Issue |
A&A
Volume 496, Number 3, March IV 2009
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 777 - 786 | |
Section | Stellar structure and evolution | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200810730 | |
Published online | 14 January 2009 |
Edge-on disk around the T Tauri star [MR81] H
17 NE in
Corona Australis![[*]](/icons/foot_motif.gif)
R. Neuhäuser1 - S. Krämer1 - M. Mugrauer1 - R. Köhler2,3 - T. O. B. Schmidt1 - M. Ammler-von Eiff4 - J. Alves5 - S. Fiedler1 - N. Vogt6,7
1 - Astrophysikalisches Institut und Universitäts-Sternwarte,
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Schillergässchen 2-3, 07745 Jena, Germany
2 -
ZAH Landessternwarte, Königstuhl, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
3 -
Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
4 -
Centro de Astronomia e Astrofísica da Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-018 Lisboa, Portugal
5 -
Calar Alto Observatory, Centro Astronomico Hispano-Aleman, C/q Jesus Durban Remon 2-2, 04004 Almeria, Spain
6 -
Departamento de Física y Astronomía, Universidad de Valparaíso,
Avenida Gran Bretaña 1111, Valparaíso, Chile
7 -
Instituto de Astronomía, Universidad Catolica del Norte, Avda. Angamos 0610,
Antofagasta, Chile
Received 1 August 2008 / Accepted 14 November 2008
Abstract
Aims. Using the speckle camera SHARP at the 3.5 m ESO NTT, Köhler and collaborators found an object 3.5 mag fainter in K only
north-east of the T Tauri star [MR81] H
in the Corona Australis (CrA) star-forming region, which could be either a brown dwarf or a T Tauri star with an edge-on disk. We attempt to study this faint object in detail.
Methods. We acquired deep VLT NACO near-infrared images at three epochs to determine, whether [MR81] H
and the nearby faint object are comoving and to measure the infrared colors of both objects. We obtained optical and infrared spectra of both objects with the VLT using FORS and ISAAC, respectively, to determine spectral types and temperatures as well as ages and masses.
Results. The T Tauri star [MR81] H
and the faint nearby object have a projected separation of 1369.58 mas, i.e. 178 AU at 130 pc. They share the same proper motion (
), so that they most certainly form a bound binary pair. The apparently fainter component [MR81] H
NE has a spectral type of M2e, while the apparently brighter component [MR81] H
SW, the previously known T Tauri star, has a spectral type of M4-5e. We can identify a nearly edge-on disk around [MR81] H
NE by visual inspection, which has a diameter of at least 30 to 50 AU. We are able to detect strong emission lines in [MR81] H
NE, which are almost certainly due to ongoing accretion. The NE object is detectable only by means of its scattered light.
Conclusions. If both objects are co-eval (2-3 Myr) and located at the same distance (130 pc as CrA), then the apparently fainter [MR81] H
NE is more massive (primary) component with a nearly edge-on disk and the apparently brigther component [MR81] H
SW is less massive (companion). Both are low-mass T Tauri stars with masses of
0.5 and
,
respectively.
Key words: astrometry - stars: binaries: visual - stars: formation - stars: pre-main sequence
1 Introduction: [MR81] H
17 in CrA
The star-forming region Corona Australis (R CrA or CrA) harbors dozens of young intermediate- to low-mass stars (and brown dwarfs) from spectral types B8 down to M 8.5. They have an age of between one and a few Myr and at a distance of appoximately 130 pc (see Neuhäuser & Forbrich 2008, for a recent review).
The first few low-mass, pre-main sequence stars, so-called T Tauri stars
(TTS) in this star-forming region were found by early H
and
infrared (IR) imaging surveys by Knacke et al. (1973),
Glass & Penston (1975),
and Marraco & Rydgren (1981). The latter found an emission-line object,
nowadays called [MR81] H
17 (MR81 for Marraco & Rydgren 1981,
sometimes also [MR81] HA 17).
It is located at
and
for J2000.0.
The catalogs GSC, USNO, NOMAD, DENIS, and 2MASS
provide BVRIJHK magnitudes for the unresolved binary.
