Planck 2018 results - VIII. Gravitational lensing
A&A, 641 (2020) A8
Published online: 2020-09-11
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Isocurvature modes: joint analysis of the CMB power spectrum and bispectrum
T. Montandon, G. Patanchon and B. van TentJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (01) 004 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/01/004
Characterization of extragalactic point-sources on E- and B-mode maps of the CMB polarization
P. Diego-Palazuelos, P. Vielva and D. HerranzJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (03) 048 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/048
Analytical approximations for curved primordial power spectra
Ayngaran Thavanesan, Denis Werth and Will HandleyPhysical Review D 103 (2) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.023519
improved Master for the LSS: fast and accurate analysis of the two-point power spectra and correlation functions
Sukhdeep SinghMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 508 (2) 1632 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2559
Cobaya: code for Bayesian analysis of hierarchical physical models
Jesús Torrado and Antony LewisJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (05) 057 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/057
Touch of neutrinos on the vacuum metamorphosis: Is the H0 solution back?
Eleonora Di Valentino, Supriya Pan, Weiqiang Yang and Luis A. AnchordoquiPhysical Review D 103 (12) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123527
Massive neutrino self-interactions and the Hubble tension
Shouvik Roy Choudhury, Steen Hannestad and Thomas TramJournal of Physics: Conference Series 2156 (1) 012016 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2156/1/012016
Thermal axions with multi-eV masses are possible in low-reheating scenarios
Pierluca Carenza, Massimiliano Lattanzi, Alessandro Mirizzi and Francesco ForastieriJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (07) 031 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/031
Dynamical dark energy after Planck CMB final release and H0 tension
Weiqiang Yang, Eleonora Di Valentino, Supriya Pan, Yabo Wu and Jianbo LuMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501 (4) 5845 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3914
Gravitational lens time-delay as a probe of a possible time variation of the fine-structure constant
L. R. Colaço, J. E. Gonzalez and R. F. L. HolandaThe European Physical Journal C 81 (6) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09319-x
Optimal Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing Reconstruction and Parameter Estimation with SPTpol Data
M. Millea, C. M. Daley, T-L. Chou, E. Anderes, P. A. R. Ade, A. J. Anderson, J. E. Austermann, J. S. Avva, J. A. Beall, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, H. C. Chiang, R. Citron, C. Corbett Moran, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, W. Everett, J. Gallicchio, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 922 (2) 259 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac02bb
Cross-correlating radio continuum surveys and CMB lensing: constraining redshift distributions, galaxy bias, and cosmology
David Alonso, Emilio Bellini, Catherine Hale, Matt J Jarvis and Dominik J SchwarzMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 502 (1) 876 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab046
Searching for extremal spots in Planck lensing maps
Clemens Jakubec, Raelyn M. Sullivan and Douglas ScottJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (03) 044 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/044
Local patch analysis for testing statistical isotropy of the Planck convergence map
Priya Goyal and Pravabati ChingangbamJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (08) 006 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/006
Cosmological bound on neutrino masses in the light of H0 tension
Toyokazu Sekiguchi and Tomo TakahashiPhysical Review D 103 (8) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083516
Unfinished fabric of the three neutrino paradigm
Francesco Capozzi, Eleonora Di Valentino, Eligio Lisi, et al.Physical Review D 104 (8) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083031
Dark sector interactions and the curvature of the universe in light of Planck's 2018 data
M. Benetti, H.A. Borges, C. Pigozzo, S. Carneiro and J.S. AlcanizJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (08) 014 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/014
Probing galaxy bias and intergalactic gas pressure with KiDS Galaxies-tSZ-CMB lensing cross-correlations
Ziang Yan, Ludovic van Waerbeke, Tilman Tröster, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 651 A76 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140568
Singling out modified gravity parameters and data sets reveals a dichotomy between Planck and lensing
Cristhian Garcia-Quintero and Mustapha IshakMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 506 (2) 1704 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1773
Cosmological constraints on Hořava gravity revised in light of GW170817 and GRB170817A and the degeneracy with massive neutrinos
Noemi Frusciante and Micol BenettiPhysical Review D 103 (10) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104060
Fractional dark energy: Phantom behavior and negative absolute temperature
Ricardo G. LandimPhysical Review D 104 (10) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.103508
Instrumental systematics biases in CMB lensing reconstruction: A simulation-based assessment
Mark Mirmelstein, Giulio Fabbian, Antony Lewis and Julien PelotonPhysical Review D 103 (12) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123540
Partially constrained internal linear combination: A method for low-noise CMB foreground mitigation
