Issue |
A&A
Volume 429, Number 2, January II 2005
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 739 - 745 | |
Section | Celestial mechanics and astrometry | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041477 | |
Published online | 17 December 2004 |
Investigation on the southern part of the high density astrometric catalogs USNO B1.0, 2MASS and UCAC2 *
1
Observatório do Valongo/UFRJ, Ladeira Pedro Antônio 43, Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil e-mail: dario@ov.ufrj.br
2
GEA - Observatório do Valongo/UFRJ, Brazil and Observatorio Nacional/MCT, Brazil
Received:
16
June
2004
Accepted:
2
September
2004
To access the astrometric capability of dense catalogues at southern declinations, the results from a sample of 76 ICRF sources of the observational program conducted
at the 1.60m telescope of the Laboratório Nacional de Astrofísica –
LNA, Brazil, are examined.
The observations were taken on mean epoch 1999.76, at Johnston V filter,
in fields of size 5´, with scale of 03/pixel. The
astrometric reduction is made relatively to the catalogs USNO B1.0
and 2MASS. The comparison between the ICRF position and the
catalogue referred measured optical counterpart position reveals both
catalogs aligned to the ICRF, but for an equatorial
offset of the B1.0 at 90.4 mas, to a significance level of 3.4 times the standard error.
The direct comparison between catalogue and ICRF positions gives
alike results. For the B1.0 there are also clumped variations on average
ranging 96 mas, but reaching up to the level of 300 mas.
Local corrections on the B1.0 positions were
applied using the UCAC2 catalog. These were effective to remove
the equatorial offset and the zonal variations, manifesting the internal
consistency of the B1.0 positions. This supports the astrometric
adherence of the UCAC2 catalog to the ICRS, as also shown by the
2MASS and referred results, since the systematic difference between 2MASS
and UCAC2 is lowest.
Key words: reference systems / astrometry
© ESO, 2005
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.