![]() |
Figure 1:
VLT NACO K-band image of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER |
Patten (1998) determined the spectral type M3-5 for the unresolved binary.
The USNO B1.0 and NOMAD catalogs provide a proper motion of
mas/yr in right ascension and
mas/yr in declination,
while Ducourant et al. (2005) indicate a proper motion of
mas/yr in right ascension and
mas/yr in declination.
We decided to use the weighted mean,
i.e.
mas/yr in right ascension
and
mas/yr in declination,
which is consistent with kinematic membership to CrA
(see e.g. Neuhäuser et al. 2000).
Using the speckle camera SHARP at the ESO 3.5 m NTT on 6 July 2001,
Köhler et al. (2008) detected a faint object close to [MR81] H 17.
The apparently fainter object is
3.5 mag fainter in K and
located at a separation of
NE from the apparently
brighter object [MR81] H
17, which we now label
[MR81] H
17 SW; the apparently fainter object is
now refered to as [MR81] H
17 NE.
Figure 3 of Köhler et al. (2008) displays their SHARP K-band image
of [MR81] H
17 NE & SW, which has lower angular resolution
and a lower signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio than our new VLT AO image (Fig. 1).
The apparently fainter object can be a young star with (nearly) edge-on disk, a brown dwarf companion, or an unrelated background star, as speculated by Köhler et al. (2008). We identify the fainter object as an early M-type T Tauri star with a nearly edge-on disk and strong emission lines due to ongoing accretion. We present the observations and data reduction in Sect. 2 and the results in Sect. 3.
2 Observations and data reduction
The apparently fainter object next to [MR81] H 17 was discovered on
the K-band speckle images taken with SHARP-I
(System for High Angular Resolution Pictures number I)
of the Max-Planck-Institut for Extraterrestrial Physics (Hofmann et al. 1992)
at the 3.5 m New Technology Telescope (NTT)
of the European Southern Observatory (ESO) on La Silla, Chile
(see Köhler et al. (2008) for details on the observations,
data reduction, and the resulting image)
.
To find out whether the apparently fainter object could be either a
sub-stellar companion or a star with an edge-on disk, follow-up
observations were necessary.
![]() |
Figure 2:
Three-dimensional contour plot (log stretch) of the
K-band brightness of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER |
Follow-up imaging in JHK was completed one year later with
the Infrared Array Camera and Spectrograph (ISAAC) of
the ESO Very Large Telescope (VLT) on Cerro Paranal, Chile.
Images of higher angular resolution and higher S/N in JHK
were taken with the Adaptive Optics imager NACO (for NAOS CONICA
for Nasmyth Adaptive Optics System, NAOS, with
COude NearInfrared Camera and Array, CONICA;
Rousset et al. 2003) at the ESO VLT in 2003, 2004, and 2008,
with the S13 camera, i.e. a
field of view.
Optical and near-infrared spectra of the apparently fainter object
were obtained with the ESO VLT instruments
FORS1 (FOcal Reductor and Spectrograph number 1)
and ISAAC, respectively (see Table 1 for the entire observations log).
All science and flat field frames acquired were dark and/or bias corrected, then the science frames were divided by a normalized flat field. A shift+add procedure was applied to subtract the background and to add up all frames in each filter for each observing run. The same procedure was performed for spectroscopic (telluric) and imaging (photometric and astrometric) standard stars. Spectra were wavelength calibrated with lamp arc exposures, divided by the telluric standard, and multiplied by a corresponding spectral template. For astrometric calibration of the imaging observations, we used astrometric standards observed in the same night, such as stars close to the Galactic Center or well-known Hipparcos binaries. Resulting pixel scales and detector orientations are given in Table 1; the errors include the effects of Gaussian centering errors in the science targets and the astrometric standards as well as possible motion in the standards (see e.g. Neuhäuser et al. (2008) for details of typical astrometric calibration procedure). For data reduction, we used ESO eclipse and MIDAS for imaging data, and IRAF for spectra.
Table 1: Observations log.