Y. Sultan Abylkairov, Omar Darwish, J. Colin Hill and Blake D. SherwinPhysical Review D 103 (10) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103510
Hubble tension in lepton asymmetric cosmology with an extra radiation
Osamu Seto and Yo TodaPhysical Review D 104 (6) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063019
Algorithm 1018: FaVeST—Fast Vector Spherical Harmonic Transforms
Quoc T. Le Gia, Ming Li and Yu Guang WangACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 47 (4) 1 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1145/3458470
Cosmological constraints from unWISE and Planck CMB lensing tomography
Alex Krolewski, Simone Ferraro and Martin WhiteJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (12) 028 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/12/028
Relaxing cosmological tensions with a sign switching cosmological constant
Özgür Akarsu, Suresh Kumar, Emre Özülker and J. Alberto VazquezPhysical Review D 104 (12) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123512
KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Constraints beyond flat ΛCDM
Tilman Tröster, Marika Asgari, Chris Blake, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 649 A88 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039805
CMB lensing power spectrum estimation without instrument noise bias
Mathew S. Madhavacheril, Kendrick M. Smith, Blake D. Sherwin and Sigurd NaessJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (05) 028 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/028
Reconstruction of the neutrino mass as a function of redshift
Christiane S. Lorenz, Lena Funcke, Matthias Löffler and Erminia CalabresePhysical Review D 104 (12) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123518
Local alignments of parsec-scale AGN radiojets
N. Mandarakas, D. Blinov, C. Casadio, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 653 A123 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140764
Minimal theory of massive gravity in the light of CMB data and the S8 tension
José C. N. de Araujo, Antonio De Felice, Suresh Kumar and Rafael C. NunesPhysical Review D 104 (10) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.104057
A numerical study of observational systematic errors in lensing analysis of CMB polarization
Ryo Nagata and Toshiya NamikawaProgress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2021 (5) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptab040
Primordial Power Spectrum reconstruction from CMB Weak Lensing Power Spectrum
Rajorshi Sushovan Chandra and Tarun SouradeepJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (10) 081 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/081
Early modified gravity in light of the H0 tension and LSS data
Matteo Braglia, Mario Ballardini, Fabio Finelli and Kazuya KoyamaPhysical Review D 103 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043528
Detecting ultra-high-energy cosmic ray anisotropies through harmonic cross-correlations
Federico R. Urban, Stefano Camera and David AlonsoAstronomy & Astrophysics 652 A41 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038459
Constraints on Non-Flat Starobinsky f(R) Dark Energy Model
Chao-Qiang Geng, Yan-Ting Hsu and Jhih-Rong LuEntropy 23 (10) 1320 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/e23101320
A demonstration of improved constraints on primordial gravitational waves with delensing
P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, M. Amiri, et al.Physical Review D 103 (2) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.022004
Precise and accurate cosmology with CMB×LSS power spectra and bispectra
Shu-Fan Chen, Hayden Lee and Cora DvorkinJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (05) 030 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/030
Impact of internal-delensing biases on searches for primordial 𝖡-modes of CMB polarisation
Antón Baleato Lizancos, Anthony Challinor and Julien CarronJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (03) 016 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/016
Unified approach to secondary effects on the CMB B-mode polarization
Toshiya Namikawa, Atsushi Naruko, Ryo Saito, Atsushi Taruya and Daisuke YamauchiJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (10) 029 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/029
Current and future constraints on single-field α -attractor models
Guadalupe Cañas-Herrera and Fabrizio RenziPhysical Review D 104 (10) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.103512
Reconstructing quintessence
Minsu Park, Marco Raveri and Bhuvnesh JainPhysical Review D 103 (10) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103530
Updated dark energy view of inflation
Sveva Castello, Stéphane Ilić and Martin KunzPhysical Review D 104 (2) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.023522
Cross-correlation of Planck CMB lensing with DESI-like LRGs
Ellie Kitanidis and Martin WhiteMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501 (4) 6181 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3927
Bounds on light sterile neutrino mass and mixing from cosmology and laboratory searches
Steffen Hagstotz, Pablo F. de Salas, Stefano Gariazzo, et al.Physical Review D 104 (12) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123524
Quantifying the global parameter tensions between ACT, SPT, and Planck
Will Handley and Pablo LemosPhysical Review D 103 (6) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063529
New cosmological bounds on hot relics: axions and neutrinos
William Giaré, Eleonora Di Valentino, Alessandro Melchiorri and Olga MenaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 505 (2) 2703 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1442
Early dark energy in the pre- and postrecombination epochs
