Supernovae and the nature of the dark energy
A&A, 380 1 (2001) 6-18
Published online: 2001-12-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Is cosmological data suggesting a nonminimal coupling between matter and gravity?
Miguel Barroso Varela and Orfeu BertolamiPhysics of the Dark Universe 48 101861 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.101861
The axis of systematic bias in SN Ia cosmology and implications for DESI 2024 results
Suhail Dhawan, Brodie Popovic and Ariel GoobarMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 540 (2) 1626 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf779
The dark energy survey supernova program: investigating beyond-ΛCDM
R Camilleri, T M Davis, M Vincenzi, P Shah, J Frieman, R Kessler, P Armstrong, D Brout, A Carr, R Chen, L Galbany, K Glazebrook, S R Hinton, J Lee, C Lidman, A Möller, B Popovic, H Qu, M Sako, D Scolnic, M Smith, M Sullivan, B O Sánchez, G Taylor, M Toy, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 533 (3) 2615 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1988
Evolution of the Universe with quintessence model in Rastall gravity
J K Singh, Akanksha Singh, Sushant G Ghosh and Sunil D MaharajPhysica Scripta 99 (12) 125001 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad8841
2D BAO vs. 3D BAO: Solving the Hubble Tension with Bimetric Cosmology
Sowmaydeep Dwivedi and Marcus HögåsUniverse 10 (11) 406 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10110406
Fitting the DESI BAO data with dark energy driven by the Cohen-Kaplan-Nelson bound
Patrick Adolf, Martin Hirsch, Sara Krieg, Heinrich Päs and Mustafa TabetJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2024 (08) 048 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/08/048
Testing Λ -free f(Q) cosmology
José Ferreira, Tiago Barreiro, José P. Mimoso and Nelson J. NunesPhysical Review D 108 (6) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.063521
High redshift constraints on extended logotropic models
Hachemi B. Benaoum, Pierre-Henri Chavanis, Orlando Luongo, Marco Muccino and Hernando QuevedoAstroparticle Physics 151 102852 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2023.102852
Forecasting F(Q) cosmology with ΛCDM background using standard sirens
José Ferreira, Tiago Barreiro, José Mimoso and Nelson J. NunesPhysical Review D 105 (12) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123531
The Dark Energy Survey supernova program: cosmological biases from supernova photometric classification
M Vincenzi, M Sullivan, A Möller, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518 (1) 1106 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1404
Generalized holographic cosmology: low-redshift observational constraint
Sunly Khimphun, Bum-Hoon Lee and Gansukh TumurtushaaJournal of High Energy Physics 2021 (10) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2021)232
Testing generalized logotropic models with cosmic growth
Kuantay Boshkayev, Talgar Konysbayev, Orlando Luongo, Marco Muccino and Francesco PacePhysical Review D 104 (2) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.023520
On the use of the local prior on the absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae in cosmological inference
David Camarena and Valerio MarraMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504 (4) 5164 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1200
Constraints on bimetric gravity. Part II. Observational constraints
Marcus Högås and Edvard MörtsellJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (05) 002 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/002
Model-independent calibrations of gamma-ray bursts using machine learning
Orlando Luongo and Marco MuccinoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (3) 4581 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab795
Kinematic constraints beyond z ≃ 0 using calibrated GRB correlations
Orlando Luongo and Marco MuccinoAstronomy & Astrophysics 641 A174 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038264
A Confront between Amati and Combo Correlations at Intermediate and Early Redshifts
Marco MuccinoSymmetry 12 (7) 1118 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12071118
Constraining Temporal Oscillations of Cosmological Parameters Using SNe Ia
Sasha R. Brownsberger, Christopher W. Stubbs and Daniel M. ScolnicThe Astrophysical Journal 875 (1) 34 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0c09
Anisotropy Effects and Observational Data on the Constraints of Evolution Dark Energy Models
S. A. A. Terohid and H HossienkhaniCommunications in Theoretical Physics 71 (1) 079 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/71/1/79
Effect of low anisotropy on cosmological models by using supernova data
H. Hossienkhani, H. Yousefi and N. AzimiNew Astronomy 68 65 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2018.11.003
The Umami Chaplygin model
Ruth Lazkoz, María Ortiz-Baños and Vincenzo SalzanoPhysics of the Dark Universe 24 100279 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2019.100279
The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives
