The HELLAS2XMM survey - IV. Optical identifications and the evolution of the accretion luminosity in the Universe
A&A, 409 1 (2003) 79-90
Published online: 2003-11-17
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Extragalactic X‐ray surveys: AGN physics and evolution
A. Comastri and M. BrusaAstronomische Nachrichten 329 (2) 122 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.200710894
Relativistic Astrophysics Legacy and Cosmology – Einstein’s
M. Brusa, V. Mainieri and G. HasingerESO Astrophysics Symposia, Relativistic Astrophysics Legacy and Cosmology – Einstein’s 197 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74713-0_44
Unveiling Obscured Accretion in the Chandra Deep Field–South
F. Fiore, A. Grazian, P. Santini, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 672 (1) 94 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1086/523348
Absorption properties and evolution of active galactic nuclei
G. HasingerAstronomy & Astrophysics 490 (3) 905 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200809839
The XMM-Newton bright serendipitous survey
A. Caccianiga, P. Severgnini, R. Della Ceca, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 477 (3) 735 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078568
EROs found behind lensing clusters
A. Hempel, D. Schaerer, E. Egami, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 477 (1) 55 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077591
The cosmological properties of AGN in theXMM-NewtonHard Bright Survey
R. Della Ceca, A. Caccianiga, P. Severgnini, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 487 (1) 119 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20079319
Low‐Level Nuclear Activity in Nearby Spiral Galaxies
Himel Ghosh, Smita Mathur, Fabrizio Fiore and Laura FerrareseThe Astrophysical Journal 687 (1) 216 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1086/591508
The Luminosity Function of X‐Ray–selected Active Galactic Nuclei: Evolution of Supermassive Black Holes at High Redshift
J. D. Silverman, P. J. Green, W. A. Barkhouse, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 679 (1) 118 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1086/529572
The XMM large scale structure survey: optical vs. X-ray classifications of active galactic nuclei and the unified scheme
O. Garcet, P. Gandhi, E. Gosset, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 474 (2) 473 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077778
The XMM-SSC survey of hard-spectrum XMM–Newton sources – I. Optically bright sources
M. J. Page, I. Lehmann, Th. Boller, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 378 (4) 1335 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11857.x
AGN counts at 15$\mu{\rm m}$
F. La Franca, S. Puccetti, N. Sacchi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 472 (3) 797 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077394
The XMM‐Newton Wide‐Field Survey in the COSMOS Field. I. Survey Description
G. Hasinger, N. Cappelluti, H. Brunner, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 172 (1) 29 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/516576
The synthesis of the cosmic X-ray background in the Chandra and XMM-Newton era
R. Gilli, A. Comastri and G. HasingerAstronomy & Astrophysics 463 (1) 79 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20066334
The XMM ‐ Newton Wide‐Field Survey in the COSMOS Field. III. Optical Identification and Multiwavelength Properties of a Large Sample of X‐Ray–Selected Sources
M. Brusa, G. Zamorani, A. Comastri, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 172 (1) 353 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/516575
The XMM‐Newton Wide‐Field Survey in the COSMOS Field. IV. X‐Ray Spectral Properties of Active Galactic Nuclei
V. Mainieri, G. Hasinger, N. Cappelluti, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 172 (1) 368 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/516573
Science Perspectives for 3D Spectroscopy
M. Mignoli, F. Civano, A. Comastri and C. VignaliEso Astrophysics Symposia, Science Perspectives for 3D Spectroscopy 281 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73491-8_46
An X-ray survey in SA 57 with XMM-Newton
D. Trevese, F. Vagnetti, S. Puccetti, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 469 (3) 1211 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077359
The HELLAS2XMM survey
F. Cocchia, F. Fiore, C. Vignali, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 466 (1) 31 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065170
The XMM‐Newton Wide‐Field Survey in the COSMOS Field. II. X‐Ray Data and the log N ‐log S Relations
N. Cappelluti, G. Hasinger, M. Brusa, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 172 (1) 341 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/516586
The HELLAS2XMM survey
F. Pozzi, C. Vignali, A. Comastri, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 468 (2) 603 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077092
An Observational Determination of the Bolometric Quasar Luminosity Function
