EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues A&A, 370 3 (2001) 743-753 Article references

Articles citing this article

The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).

Cited article:

Euclid: Early Release Observations

A. Ellien, M. Montes, S. L. Ahad, P. Dimauro, J. B. Golden-Marx, Y. Jimenez-Teja, F. Durret, C. Bellhouse, J. M. Diego, S. P. Bamford, A. H. Gonzalez, N. A. Hatch, M. Kluge, R. Ragusa, E. Slezak, J. -C. Cuillandre, R. Gavazzi, H. Dole, G. Mahler, G. Congedo, T. Saifollahi, N. Aghanim, B. Altieri, A. Amara, S. Andreon, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 698 A134 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554460

A Redshift Survey of the Coma Cluster (A1656): Understanding the Nature of Subhalos in the Weak-lensing Map

Wooseok Kang, Ho Seong Hwang, Nobuhiro Okabe and Changbom Park
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 278 (2) 51 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/adcac8

The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey

V. Ghirardini, E. Bulbul, E. Artis, N. Clerc, C. Garrel, S. Grandis, M. Kluge, A. Liu, Y. E. Bahar, F. Balzer, I. Chiu, J. Comparat, D. Gruen, F. Kleinebreil, S. Krippendorf, A. Merloni, K. Nandra, N. Okabe, F. Pacaud, P. Predehl, M. E. Ramos-Ceja, T. H. Reiprich, J. S. Sanders, T. Schrabback, R. Seppi, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 689 A298 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348852

Euclid preparation

C. Giocoli, M. Meneghetti, E. Rasia, S. Borgani, G. Despali, G. F. Lesci, F. Marulli, L. Moscardini, M. Sereno, W. Cui, A. Knebe, G. Yepes, T. Castro, P.-S. Corasaniti, S. Pires, G. Castignani, T. Schrabback, G. W. Pratt, A. M. C. Le Brun, N. Aghanim, L. Amendola, N. Auricchio, M. Baldi, C. Bodendorf, D. Bonino, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 681 A67 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346058

ACT-DR5 Sunyaev-Zel’dovich clusters: Weak lensing mass calibration with KiDS

Naomi Clare Robertson, Cristóbal Sifón, Marika Asgari, Nicholas Battaglia, Maciej Bilicki, John Richard Bond, Mark J. Devlin, Jo Dunkley, Benjamin Giblin, Catherine Heymans, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Matt Hilton, Henk Hoekstra, John P. Hughes, Konrad Kuijken, Thibaut Louis, Maya Mallaby-Kay, Lyman Page, Bruce Partridge, Mario Radovich, Peter Schneider, HuanYuan Shan, David N. Spergel, Tilman Tröster, Edward J. Wollack, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 681 A87 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346712

Hubble Space Telescope and Hyper-Suprime-Cam Weak-lensing Study of the Equal-mass Dissociative Merger CIZA J0107.7+5408

Kyle Finner, Scott W. Randall, M. James Jee, Elizabeth L. Blanton, Hyejeon Cho, Tracy E. Clarke, Simona Giacintucci, Paul Nulsen and Reinout van Weeren
The Astrophysical Journal 942 (1) 23 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac9fd3

Galaxy cluster aperture masses are more robust to baryonic effects than 3D halo masses

Stijn N B Debackere, Henk Hoekstra and Joop Schaye
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 515 (4) 6023 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2077

Spatial Distribution of Dark Matter in and Around Galaxy Clusters Traced by Galaxies, Gas, and Intracluster Stars in a Simulated Universe

Jihye Shin, Jong Chul Lee, Ho Seong Hwang, Hyunmi Song, Jongwan Ko, Rory Smith, Jae-Woo Kim and Jaewon Yoo
The Astrophysical Journal 934 (1) 43 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac7961

Why are we still using 3D masses for cluster cosmology?

