Supernovae and the nature of the dark energy
A&A, 380 1 (2001) 6-18
Published online: 2001-12-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Constraining f(G) gravity models using MCMC method
Albert Munyeshyaka, Praveen Kumar Dhankar, Aritra Sanyal, Safiqul Islam, Farook Rahaman and Behnam PourhassanPhysics of the Dark Universe 102246 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2026.102246
Implications of f(R) gravity on late-time cosmic structure growth through a complete description of density perturbations
Miguel Barroso Varela and Álvaro de la Cruz-DombrizPhysics of the Dark Universe 51 102232 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2026.102232
Compact objects in 4D Einstein Gauss Bonnet gravity: A data based perspective
Puja Mukherjee, Himanshu Chaudhary, Ujjal Debnath and G. MustafaNuclear Physics B 1022 117206 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.117206
Is dark energy dynamical in the DESI era? A critical review
Salvatore Capozziello, Himanshu Chaudhary, Tiberiu Harko and G. MustafaPhysics of the Dark Universe 51 102196 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.102196
Probing generalized emergent dark energy with DESI DR2
Vipin Kumar Sharma, Himanshu Chaudhary and Sanved KolekarJournal of High Energy Astrophysics 51 100518 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100518
Is the ΛCDM model in crisis?
Himanshu Chaudhary, Salvatore Capozziello, Subhrat Praharaj, Shibesh Kumar Jas Pacif and G. MustafaJournal of High Energy Astrophysics 50 100507 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100507
The axis of systematic bias in SN Ia cosmology and implications for DESI 2024 results
Suhail Dhawan, Brodie Popovic and Ariel GoobarMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 540 (2) 1626 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf779
Probing the dynamics of Gaussian dark energy equation of state using DESI BAO
Saddam Hussain, Simran Arora, Anzhong Wang and Benjamin RoseMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 545 (2) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1924
Is cosmological data suggesting a nonminimal coupling between matter and gravity?
Miguel Barroso Varela and Orfeu BertolamiPhysics of the Dark Universe 48 101861 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.101861
Constraining deviations from $$\varLambda $$CDM in the Hubble expansion rate
Yupeng YangThe European Physical Journal C 85 (11) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15088-8
Can Inflation Resolve the Hubble Tension?
Ione A. Silva and Edésio M. BarbozaUniverse 11 (11) 379 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe11110379
Observational Tests of the Conformal Osculating Barthel–Kropina Cosmological Model
Himanshu Chaudhary, Rattanasak Hama, Tiberiu Harko, Sorin V. Sabau and Shibesh Kumar Jas PacifUniverse 11 (11) 369 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe11110369
Bimetric gravity improves the fit to DESI BAO and eases the Hubble tension
Marcus Högås and Edvard MörtsellPhysical Review D 112 (10) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1103/zz5k-kzzk
Quintessence and phantoms in light of DESI 2025
Ioannis D. Gialamas, Gert Hütsi, Martti Raidal, Juan Urrutia, Martin Vasar and Hardi VeermäePhysical Review D 112 (6) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1103/kdqc-y37v
(2025)
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5389497
(2025)
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5375436
2D BAO vs. 3D BAO: Solving the Hubble Tension with Bimetric Cosmology
Sowmaydeep Dwivedi and Marcus HögåsUniverse 10 (11) 406 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10110406
Evolution of the Universe with quintessence model in Rastall gravity
J K Singh, Akanksha Singh, Sushant G Ghosh and Sunil D MaharajPhysica Scripta 99 (12) 125001 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad8841
Fitting the DESI BAO data with dark energy driven by the Cohen-Kaplan-Nelson bound
Patrick Adolf, Martin Hirsch, Sara Krieg, Heinrich Päs and Mustafa TabetJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2024 (08) 048 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/08/048
The dark energy survey supernova program: investigating beyond-ΛCDM
R Camilleri, T M Davis, M Vincenzi, P Shah, J Frieman, R Kessler, P Armstrong, D Brout, A Carr, R Chen, L Galbany, K Glazebrook, S R Hinton, J Lee, C Lidman, A Möller, B Popovic, H Qu, M Sako, D Scolnic, M Smith, M Sullivan, B O Sánchez, G Taylor, M Toy, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 533 (3) 2615 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1988
Testing Λ -free f(Q) cosmology
José Ferreira, Tiago Barreiro, José P. Mimoso and Nelson J. NunesPhysical Review D 108 (6) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.063521
High redshift constraints on extended logotropic models
Hachemi B. Benaoum, Pierre-Henri Chavanis, Orlando Luongo, Marco Muccino and Hernando QuevedoAstroparticle Physics 151 102852 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2023.102852
Forecasting F(Q) cosmology with ΛCDM background using standard sirens
José Ferreira, Tiago Barreiro, José Mimoso and Nelson J. NunesPhysical Review D 105 (12) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123531
The Dark Energy Survey supernova program: cosmological biases from supernova photometric classification
M Vincenzi, M Sullivan, A Möller, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518 (1) 1106 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1404
Constraints on bimetric gravity. Part II. Observational constraints
Marcus Högås and Edvard MörtsellJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (05) 002 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/002
Generalized holographic cosmology: low-redshift observational constraint
