Issue |
A&A
Volume 614, June 2018
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | L3 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Letters to the Editor | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832934 | |
Published online | 21 June 2018 |
Letter to the Editor
Why an intrinsic magnetic field does not protect a planet against atmospheric escape
1
Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Avenue Circulaire 3, 1180 Brussels, Belgium
e-mail: herbert.gunell@physics.org
2
Department of Physics, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
3
Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 812, 981 28 Kiruna, Sweden
4
EISCAT Scientific Association, P. O. Box 812, 981 28 Kiruna, Sweden
Received:
2
March
2018
Accepted:
23
May
2018
The presence or absence of a magnetic field determines the nature of how a planet interacts with the solar wind and what paths are available for atmospheric escape. Magnetospheres form both around magnetised planets, such as Earth, and unmagnetised planets, like Mars and Venus, but it has been suggested that magnetised planets are better protected against atmospheric loss. However, the observed mass escape rates from these three planets are similar (in the approximate (0.5–2) kg s−1 range), putting this latter hypothesis into question. Modelling the effects of a planetary magnetic field on the major atmospheric escape processes, we show that the escape rate can be higher for magnetised planets over a wide range of magnetisations due to escape of ions through the polar caps and cusps. Therefore, contrary to what has previously been believed, magnetisation is not a sufficient condition for protecting a planet from atmospheric loss. Estimates of the atmospheric escape rates from exoplanets must therefore address all escape processes and their dependence on the planet’s magnetisation.
Key words: Planets and satellites: magnetic fields / Planets and satellites: atmospheres / plasmas
© ESO 2018
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.