Free Access
 

 

Table 4:

A detailed view of the redshift asymmetries in mock catalogues.
Sample $n_{\rm G}$ $n_{+ \Delta z}$ $n_{- \Delta z}$ $n_{\pm \Delta z}$ $+ \Delta z$ (%) $- \Delta z$ (%) $\pm \Delta z$ (%)
Mock1, gravitationally bound groups              
all groups ($n \leq 10$) 675 282 259 134 50.5 $\pm$ 10.1 49.5 $\pm$ 10.1 19.9 $\pm$ 2.5
spiral ( $T \geq 0.92$) dominant groups 537 231 199 107 52.4 $\pm$ 10.6 47.6 $\pm$ 10.6 19.9 $\pm$ 2.7
E/S0 (T < 0.92) dominant groups 138 51 60 27 46.0 $\pm$ 16.0 54.1 $\pm$ 16.0 19.6 $\pm$ 4.4
Mock1, gravitationally unbound groups              
all groups ($n \leq 10$) 709 340 246 123 58.3 $\pm$ 2.9 41.7 $\pm$ 2.9 17.3 $\pm$ 2.2
spiral ( $T \geq 0.92$) dominant groups 616 297 209 110 59.0 $\pm$ 3.2 41.0 $\pm$ 3.2 17.9 $\pm$ 2.8
E/S0 (T < 0.92) dominant groups 93 43 37 13 54.1 $\pm$ 7.1 45.9 $\pm$ 7.1 14.0 $\pm$ 8.5
Mock1, bound, wrongly identified              
all groups ($n \leq 10$) 289 142 110 37 56.3 $\pm$ 12.9 43.7 $\pm$ 12.9 12.8 $\pm$ 4.2
spiral ( $T \geq 0.92$) dominant groups 257 129 95 33 57.6 $\pm$ 12.8 42.4 $\pm$ 12.8 12.8 $\pm$ 3.7
E/S0 (T < 0.92) dominant groups 32 13 15 4 46.4 $\pm$ 18.2 53.6 $\pm$ 18.2 12.5 $\pm$ 12.0
Mock1, unbound, wrongly identified              
all groups ($n \leq 10$) 338 193 96 49 66.8 $\pm$ 3.8 33.2 $\pm$ 3.8 14.5 $\pm$ 4.6
spiral ( $T \geq 0.92$) dominant groups 297 171 83 43 67.6 $\pm$ 3.5 32.4 $\pm$ 3.5 14.5 $\pm$ 4.8
E/S0 (T < 0.92) dominant groups 41 22 13 6 62.9 $\pm$ 9.7 37.1 $\pm$ 9.7 14.6 $\pm$ 9.9
Mock2, gravitationally bound groups              
all groups ($n \leq 10$) 5715 2327 2214 1174 51.3 $\pm$ 1.7 48.7 $\pm$ 1.7 20.5 $\pm$ 0.7
spiral ( $T \geq 0.92$) dominant groups 3649 1515 1386 748 52.3 $\pm$ 2.9 47.7 $\pm$ 2.9 20.5 $\pm$ 1.2
E/S0 (T < 0.92) dominant groups 2066 801 839 426 48.8 $\pm$ 2.2 51.2 $\pm$ 2.2 20.6 $\pm$ 2.5
Mock2, gravitationally unbound groups              
all groups ($n \leq 10$) 6385 2760 2444 1181 52.9 $\pm$ 1.6 47.1 $\pm$ 1.6 18.5 $\pm$ 0.9
spiral ( $T \geq 0.92$) dominant groups 5437 2357 2080 1000 53.0 $\pm$ 1.7 47.0 $\pm$ 1.7 18.4 $\pm$ 1.1
E/S0 (T < 0.92) dominant groups 947 402 364 181 52.4 $\pm$ 2.8 47.6 $\pm$ 2.8 19.1 $\pm$ 1.7
Mock2, bound, wrongly identified              
all groups ($n \leq 10$) 2618 1193 1028 397 53.7 $\pm$ 2.2 46.3 $\pm$ 2.2 15.2 $\pm$ 0.7
spiral ( $T \geq 0.92$) dominant groups 2151 980 840 331 53.8 $\pm$ 2.7 46.2 $\pm$ 2.7 15.4 $\pm$ 1.0
E/S0 (T < 0.92) dominant groups 467 213 188 66 53.1 $\pm$ 1.7 46.9 $\pm$ 1.7 14.1 $\pm$ 3.4
Mock2, unbound, wrongly identified              
all groups ($n \leq 10$) 3591 1661 1379 551 54.6 $\pm$ 1.9 45.4 $\pm$ 1.9 15.3 $\pm$ 1.3
spiral ( $T \geq 0.92$) dominant groups 3291 1535 1260 496 54.8 $\pm$ 2.0 45.2 $\pm$ 2.0 15.1 $\pm$ 1.4
E/S0 (T < 0.92) dominant groups 300 126 119 55 51.4 $\pm$ 5.6 48.6 $\pm$ 5.6 18.3 $\pm$ 4.1
Note: Sample is the subsample of the mock catalogue, $n_{\rm G}$ is the number of groups, $n_{+ \Delta z}$ is the number of groups with positive redshift excess, $n_{- \Delta z}$ is the number of groups with negative redshift excess, $n_{\pm \Delta z}$ is the number of groups with no excess, $+ \Delta z$ is the percentage of groups with positive redshift excess when ties have been removed, $- \Delta z$is the percentage of groups with negative redshift excess when ties have been removed and $\pm \Delta z$ is the percentage of groups having equal number of negative and positive redshifts. Errors for mock catalogues are standard deviation errors between five different observation points.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.