Planck 2018 results - VII. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB
A&A, 641 (2020) A7
Published online: 2020-09-11
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Asymmetry of the CMB map: local and global anomalies
James Creswell and Pavel NaselskyJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (03) 103 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/103
medusa: Minkowski functionals estimated from Delaunay tessellations of the three-dimensional large-scale structure
Martha Lippich and Ariel G SánchezMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 508 (3) 3771 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2820
Phenomenological gravitational phase transition: Reconciliation between the late and early Universe
Marzieh Farhang and Nima KhosraviPhysical Review D 103 (8) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083523
Determining our peculiar velocity from the aberration in the cosmic microwave background
R Aurich and D ReinhardtMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 506 (3) 3259 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1897
Post-Newtonian limit of generalized symmetric teleparallel gravity
Kai Flathmann and Manuel HohmannPhysical Review D 103 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044030
Cosmological constraints with the Effective Fluid approach for Modified Gravity
Wilmar Cardona, Rubén Arjona, Alejandro Estrada and Savvas NesserisJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (05) 064 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/064
Cosmological Parameter Inference with Bayesian Statistics
Luis E. Padilla, Luis O. Tellez, Luis A. Escamilla and Jose Alberto VazquezUniverse 7 (7) 213 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7070213
Emergent universe revisited through the CSL theory
Gabriel R. Bengochea, María Pía Piccirilli and Gabriel LeónThe European Physical Journal C 81 (12) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09842-x
Application of the contour Minkowski tensor and D statistic to the Planck E -mode data
Joby P. Kochappan, Aparajita Sen, Tuhin Ghosh, Pravabati Chingangbam and Soumen BasakPhysical Review D 103 (12) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123523
Anisotropic k-essence
J. Bayron Orjuela-Quintana and César A. Valenzuela-ToledoPhysics of the Dark Universe 33 100857 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2021.100857
Probing the anisotropic distribution of baryon matter in the Universe using fast radio bursts *
Hai-Nan Lin and Yu SangChinese Physics C 45 (12) 125101 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ac2660
The variance of the CMB temperature gradient: a new signature of a multiply connected Universe
Ralf Aurich, Thomas Buchert, Martin J France and Frank SteinerClassical and Quantum Gravity 38 (22) 225005 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac27f0
Dynamics of a Homogeneous and Isotropic Space in Pure Cubic f(R) Gravity
Polina PetriakovaPhysics 3 (2) 379 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/physics3020027
Planck intermediate results
Y. Akrami, K. J. Andersen, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 643 A42 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038073
Phase decoherence of gravitational wave backgrounds
Aoibheann Margalit, Carlo R. Contaldi and Mauro PieroniPhysical Review D 102 (8) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.083506
Planck2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A8 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833886
One- and two-point source statistics from the LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey first data release
T. M. Siewert, C. Hale, N. Bhardwaj, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 643 A100 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936592
Planck2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. I. R. Alves, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A12 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833885
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A11 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832618
Searching for anisotropy in the distribution of binary black hole mergers
Ethan Payne, Sharan Banagiri, Paul D. Lasky and Eric ThranePhysical Review D 102 (10) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.102004
Planck2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A6 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A9 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935891
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A4 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833881
Testing cosmic anisotropy with Pantheon sample and quasars at high redshifts
J. P. Hu, Y. Y. Wang and F. Y. WangAstronomy & Astrophysics 643 A93 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038541
Re-evaluating evidence for Hawking points in the CMB
Dylan L. Jow and Douglas ScottJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (03) 021 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/021
Radial derivatives as a test of pre-big bang events on the Planck data
R Fernández-Cobos, A Marcos-Caballero and E Martínez-GonzálezMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499 (1) 1300 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2844
Planck 2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A3 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832909
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, F. Argüeso, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A2 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833293
Planck 2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A5 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936386
Planck intermediate results
Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 644 A100 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038053
Detection likelihood of cluster-induced CMB polarization
M. Mirmelstein, M. Shimon and Y. RephaeliAstronomy & Astrophysics 644 A36 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834657
Planck 2018 constraints on anisotropic birefringence and its cross-correlation with CMB anisotropy
A. Gruppuso, D. Molinari, P. Natoli and L. PaganoJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (11) 066 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/066
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A10 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833887
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A7 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935201
A Monte Carlo comparison between template-based and Wiener-filter CMB dipole estimators
H. Thommesen, K. J. Andersen, R. Aurlien, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 643 A179 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038905
Screening anisotropy via energy-momentum squared gravity: ΛCDM model with hidden anisotropy
Özgür Akarsu, John D. Barrow and N. Merve UzunPhysical Review D 102 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.124059