Philip F. Hopkins, Gordon T. Richards and Lars HernquistThe Astrophysical Journal 654 (2) 731 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/509629
Elusive AGN in theXMM-Newtonbright serendipitous survey
A. Caccianiga, P. Severgnini, R. Della Ceca, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 470 (2) 557 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077732
The XMM-Newton serendipitous survey
X. Barcons, F. J. Carrera, M. T. Ceballos, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 476 (3) 1191 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077606
X‐Ray Luminosity Functions of Normal Galaxies in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey
Andrew Ptak, Bahram Mobasher, Ann Hornschemeier, Franz Bauer and Colin NormanThe Astrophysical Journal 667 (2) 826 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/520824
The VVDS type-1 AGN sample: the faint end of the luminosity function
A. Bongiorno, G. Zamorani, I. Gavignaud, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 472 (2) 443 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077611
Most Hard‐X‐Ray–Selected Quasars in the Chandra Deep Fields are Obscured
J. X. Wang, P. Jiang, Z. Y. Zheng, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 657 (1) 95 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/510766
The HELLAS2XMM survey
F. Civano, M. Mignoli, A. Comastri, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 476 (3) 1223 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077945
Magellan Spectroscopy of AGN Candidates in the COSMOS Field
Jonathan R. Trump, Chris D. Impey, Patrick J. McCarthy, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 172 (1) 383 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1086/516578
Obscured and unobscured AGN populations in a hard-X-ray selected sample of the XMDS survey
M. Tajer, M. Polletta, L. Chiappetti, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 467 (1) 73 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20066667
Chandra and Spitzer observations of CDFS X-ray obscured QSOs
I. Georgantopoulos, A. Georgakakis and A. AkylasAstronomy & Astrophysics 466 (3) 823 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065096
The quest for Type 2 quasars: Chandra observations of luminous obscured quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
C. Vignali, D. M. Alexander and A. ComastriMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 373 (1) 321 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11033.x
High-Energy Astrophysics and the Virtual Observatory
Paolo PadovaniChinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics 6 (S1) 73 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1009-9271/6/S1/07
The correlation of narrow line emission and X-ray luminosity in active galactic nuclei
H. Netzer, V. Mainieri, P. Rosati and B. TrakhtenbrotAstronomy & Astrophysics 453 (2) 525 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054203
XMM-Newton and Chandra measurements of the AGN intrinsic absorption: dependence on luminosity and redshift
A. Akylas, I. Georgantopoulos, A. Georgakakis, S. Kitsionas and E. HatziminaoglouAstronomy & Astrophysics 459 (3) 693 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054632
A possible bias on the estimate of Lbol/Ledd in AGN as a function of luminosity and redshift
A. Lamastra, G. Matt and G. C. PerolaAstronomy & Astrophysics 460 (2) 487 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065905
An X-ray bright ERO hosting a type 2 QSO
P. Severgnini, A. Caccianiga, V. Braito, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 451 (3) 859 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053980
Fueling Low‐Level AGN Activity through Stochastic Accretion of Cold Gas
Philip F. Hopkins and Lars HernquistThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 166 (1) 1 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/505753
On the Fraction of X-Ray-obscured Quasars in the Local Universe
J. X. Wang and P. JiangThe Astrophysical Journal 646 (2) L103 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/507100
A deep Chandra survey of the Groth Strip - II. Optical identification of the X-ray sources
A. Georgakakis, K. Nandra, E. S. Laird, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 371 (1) 221 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10634.x
The HELLAS2XMM survey
R. Maiolino, M. Mignoli, L. Pozzetti, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 445 (2) 457 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053486
Constraints on the accretion history of massive black holes from faint X-ray counts
M. Volonteri, R. Salvaterra and F. HaardtMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 373 (1) 121 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10976.x
Physics of Active Galactic Nuclei at all Scales
W.N. Brandt, D.M. Alexander, F.E. Bauer and C. VignaliLecture Notes in Physics, Physics of Active Galactic Nuclei at all Scales 693 185 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34621-X_7
Can the unresolved X-ray background be explained by the emission from the optically-detected faint galaxies of the GOODS project?
