Volume 543, July 2012
|Number of page(s)||5|
|Published online||20 June 2012|
O-star mass-loss rates at low metallicity
Astrophysics Group, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Received: 18 April 2012
Accepted: 11 May 2012
Mass fluxes J are computed for the extragalactic O stars investigated by Tramper et al. (2011, ApJ, 741, 8 – TSKK). For one early-type O star, computed and observed rates agree within errors. However, for two late-type O stars, theoretical mass-loss rates underpredict observed rates by ~1.6 dex, far exceeding observational errors. A likely cause of the discrepancy is overestimated observed rates due to the neglect of wind-clumping. A less likely but intriguing possibility is that, in observing O stars with Z/Z⊙ ~ 1/7, TSKK have serendipitously discovered an additional mass-loss mechanism not evident in the spectra of Galactic O stars because of their powerful radiation-driven winds. Constraints on this unknown mechanism are discussed. In establishing that the discrepancies, if real, are inescapable for purely radiation-driven winds, failed searches for high-J solutions are reported and the importance stressed of a numerical technique that cannot spuriously create or destroy momentum. The Z-dependences of the computed rates for Z/Z⊙ ∈ (1/30,2) show significant departures from a single power law, and these are attributed to curve-of-growth effects in the differentially expanding reversing layers. The best-fitting power-law exponents range from 0.68−0.97.
Key words: stars: early-type / stars: mass-loss / stars: winds, outflows
© ESO, 2012
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.