Adrià Gómez-Valent, Ziyang Zheng, Luca Amendola, Valeria Pettorino and Christof WetterichPhysical Review D 104 (8) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083536
Constraining quantum initial conditions before inflation
T. Gessey-Jones and W. J. HandleyPhysical Review D 104 (6) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063532
Testing the consistency between cosmological data: the impact of spatial curvature and the dark energy EoS
Javier E. Gonzalez, Micol Benetti, Rodrigo von Marttens and Jailson AlcanizJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (11) 060 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/060
Improving models of the cosmic infrared background using CMB lensing mass maps
Fiona McCarthy and Mathew S. MadhavacherilPhysical Review D 103 (10) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103515
Detection of a Cross-correlation between Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing and Low-density Points
Fuyu Dong, Pengjie Zhang, Le Zhang, Ji Yao, Zeyang Sun, Changbom Park and Xiaohu YangThe Astrophysical Journal 923 (2) 153 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac2d31
Early dark energy resolution to the Hubble tension in light of weak lensing surveys and lensing anomalies
Riccardo Murgia, Guillermo F. Abellán and Vivian PoulinPhysical Review D 103 (6) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063502
Limitations of CMB B -mode template delensing
Antón Baleato Lizancos, Anthony Challinor and Julien CarronPhysical Review D 103 (2) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.023518
A test of the standard cosmological model with geometry and growth
Uendert Andrade, Dhayaa Anbajagane, Rodrigo von Marttens, Dragan Huterer and Jailson AlcanizJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (11) 014 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/014
Strong detection of the CMB lensing and galaxy weak lensing cross-correlation from ACT-DR4,PlanckLegacy, and KiDS-1000
Naomi Clare Robertson, David Alonso, Joachim Harnois-Déraps, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 649 A146 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039975
Deep learning simulations of the microwave sky
Dongwon Han, Neelima Sehgal and Francisco Villaescusa-NavarroPhysical Review D 104 (12) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123521
Consistency tests of ΛCDM from the early integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect: Implications for early-time new physics and the Hubble tension
Sunny VagnozziPhysical Review D 104 (6) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063524
Post-Newtonian limit of generalized symmetric teleparallel gravity
Kai Flathmann and Manuel HohmannPhysical Review D 103 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044030
Eppur è piatto? The Cosmic Chronometers Take on Spatial Curvature and Cosmic Concordance
Sunny Vagnozzi, Abraham Loeb and Michele MorescoThe Astrophysical Journal 908 (1) 84 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abd4df
Geometry versus growth
Jaime Ruiz-Zapatero, Benjamin Stölzner, Benjamin Joachimi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 655 A11 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141350
Planck2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A8 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833886
Planck 2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A5 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936386
Cannibalism hinders growth: Cannibal Dark Matter and the S8 tension
Stefan Heimersheim, Nils Schöneberg, Deanna C. Hooper and Julien LesgourguesJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (12) 016 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/016
Testing general relativity on cosmological scales at redshift z ∼ 1.5 with quasar and CMB lensing
Yucheng Zhang, Anthony R Pullen, Shadab Alam, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501 (1) 1013 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3672
Planck 2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A3 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832909
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A9 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935891
The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters
Simone Aiola, Erminia Calabrese, Loïc Maurin, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (12) 047 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/047
Possible nonequilibrium imprint in the cosmic background at low frequencies
Marco Baiesi, Carlo Burigana, Livia Conti, et al.Physical Review Research 2 (1) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013210
Cosmology with the submillimetre galaxies magnification bias: Proof of concept
L. Bonavera, J. González-Nuevo, M. M. Cueli, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 639 A128 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038050
Updating constraints on f(T) teleparallel cosmology and the consistency with big bang nucleosynthesis
Micol Benetti, Salvatore Capozziello and Gaetano LambiaseMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 500 (2) 1795 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3368
Density and temperature of cosmic-web filaments on scales of tens of megaparsecs
H. Tanimura, N. Aghanim, V. Bonjean, N. Malavasi and M. DouspisAstronomy & Astrophysics 637 A41 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937158
Current constraints on deviations from General Relativity using binning in redshift and scale
Cristhian Garcia-Quintero, Mustapha Ishak and Orion NingJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (12) 018 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/018
Deep learning for Sunyaev–Zel’dovich detection in Planck