Matthew J. Graham, S. R. Kulkarni, Eric C. Bellm, et al.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 131 (1001) 078001 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c
On the concordance of cosmological data in the case of the generalized Chaplygin gas
R. Aurich and S. LustigAstroparticle Physics 97 118 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2017.11.002
f(R) gravity modifications: from the action to the data
Ruth Lazkoz, María Ortiz-Baños and Vincenzo SalzanoThe European Physical Journal C 78 (3) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5711-6
The Redshift Completeness of Local Galaxy Catalogs
S. R. Kulkarni, D. A. Perley and A. A. MillerThe Astrophysical Journal 860 (1) 22 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aabf85
A problem with the analysis of type Ia supernovae
David F. CrawfordOpen Astronomy 26 (1) 111 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1515/astro-2017-0013
High Performance Computing
Jaime Klapp, Alejandro Aviles and Orlando LuongoCommunications in Computer and Information Science, High Performance Computing 697 393 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57972-6_30
Toward unbiased estimations of the statefinder parameters
Alejandro Aviles, Jaime Klapp and Orlando LuongoPhysics of the Dark Universe 17 25 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2017.07.002
Discerning dark energy models with high redshift standard candles
P. Andersen and J. HjorthMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 472 (2) 1413 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1975
Observational constraints to a unified cosmological model
Rodrigo R. Cuzinatto, Eduardo M. de Morais and Leo G. MedeirosAstroparticle Physics 73 52 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.08.002
Constructing a cosmological model-independent Hubble diagram of type Ia supernovae with cosmic chronometers
Zhengxiang Li, J. E. Gonzalez, Hongwei Yu, Zong-Hong Zhu and J. S. AlcanizPhysical Review D 93 (4) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.043014
A cosmographic analysis of the transition to acceleration using SN-Ia and BAO
Daniel Muthukrishna and David ParkinsonJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (11) 052 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/11/052
Constraints on cosmic distance duality relation from cosmological observations
Meng-Zhen Lv and Jun-Qing XiaPhysics of the Dark Universe 13 139 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2016.06.003
Massive photon and dark energy
Seyen Kouwn, Phillial Oh and Chan-Gyung ParkPhysical Review D 93 (8) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.083012
Transition redshift inf(T)cosmology and observational constraints
Salvatore Capozziello, Orlando Luongo and Emmanuel N. SaridakisPhysical Review D 91 (12) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.124037
Toward cosmological-model-independent calibrations for the luminosity relations of Gamma-Ray Bursts
Xuheng Ding, Zhengxiang Li and Zong-Hong ZhuInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 24 (07) 1550057 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271815500571
Local gravitational redshifts can bias cosmological measurements
Radosław Wojtak, Tamara M. Davis and Jophiel WiisJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (07) 025 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/025
Precision cosmology with Padé rational approximations: Theoretical predictions versus observational limits
Alejandro Aviles, Alessandro Bravetti, Salvatore Capozziello and Orlando LuongoPhysical Review D 90 (4) (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.043531
LINEAR DARK ENERGY EQUATION OF STATE REVEALED BY SUPERNOVAE?
VINCENZO SALZANO, YUN WANG, IRENE SENDRA and RUTH LAZKOZModern Physics Letters A 29 (02) 1450008 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732314500084
High-redshift standard candles: predicted cosmological constraints
Anthea L. King, Tamara M. Davis, K. D. Denney, M. Vestergaard and D. WatsonMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 441 (4) 3454 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu793
Constraints on cosmological models from Hubble parameters measurements
Wei Zheng, Hong Li, Jun-Qing Xia, et al.International Journal of Modern Physics D 23 (05) 1450051 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271814500515
Dark aspects of massive spinor electrodynamics
Edward J. Kim, Seyen Kouwn, Phillial Oh and Chan-Gyung ParkJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (07) 001 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/001
Scalar field description for parametric models of dark energy
E. M. Barboza, B. Santos, F. E. M. Costa and J. S. AlcanizPhysical Review D 85 (10) (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.107304
A kinematic method to probe cosmic acceleration
Edésio M. Barboza and F.C. CarvalhoPhysics Letters B 715 (1-3) 19 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.07.042
The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: joint measurements of the expansion and growth history atz< 1