3 Results
We present and discuss the results for our imaging (photometry and astrometry) data and spectroscopy (physical parameters) data.
3.1 Imaging results: photometry and astrometry
In our NACO images (Fig. 1), the ellipsoidal shape of the NE component is visible with a faint dark lane across the object. This image clearly resembles the typical appearence of a classical T Tauri star with (nearly) edge-on disk.
The first young stellar object displaying this pattern, HH 30 IRS in Taurus,
was imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope (Burrows et al. 1996). Edge-on disks
are also observable with ground-based near-IR imaging observations
both with AO,
e.g. HK Tau/c (Stapelfeldt et al. 1998; Koresko 1998),
HV Tau C (Monin & Bouvier 2000),
and LkH 263 C (Jayawardhana et al. 2002)
and seeing-limited, e.g.
2MASSI J1628137243139 (Grosso et al. 2003).
Hence, this object is most probably a young star with a nearly edge-on disk.
The faint red object also resembles the appearance of so-called infrared companions,
see e.g. Koresko & Leinert (2001), a typical example of which
is T Tau Sa (Koresko et al. 2000).
Table 2: Astrometric results.
![]() |
Figure 3:
VLT NACO K-band image of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER |
Astrometric and photometric data for NE are obtained after
subtraction of the Point Spread Function (PSF) of the brighter star SW.
Our astrometric results for the objects [MR81] H 17 SW & NE
are listed in Table 2. The brighter object (SW) has a FWHM of
mas.
The position angle (PA) of the disk major axis is
,
where the extension along the disk lane axis is maximal, namely 247 mas,
while the extension perpendicular to the disk lane is only 181 mas
(both measured in the June 2004 NACO image);
this disk angle is closely aligned (within
)
with the PA between the
SW and NE sources. However, as seen in Figs. 4 and 5, a more pole-on orbit
of SW around NE is more likely than a more edge-on orbital inclination,
so that disk and binary orbit were not coplanar.
The NACO image after subtraction of the PSF of SW is shown in Fig. 3.
We detect an additional faint object
NW of [MR81] H
17 SW. This object is detected only in our
highest quality image, the NACO image of June 2004, not in any other image.
This faint object close to a bright star, for which only one epoch
of data is available,
must be regarded as a companion candidate (cc); we call it [MR81]
H
17 SW/cc2
(cc1 was what is now [MR81] H
17 NE).
This new object is
mas west of SW
and
north of SW,
corresponding to
AU projected separation at 130 pc.
This separation is close to the separation between the stars
[MR81] H
17 SW and NE; such an non-hierarchical triple
would probably be unstable.
With
mag (and using B.C.K=3.3 mag as for
substellar L- and T-type objects), it would have a bolometric
luminosity (at 130 pc) of
and, hence, only about 1 to 2 Jupiter masses (according to either
Burrows et al. 1997; or Baraffe et al. 1998), for 2-3 Myr of age.
However, not only are these models with evolutionary tracks
uncertain at such very young ages, we also should note that this
object is more likely to be a background object then another bound companion.
A 2nd epoch image should be taken to check for common proper motion.
In addition to NE and cc2, there are no other objects detected
within
around SW down to K=19 mag; faint objects within
of SW cannot be excluded.
In Figs. 4 and 5, we show the evolution in the separation and PA with time to investigate whether the NE and SW components form a common proper motion pair. For the epoch 2002 (ISAAC), we use only the K-band data, because the fainter object is hardly detected in J and H.
To test the background and companion hypotheses,
we estimate the maximum possible orbital motion
for edge-on orbit (separation change) and pole-on orbit (PA change).
We assume a circular orbit. The most reliably measured separation (2004) is
mas, i.e.
178 AU at 130 pc,
yielding a
3000 yr long orbit (for 0.6
total mass).
When using all data available, common proper motion appears possible;
only the SHARP data point regarding separation appears to be deviant by 1 to
2
.
When using only the NACO data, which provide the most accurate measurements,
the smallest errors, and are all taken with the same instrument
and same set-up (high angular resolution AO),
both objects clearly exhibit common proper motion,
i.e. are most certainly bound and orbiting each other.
