Time-dependent data-driven coronal simulations of AR 12673 from emergence to eruption
A&A, 628 (2019) A114
Published online: 2019-08-14
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Comparison of Relative Magnetic Helicity Flux Calculation Results Based on the Line-of-Sight Magnetograms of ASO-S/FMG and SDO/HMI
Shangbin Yang, Suo Liu, Jiangtao Su and Yuanyong DengSolar Physics 300 (3) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-024-02421-9
Investigating the Efficacy of Topologically Derived Time Series for Flare Forecasting. I. Data Set Preparation
Thomas Williams, Christopher B. Prior and David MacTaggartThe Astrophysical Journal 980 (1) 102 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ada600
Persistence and Burn-in in Solar Coronal Magnetic Field Simulations
Eric J. Hall, Karen A. Meyer and Anthony R. YeatesThe Astrophysical Journal 979 (1) 88 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad99db
Data-driven Modeling of a Coronal Magnetic Flux Rope: From Birth to Death
J. H. Guo, Y. W. Ni, Y. Guo, C. Xia, B. Schmieder, S. Poedts, Z. Zhong, Y. H. Zhou, F. Yu and P. F. ChenThe Astrophysical Journal 961 (1) 140 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad088d
A comparative study of two X2.2 and X9.3 solar flares observed with HARPS-N
A. G. M. Pietrow, M. Cretignier, M. K. Druett, J. D. Alvarado-Gómez, S. J. Hofmeister, M. Verma, R. Kamlah, M. Baratella, E. M. Amazo-Gómez, I. Kontogiannis, E. Dineva, A. Warmuth, C. Denker, K. Poppenhaeger, O. Andriienko, X. Dumusque and M. G. LöfdahlAstronomy & Astrophysics 682 A46 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347895
Recent advances in solar data-driven MHD simulations of the formation and evolution of CME flux ropes
Schmieder Brigitte, Guo Jinhan and Poedts StefaanReviews of Modern Plasma Physics 8 (1) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41614-024-00166-3
The winding number of coronal flux ropes
D. J. Price, J. Pomoell and E. K. J. KilpuaAstronomy & Astrophysics 686 A197 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348409
A New Approach of Data-driven Simulation and its Application to Solar Active Region 12673
Zhi-Peng Liu, Chao-Wei Jiang, Xin-Kai Bian, Qing-Jun Liu, Peng Zou and Xue-Shang FengResearch in Astronomy and Astrophysics 24 (12) 125005 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ad862b
From fundamental theory to realistic modeling of the birth of solar eruptions
Chaowei JiangScience China Earth Sciences 67 (12) 3765 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-023-1402-3
The effect of data-driving and relaxation models on magnetic flux rope evolution and stability
A. Wagner, D. J. Price, S. Bourgeois, F. Daei, J. Pomoell, S. Poedts, A. Kumari, T. Barata, R. Erdélyi and E. K. J. KilpuaAstronomy & Astrophysics 692 A74 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450577
太阳爆发活动起源的基本理论与数值建模
朝伟 江SCIENTIA SINICA Terrae 54 (12) 3806 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1360/N072023-0309
Stability of the coronal magnetic field around large confined and eruptive solar flares
M. Gupta, J. K. Thalmann and A. M. VeronigAstronomy & Astrophysics 686 A115 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346212
Modeling the formation and eruption of coronal structures by linking data-driven magnetofrictional and MHD simulations for AR 12673
F. Daei, J. Pomoell, D. J. Price, A. Kumari, S. Good and E. K. J. KilpuaAstronomy & Astrophysics 676 A141 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346183
The automatic identification and tracking of coronal flux ropes
A. Wagner, E. K. J. Kilpua, R. Sarkar, D. J. Price, A. Kumari, F. Daei, J. Pomoell and S. PoedtsAstronomy & Astrophysics 677 A81 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346260
A comparative study of data-driven MHD simulations of solar coronal evolution with photospheric flows derived from two different approaches
Xinyi Wang, Chaowei Jiang, Xueshang Feng, Boyi Wang and Bo ChenFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 10 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1157304
MHD Simulation of a Solar Eruption from Active Region 11429 Driven by a Photospheric Velocity Field
Xinyi Wang, Chaowei Jiang and Xueshang FengThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 942 (2) L41 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acaec3
Comparison of magnetic energy and helicity in coronal jet simulations
E. Pariat, P. F. Wyper and L. LinanAstronomy & Astrophysics 669 A33 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245142
Data-driven Radiative Magnetohydrodynamics Simulations with the MURaM Code
Feng Chen, Mark C. M. Cheung, Matthias Rempel and Georgios ChintzoglouThe Astrophysical Journal 949 (2) 118 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc8c5
Time-dependent boundary conditions for data-driven coronal global and spherical wedge-shaped models
Xueshang Feng, Jiakun Lv, Changqing Xiang and Chaowei JiangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 519 (4) 6297 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3818
Magnetic helicity and free magnetic energy as tools for probing eruptions in two differently evolving solar active regions