Sunly Khimphun, Bum-Hoon Lee and Gansukh TumurtushaaJournal of High Energy Physics 2021 (10) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2021)232
On the use of the local prior on the absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae in cosmological inference
David Camarena and Valerio MarraMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504 (4) 5164 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1200
Model-independent calibrations of gamma-ray bursts using machine learning
Orlando Luongo and Marco MuccinoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (3) 4581 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab795
Testing generalized logotropic models with cosmic growth
Kuantay Boshkayev, Talgar Konysbayev, Orlando Luongo, Marco Muccino and Francesco PacePhysical Review D 104 (2) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.023520
Kinematic constraints beyond z ≃ 0 using calibrated GRB correlations
Orlando Luongo and Marco MuccinoAstronomy & Astrophysics 641 A174 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038264
A Confront between Amati and Combo Correlations at Intermediate and Early Redshifts
Marco MuccinoSymmetry 12 (7) 1118 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12071118
Anisotropy Effects and Observational Data on the Constraints of Evolution Dark Energy Models
S. A. A. Terohid and H HossienkhaniCommunications in Theoretical Physics 71 (1) 079 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/71/1/79
The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives
Matthew J. Graham, S. R. Kulkarni, Eric C. Bellm, et al.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 131 (1001) 078001 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c
Effect of low anisotropy on cosmological models by using supernova data
H. Hossienkhani, H. Yousefi and N. AzimiNew Astronomy 68 65 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2018.11.003
The Umami Chaplygin model
Ruth Lazkoz, María Ortiz-Baños and Vincenzo SalzanoPhysics of the Dark Universe 24 100279 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2019.100279
Constraining Temporal Oscillations of Cosmological Parameters Using SNe Ia
Sasha R. Brownsberger, Christopher W. Stubbs and Daniel M. ScolnicThe Astrophysical Journal 875 (1) 34 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0c09
The Redshift Completeness of Local Galaxy Catalogs
S. R. Kulkarni, D. A. Perley and A. A. MillerThe Astrophysical Journal 860 (1) 22 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aabf85
On the concordance of cosmological data in the case of the generalized Chaplygin gas
R. Aurich and S. LustigAstroparticle Physics 97 118 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2017.11.002
f(R) gravity modifications: from the action to the data
Ruth Lazkoz, María Ortiz-Baños and Vincenzo SalzanoThe European Physical Journal C 78 (3) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5711-6
Toward unbiased estimations of the statefinder parameters
Alejandro Aviles, Jaime Klapp and Orlando LuongoPhysics of the Dark Universe 17 25 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2017.07.002
A problem with the analysis of type Ia supernovae
David F. CrawfordOpen Astronomy 26 (1) 111 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1515/astro-2017-0013
Discerning dark energy models with high redshift standard candles
P. Andersen and J. HjorthMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 472 (2) 1413 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1975
High Performance Computing
Jaime Klapp, Alejandro Aviles and Orlando LuongoCommunications in Computer and Information Science, High Performance Computing 697 393 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57972-6_30
Massive photon and dark energy
Seyen Kouwn, Phillial Oh and Chan-Gyung ParkPhysical Review D 93 (8) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.083012
Constructing a cosmological model-independent Hubble diagram of type Ia supernovae with cosmic chronometers
Zhengxiang Li, J. E. Gonzalez, Hongwei Yu, Zong-Hong Zhu and J. S. AlcanizPhysical Review D 93 (4) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.043014
Observational constraints to a unified cosmological model
Rodrigo R. Cuzinatto, Eduardo M. de Morais and Leo G. MedeirosAstroparticle Physics 73 52 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.08.002
A cosmographic analysis of the transition to acceleration using SN-Ia and BAO
Daniel Muthukrishna and David ParkinsonJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (11) 052 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/11/052
Constraints on cosmic distance duality relation from cosmological observations
Meng-Zhen Lv and Jun-Qing XiaPhysics of the Dark Universe 13 139 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2016.06.003
Transition redshift inf(T)cosmology and observational constraints
Salvatore Capozziello, Orlando Luongo and Emmanuel N. SaridakisPhysical Review D 91 (12) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.124037
Toward cosmological-model-independent calibrations for the luminosity relations of Gamma-Ray Bursts
Xuheng Ding, Zhengxiang Li and Zong-Hong ZhuInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 24 (07) 1550057 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271815500571
Local gravitational redshifts can bias cosmological measurements
Radosław Wojtak, Tamara M. Davis and Jophiel WiisJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (07) 025 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/025
Precision cosmology with Padé rational approximations: Theoretical predictions versus observational limits
Alejandro Aviles, Alessandro Bravetti, Salvatore Capozziello and Orlando LuongoPhysical Review D 90 (4) (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.043531
LINEAR DARK ENERGY EQUATION OF STATE REVEALED BY SUPERNOVAE?