![]() |
Figure 4:
Separation (in mas) versus observing epoch (in years) for
data listed in Table 2.
The dotted lines (starting from the 2008 data point opening to the
past) indicate maximum possible separation change due to orbital motion
in case of edge-on orbit. The dashed lines are for the background
hypothesis, if the brighter object (SW) would have moved according to
its (poorly) known proper motion, while the fainter object (NE)
would be a non-moving object;
we use the weighted mean of the USNO and NOMAD values for the proper
motion of the SW object, namely mu
|
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Position angle (in degrees) versus observing epoch (in years) for
data listed in Table 2. The dotted lines (starting from the
2008 datapoint and opening to the past) indicate maximum PA change due to
orbital motion in the case of a pole-on orbit. The dashed lines indicate the background
hypothesis, if the brighter object (SW) has moved according to
its (poorly) known proper motion, while the fainter object (NE)
would be a non-moving object;
again, we use the weighted mean of the USNO and NOMAD proper motions for the SW object.
The datapoints from 2003 and 2004 are inconsistent with
the background hypothesis by |
Open with DEXTER |
Photometric results are as follows.
By comparing aperture photometry for the apparently brighter object SW and
the apparently fainter object NE (after subtraction of the PSF
of SW), we derive magnitude differences as follows:
mag
(i.e. a factor of 101),
mag,
and
mag.
Using in addition the error-weighted averages of the 2MASS and DENIS magnitudes
for the unresolved object [MR81] H
17, we obtain
mag,
mag,
and
mag for the object NE,
and
mag,
mag,
and
mag for the object SW.
![]() |
Figure 6:
Our VLT/ISAAC image of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER |
In the ISAAC JHK images, we observe a filament in addition to [MR81] H
17 SW and NE
(see Fig. 6), that is most pronounced in the J and H-bands, but also visible in
;
it is also marginally visible in the 2MASS JHK images (lower sensitivity).
Given the visual appearence, one is tempted to speculate that the filament originates
in [MR81] H
17; we observe a helix- or spiral-like structure going
first towards SW for
,
then appears to curve to the SE
(detected in our ISAAC images until
separation
from [MR81] H
17, or
5000 AU at 130 pc);
it is detected even out to
separation towards SE (
22 360 AU at 130 pc) in the 2MASS images.
Strong (forbidden) emission lines, as detected
in [MR81] H
17 NE, are often related to outflows, so that a physical
connection is possible, but uncertain. The curvature could be produced by
rotational and/or orbital revolution. However, the proper motion of
the binary is directed towards the south,
i.e. not away from the filament in the plane of the sky,
but it is of course possible that the (as yet unknown) radial (or orbital?)
velocity of [MR81] H
17 NE ensures that the filament trails behind.
It would be important to complete a narrow-band imaging surbey of this
feature and to monitor its possible variability.
3.2 Spectroscopy results
The optical spectrum was aqquired on 27 Mar. 2003 with VLT/FORS1 (three exposures of
790 s each at airmass 1.2 to 1.3) with the
slit and
the order-sorting filter OG590 and grism 300I, i.e. covering 6000 Å to 1.1
with
a dispersion of 2.5 Å resulting in a spectral resolution of between 6.4 and
11 Å.
The faint object NE was located directly on the slit, and the brighter object SW
was also close to the slit, so that we could also extract its spectrum.
The optical spectra are shown in Figs. 7 and 8.
In the optical spectrum, we observe remarkable emission lines
with H
being clearly the strongest of all.
The remainder of the spectrum is dominated by strong emission
of forbidden lines such as [OI], [NII], and [SII].
These forbidden lines are usually signs of
shocked low-density regions of young stars
such as outflows, winds, and jets (see e.g. Cabrit et al. 1990;
Hamann 1994; Hartigan et al. 1995; Hirth et al. 1997;
Dougados et al. 2000; and Fernández & Comerón 2001).
Outflow is often seen as both an indication and result of ongoing accretion.
