Volume 480, Number 1, March II 2008
|Page(s)||61 - 68|
|Published online||09 January 2008|
Analysis of possible anomalies in the QSO distribution of the Flesch & Hardcastle catalogue
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/.Vía Láctea, s/n, 38200 La Laguna (S/C de Tenerife), Spain e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
2 Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCAA), Post Bag No. 4, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411 007, India
3 Observatorio Astronómico, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Laprida 854, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina
4 SECyT, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina
5 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina
6 Complejo Astronómico El Leoncito, Argentina
Accepted: 28 November 2007
Aims.A recent catalogue by Flesch & Hardcastle presents two major anomalies in the spatial distribution of QSO candidates: an apparent excess of such objects near bright galaxies, and an excess of very bright QSO candidates compared to random background expectations in several regions of the sky. Because anyone of these anomalies would be relevant in a cosmological context, we carried out an extensive analysis of the probabilities quoted in that catalogue.
Methods.We determine the nature and redshift of a subsample of 30 sources in that catalogue by analysing their optical spectra (another 11 candidates were identified from existing public databases). These have allowed us to statistically check the reliability of the probabilities QSO status quoted by Flesch & Hardcastle for their candidates.
Results.Only 12 of the 41 candidates turned out QSOs (7 of which have been identified here for the first time).
Conclusions.The probabilities of the QSOs' being the candidates given by Flesch & Hardcastle are overestimated for mB ≤ 17 and for objects projected near (≤1 arcmin) bright galaxies. This is the cause of the anomalies mentioned above.
Key words: quasars: general / galaxies: statistics / distance scale / catalogs
© ESO, 2008
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.