Volume 609, January 2018
|Number of page(s)||19|
|Section||Planets and planetary systems|
|Published online||23 January 2018|
A complete study of the precision of the concentric MacLaurin spheroid method to calculate Jupiter’s gravitational moments
1 École normale supérieure de Lyon, CRAL, UMR CNRS 5574, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France
2 School of Physics, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QL, UK
Received: 31 July 2017
Accepted: 6 October 2017
A few years ago, Hubbard (2012, ApJ, 756, L15; 2013, ApJ, 768, 43) presented an elegant, non-perturbative method, called concentric MacLaurin spheroid (CMS), to calculate with very high accuracy the gravitational moments of a rotating fluid body following a barotropic pressure-density relationship. Having such an accurate method is of great importance for taking full advantage of the Juno mission, and its extremely precise determination of Jupiter gravitational moments, to better constrain the internal structure of the planet. Recently, several authors have applied this method to the Juno mission with 512 spheroids linearly spaced in altitude. We demonstrate in this paper that such calculations lead to errors larger than Juno’s error bars, invalidating the aforederived Jupiter models at the level required by Juno’s precision. We show that, in order to fulfill Juno’s observational constraints, at least 1500 spheroids must be used with a cubic, square or exponential repartition, the most reliable solutions. When using a realistic equation of state instead of a polytrope, we highlight the necessity to properly describe the outermost layers to derive an accurate boundary condition, excluding in particular a zero pressure outer condition. Providing all these constraints are fulfilled, the CMS method can indeed be used to derive Jupiter models within Juno’s present observational constraints. However, we show that the treatment of the outermost layers leads to irreducible errors in the calculation of the gravitational moments and thus on the inferred physical quantities for the planet. We have quantified these errors and evaluated the maximum precision that can be reached with the CMS method in the present and future exploitation of Juno’s data.
Key words: planets and satellites: gaseous planets / planets and satellites: interiors / equation of state / methods: numerical
© ESO, 2018
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.