The optical spectrum with these strong emission lines looks generally
similar to young, low-mass objects like HBC 617 in
Lupus
(Krautter et al. 1984),
LS-RCrA 1 in CrA (Fernández & Comerón 2001;
Comerón & Fernández 2001),
as well as Sz 102, Sz 106, and Par-Lup3-4 in Lupus (Comerón et al. 2003),
e.g. our object [MR81] H
17 NE has an H
equivalent width
of
330 Å (but may be slightly saturated), while LS-RCrA 1 has 360 Å.
Fernández & Comerón (2001) concluded that LS-RCrA 1 is surrounded
and extincted by an edge-on disk, which was not resolve by their imaging data.
We list all emission lines for which we care able to measure reliable equivalent widths in Table 3. Between 7319 and 7329 Å, the noise is too strong, and/or possible lines to weak, and/or spectral resolution too poor to unambiguously identify feature(s) either as [CaII] line at 7324 Å or as a [OII] doublet at 7319 and 7329 Å. The CaII triplet at 8498 to 8662 Å is detected.
The five strongest emission lines in [MR81] H 17 NE are
saturated, and their equivalent width measurements therefore represent
uncertain limits.
There even appear
Fake emission lines even appear at these wavelengths
in the other object [MR81] H
17 SW, which was located
outside the slit. Therefore, it is also difficult to measure the
H
equivalent width of the object SW (whose upper limit should be
16 Å), and we are unable to classify unambiguously the SW object
as being either a classical or weak-line T Tauri star.
For the BVRIJHK part of the spectral energy distribution,
the SW object resembles a blackbody; the IRAS 12 to 60
data are offset above the blackbody (see Fig. 10), but it is unclear,
whether the far-IR emission originates in the immediate surroundings
of the star (its disk) or its more distant surroundings
(the star-forming cloud). The object [MR81] H
17 NE can
clearly be classified as a classical T Tauri star because of its
strong H
emission and edge-on disk.
![]() |
Figure 7:
Optical VLT/FORS1 spectrum of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Spectra of standard stars and [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER |
Table 3:
Lines detected in [MR81] H
17 NE.
Due to poor spectral resolution, strong (saturated) nearby [SII] emission lines, and strong veiling in the NE object (and low S/N data of the SW object), the Lithium 6708 Å line is detected only marginally in both the SW and NE components.
We determine the spectral types of both objects by comparison with M dwarfs of known spectral types from Kirkpatrick et al. (1991, see Fig. 8). Surprisingly, the spectral type of the apparently fainter component (NE) is earlier (M2e) than that of the apparently brighter component (SW), which is M4-5e according to our spectra. These spectral types are consistent with the results of Patten (1998), who assigned M3-5e to the unresolved system.
We display the K-band spectra of both objects in Fig. 9, both of which
exhibit the CO lines typical of late-type objects.
The spectra of [MR81] H 17 NE also
exhibit emission lines of H2 and Br
.
As in LS-RCrA 1 (Fernández & Comerón 2001), the H2 lines
are stronger than the Br
line, but in the data of our object, the
Br
line is clearly detected and there are more H2emission lines detected than in LS-RCrA 1.
These H2 emission lines are also observed in other young
low-mass objects surrounded by dense circumstellar material
such as GY 11 (Greene & Lada 1996; Wilking et al. 1999).
Our VLT ISAAC H-band spectra of both objects are basically feature-less
and triangular-shaped, as is typical of young M-type objects.
According to both the H- and K-band spectra, the NE component is
slightly earlier (early-M) in spectral type than the SW component
(mid-M), as also observed in the optical spectra.
![]() |
Figure 9:
Infrared VLT/ISAAC K-band spectra of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER |
Since we detect indications of youth in both objects, such as emission lines and Lithium
absorption, both objects are young and most probably CrA members; the proper motions
of both objects are also consistent with CrA membership.
If both objects are at the same distance and age, then the earlier-type component
should be more massive and intrinsically brighter than the later-type object.
Obviously, a large amount of flux from the NE component is absorbed by its edge-on disk,
and the forbidden emission lines and the strong H emission
are a clear characteristic of accretion.