Stijn N B Debackere, Henk Hoekstra, Joop Schaye, Katrin Heitmann and Salman Habib
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 515 (3) 3383 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1687

AMICO galaxy clusters in KiDS-DR3: measurement of the halo bias and power spectrum normalization from a stacked weak lensing analysis

Lorenzo Ingoglia, Giovanni Covone, Mauro Sereno, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 511 (1) 1484 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac046

Chandra follow-up of the Hectospec Cluster Survey: Comparison of caustic and hydrostatic masses and constraints on the hydrostatic bias

Crispin H. A. Logan, Ben J. Maughan, Antonaldo Diaferio, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 665 A124 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243347

CODEX weak lensing mass catalogue and implications on the mass–richness relation

K Kiiveri, D Gruen, A Finoguenov, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 502 (1) 1494 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3936

Weak lensing mass modeling bias and the impact of miscentring

Martin W Sommer, Tim Schrabback, Douglas E Applegate, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 509 (1) 1127 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3052

CCCP and MENeaCS: (updated) weak-lensing masses for 100 galaxy clusters

Ricardo Herbonnet, Cristóbal Sifón, Henk Hoekstra, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 497 (4) 4684 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2303

Covariance matrices for galaxy cluster weak lensing: from virial regime to uncorrelated large-scale structure

Hao-Yi Wu, David H Weinberg, Andrés N Salcedo, Benjamin D Wibking and Ying Zu
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (2) 2606 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2617

Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect and X-ray scaling relations from weak lensing mass calibration of 32 South Pole Telescope selected galaxy clusters

J P Dietrich, S Bocquet, T Schrabback, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 483 (3) 2871 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3088

A measurement of CMB cluster lensing with SPT and DES year 1 data

E J Baxter, S Raghunathan, T M Crawford, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 476 (2) 2674 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty305

KiDS-450: cosmological constraints from weak lensing peak statistics – I. Inference from analytical prediction of high signal-to-noise ratio convergence peaks

HuanYuan Shan, Xiangkun Liu, Hendrik Hildebrandt, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 474 (1) 1116 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2837

Cluster mass calibration at high redshift: HST weak lensing analysis of 13 distant galaxy clusters from the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev–Zel'dovich Survey

T Schrabback, D Applegate, J P Dietrich, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 474 (2) 2635 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2666

The galaxy–subhalo connection in low-redshift galaxy clusters from weak gravitational lensing

Cristóbal Sifón, Ricardo Herbonnet, Henk Hoekstra, Remco F J van der Burg and Massimo Viola
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 478 (1) 1244 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1161

THE VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION OF GALAXY CLUSTERS AS A COSMOLOGICAL PROBE

M. Ntampaka, H. Trac, J. Cisewski and L. C. Price
The Astrophysical Journal 835 (1) 106 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/106

Weak-lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data

P. Melchior, D. Gruen, T. McClintock, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 469 (4) 4899 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1053

Weak-lensing-inferred scaling relations of galaxy clusters in the RCS2: mass-richness, mass-concentration, mass-bias, and more

Edo van Uitert, David G. Gilbank, Henk Hoekstra, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 586 A43 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526719

Statistical uncertainties and systematic errors in weak lensing mass estimates of galaxy clusters

F. Köhlinger, H. Hoekstra and M. Eriksen
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453 (3) 3108 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1852

CFHTLenS: weak lensing calibrated scaling relations for low-mass clusters of galaxies

K. Kettula, S. Giodini, E. van Uitert, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 451 (2) 1460 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv923

Cosmic variance of the galaxy cluster weak lensing signal

D. Gruen, S. Seitz, M. R. Becker, O. Friedrich and A. Mana
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (4) 4264 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv532

The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: detailed study of systematics and updated weak lensing masses★

Henk Hoekstra, Ricardo Herbonnet, Adam Muzzin, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (1) 685 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv275

The X-ray properties of weak-lensing-selected galaxy clusters

P. A. Giles, B. J. Maughan, T. Hamana, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 447 (4) 3044 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2679

LINE-OF-SIGHT STRUCTURE TOWARD STRONG LENSING GALAXY CLUSTERS

Matthew B. Bayliss, Traci Johnson, Michael D. Gladders, Keren Sharon and Masamune Oguri
The Astrophysical Journal 783 (1) 41 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/41

CLASH-X: A COMPARISON OF LENSING AND X-RAY TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING THE MASS PROFILES OF GALAXY CLUSTERS