M. A. Worsley, A. C. Fabian, F. E. Bauer, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 368 (4) 1735 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10240.x
The Evolution of Obscuration in Active Galactic Nuclei
Ezequiel Treister and C. Megan UrryThe Astrophysical Journal 652 (2) L79 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/510237
Red active galactic nuclei in XMM-Newton/Sloan Digital Sky Survey fields
A. E. Georgakakis, I. Georgantopoulos and A. AkylasMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 366 (1) 171 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09835.x
The XMM-Newton survey of the ELAIS-S1 field
S. Puccetti, F. Fiore, V. D'Elia, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 457 (2) 501 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20064904
The Evolution in the Faint‐End Slope of the Quasar Luminosity Function
Philip F. Hopkins, Lars Hernquist, Thomas J. Cox, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 639 (2) 700 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/499351
ChandraandSpitzerUnveil Heavily Obscured Quasars in theChandra/SWIRE Survey
Maria del Carmen Polletta, Belinda J. Wilkes, Brian Siana, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 642 (2) 673 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/500821
TheChandraXBootes Survey. III. Optical and Near‐Infrared Counterparts
Kate Brand, Michael J. I. Brown, Arjun Dey, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 641 (1) 140 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/500312
On the exotic hard X-ray source populations in the Hellas2XMM survey
C. Vignali and M. MignoliAdvances in Space Research 38 (7) 1417 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.043
The Serendipitous Extragalactic X‐Ray Source Identification (SEXSI) Program. III. Optical Spectroscopy
Megan E. Eckart, Daniel Stern, David J. Helfand, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 165 (1) 19 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/504524
ChandraMultiwavelength Project: Normal Galaxies at Intermediate Redshift
D.‐W. Kim, W. A. Barkhouse, E. Romero‐Colmenero, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 644 (2) 829 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/503828
Active galactic nuclei in the mid-IR
I. Matute, F. La Franca, F. Pozzi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 451 (2) 443 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053710
The Many Scales in the Universe
Mark G. Allen, Paolo Padovani, Piero Rosati and Nicholas A. WaltonThe Many Scales in the Universe 253 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4526-3_21
A Unified, Merger‐driven Model of the Origin of Starbursts, Quasars, the Cosmic X‐Ray Background, Supermassive Black Holes, and Galaxy Spheroids
Philip F. Hopkins, Lars Hernquist, Thomas J. Cox, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 163 (1) 1 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/499298
The HELLAS2XMM Survey. VII. The Hard X‐Ray Luminosity Function of AGNs up toz= 4: More Absorbed AGNs at Low Luminosities and High Redshifts
F. La Franca, F. Fiore, A. Comastri, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 635 (2) 864 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/497586
Why Optically Faint AGNs Are Optically Faint: TheSpitzerPerspective
J. R. Rigby, G. H. Rieke, P. G. Perez‐Gonzalez, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 627 (1) 134 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/430398
XMM-Newton spectroscopy of an X-ray selected sample of RL AGNs
E. Galbiati, A. Caccianiga, T. Maccacaro, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 430 (3) 927 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041716
The Number Density of Intermediate‐ and High‐Luminosity Active Galactic Nuclei atz∼ 2–3
A. J. Barger and L. L. CowieThe Astrophysical Journal 635 (1) 115 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/497330
X-ray bright optically inactive galaxies inXMM-Newton/Sloan Digital Sky Survey fields: more diluted than absorbed?
I. Georgantopoulos and A. GeorgakakisMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 358 (1) 131 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08754.x
Unobscured QSO 2: a new class of objects?
A. Wolter, I. M. Gioia, J. P. Henry and C. R. MullisAstronomy & Astrophysics 444 (1) 165 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053441
The unresolved hard X-ray background: the missing source population implied by the Chandra and XMM--Newton deep fields
M. A. Worsley, A. C. Fabian, F. E. Bauer, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 357 (4) 1281 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08731.x
X-ray spectral analysis of optically faint sources in theChandradeep fields
Francesca Civano, Andrea Comastri and Marcella BrusaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 358 (2) 693 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08821.x
Hard X‐Ray–emitting Active Galactic Nuclei Selected by theChandraMultiwavelength Project
J. D. Silverman, P. J. Green, W. A. Barkhouse, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 618 (1) 123 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/425895
Luminosity-dependent evolution of soft X-ray selected AGN
G. Hasinger, T. Miyaji and M. SchmidtAstronomy & Astrophysics 441 (2) 417 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20042134
The Serendipitous Extragalactic X‐Ray Source Identification (SEXSI) Program. II. Optical Imaging
Megan E. Eckart, Elise S. Laird, Daniel Stern, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 156 (1) 35 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/425869
TheChandradeep field South/GOODS survey
V. Mainieri, P. Rosati, P. Tozzi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 437 (3) 805 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041212
The impact of energy feedback on quasar evolution and black hole demographics
V. Vittorini, F. Shankar and A. CavaliereMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 363 (4) 1376 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09529.x
A simple model for the evolution of supermassive black holes and the quasar population
Asim Mahmood, Julien E. G. Devriendt and Joseph SilkMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 359 (4) 1363 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08976.x
XMM‐NewtonObservations of Red AGNs
B. J. Wilkes, K. A. Pounds, G. D. Schmidt, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 634 (1) 183 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/444555
XMM-Newtonobservations of Extremely Red Objects and the link with luminous, X-ray obscured quasars