4 Discussion
Given the spectral type and JHK colors,
we can estimate the extinction towards
the SW object and obtain
mag for SW;
the extinction towards the NE objects cannot be determined,
because we unablt to detect photospheric light.
![]() |
Figure 10:
JHK color-color diagram for [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER |
In the JHK color-color diagram, both objects lie on
or close to the reddening vector, which has its origin at a mid-M dwarf
(see Fig. 10).
The object SW is located at the intersection of the reddening vector for dwarfs
and the loci of classical T Tauri stars (Meyer et al. 1997),
i.e. there is no evidence of near-IR excess emission from the SW component.
The NE object lies 10 mag of extinction away from the
unabsorbed mid-M dwarf and also about one tenth of a magnitude
to the right (red) of the reddening vector, which indicates
strong
near-IR excess emission typical of circumstellar material
(and a disk).
See also Fig. 11 for the spectral energy distribution of [MR81]
H 17 SW, which again shows its spectral type to be M4-5,
but no near-IR excessemission.
![]() |
Figure 11:
Spectral energy distribution of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER |
We then calculate their bolometric luminosities (at 130 pc),
obtaining
for the apparently brighter SW (M4-5e, hence
K)
and
for the apparently fainter NE (M2e, hence
K),
using a temperature scale for young M-type objects that is
intermediate between dwarfs and giants from Luhman (1999).
However, since the faint NE object is detectable only in scattered light
due to the edge-on disk, we are unable to study the stellar photosphere,
so that the aforementioned luminosity for the object NE is not the
luminosity of the star. This luminosity value appears strongly under-luminous,
which it is typical of objects with edge-on disks,
(see e.g. Watson & Stapelfeldt 2007).
![]() |
Figure 12:
H-R diagram with the location of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER |
The SW object (M4-5e) lies on the 2-3 Myr isochrone
of the Baraffe et al. (1998) models (see Fig. 12) and on the 3 Myr isochrone
on both the Burrows et al. (1997) and D'Antona & Mazzitelli (1997) models.
According to those models, it lies between the
(interpolated) 0.15 to 0.30
tracks.
Hence, we obtain an age of 2-3 Myr and
a mass of
for this object (SW).
Given its temperature, the
NE object lies on the
0.3 to 0.5
tracks,
according to Baraffe et al. (1998) and D'Antona & Mazzitelli (1997),
almost independently of luminosity, which cannot be measured.
Hence, the apparently fainter object (early-M) is more massive than
the apparently brighter object (mid-M),
0.5
,
if coeval with the SW object.
5 Summary and conclusion
Based on imaging and spectroscopic observations in the red optical
and near-infrared, we conclude that the object [MR81] H 17 NE
is surrounded (and absorbed) by a disk seen nearly edge-on.
The NE object appears fainter and has a spectral type M2e,
while the object SW appears brighter, but has spectral type M4-5e.
Both objects exhibit indicatons of youth such as emission lines and
common proper motion with known CrA members,
i.e. they are both low-mass T Tauri stars
(both exhibit strong H
emission).
The astrometric data from SHARP 2001 to NACO 2008
indicate that the two objects separated by
exhibit common proper motion. When using only AO data from NACO, i.e.
data of the highest quality pixel scale and resolution, and
aquired by an identical instrument, then
we have strong evidence for common proper motion.
Even with similar proper motion,
they could be independent members of the young CrA star-forming region.
In both cases, they have an age of 2-3 Myr at
130 pc.
A more detailed investigation of the emission lines is beyond the scope of this paper, and should be completed together with a study of their expected variability and higher-resolution spectra. Our spectral resolution is insufficient to resolve the line shape, e.g. of an inverse P Cyg profile, or to measure accurately outflow velocities. Using data of even higher resolution and/or deeper studies in the future, which cover a wider wavelength range, e.g. from space, one can investigate in detail the density distribution, scale height, and the gas and dust population, possibly polarization, accretion, outflow, variability, and ongoing planet formation in the disk.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the ESO User Support Group and ESO service mode observers for their support and observations. We have made use of the 2MASS, DENIS, USNO, GSC, NOMAD, and IRAS Faint Source Catalogs as well as the Simbad, Visir, and ADS databases. R.N. wishes to acknowledge general support from the German National Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG), grants NE 515/13-1, 13-2 and 23-1. MAvE was supported first by a graduate scholarship of the Cusanuswerk, one of the national student elite programs of Germany, and then by an individual fellowship granted by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal (reference SFRH/BPD/26817/2006). TOBS acknowledges support from Evangelisches Studienwerk e.V. Villigst, another national student elite program in Germany. NV acknowledges support by grants FONDECYT 1061199 and DIPUV 07/2007. We also thank our referee, Karl Stapelfeldt, for very helpful remarks.