Megan Donahue, G. Mark Voit, Andisheh Mahdavi, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 794 (2) 136 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/136

COMPARING DENSE GALAXY CLUSTER REDSHIFT SURVEYS WITH WEAK-LENSING MAPS

Ho Seong Hwang, Margaret J. Geller, Antonaldo Diaferio, Kenneth J. Rines and H. Jabran Zahid
The Astrophysical Journal 797 (2) 106 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/106

HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE/ADVANCED CAMERA FOR SURVEYS CONFIRMATION OF THE DARK SUBSTRUCTURE IN A520

M. J. Jee, H. Hoekstra, A. Mahdavi and A. Babul
The Astrophysical Journal 783 (2) 78 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/78

Weak lensing analysis of SZ-selected clusters of galaxies from the SPT and Planck surveys

D. Gruen, S. Seitz, F. Brimioulle, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 442 (2) 1507 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu949

Weighing the Giants – I. Weak-lensing masses for 51 massive galaxy clusters: project overview, data analysis methods and cluster images

Anja von der Linden, Mark T. Allen, Douglas E. Applegate, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 439 (1) 2 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1945

CFHTLenS: mapping the large-scale structure with gravitational lensing

L. Van Waerbeke, J. Benjamin, T. Erben, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 433 (4) 3373 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt971

Weak lensing peak count as a probe of f(R) theories

V. F. Cardone, S. Camera, R. Mainini, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 430 (4) 2896 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt084

MEASURING THE MASS DISTRIBUTION IN GALAXY CLUSTERS

Margaret J. Geller, Antonaldo Diaferio, Kenneth J. Rines and Ana Laura Serra
The Astrophysical Journal 764 (1) 58 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/58

Dark matter astrometry: accuracy of subhalo positions for the measurement of self-interaction cross-sections

David Harvey, Richard Massey, Thomas Kitching, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 433 (2) 1517 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt819

WEAK LENSING CALIBRATEDM-TSCALING RELATION OF GALAXY GROUPS IN THE COSMOS FIELD

K. Kettula, A. Finoguenov, R. Massey, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 778 (1) 74 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/74

TESTING WEAK-LENSING MAPS WITH REDSHIFT SURVEYS: A SUBARU FIELD

Michael J. Kurtz, Margaret J. Geller, Yousuke Utsumi, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 750 (2) 168 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/168

The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: weak lensing masses and SZ scaling relations

Henk Hoekstra, Andisheh Mahdavi, Arif Babul and Chris Bildfell
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 427 (2) 1298 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22072.x

Weak-lensing mass estimates of galaxy groups and the line-of-sight contamination

P. F. Spinelli, S. Seitz, M. Lerchster, F. Brimioulle and A. Finoguenov
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 420 (2) 1384 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20126.x

LoCuSS: THE SUNYAEV–ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT AND WEAK-LENSING MASS SCALING RELATION

Daniel P. Marrone, Graham P. Smith, Nobuhiro Okabe, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 754 (2) 119 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/119

Optimized detection of shear peaks in weak lensing maps

Laura Marian, Robert E. Smith, Stefan Hilbert and Peter Schneider
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 423 (2) 1711 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20992.x

Effects of distant large-scale structure on the precision of weak lensing mass measurements

Henk Hoekstra, Jan Hartlap, Stefan Hilbert and Edo van Uitert
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 412 (3) 2095 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18053.x

Optimizing weak lensing mass estimates for cluster profile uncertainty

D. Gruen, G. M. Bernstein, T. Y. Lam and S. Seitz
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 416 (2) 1392 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19135.x

SCALING RELATIONS AND OVERABUNDANCE OF MASSIVE CLUSTERS ATz≳ 1 FROM WEAK-LENSING STUDIES WITH THEHUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE

M. J. Jee, K. S. Dawson, H. Hoekstra, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 737 (2) 59 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/59

LoCuSS: A COMPARISON OF CLUSTER MASS MEASUREMENTS FROMXMM-NEWTONAND SUBARU—TESTING DEVIATION FROM HYDROSTATIC EQUILIBRIUM AND NON-THERMAL PRESSURE SUPPORT