M. Brusa, A. Comastri, E. Daddi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 432 (1) 69 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041468
ChandraObservations of 12 Luminous Red Quasars
Tanya Urrutia, Mark Lacy, Michael D. Gregg and Robert H. BeckerThe Astrophysical Journal 627 (1) 75 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/430165
The X‐Ray Spectral Properties of SCUBA Galaxies
D. M. Alexander, F. E. Bauer, S. C. Chapman, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 632 (2) 736 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/444342
Looking for obscured QSOs in the X-ray emitting ERO population
P. Severgnini, R. Della Ceca, V. Braito, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 431 (1) 87 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041587
X-ray spectra of XMM-Newton serendipitous medium flux sources
S. Mateos, X. Barcons, F. J. Carrera, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 433 (3) 855 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041340
The Calan‐Yale Deep Extragalactic Research (CYDER) Survey: Optical Properties and Deep Spectroscopy of Serendipitous X‐Ray Sources
Ezequiel Treister, Francisco J. Castander, Thomas J. Maccarone, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 621 (1) 104 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/427471
Deep Extragalactic X-Ray Surveys
W.N. Brandt and G. HasingerAnnual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 43 (1) 827 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.43.051804.102213
The XMM-LSS survey
L. Chiappetti, M. Tajer, G. Trinchieri, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 439 (1) 413 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20042583
The anti-hierarchical growth of supermassive black holes
Andrea MerloniMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 353 (4) 1035 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08147.x
The HELLAS2XMM survey
M. Mignoli, L. Pozzetti, A. Comastri, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 418 (3) 827 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20035622
TheXMM-Newton/2dF survey - IV. The X-ray spectral properties of the hard sources
I. Georgantopoulos, A. Georgakakis, A. Akylas, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 352 (1) 91 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07899.x
Supermassive Black Holes in the Distant Universe
Andrea ComastriAstrophysics and Space Science Library, Supermassive Black Holes in the Distant Universe 308 245 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2471-9_8
Connecting the cosmic infrared background to the X-ray background
L. Silva, R. Maiolino and G. L. GranatoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 355 (3) 973 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08380.x
High Energy Large Area Surveys: from BeppoSAX to Chandra and XMM-Newton
Fabrizio FioreNuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 132 69 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.04.010
The Phoenix Deep Survey: the radio properties of the hard X-ray-selected sample
A. Georgakakis, A. M. Hopkins, J. Afonso, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 354 (1) 127 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08174.x
The X-ray background and AGNs
G. HasingerNuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 132 86 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.04.127
X-Ray Line-emitting Objects in XMM-Newton Observations: The Tip of the Iceberg
T. Maccacaro, V. Braito, R. Della Ceca, P. Severgnini and A. CaccianigaThe Astrophysical Journal 617 (1) L33 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1086/427024
The Density and Masses of Obscured Black Holes
Andrea Comastri and Fabrizio FioreAstrophysics and Space Science 294 (1-2) 63 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-004-4023-5
The XMM-Newton/2dF survey - VII. Is there any X-ray absorption in optically selected QSOs?
A. Akylas, A. Georgakakis and I. GeorgantopoulosMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 353 (3) 1015 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08128.x
The HELLAS2XMM survey
G. C. Perola, S. Puccetti, F. Fiore, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 421 (2) 491 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20047118
Local supermassive black holes, relics of active galactic nuclei and the X-ray background
A. Marconi, G. Risaliti, R. Gilli, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 351 (1) 169 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07765.x
Tracing the cosmological assembly of stars and supermassive black holes in galaxies
Andrea Merloni, Gregory Rudnick and Tiziana Di MatteoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 354 (3) L37 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08382.x
Powerful, obscured active galactic nuclei among X-ray hard, optically dim serendipitousChandrasources
P. Gandhi, C. S. Crawford, A. C. Fabian and R. M. JohnstoneMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 348 (2) 529 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07341.x
Obscured Active Galactic Nuclei and the X‐Ray, Optical, and Far‐Infrared Number Counts of Active Galactic Nuclei in the GOODS Fields
Ezequiel Treister, C. Megan Urry, Eleni Chatzichristou, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 616 (1) 123 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1086/424891
Evidence for X-ray obscuration in Type II quasar candidates from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Cristian Vignali, Dave M. Alexander and Andrea ComastriMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 354 (3) 720 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08231.x
Exploring the X-ray sky with the XMM-Newton bright serendipitous survey
R. Della Ceca, T. Maccacaro, A. Caccianiga, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 428 (2) 383 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20040252
The XMM-NewtonHBS28 sample: Studying the obscuration in hard X-ray selected AGNs
A. Caccianiga, P. Severgnini, V. Braito, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 416 (3) 901 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20034148
X-Ray Nondetection of the Lyα Emitters at z ~ 4.5
J. X. Wang, J. E. Rhoads, S. Malhotra, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 608 (1) L21 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1086/422311
X‐Ray Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei and Hierarchical Galaxy Formation
N. Menci, F. Fiore, G. C. Perola and A. CavaliereThe Astrophysical Journal 606 (1) 58 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1086/382780