Issue |
A&A
Volume 691, November 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A152 | |
Number of page(s) | 20 | |
Section | Stellar atmospheres | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450129 | |
Published online | 08 November 2024 |
Assessing the capability of a model-based stellar XUV estimation
1
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, School of Science, The University of Tokyo,
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku,
Tokyo
113-0033,
Japan
2
The Hakubi Center for Advanced Research, Kyoto University,
Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku,
Kyoto
606-8501,
Japan
3
Department of Physics, Kyoto University,
Kitashirakawa-Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku,
Kyoto
606-8502,
Japan
4
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
8800 Greenbelt Road,
Greenbelt,
MD
20771,
USA
5
Division of Science, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, NINS,
2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka,
Tokyo
181-8588,
Japan
6
Department of Earth and Space Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University,
Toyonaka, Osaka
560-0043,
Japan
★ Corresponding author; shoda.m.astroph@gmail.com
Received:
26
March
2024
Accepted:
24
September
2024
Stellar X-ray and extreme ultraviolet (XUV) emission drives the heating and chemical reactions in planetary atmospheres and proto-planetary disks, and therefore, a proper estimation of a stellar XUV spectrum is required for their studies. One proposed solution is to estimate stellar atmospheric heating using numerical models, although the validation was restricted to the Sun over a limited parameter range. For this study, we extended the validation of the model by testing it with the Sun and three young, nearby solar-type stars with available XUV observational data (κ1 Ceti, π1 UMa, and EK Dra). We first tested the model with the solar observations, examining its accuracy for the activity minimum and maximum phases, its dependence on the loop length, the effect of loop length superposition, and its sensitivity to elemental abundance. We confirm that the model spectrum is mostly accurate both for the activity minimum and maximum, although the high-energy X-rays (λ < 1 nm) are underestimated in the activity maximum. Applying the model to young solar-type stars, we find that it can reproduce the observed XUV spectra within a factor of 3 in the range of 1–30 nm for stars with a magnetic flux up to 100 times that of the Sun (κ1 Ceti and π1 UMa). For a star with 300 times the solar magnetic flux (EK Dra), although the raw numerical data show a systematically lower spectrum than observed, the spectra are in good agreement once corrected for the effect of insufficient resolution in the transition region. For all young solar-type stars, high-energy X-rays (λ < 1 nm) are significantly underestimated, with the deviation increasing with stellar magnetic activity. Furthermore, our model-based estimation shows performance that is comparable to or surpasses that of previous empirical approaches. We also demonstrate that the widely used fifth-order Chebyshev polynomial fitting can accurately reproduce the actual differential emission measure and XUV spectrum. Our findings indicate that the stellar XUV spectrum can be reasonably estimated through a numerical model, given that the essential input parameters (surface magnetic flux and elemental abundance) are known.
Key words: methods: numerical / Sun: corona / stars: coronae / stars: low-mass / ultraviolet: stars / X-rays: stars
© The Authors 2024
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.