Issue |
A&A
Volume 474, Number 3, November II 2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 717 - 729 | |
Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077998 | |
Published online | 23 October 2007 |
(An)isotropy of the Hubble diagram: comparing hemispheres
Fakultät für Physik, Postfach 100131, Universität Bielefeld, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany e-mail: [dschwarz;bwein]@physik.uni-bielefeld.de
Received:
1
June
2007
Accepted:
28
August
2007
Aims.We test the isotropy of the Hubble diagram. At small redshifts, this is possible without assumptions on the cosmic inventory and provides a fundamental test of the cosmological principle. At higher redshift we check for the self-consistency of the ΛCDM model.
Methods.At small redshifts, we use public supernovae (SNe) Ia data to determine the
deceleration parameter q0 and the SN calibration on opposite
hemispheres. For the complete data sets we fit and the
SN calibration on opposite hemispheres.
Results.A statistically significant anisotropy of the Hubble diagram at redshifts
is discovered (>95%C.L.). While data from the North Galactic
hemisphere favour the accelerated expansion of the Universe, data from the
South Galactic hemisphere are not conclusive. The hemispheric asymmetry is
maximal toward a
direction close to the equatorial poles. The discrepancy between the
equatorial North and South hemispheres shows up in the SN calibration. For the
ΛCDM model fitted to all available SNe, we find the same asymmetry.
Conclusions.The alignment of discrepancies between hemispheric Hubble diagrams with the equatorial frame seems to point toward a systematic error in the SN search, observation, analysis or data reduction. We also find that our model independent test cannot exclude the case of the deceleration of the expansion at a statistically significant level.
Key words: cosmology: observations / large-scale structure of Universe / supernovae: general
© ESO, 2007
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.