Articles citing this article

The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).

Cited article:

Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies

Elcio Abdalla, Guillermo Franco Abellán, Amin Aboubrahim, et al.
Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 34 49 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002

Constraints on interacting dark energy models from time-delay cosmography with seven lensed quasars

Ling-Feng Wang, Jie-Hao Zhang, Dong-Ze He, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin Zhang
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 514 (1) 1433 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1468

Revealing the late-time transition of H0: relieve the Hubble crisis

J P Hu and F Y Wang
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 517 (1) 576 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2728

Out of one, many: distinguishing time delays from lensed supernovae

Mikhail Denissenya, Satadru Bag, Alex G Kim, Eric V Linder and Arman Shafieloo
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 511 (1) 1210 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac143

SHARP – VIII. J0924+0219 lens mass distribution and time-delay prediction through adaptive-optics imaging

Geoff C-F Chen, Christopher D Fassnacht, Sherry H Suyu, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 513 (2) 2349 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1081

An efficient method for simulating light curves of cosmological microlensing and caustic crossing events

Ashish Kumar Meena, Ofir Arad and Adi Zitrin
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 514 (2) 2545 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1511

Consistency of Planck, ACT, and SPT constraints on magnetically assisted recombination and forecasts for future experiments

Silvia Galli, Levon Pogosian, Karsten Jedamzik and Lennart Balkenhol
Physical Review D 105 (2) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023513

The Hubble Constant from Strongly Lensed Supernovae with Standardizable Magnifications

Simon Birrer, Suhail Dhawan and Anowar J. Shajib
The Astrophysical Journal 924 (1) 2 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac323a

Is local H0at odds with dark energy EFT?

Bum-Hoon Lee, Wonwoo Lee, Eoin Ó Colgáin, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari and Somyadip Thakur
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2022 (04) 004 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/004

SDSS-IV MaNGA: a catalogue of spectroscopically detected strong galaxy–galaxy lens candidates

Michael S Talbot, Joel R Brownstein, Justus Neumann, Daniel Thomas, Claudia Maraston and Niv Drory
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 515 (4) 4953 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1736

Revisiting the Hubble Constant, Spatial Curvature, and Cosmography with Strongly Lensed Quasar and Hubble Parameter Observations

Tonghua Liu, Shuo Cao, Marek Biesiada and Shuaibo Geng
The Astrophysical Journal 939 (1) 37 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac93f3

Prospects of strongly lensed fast radio bursts: simultaneous measurement of post-Newtonian parameter and Hubble constant

Ran Gao, Zhengxiang Li and He Gao
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 516 (2) 1977 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2270

Cosmological Parameter Estimation Using Current and Future Observations of Strong Gravitational Lensing

Jing-Zhao Qi, Wei-Hong Hu, Yu Cui, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin Zhang
Universe 8 (5) 254 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8050254

GIGA-Lens: Fast Bayesian Inference for Strong Gravitational Lens Modeling

A. Gu, X. Huang, W. Sheu, G. Aldering, A. S. Bolton, K. Boone, A. Dey, A. Filipp, E. Jullo, S. Perlmutter, D. Rubin, E. F. Schlafly, D. J. Schlegel, Y. Shu and S. H. Suyu
The Astrophysical Journal 935 (1) 49 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac6de4

Systematic Errors Induced by the Elliptical Power-law model in Galaxy–Galaxy Strong Lens Modeling

Xiaoyue Cao, Ran Li, J. W. Nightingale, et al.
Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 22 (2) 025014 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ac3f2b

STRIDES: automated uniform models for 30 quadruply imaged quasars

T Schmidt, T Treu, S Birrer, A J Shajib, C Lemon, M Millon, D Sluse, A Agnello, T Anguita, M W Auger-Williams, R G McMahon, V Motta, P Schechter, C Spiniello, I Kayo, F Courbin, S Ertl, C D Fassnacht, J A Frieman, A More, S Schuldt, S H Suyu, M Aguena, F Andrade-Oliveira, J Annis, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518 (1) 1260 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2235

Search of strong lens systems in the Dark Energy Survey using convolutional neural networks

K. Rojas, E. Savary, B. Clément, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 668 A73 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142119

Yolov3-Pruning(transfer): real-time object detection algorithm based on transfer learning

Xiaoning Li, Zhengzhong Wang, Shichao Geng, et al.
Journal of Real-Time Image Processing 19 (4) 839 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11554-022-01227-x

Constraining cosmological and galaxy parameters using strong gravitational lensing systems