E. Liokati, A. Nindos and M. K. GeorgoulisAstronomy & Astrophysics 672 A38 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245631
Effects of optimisation parameters on data-driven magnetofrictional modelling of active regions
A. Kumari, D. J. Price, F. Daei, J. Pomoell and E. K. J. KilpuaAstronomy & Astrophysics 675 A80 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244650
Self-consistent propagation of flux ropes in realistic coronal simulations
L. Linan, F. Regnault, B. Perri, M. Brchnelova, B. Kuzma, A. Lani, S. Poedts and B. SchmiederAstronomy & Astrophysics 675 A101 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346235
Data-driven modeling of solar coronal magnetic field evolution and eruptions
Chaowei Jiang, Xueshang Feng, Yang Guo and Qiang HuThe Innovation 3 (3) 100236 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100236
The Solar Internetwork. III. Unipolar versus Bipolar Flux Appearance
M. Gošić, L. R. Bellot Rubio, M. C. M. Cheung, D. Orozco Suárez, Y. Katsukawa and J. C. del Toro IniestaThe Astrophysical Journal 925 (2) 188 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac37be
Magnetic Helicity Evolution and Eruptive Activity in NOAA Active Region 11158
L. M. Green, J. K. Thalmann, G. Valori, E. Pariat, L. Linan and K. MoraitisThe Astrophysical Journal 937 (2) 59 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac88cb
Data-driven, time-dependent modeling of pre-eruptive coronal magnetic field configuration at the periphery of NOAA AR 11726
E. Lumme, J. Pomoell, D. J. Price, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 658 A200 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038744
Estimating the Magnetic Structure of an Erupting CME Flux Rope From AR12158 Using Data-Driven Modeling
Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Jens Pomoell, Daniel Price, Ranadeep Sarkar and Eleanna AsvestariFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 8 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2021.631582
Long-term evolution of magnetic fields in flaring Active Region NOAA 12673
Johan Muhamad, Muhamad Zamzam Nurzaman, Tiar Dani and Arun Relung PamutriResearch in Astronomy and Astrophysics 21 (12) 312 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/21/12/312
Magnetic Helicity Estimations in Models and Observations of the Solar Magnetic Field. IV. Application to Solar Observations
J. K. Thalmann, M. K. Georgoulis, Y. Liu, E. Pariat, G. Valori, S. Anfinogentov, F. Chen, Y. Guo, K. Moraitis, S. Yang and Alpha MastranoThe Astrophysical Journal 922 (1) 41 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1f93
An MHD Modeling of the Successive X2.2 and X9.3 Solar Flares of 2017 September 6
Satoshi Inoue and Yumi BambaThe Astrophysical Journal 914 (1) 71 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abf835
Earth-affecting solar transients: a review of progresses in solar cycle 24
Jie Zhang, Manuela Temmer, Nat Gopalswamy, et al.Progress in Earth and Planetary Science 8 (1) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-021-00426-7
Magnetic helicity and energy budget around large confined and eruptive solar flares
M. Gupta, J. K. Thalmann and A. M. VeronigAstronomy & Astrophysics 653 A69 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140591
Non-LTE inversions of a confined X2.2 flare
G. J. M. Vissers, S. Danilovic, J. de la Cruz Rodríguez, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 645 A1 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038900
The PDFI_SS Electric Field Inversion Software
George H. Fisher, Maria D. Kazachenko, Brian T. Welsch, Xudong 旭东 Sun 孙, Erkka Lumme, David J. Bercik, Marc L. DeRosa and Mark C. M. CheungThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 248 (1) 2 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab8303
CME–CME Interactions as Sources of CME Geoeffectiveness: The Formation of the Complex Ejecta and Intense Geomagnetic Storm in 2017 Early September
Camilla Scolini, Emmanuel Chané, Manuela Temmer, Emilia K. J. Kilpua, Karin Dissauer, Astrid M. Veronig, Erika Palmerio, Jens Pomoell, Mateja Dumbović, Jingnan Guo, Luciano Rodriguez and Stefaan PoedtsThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 247 (1) 21 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab6216
EUropean Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset 2.0
Stefaan Poedts, Andrea Lani, Camilla Scolini, et al.Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate 10 57 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2020055
Exploring the coronal evolution of AR 12473 using time-dependent, data-driven magnetofrictional modelling
D. J. Price, J. Pomoell and E. K. J. KilpuaAstronomy & Astrophysics 644 A28 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038925
Decoding the Pre-Eruptive Magnetic Field Configurations of Coronal Mass Ejections
S. Patsourakos, A. Vourlidas, T. Török, et al.Space Science Reviews 216 (8) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00757-9
Trigger mechanisms of the major solar flares
Shuhong YangProceedings of the International Astronomical Union 15 (S354) 392 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921319009943