V. BonjeanAstronomy & Astrophysics 634 A81 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936919
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A7 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935201
Planck2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A1 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833880
Comparison of delensing methodologies and assessment of the delensing capabilities of future experiments
P. Diego-Palazuelos, P. Vielva, E. Martínez-González and R.B. BarreiroJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (11) 058 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/058
The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: a CMB lensing mass map over 2100 square degrees of sky and its cross-correlation with BOSS-CMASS galaxies
Omar Darwish, Mathew S Madhavacheril, Blake D Sherwin, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 500 (2) 2250 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3438
Planck2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A6 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910
Reconciling Hubble constant discrepancy from holographic dark energy
Wei-Ming Dai, Yin-Zhe Ma and Hong-Jian HePhysical Review D 102 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.121302
A novel CMB polarization likelihood package for large angular scales built from combined WMAP and Planck LFI legacy maps
U. Natale, L. Pagano, M. Lattanzi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 644 A32 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038508
Planck2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. I. R. Alves, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A12 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833885
Recombination-independent Determination of the Sound Horizon and the Hubble Constant from BAO
Levon Pogosian, Gong-Bo Zhao and Karsten JedamzikThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 904 (2) L17 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abc6a8
Deconstructing the Planck TT Power Spectrum to Constrain Deviations from ΛCDM
Joshua A. Kable, Graeme E. Addison and Charles L. BennettThe Astrophysical Journal 905 (2) 164 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc4e7
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A11 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832618
Reionization optical depth determination from Planck HFI data with ten percent accuracy
L. Pagano, J.-M. Delouis, S. Mottet, J.-L. Puget and L. VibertAstronomy & Astrophysics 635 A99 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936630
Cross-correlation between Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Galaxy Weak Lensing and Planck Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing
Gabriela A. Marques, Jia Liu, Kevin M. Huffenberger and J. Colin HillThe Astrophysical Journal 904 (2) 182 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc003
A Measurement of the CMB E-mode Angular Power Spectrum at Subdegree Scales from 670 Square Degrees of POLARBEAR Data
S. Adachi, M. A. O. Aguilar Faúndez, K. Arnold, C. Baccigalupi, D. Barron, D. Beck, F. Bianchini, S. Chapman, K. Cheung, Y. Chinone, K. Crowley, M. Dobbs, H. El Bouhargani, T. Elleflot, J. Errard, G. Fabbian, C. Feng, T. Fujino, N. Galitzki, N. Goeckner-Wald, J. Groh, G. Hall, M. Hasegawa, M. Hazumi, H. Hirose, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 904 (1) 65 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abbacd
The Websky extragalactic CMB simulations
George Stein, Marcelo A. Alvarez, J. Richard Bond, Alexander van Engelen and Nicholas BattagliaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (10) 012 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/012
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A10 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833887
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A4 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833881
Planck residuals anomaly as a fingerprint of alternative scenarios to inflation
Guillem Domènech, Xingang Chen, Marc Kamionkowski and Abraham LoebJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (10) 005 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/005
Galaxy clustering in the DESI Legacy Survey and its imprint on the CMB
Qianjun Hang, Shadab Alam, John A Peacock and Yan-Chuan CaiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501 (1) 1481 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3738
Testing H0 in acoustic dark energy models with Planck and ACT polarization data
Meng-Xiang Lin, Wayne Hu and Marco RaveriPhysical Review D 102 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123523
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, F. Argüeso, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A2 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833293
Post-inflationary axion isocurvature perturbations facing CMB and large-scale structure
M. Feix, S. Hagstotz, A. Pargner, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (11) 046 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/046
Sampling-based inference of the primordial CMB and gravitational lensing
Marius Millea, Ethan Anderes and Benjamin D. WandeltPhysical Review D 102 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123542
Determining the Hubble constant without the sound horizon scale: measurements from CMB lensing
Eric J Baxter and Blake D SherwinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501 (2) 1823 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3706
Spin characterization of systematics in CMB surveys – a comprehensive formalism
Nialh McCallum, Daniel B Thomas, Michael L Brown and Nicolas TessoreMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501 (1) 802 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3609