VINCENZO SALZANO, YUN WANG, IRENE SENDRA and RUTH LAZKOZModern Physics Letters A 29 (02) 1450008 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732314500084
Dark aspects of massive spinor electrodynamics
Edward J. Kim, Seyen Kouwn, Phillial Oh and Chan-Gyung ParkJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (07) 001 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/001
High-redshift standard candles: predicted cosmological constraints
Anthea L. King, Tamara M. Davis, K. D. Denney, M. Vestergaard and D. WatsonMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 441 (4) 3454 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu793
Constraints on cosmological models from Hubble parameters measurements
Wei Zheng, Hong Li, Jun-Qing Xia, et al.International Journal of Modern Physics D 23 (05) 1450051 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271814500515
Cosmography beyond standard candles and rulers
Jun-Qing Xia, Vincenzo Vitagliano, Stefano Liberati and Matteo VielPhysical Review D 85 (4) (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.043520
Impacts on cosmological constraints from degeneracies
Hong Li and Jun-Qing XiaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2012 (11) 039 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2012/11/039
Scalar field description for parametric models of dark energy
E. M. Barboza, B. Santos, F. E. M. Costa and J. S. AlcanizPhysical Review D 85 (10) (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.107304
The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: joint measurements of the expansion and growth history atz< 1
Chris Blake, Sarah Brough, Matthew Colless, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 425 (1) 405 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21473.x
A kinematic method to probe cosmic acceleration
Edésio M. Barboza and F.C. CarvalhoPhysics Letters B 715 (1-3) 19 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.07.042
SUPERNOVA CONSTRAINTS AND SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES FROM THE FIRST THREE YEARS OF THE SUPERNOVA LEGACY SURVEY
A. Conley, J. Guy, M. Sullivan, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 192 (1) 1 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/1
Interacting Holographic Modified Gravity in a Non-flat Universe
A. Banijamali, M. R. Setare and B. FazlpourInternational Journal of Theoretical Physics 50 (10) 3275 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-011-0829-4
The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: mapping the distance-redshift relation with baryon acoustic oscillations
Chris Blake, Eyal A. Kazin, Florian Beutler, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 418 (3) 1707 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19592.x
INTERACTING MODIFIED HOLOGRAPHIC DARK ENERGY IN A NONFLAT UNIVERSE
M. R. SETARE, A. BANIJAMALI and B. FAZLPOURInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 20 (03) 269 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271811018792
High-redshift cosmography
Vincenzo Vitagliano, Jun-Qing Xia, Stefano Liberati and Matteo VielJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2010 (03) 005 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2010/03/005
THE CARNEGIE SUPERNOVA PROJECT: ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST SAMPLE OF LOW-REDSHIFT TYPE-Ia SUPERNOVAE
Gastón Folatelli, M. M. Phillips, Christopher R. Burns, et al.The Astronomical Journal 139 (1) 120 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/139/1/120
Lectures on Cosmology
M. SullivanLecture Notes in Physics, Lectures on Cosmology 800 59 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10598-2_2
Observational constraint on dynamical evolution of dark energy
Yungui Gong, Rong-Gen Cai, Yun Chen and Zong-Hong ZhuJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2010 (01) 019 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2010/01/019
Generalized equation of state for dark energy
E. M. Barboza, J. S. Alcaniz, Z.-H. Zhu and R. SilvaPhysical Review D 80 (4) (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.043521
Modified holographic dark energy
Hao WeiNuclear Physics B 819 (1-2) 210 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.04.020
Constraints on modified Chaplygin gas from recent observations and a comparison of its status with other models
Jianbo Lu, Lixin Xu, Jiechao Li, et al.Physics Letters B 662 (2) 87 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.03.005
Confronting the Hubble diagram of gamma-ray bursts with Cardassian cosmology
Herman J Mosquera Cuesta, Habib Dumet M and Cristina FurlanettoJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2008 (07) 004 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2008/07/004
Overcoming the Circular Problem for Gamma‐Ray Bursts in Cosmological Global‐Fitting Analysis
Hong Li, Jun‐Qing Xia, Jie Liu, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 680 (1) 92 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1086/529582
A parametric model for dark energy
E.M. Barboza and J.S. AlcanizPhysics Letters B 666 (5) 415 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.012
CONSTRAINTS ON SIMPLIFIED QUARTESSENCE COSMOLOGY FROM THE LATEST OBSERVATIONAL DATA
PUXUN WU and SUMEI DONGInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 16 (11) 1783 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271807011085
Information theoretic model selection applied to supernovae data
Marek BiesiadaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2007 (02) 003 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2007/02/003
Virialization of cosmological structures in models with time-varying equation of state
S. Basilakos and N. VoglisMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 374 (1) 269 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11158.x
“Expansion” around the vacuum: how far can we go fromΛ?
