Issue |
A&A
Volume 670, February 2023
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A173 | |
Number of page(s) | 19 | |
Section | Celestial mechanics and astrometry | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243614 | |
Published online | 24 February 2023 |
Comparison of dynamical and kinematic reference frames via pulsar positions from timing, Gaia, and interferometric astrometry
1
School of Astronomy and Space Science, Key Laboratory of Modern Astronomy and Astrophysics (Ministry of Education), Nanjing University,
Nanjing
210023, PR China
e-mail: niu.liu@nju.edu.cn; zhuzi@nju.edu.cn
2
School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University,
Nanjing
210023, PR China
3
Institute of Astrophysics, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas,
Voutes,
71110
Heraklion, Greece
e-mail: john@ia.forth.gr
4
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie,
Auf dem Hügel 69,
53121
Bonn, Germany
Received:
23
March
2022
Accepted:
13
December
2022
Context. Pulsars are special objects whose positions can be determined independently from timing, radio interferometric, and Gaia astrometry at sub-milliarcsecond (mas) precision; thus, they provide a unique way to monitor the link between dynamical and kinematic reference frames.
Aims. We aim to assess the orientation consistency between the dynamical reference frames represented by the planetary ephemerides and the kinematic reference frames constructed by Gaia and very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) through pulsar positions.
Methods. We identified 49 pulsars in Gaia Data Release 3 and 62 pulsars with VLBI positions from the PSRπ and MSPSRπ projects and searched for the published timing solutions of these pulsars. We then compared pulsar positions measured by timing, VLBI, and Gaia to estimate the orientation offsets of the ephemeris frames with respect to the Gaia and VLBI reference frames by iterative fitting.
Results. We found orientation offsets of ~10 mas in the DE200 frame with respect to the Gaia and VLBI frame. Our results strongly depend on the subset used in the comparison and they could be biased by underestimated errors in the archival timing data, reflecting the limitation of using the literature timing solutions to determine the frame rotation.
Key words: reference systems / astrometry / pulsars: general / techniques: interferometric / ephemerides
© The Authors 2023
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.