Appendix A
![]() |
Figure 13:
JHK color composite of our VLT/NACO images of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14:
JHK color composite of our VLT/ISAAC images
of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER |
References
- Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, A&A, 337, 403 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Bessell, M. S., & Brett, J. M. 1988, PASP, 100, 1134 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Burrows, C. J., Stapelfeldt, K. R., & Watson, A. M. 1996, ApJ, 473, 437 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Burrows, A., Marley, M., Hubbard, W., et al. 1997, ApJ, 491, 856 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Cabrit, S., Ferreira, J., & Raga, A. C. 1990, A&A, 343, L61 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Comerón, F., & Fernández, M. 2001, ESO Messenger, 103, 21 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Comerón, F., Fernández, M., Baraffe, I., Neuhäuser, R., & Kaas, A. A. 2003, A&A, 406, 1001 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- D'Antona, F., & Mazzitelli, I. 1997, MmSAI, 68, 807 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Dougados, C., Cabrit, S., Lavally, C., & Menard, F. 2000, A&A, 357, L61 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Ducourant, C., Teixeira, R., Perie, J. P., et al. 2005, A&A, 438, 769 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Fernández, M., & Comerón, F. 2001, A&A, 380, 264 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Glass, I. S., & Penston, M. V. 1975, MNRAS, 172, 227 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Greene, T. P., & Lada, C. J. 1996, AJ, 112, 2184 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Grosso, N., Alves, J., Wood, K., et al. 2003, ApJ, 586, 296 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Harmann, F. 1994, ApJS, 93, 485 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Hartigan, P., Edwards, S., & Ghandour, L. 1995, ApJ, 452, 736 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Hirth, G. A., Mundt, R., & Solf, J. 1997, A&AS, 126, 437 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Hofmann, R., Blietz, M., Duhoux, Ph., et al. 1992, in Progress in Telescope and Instrumentation Technologies, ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings, ed. M. H. Ulrich (ESO Garching), 42, 617 (In the text)
- Kirkpatrick, J. D., Herny, T. J., & McCarthy, D. W. 1991, ApJS, 77, 417 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Jayawardhana, R., Luhman, K. L., D'Alessio, P., & Stauffer, J. R. 2002, ApJ, 571, L51 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Köhler, R., Neuhäuser, R., Krämer, S., et al. 2008, A&A, 488, 997 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Koresko, C. D. 1998, ApJ, 507, L145 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Koresko, C. D. 2000, ApJ, 531, L147 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Koresko, C. D., & Leinert, C. 2001, in The Formation of Binary Stars, ed. H. Zinnecker, & D. Mathieu, Proc. IAU Symp., 200, 265 (In the text)
- Knacke, R. F., Strom, K. M., Strom, S. R., Young, E., & Kunkel, W. 1973, ApJ 179, 847 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Krämer, S. 2008, Diploma Thesis, University Jena
- Krautter, J., Reipurth, B., & Eichendorf, W. 1984, A&A, 133, 169 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Luhman, K. L. 1999, ApJ, 525, 466 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Marraco, H. G., & Rydgren, A. E. 1981, AJ, 86, 62 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (MR81) (In the text)
- Meyer, M. R., Calvet, N., & Hillenbrandt, L. A. 1997, AJ, 114, 288 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Monin, F. J., & Bouvier, J. 2000, A&A, 356, L75 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Moshir, M. 1989, IRAS Faint Source Survey Catalog and explanatory supplement, IPAC (In the text)
- Neuhäuser, R., & Forbrich, J. 2008, The Corona-Australis star forming region, in Handbook of Low Mass Star Forming Regions, Astron. Soc. Pacific (Invited Review), ed. B. Reipurth, 735 (In the text)
- Neuhäuser, R., Walter, F. M., Covino, E., et al. 2000, A&A, 146, 323 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Neuhäuser, R., Guenther, E. W., Wuchterl, G., et al. 2005, A&A, 435, L13 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
