Open Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245158]


Issue
A&A
Volume 688, August 2024
Article Number C3
Number of page(s) 3
Section Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450702e
Published online 15 August 2024

This erratum provides a correction to the original paper (Dvornik et al. 2023) by updating Fig. 4 with the correct data. In Fig. 4 of the original paper, the data that were presented contained a factor of 1/h3 in the amplitude of both data and the model. In our analysis we used the correct data and the covariance matrix and the error was only introduced during the creation of the figures, thus influencing only our plotting scripts and the final figure. The mistake neither affected the results of the paper nor the conclusions from which they were drawn. In Fig. 1 we show the old wrong figure; Fig. 2 shows the correct data and model plots replacing the original figure. In Fig. 3 we show the correct data compared to the measurements from the GAMA survey (Driver et al. 2022) and predictions from the IllustrisTNG simulation (Nelson et al. 2018). The differences between our data and predictions from IllustrisTNG will be explained in the upcoming paper by Mahony et al. (in prep.).

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Old Fig. 4 as presented in the original paper.

thumbnail Fig. 2.

New Fig. 4, showing the correct data and best-fit model.

thumbnail Fig. 3.

Comparison of the KiDS Bright clustering data to the clustering data from the GAMA survey employing a similar selection of lens galaxies (in red) and hydrodynamical simulations (IllustrisTNG in orange).

Acknowledgments

We thank Christos Georgiou for providing measurements from the GAMA survey to cross-check the data. Author contributions: Majority of work for this corrigendum was done by CM. The authorship list reflects the lead authors (AD, CH, MA, CM, BJ) followed by an alphabetical group that includes those who are key contributors to the scientific analysis.

References

  1. Driver, S. P., Bellstedt, S., Robotham, A. S. G., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 439 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dvornik, A., Heymans, C., Asgari, M., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A189 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nelson, D., Springel, V., Pillepich, A., et al. 2018, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1812.05609] [Google Scholar]

© The Authors 2024

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Old Fig. 4 as presented in the original paper.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

New Fig. 4, showing the correct data and best-fit model.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3.

Comparison of the KiDS Bright clustering data to the clustering data from the GAMA survey employing a similar selection of lens galaxies (in red) and hydrodynamical simulations (IllustrisTNG in orange).

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.