Issue |
A&A
Volume 545, September 2012
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A108 | |
Number of page(s) | 15 | |
Section | Astronomical instrumentation | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219087 | |
Published online | 14 September 2012 |
Redundancy calibration of phased-array stations
1
Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen,
Landleven 12,
9747 AV
Groningen,
The Netherlands
e-mail: noorishad@astro.rug.nl
2
ASTRON, Oude Hoogeveensedijk 4, 7991 PD
Dwingeloo, The
Netherlands
3
Chalmers University of Technology, 41296
Gothenburg,
Sweden
Received:
21
February
2012
Accepted:
1
May
2012
Aims. We assess the benefits and limitations of using the redundant visibility information in regular phased-array systems to improve the quality of the calibration.
Methods. Regular arrays offer the possibility of using redundant visibility information to constrain the calibration of the array independently of a sky model and a beam model of the station elements. This requires a regular arrangement of the configuration of array elements and identical beam patterns.
Results. We revised a previously developed calibration method for phased-array stations using the redundant visibility information in the system and applied it successfully to a LOFAR station. The performance and limitations of the method were demonstrated by comparing its application to real and simulated data. The main limitation is the mutual coupling between the station elements, which leads to non-identical beams and stronger baseline-dependent noise. Comparing the variance in the estimated complex gains with the Cramer-Rao Bound indicates that redundancy is a stable and optimum method for calibrating the complex gains of the system.
Conclusions. Our study shows that the use of the redundant visibility does improve the quality of the calibration in phased-array systems. In addition, it provides a powerful tool obtaining system diagnostics. Our results demonstrate that designing redundancy in both the station layout and the array configuration of future aperture arrays is strongly recommended. This is particularly true in the case of the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) with its dynamic range requirement that surpasses any existing array by an order of magnitude.
Key words: instrumentation: interferometers / telescopes / methods: observational
© ESO, 2012
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.