Chris Blake, Sarah Brough, Matthew Colless, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 425 (1) 405 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21473.x
Impacts on cosmological constraints from degeneracies
Hong Li and Jun-Qing XiaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2012 (11) 039 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2012/11/039
Cosmography beyond standard candles and rulers
Jun-Qing Xia, Vincenzo Vitagliano, Stefano Liberati and Matteo VielPhysical Review D 85 (4) (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.043520
SUPERNOVA CONSTRAINTS AND SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES FROM THE FIRST THREE YEARS OF THE SUPERNOVA LEGACY SURVEY
A. Conley, J. Guy, M. Sullivan, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 192 (1) 1 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/1
INTERACTING MODIFIED HOLOGRAPHIC DARK ENERGY IN A NONFLAT UNIVERSE
M. R. SETARE, A. BANIJAMALI and B. FAZLPOURInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 20 (03) 269 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271811018792
Interacting Holographic Modified Gravity in a Non-flat Universe
A. Banijamali, M. R. Setare and B. FazlpourInternational Journal of Theoretical Physics 50 (10) 3275 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-011-0829-4
The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: mapping the distance-redshift relation with baryon acoustic oscillations
Chris Blake, Eyal A. Kazin, Florian Beutler, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 418 (3) 1707 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19592.x
Observational constraint on dynamical evolution of dark energy
Yungui Gong, Rong-Gen Cai, Yun Chen and Zong-Hong ZhuJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2010 (01) 019 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2010/01/019
THE CARNEGIE SUPERNOVA PROJECT: ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST SAMPLE OF LOW-REDSHIFT TYPE-Ia SUPERNOVAE
Gastón Folatelli, M. M. Phillips, Christopher R. Burns, et al.The Astronomical Journal 139 (1) 120 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/139/1/120
Lectures on Cosmology
M. SullivanLecture Notes in Physics, Lectures on Cosmology 800 59 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10598-2_2
High-redshift cosmography
Vincenzo Vitagliano, Jun-Qing Xia, Stefano Liberati and Matteo VielJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2010 (03) 005 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2010/03/005
Modified holographic dark energy
Hao WeiNuclear Physics B 819 (1-2) 210 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.04.020
Generalized equation of state for dark energy
E. M. Barboza, J. S. Alcaniz, Z.-H. Zhu and R. SilvaPhysical Review D 80 (4) (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.043521
Confronting the Hubble diagram of gamma-ray bursts with Cardassian cosmology
Herman J Mosquera Cuesta, Habib Dumet M and Cristina FurlanettoJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2008 (07) 004 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2008/07/004
A parametric model for dark energy
E.M. Barboza and J.S. AlcanizPhysics Letters B 666 (5) 415 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.012
Overcoming the Circular Problem for Gamma‐Ray Bursts in Cosmological Global‐Fitting Analysis
Hong Li, Jun‐Qing Xia, Jie Liu, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 680 (1) 92 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1086/529582
Constraints on modified Chaplygin gas from recent observations and a comparison of its status with other models
Jianbo Lu, Lixin Xu, Jiechao Li, et al.Physics Letters B 662 (2) 87 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.03.005
Observation Constraints on the Simplified GCG Model
Dong Su-Mei and Wu Pu-XunChinese Physics Letters 24 (6) 1782 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/24/6/096
Virialization of cosmological structures in models with time-varying equation of state
S. Basilakos and N. VoglisMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 374 (1) 269 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11158.x
CONSTRAINTS ON SIMPLIFIED QUARTESSENCE COSMOLOGY FROM THE LATEST OBSERVATIONAL DATA
PUXUN WU and SUMEI DONGInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 16 (11) 1783 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271807011085
“Expansion” around the vacuum: how far can we go fromΛ?
J. S. Alcaniz and H. ŠtefančićAstronomy & Astrophysics 462 (2) 443 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065656
Information theoretic model selection applied to supernovae data
Marek BiesiadaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2007 (02) 003 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2007/02/003
Observational constraints on the time-dependence of dark energy
Deepak Jain, J.S. Alcaniz and Abha DevNuclear Physics B 732 (1-2) 379 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.11.002
An old quasar in a young dark energy-dominated universe?