J. S. Alcaniz and H. ŠtefančićAstronomy & Astrophysics 462 (2) 443 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065656
Observation Constraints on the Simplified GCG Model
Dong Su-Mei and Wu Pu-XunChinese Physics Letters 24 (6) 1782 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/24/6/096
Observational constraints on the time-dependence of dark energy
Deepak Jain, J.S. Alcaniz and Abha DevNuclear Physics B 732 (1-2) 379 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.11.002
An old quasar in a young dark energy-dominated universe?
A. C. S. Friaça, J. S. Alcaniz and J. A. S. LimaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 362 (4) 1295 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09401.x
DIRECT DETERMINATIONS OF THE REDSHIFT BEHAVIOR OF THE PRESSURE, ENERGY DENSITY, AND EQUATION OF STATE OF THE DARK ENERGY AND THE ACCELERATION OF THE UNIVERSE
RUTH A. DALY and S. G. DJORGOVSKIInternational Journal of Modern Physics A 20 (06) 1113 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X05023980
Constraints on holographic dark energy from type Ia supernova observations
Xin Zhang and Feng-Quan WuPhysical Review D 72 (4) (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043524
Measuring the Chaplygin Gas Equation of State from Angular and Luminosity Distances
J. S. Alcaniz and J. A. S. LimaThe Astrophysical Journal 618 (1) 16 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/425860
On the future of gamma-ray burst cosmology
E Mörtsell and J SollermanJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2005 (06) 009 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2005/06/009
Particle Physics and the Universe
Ariel GoobarSpringer Proceedings in Physics, Particle Physics and the Universe 98 47 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26798-0_5
Gamma-ray bursts as dark energy-matter probes in the context of the generalized Chaplygin gas model
O. Bertolami and P. T. SilvaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 365 (4) 1149 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09765.x
3K, SN’s, Clusters: Hunting the Cosmological Parameters with Precision Cosmology
Sébastien Fabbro3K, SN’s, Clusters: Hunting the Cosmological Parameters with Precision Cosmology 1 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0559-2_1
Constraints on Extended Quintessence from High‐Redshift Supernovae
P. Caresia, S. Matarrese and L. MoscardiniThe Astrophysical Journal 605 (1) 21 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1086/382270
Testing dark energy beyond the cosmological constant barrier
J. S. AlcanizPhysical Review D 69 (8) (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.083521
Constraints on Chaplygin quartessence from the CLASS gravitational lens statistics and supernova data
Abha Dev, Deepak Jain and J. S. AlcanizAstronomy & Astrophysics 417 (3) 847 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20035627
Direct Determination of the Kinematics of the Universe and Properties of the Dark Energy as Functions of Redshift
Ruth A. Daly and S. G. DjorgovskiThe Astrophysical Journal 612 (2) 652 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1086/422673
Constraints on the cosmic equation of state: Age conflict versus phantom energy
J. CepaAstronomy & Astrophysics 422 (3) 831 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20035734
Cosmological constraints on Chaplygin gas dark energy from galaxy cluster x-ray and supernova data
J. V. Cunha, J. S. Alcaniz and J. A. S. LimaPhysical Review D 69 (8) (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.083501
Probing Dark Energy with Supernova Searches
Sébastien FabbroAstrophysics and Space Science 290 (1-2) 1 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASTR.0000022160.63723.c2
Revealing the nature of dark energy using Bayesian evidence
T. D. Saini, J. Weller and S. L. BridleMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 348 (2) 603 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07391.x
Constraining dark energy evolution with gravitational lensing by large scale structures
Karim Benabed and Ludovic Van WaerbekePhysical Review D 70 (12) (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123515
Probing dark energy with supernovae: Bias from the time evolution of the equation of state
J.-M. Virey, P. Taxil, A. Tilquin, et al.Physical Review D 70 (4) (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043514
Evolution of inverse power law quintessence at low redshift
Casey R. Watson and Robert J. ScherrerPhysical Review D 68 (12) (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.123524