Darshan Kumar, Deepak Jain, Shobhit Mahajan, Amitabha Mukherjee and Nisha Rani
Physical Review D 103 (6) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063511

Hamilton’s Object – a clumpy galaxy straddling the gravitational caustic of a galaxy cluster: constraints on dark matter clumping

Richard E Griffiths, Mitchell Rudisel, Jenny Wagner, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 506 (2) 1595 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1375

Prospects for Measuring the Hubble Constant with Neutron-Star–Black-Hole Mergers

Stephen M. Feeney, Hiranya V. Peiris, Samaya M. Nissanke and Daniel J. Mortlock
Physical Review Letters 126 (17) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.171102

Measuring accretion disk sizes of lensed quasars with microlensing time delay in multi-band light curves

J. H. H. Chan, K. Rojas, M. Millon, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 647 A115 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038971

Early dark energy resolution to the Hubble tension in light of weak lensing surveys and lensing anomalies

Riccardo Murgia, Guillermo F. Abellán and Vivian Poulin
Physical Review D 103 (6) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063502

Be It Unresolved: Measuring Time Delays from Lensed Supernovae

Satadru Bag, Alex G. Kim, Eric V. Linder and Arman Shafieloo
The Astrophysical Journal 910 (1) 65 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abe238

Model-independent Estimation of H 0 and Ω K from Strongly Lensed Fast Radio Bursts

Shaoxin Zhao, Bin Liu, Zhengxiang Li and He Gao
The Astrophysical Journal 916 (2) 70 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abfa91

Early Universe Physics Insensitive and Uncalibrated Cosmic Standards: Constraints on Ωm and Implications for the Hubble Tension

Weikang Lin, Xingang Chen and Katherine J. Mack
The Astrophysical Journal 920 (2) 159 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac12cf

Does Hubble tension signal a breakdown in FLRW cosmology?

C Krishnan, R Mohayaee, E Ó Colgáin, M M Sheikh-Jabbari and L Yin
Classical and Quantum Gravity 38 (18) 184001 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac1a81

In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions *

Eleonora Di Valentino, Olga Mena, Supriya Pan, et al.
Classical and Quantum Gravity 38 (15) 153001 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d

Taxonomy of Dark Energy Models

Verónica Motta, Miguel A. García-Aspeitia, Alberto Hernández-Almada, Juan Magaña and Tomás Verdugo
Universe 7 (6) 163 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7060163

Improved time-delay lens modelling and H0 inference with transient sources

Xuheng Ding, Kai Liao, Simon Birrer, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504 (4) 5621 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1240

Dark matter haloes of massive elliptical galaxies at z ∼ 0.2 are well described by the Navarro–Frenk–White profile

Anowar J Shajib, Tommaso Treu, Simon Birrer and Alessandro Sonnenfeld
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (2) 2380 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab536

Combining strong and weak lensing estimates in the Cosmos field

Felix Arjun Kuhn, Simon Birrer, Claudio Bruderer, Adam Amara and Alexandre Refregier
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (04) 010 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/010

lenstronomy II: A gravitational lensing software ecosystem

Simon Birrer, Anowar Shajib, Daniel Gilman, et al.
Journal of Open Source Software 6 (62) 3283 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03283

Galaxy-lens determination of H0: the effect of the ellipse + shear modelling assumption

Matthew R Gomer and Liliya L R Williams
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504 (1) 1340 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab930

The impact of mass map truncation on strong lensing simulations

Lyne Van de Vyvere, Dominique Sluse, Sampath Mukherjee, Dandan Xu and Simon Birrer
Astronomy & Astrophysics 644 A108 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038942

Cosmic dissonance: are new physics or systematics behind a short sound horizon?

Nikki Arendse, Radosław J. Wojtak, Adriano Agnello, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 639 A57 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936720

Reaffirming the Cosmic Acceleration without Supernovae and the Cosmic Microwave Background

Xiaolin Luo, Zhiqi Huang, Qiyue Qian and Lu Huang
The Astrophysical Journal 905 (1) 53 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc25f

All good things come in threes: the third image of the lensed quasar PKS 1830−211

S. Muller, S. Jaswanth, C. Horellou and I. Martí-Vidal
Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 L2 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038978

Quantifying the structure of strong gravitational lens potentials with uncertainty-aware deep neural networks

Georgios Vernardos, Grigorios Tsagkatakis and Yannis Pantazis
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499 (4) 5641 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3201

The KBC void and Hubble tension contradict ΛCDM on a Gpc scale − Milgromian dynamics as a possible solution

Moritz Haslbauer, Indranil Banik and Pavel Kroupa
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499 (2) 2845 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2348