Highlight
Free Access
 

 

Table 2:

Contribution of [C II] from various regions in the LMC.
Region ${L_{\rm [C {\sc ii}]}/L_{[C {\sc ii}],\rm total}}$ ${\rm Area/Area_{\rm total}}$ ${L_{\rm TIR}/L_{\rm TIR,total}}$ ${L_{\rm [C {\sc ii}]}/L_{160}}$ ${L_{\rm [C {\sc ii}]}/L_{\rm [TIR]}^{a}}$ ${L_{\rm [C {\sc ii}]}/L_{\rm [FIR]}^{b}}$
Diffuse regions $51.8\pm0.1\%$ 86% 59.0 $\pm$ 0.1% 0.032 $\pm$ 0.1% 0.40 $\pm$ 0.01% 0.80 $\pm$ 0.01%
SF regions $48.2\pm0.1\%$ 14% 41.0 $\pm$ 0.1% 0.063 $\pm$ 0.1% 0.55 $\pm$ 0.01% 1.10 $\pm$ 0.01%
30 Dor $8.1\pm0.1\%$ 0.8% 9.0 $\pm$ 0.1% 0.072 $\pm$ 0.1% 0.42 $\pm$ 0.01% 0.84 $\pm$ 0.01%
N11 $2.2\pm0.1\%$ 0.7% 2.0 $\pm$ 0.1% 0.058 $\pm$ 0.1% 0.57 $\pm$ 0.01% 1.14 $\pm$ 0.03%
total LMC $100\%$ $100\%$ $100\%$ 0.042 $\pm$ 0.1% 0.46 $\pm$ 0.01% 0.92 $\pm$ 0.02%
a Also referred to as the photoelectric efficiency (see Sect. 7.2 ). b FIR is defined using the IRAS bands (see Sect. 2.2). TIR assumes the factor of 2 increase from the FIR, as found by Hunter et al. (2001) and discussed in the text (Sect. 2.2). Due to the calibration uncertainties of the BICE map, all of these values have a systematic uncertainty of $\pm$30%. The uncertainties in the table reflect the random noise which is important for comparing the relative.


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.