- Neuhäuser, R., Mugrauer, M., Seifahrt, A., Schmidt, T., & Vogt, N. 2008, A&A, 484, 281 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
- Patten, B. M. 1998, in The Tenth Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun, ed. R. A. Donahue, & J. A. Bookbinder, ASP Conf. Ser., 154, 1755 (In the text)
- Rousset et al. 2003, SPIE, 4839, 14 (In the text)
- Stapelfeldt, K., Krist, J. E., Menard, F., et al. 1998, ApJ, 502, L65 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Watson, A. M., & Stapelfeldt, K. R. 2007, AJ, 133, 845 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Wilking, B. A., Greene, T. P., & Meyer, M. R. 1999, AJ, 117, 469 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
Footnotes
- ... Australis
- Based on observations collected at the European Southern Observatory, Chile in runs 67.C-0213, 71.C-0206(D), 71.C-0522(B), 073.C-0164(A), 073.C-0167(B) and 081.C-0393(A).
- ... image)
- The SHARP data
were reduced independently by Köhler et al. (2008) with the speckle
interferometry technique and by Krämer (2008) with a simple shift+add
technique; they determined and used two slightly different
pixel scales and detector orientations (Krämer uses
mas/pixel for right ascension,
mas/pixel for declination, and a detector orientation of
obtained by Ott (priv. comm.) from the Galactic Center images of the same night; see Table 1 for the astrometric solution of Köhler et al. (2008); with slightly different calibrations, the results on separation and PA also differ slightly; in this paper, we use the mean of their results for [MR81] H
17, listed in Table 2.
- ... colors
- Also optical colors BVRI
for the unresolved object from USNO, NOMAD, GSC, and DENIS,
which are almost identical to the colors of the
apparently brighter object [MR81] H
17 SW.
All Tables
Table 1: Observations log.
Table 2: Astrometric results.
Table 3:
Lines detected in [MR81] H
17 NE.
All Figures
![]() |
Figure 1:
VLT NACO K-band image of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Three-dimensional contour plot (log stretch) of the
K-band brightness of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 3:
VLT NACO K-band image of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Separation (in mas) versus observing epoch (in years) for
data listed in Table 2.
The dotted lines (starting from the 2008 data point opening to the
past) indicate maximum possible separation change due to orbital motion
in case of edge-on orbit. The dashed lines are for the background
hypothesis, if the brighter object (SW) would have moved according to
its (poorly) known proper motion, while the fainter object (NE)
would be a non-moving object;
we use the weighted mean of the USNO and NOMAD values for the proper
motion of the SW object, namely mu
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Position angle (in degrees) versus observing epoch (in years) for
data listed in Table 2. The dotted lines (starting from the
2008 datapoint and opening to the past) indicate maximum PA change due to
orbital motion in the case of a pole-on orbit. The dashed lines indicate the background
hypothesis, if the brighter object (SW) has moved according to
its (poorly) known proper motion, while the fainter object (NE)
would be a non-moving object;
again, we use the weighted mean of the USNO and NOMAD proper motions for the SW object.
The datapoints from 2003 and 2004 are inconsistent with
the background hypothesis by |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Our VLT/ISAAC image of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Optical VLT/FORS1 spectrum of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Spectra of standard stars and [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Infrared VLT/ISAAC K-band spectra of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 10:
JHK color-color diagram for [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Spectral energy distribution of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 12:
H-R diagram with the location of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 13:
JHK color composite of our VLT/NACO images of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 14:
JHK color composite of our VLT/ISAAC images
of [MR81] H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
Copyright ESO 2009
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.