Issue |
A&A
Volume 644, December 2020
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A150 | |
Number of page(s) | 11 | |
Section | Astrophysical processes | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039182 | |
Published online | 14 December 2020 |
A comparison of methods for finding magnetic nulls in simulations and in situ observations of space plasmas
1
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Lindstedtsvagen 5, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden
2
Main Astronomical Observatory of NAS, Akademika Zabolotnoho 27, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine
3
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
e-mail: David.Pontin@newcastle.edu.au
4
University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, UK
5
Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, PR China
6
Institute of Space Sciences, Shandong University, Weihai, PR China
7
State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, PR China
8
Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 537, 751 21 Uppsala, Sweden
Received:
14
August
2020
Accepted:
29
October
2020
Context. Magnetic nulls are ubiquitous in space plasmas, and are of interest as sites of localised energy dissipation or magnetic reconnection. As such, a number of methods have been proposed for detecting nulls in both simulation data and in situ spacecraft data from Earth’s magnetosphere. The same methods can be applied to detect stagnation points in flow fields.
Aims. In this paper we describe a systematic comparison of different methods for finding magnetic nulls. The Poincaré index method, the first-order Taylor expansion (FOTE) method, and the trilinear method are considered.
Methods. We define a magnetic field containing fourteen magnetic nulls whose positions and types are known to arbitrary precision. Furthermore, we applied the selected techniques in order to find and classify those nulls. Two situations are considered: one in which the magnetic field is discretised on a rectangular grid, and the second in which the magnetic field is discretised along synthetic “spacecraft trajectories” within the domain.
Results. At present, FOTE and trilinear are the most reliable methods for finding nulls in the spacecraft data and in numerical simulations on Cartesian grids, respectively. The Poincaré index method is suitable for simulations on both tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes.
Conclusions. The proposed magnetic field configuration can be used for grading and benchmarking the new and existing tools for finding magnetic nulls and flow stagnation points.
Key words: methods: numerical / magnetic fields / plasmas / Sun: magnetic fields / planets and satellites: magnetic fields
© ESO 2020
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.