Volume 561, January 2014
|Number of page(s)||19|
|Section||Numerical methods and codes|
|Published online||22 January 2014|
Resolving galaxies in time and space
II. Uncertainties in the spectral synthesis of datacubes
1 Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, PO Box 476, 88040-900 Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
2 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC), PO Box 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain
3 Centro Astronómico Hispano Alemán, Calar Alto, (CSIC-MPG), C/Jesús Durbán Remón 2-2, 04004 Almería, Spain
4 Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam, innoFSPEC Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
5 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, vía Lactea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
6 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, 38205 Tenerife, Spain
7 Departamento de Física Teórica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Received: 13 April 2013
Accepted: 28 June 2013
Aims. In a companion paper we have presented many products derived from the application of the spectral synthesis code starlight to datacubes from the CALIFA survey, including 2D maps of stellar population properties (such as mean ages, mass, and extinction) and 1D averages in the temporal and spatial dimensions. Our goal here is to assess the uncertainties in these products.
Methods. Uncertainties associated to noise and spectral shape calibration errors in the data and to the synthesis method were investigated by means of a suite of simulations, perturbing spectra and processing them through our analysis pipelines. The simulations used 1638 CALIFA spectra for NGC 2916, with perturbation amplitudes gauged in terms of the expected errors. A separate study was conducted to assess uncertainties related to the choice of evolutionary synthesis models, the key ingredient in the translation of spectroscopic information into stellar population properties. We compare the results obtained with three different sets of models: the traditional Bruzual & Charlot models, a preliminary update of them, and a combination of spectra derived from the Granada and MILES models. About 105 spectra from over 100 CALIFA galaxies were used in this comparison.
Results. Noise and shape-related errors at the level expected for CALIFA propagate to uncertainties of 0.10−0.15 dex in stellar masses, mean ages, and metallicities. Uncertainties in AV increase from 0.06 mag for random noise to 0.16 mag for spectral shape errors. Higher-order products such as star formation histories are more uncertain than global properties, but still relatively stable. Owing to the large number statistics of datacubes, spatial averaging reduces uncertainties while preserving information on the history and structure of stellar populations. Radial profiles of global properties, and star formation histories averaged over different regions are much more stable than those obtained for individual spaxels. Uncertainties related to the choice of base models are larger than those associated with data and method. Except for metallicities, which come out very different when fits are performed with the Bruzual & Charlot models, differences in mean age, mass, and metallicity are of the order of 0.15 to 0.25 dex, and 0.1 mag for AV. Spectral residuals are of the order of 1% on average, but with systematic features of up to 4% amplitude. We discuss the origin of these features, most of which are present in both in CALIFA and SDSS spectra.
Key words: techniques: imaging spectroscopy / galaxies: evolution / galaxies: stellar content
© ESO, 2014
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.