (15.61552$^\circ$, -21.60940$^\circ$) and (15.54687$^\circ$, -21.60804$^\circ$)
A147 Very bright star in (16.99828$^\circ$, 1.99262$^\circ$)
A151 Background structure at $z\sim0.096$
A160 Background group at $z\sim0.060$
A168 Merger of a spiral dominated cluster and a cD dominated one
A193  
A311  
A376 Strong spatial variation of the PSF along the declination direction
  Bright star in $(\alpha,\delta)_{J2000.0}$ = (41.13167$^\circ$, 36.76294$^\circ$)
A500  
A548b Interacting central pair of galaxies
A602 Cluster with two similar dominant galaxies
A671  
A754 Two bright stars at (137.16750$^\circ$, -9.38406$^\circ$) and (136.95036$^\circ$, -9.85370$^\circ$)
A780 Bright stars at (139.52435$^\circ$, -12.319313$^\circ$) and (139.31748$^\circ$, -12.00786$^\circ$)
  BCG contaminated by two stars that are at $\sim$1 arcmin
  High contamination from a star outside of the field of view.
A957x Very bright star at (153.63937$^\circ$, -1.11778$^\circ$)
A970  
A1069  
A1291 Bright star in (173.08422$^\circ$, 56.09649$^\circ$)
A1631a Contaminated by a foreground group at $z\sim0.0144$
  The brightest galaxy in the center of the field is a foreground galaxy
A1644 Merging between two clusters
  Bright star close to the center (194.39669$^\circ$, -17.39507$^\circ$)
A1668  
A1736 Cluster without a clear center and with two dominant galaxies quite far away one from the other ($\ga$ $14' \ga 700$ kpc).
  Possible merger ?
A1795 Bright star at (207.01130$^\circ$, 26.51543$^\circ$)
  Bright star at (207.20086$^\circ$, 26.61439$^\circ$) at only $\sim$ $1\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$ }67$ of the BCG
A1831  
A1983 Two dominant galaxies
A1991 Bright star at (223.49666$^\circ$, 18.49984$^\circ$)
A2107 Only field observed using high-dithering technique
A2124  
A2149 Very bright star at (240.10335$^\circ$, 53.96715$^\circ$)
A2169 Bright spike near the edge of one chip from (4050, 1) to (4050, $\sim$100)
A2256 Field with a high star density
  Bright star at (255.89125$^\circ$, 78.630028$^\circ$)
A2271 Bright star in (257.09583$^\circ$, 78.828472$^\circ$)
A2382 Bright star at (328.15959$^\circ$, -15.80787$^\circ$)
A2399 The brightest galaxy in the field is indeed a foreground (z=0.017) spiral galaxy
A2415 Bright star at (331.52216$^\circ$, -5.35782$^\circ$)
A2457 Contaminated by a galactic nebula
A2572a Central pair of galaxies in interaction
  Bright star at (349.47527$^\circ$, 18.70290$^\circ$)
A2589 Background group at $z\sim0.17$
A2593 Bright star at (351.09915$^\circ$, 14.47857$^\circ$)
A2622  
A2626 Contaminated by A2625 (z=0.0609)
A2657 Field contaminated by a galactic nebula
A2665 Bright stars at (357.65235$^\circ$, 6.01907$^\circ$)
A2717 Bright star at (0.85301$^\circ$, -35.96565$^\circ$) close to the BCG ($\sim$ $2\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$ }9$)
A2734  
A3128 Bright star at (53.00461$^\circ$, -52.47426$^\circ$)
A3158  
A3164 BCG lost in interchip region!!
A3266 Bright star at (67.97359$^\circ$, -61.38483$^\circ$)
A3376 Bright star at (90.15115$^\circ$, -39.95171$^\circ$)
A3395  
A3490  
A3497 About half of the BCG falls in an interchip region
A3528a Double system together with A3528b
  Member of a group of clusters with A3528a, A3530 and A3532
  Bright stars at (193.55279$^\circ$, -29.40419$^\circ$) and (193.47205$^\circ$, -29.30771$^\circ$)
A3528b Only 460 s of total exposure time in V and 180 s in B
  Double system together with A3528a
  Member of a group of clusters with A3528b, A3530 and A3532
A3530 Member of a group of clusters with A3528a, A3528b and A3532
  BCG in interaction with a close galaxy
  Bright star at (193.88556$^\circ$, -30.06425$^\circ$)
A3532 Member of a group of clusters with A3528a, A3528b and A3530
A3556 Cluster with two dominant galaxies
A3558 Bright stars at (202.05404$^\circ$, -31.55222$^\circ$) and (201.64741$^\circ$, -31.45133$^\circ$)
A3560 The central galaxy of the field which is also the brightest galaxy in the field is a foreground galaxy (z=0.0124)
  Bright star at (203.06308$^\circ$, -33.24893$^\circ$)
A3562 Total exposure times of 180 s in each filter
  Very bad seeing ( $\it FWHM_*(V)\sim2\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$ }38$)
A3667 Bright star at (303.24178$^\circ$, -56.84679$^\circ$)
A3716 Brightest galaxy in the field is a background galaxy (z=0.0557)
  Two bright central galaxies maybe in interaction
  Bright star at (312.81216$^\circ$, -52.62427$^\circ$)
A3809 Bright star at (326.41697$^\circ$, -44.13961$^\circ$)
A3880 Bright star at (336.96038$^\circ$, -30.60259$^\circ$) at $\sim$ $1\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$ }82$ from the BCG
A4059  
IIZW108 BCG in clear interaction
  Very bright star at (318.18880$^\circ$, 2.64289$^\circ$)
MKW3s Two bright stars at (230.21682$^\circ$, 7.68269$^\circ$) and (230.59067$^\circ$, 7.81603$^\circ$), respectively
RX 58 BCG with two nuclei separated by $\sim$7''
  In the catalog they are considered as two objects
  Two bright stars (14.61869$^\circ$, 26.78588$^\circ$) and (14.66231$^\circ$, 26.85845$^\circ$) both closer than 5 arcmin to the BCG
RX1022 Problem with photometry found, probably extinction by clouds. Corrected using SDSS data.
RX1740 Field with high density of stars.
  Bright star at (265.30723$^\circ$, 35.73833$^\circ$) and (265.41056$^\circ$, 35.36699$^\circ$)
Z1261  
Z2844 Very bright spike in the border of one chip (150.98105$^\circ$, 32.64584$^\circ$)
Z8338 Field with high density of stars
Z8852 Very bright star at (347.52789$^\circ$, 7.36402$^\circ$)

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.