A. C. S. Friaça, J. S. Alcaniz and J. A. S. LimaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 362 (4) 1295 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09401.x
DIRECT DETERMINATIONS OF THE REDSHIFT BEHAVIOR OF THE PRESSURE, ENERGY DENSITY, AND EQUATION OF STATE OF THE DARK ENERGY AND THE ACCELERATION OF THE UNIVERSE
RUTH A. DALY and S. G. DJORGOVSKIInternational Journal of Modern Physics A 20 (06) 1113 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X05023980
Particle Physics and the Universe
Ariel GoobarSpringer Proceedings in Physics, Particle Physics and the Universe 98 47 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26798-0_5
Gamma-ray bursts as dark energy-matter probes in the context of the generalized Chaplygin gas model
O. Bertolami and P. T. SilvaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 365 (4) 1149 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09765.x
Measuring the Chaplygin Gas Equation of State from Angular and Luminosity Distances
J. S. Alcaniz and J. A. S. LimaThe Astrophysical Journal 618 (1) 16 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/425860
On the future of gamma-ray burst cosmology
E Mörtsell and J SollermanJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2005 (06) 009 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2005/06/009
Constraints on holographic dark energy from type Ia supernova observations
Xin Zhang and Feng-Quan WuPhysical Review D 72 (4) (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043524
Constraints on Chaplygin quartessence from the CLASS gravitational lens statistics and supernova data
Abha Dev, Deepak Jain and J. S. AlcanizAstronomy & Astrophysics 417 (3) 847 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20035627
Revealing the nature of dark energy using Bayesian evidence
T. D. Saini, J. Weller and S. L. BridleMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 348 (2) 603 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07391.x
Direct Determination of the Kinematics of the Universe and Properties of the Dark Energy as Functions of Redshift
Ruth A. Daly and S. G. DjorgovskiThe Astrophysical Journal 612 (2) 652 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1086/422673
3K, SN’s, Clusters: Hunting the Cosmological Parameters with Precision Cosmology
Sébastien Fabbro3K, SN’s, Clusters: Hunting the Cosmological Parameters with Precision Cosmology 1 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0559-2_1
Probing Dark Energy with Supernova Searches
Sébastien FabbroAstrophysics and Space Science 290 (1-2) 1 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASTR.0000022160.63723.c2
Constraints on Extended Quintessence from High‐Redshift Supernovae
P. Caresia, S. Matarrese and L. MoscardiniThe Astrophysical Journal 605 (1) 21 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1086/382270
Constraining dark energy evolution with gravitational lensing by large scale structures
Karim Benabed and Ludovic Van WaerbekePhysical Review D 70 (12) (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123515
Probing dark energy with supernovae: Bias from the time evolution of the equation of state
J.-M. Virey, P. Taxil, A. Tilquin, et al.Physical Review D 70 (4) (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043514
Constraints on the cosmic equation of state: Age conflict versus phantom energy
J. CepaAstronomy & Astrophysics 422 (3) 831 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20035734
Testing dark energy beyond the cosmological constant barrier
J. S. AlcanizPhysical Review D 69 (8) (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.083521
Cosmological constraints on Chaplygin gas dark energy from galaxy cluster x-ray and supernova data
J. V. Cunha, J. S. Alcaniz and J. A. S. LimaPhysical Review D 69 (8) (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.083501
Future supernovae data and quintessence models
E. D. Pietro and J.-F. ClaeskensMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 341 (4) 1299 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06508.x
A Model‐Independent Determination of the Expansion and Acceleration Rates of the Universe as a Function of Redshift and Constraints on Dark Energy
Ruth A. Daly and S. G. DjorgovskiThe Astrophysical Journal 597 (1) 9 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1086/378230
Correcting for lensing bias in the Hubble diagram
R. Amanullah, E. Mörtsell and A. GoobarAstronomy & Astrophysics 397 (3) 819 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20021547
Constraints on the generalized Chaplygin gas from supernovae observations
Martı́n Makler, Sérgio Quinet de Oliveira and Ioav WagaPhysics Letters B 555 (1-2) 1 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00038-8
Current and future supernova constraints on decayingΛcosmologies
J. S. Alcaniz and J. M. F. MaiaPhysical Review D 67 (4) (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.043502
Evolution of inverse power law quintessence at low redshift
Casey R. Watson and Robert J. ScherrerPhysical Review D 68 (12) (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.123524
Expected Constraints on the Generalized Chaplygin Equation of State from Future Supernova Experiments and Gravitational Lensing Statistics
P. T. Silva and O. BertolamiThe Astrophysical Journal 599 (2) 829 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1086/379362
An investigation of gravitational lens determinations ofH0in quintessence cosmologies
Geraint F. Lewis and Rodrigo A. IbataMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 337 (1) 26 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05797.x
Supernovae, CMB, and gravitational leakage into extra dimensions
Cédric Deffayet, Susana J. Landau, Julien Raux, Matias Zaldarriaga and Pierre AstierPhysical Review D 66 (2) (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.66.024019
Measuring the properties of extragalactic dust and implications for the Hubble diagram
A. Goobar, L. Bergström and E. MörtsellAstronomy & Astrophysics 384 (1) 1 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20020002
Selection of High‐zSupernova Candidates
Tomas Dahlén and Ariel GoobarPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 114 (793) 284 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1086/341046
Cosmological parameters from lensed supernovae
A. Goobar, E. Mörtsell, R. Amanullah and P. NugentAstronomy & Astrophysics 393 (1) 25 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20020987
Effects of quintessence on observations of Type Ia supernovae in the clumpy universe
M. Sereno, E. Piedipalumbo and M. V. SazhinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 335 (4) 1061 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05687.x
Probing the Dark Energy with Quasar Clustering
M. O. Calvão, J. R. T. de Mello Neto and I. WagaPhysical Review Letters 88 (9) (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.091302
Probing the dark side: Constraints on the dark energy equation of state from CMB, large scale structure, and type Ia supernovae
Steen Hannestad and Edvard MörtsellPhysical Review D 66 (6) (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.66.063508