Yu-Ying Zhang, Nobuhiro Okabe, Alexis Finoguenov, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 711 (2) 1033 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/711/2/1033

Large-scale structure and dynamics of the most X-ray luminous galaxy cluster known - RX J1347−1145

Ting Lu, David G. Gilbank, Michael L. Balogh, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 403 (4) 1787 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16245.x

LoCuSS: Subaru Weak Lensing Study of 30 Galaxy Clusters

Nobuhiro Okabe, Masahiro Takada, Keiichi Umetsu, Toshifumi Futamase and Graham P. Smith
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 62 (3) 811 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/62.3.811

Evidence for non-hydrostatic gas from the cluster X-ray to lensing mass ratio

A. Mahdavi, H. Hoekstra, A. Babul and J. P. Henry
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 384 (4) 1567 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12796.x

Cross‐Correlation Lensing: Determining Galaxy and Cluster Mass Profiles from Statistical Weak‐Lensing Measurements

David E. Johnston, Erin S. Sheldon, Argyro Tasitsiomi, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 656 (1) 27 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/510060

Calibration of the Mass‐Temperature Relation for Clusters of Galaxies Using Weak Gravitational Lensing

Kristian Pedersen and Hakon Dahle
The Astrophysical Journal 667 (1) 26 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/520945

The Mass of the Coma Cluster from Weak Lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Jeffrey M. Kubo, Albert Stebbins, James Annis, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 671 (2) 1466 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/523101

Multiwavelength Mass Comparisons of the \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage[OT2,OT1]{fontenc} \newcommand\cyr{ \renewcommand\rmdefault{wncyr} \renewcommand\sfdefault{wncyss} \renewcommand\encodingdefault{OT2} \normalfont \selectfont} \DeclareTextFontCommand{\textcyr}{\cyr} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} \landscape $z\sim 0.3$ \end{document} CNOC Cluster Sample

A. K. Hicks, E. Ellingson, H. Hoekstra and H. K. C. Yee
The Astrophysical Journal 652 (1) 232 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/508138

Stacking Weak‐Lensing Signals of Sunyaev‐Zel'dovich Clusters to Constrain Cluster Physics

Carolyn Sealfon, Licia Verde and Raul Jimenez
The Astrophysical Journal 649 (1) 118 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/505928

Hubble Space TelescopeAdvanced Camera for Surveys Weak‐Lensing andChandraX‐Ray Studies of the High‐Redshift Cluster MS 1054−0321

M. J. Jee, R. L. White, H. C. Ford, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 634 (2) 813 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/497001

Shear‐selected Cluster Cosmology: Tomography and Optimal Filtering

Joseph F. Hennawi and David N. Spergel
The Astrophysical Journal 624 (1) 59 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/428749

Effects of the Complex Mass Distribution of Dark Matter Halos on Weak‐Lensing Cluster Surveys

J. Y. Tang and Z. H. Fan
The Astrophysical Journal 635 (1) 60 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/497285

Cosmological constraints from the local X-ray luminosity function of the most X-ray-luminous galaxy clusters

S. W. Allen, R. W. Schmidt, A. C. Fabian and H. Ebeling
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 342 (1) 287 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06550.x

Weak Gravitational Lensing by a Sample of X‐Ray–luminous Clusters of Galaxies. III. Serendipitous Weak Lensing Detections of Dark and Luminous Mass Concentrations

Hakon Dahle, Kristian Pedersen, Per B. Lilje, Steve J. Maddox and Nick Kaiser
The Astrophysical Journal 591 (2) 662 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1086/375485

ChandraObservations of the Lensing Cluster EMSS 1358+6245: Implications for Self‐interacting Dark Matter

J. S. Arabadjis, M. W. Bautz and G. P. Garmire
The Astrophysical Journal 572 (1) 66 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1086/340296

Constraints on Ωmand σ8from Weak Lensing in Red‐Sequence Cluster Survey Fields

Henk Hoekstra, Howard K. C. Yee and Michael D. Gladders
The Astrophysical Journal 577 (2) 595 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1086/342120