A highly precise shear bias estimator independent of the measured shape noise
A&A, 621 (2019) A2
Published online: 2018-12-19
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Analytical noise bias correction for precise weak lensing shear inference
Xiangchong Li and Rachel MandelbaumMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 536 (4) 3663 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2764
Euclid preparation
D. Scognamiglio, T. Schrabback, M. Tewes, B. Gillis, H. Hoekstra, E. M. Huff, O. Marggraf, T. Kitching, R. Massey, I. Tereno, C. S. Carvalho, A. Robertson, G. Congedo, N. Aghanim, B. Altieri, A. Amara, S. Andreon, N. Auricchio, C. Baccigalupi, M. Baldi, S. Bardelli, P. Battaglia, C. Bodendorf, D. Bonino, E. Branchini, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 694 A262 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451587
Accurate shear estimation with fourth-order moments
Andy Park, Xiangchong Li and Rachel MandelbaumMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 537 (1) 507 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf053
Euclid preparation
G. Congedo, L. Miller, A. N. Taylor, N. Cross, C. A. J. Duncan, T. Kitching, N. Martinet, S. Matthew, T. Schrabback, M. Tewes, N. Welikala, N. Aghanim, A. Amara, S. Andreon, N. Auricchio, M. Baldi, S. Bardelli, R. Bender, C. Bodendorf, D. Bonino, E. Branchini, M. Brescia, J. Brinchmann, S. Camera, V. Capobianco, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 691 A319 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450617
Euclid: Improving the efficiency of weak lensing shear bias calibration
H. Jansen, M. Tewes, T. Schrabback, N. Aghanim, A. Amara, S. Andreon, N. Auricchio, M. Baldi, E. Branchini, M. Brescia, J. Brinchmann, S. Camera, V. Capobianco, C. Carbone, V. F. Cardone, J. Carretero, S. Casas, M. Castellano, S. Cavuoti, A. Cimatti, G. Congedo, L. Conversi, Y. Copin, L. Corcione, F. Courbin, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 683 A240 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347833
A differentiable perturbation-based weak lensing shear estimator
Xiangchong Li, Rachel Mandelbaum, Mike Jarvis, Yin Li, Andy Park and Tianqing ZhangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527 (4) 10388 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3895
Weak gravitational lensing shear estimation with metacalibration for the Roman High-Latitude Imaging Survey
Masaya Yamamoto, M A Troxel, Mike Jarvis, Rachel Mandelbaum, Christopher Hirata, Heyang Long, Ami Choi and Tianqing ZhangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 519 (3) 4241 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2644
Weak gravitational lensing shear measurement with FPFS: analytical mitigation of noise bias and selection bias
Xiangchong Li, Yin Li and Richard MasseyMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 511 (4) 4850 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac342
The three-year shear catalog of the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey
Xiangchong Li, Hironao Miyatake, Wentao Luo, Surhud More, Masamune Oguri, Takashi Hamana, Rachel Mandelbaum, Masato Shirasaki, Masahiro Takada, Robert Armstrong, Arun Kannawadi, Satoshi Takita, Satoshi Miyazaki, Atsushi J Nishizawa, Andres A Plazas Malagon, Michael A Strauss, Masayuki Tanaka and Naoki YoshidaPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 74 (2) 421 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psac006
Propagating spatially varying multiplicative shear bias to cosmological parameter estimation for stage-IV weak-lensing surveys
Casey Cragg, Christopher A J Duncan, Lance Miller and David AlonsoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518 (4) 4909 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3324
Accounting for object detection bias in weak gravitational lensing studies
Henk Hoekstra, Arun Kannawadi and Thomas D. KitchingAstronomy & Astrophysics 646 A124 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038998
Synthetic galaxy clusters and observations based on Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Data
T N Varga, D Gruen, S Seitz, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 509 (4) 4865 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3269
The point spread function reconstruction – II. The smooth PCA
Lin Nie, Guoliang Li, John R Peterson and Chengliang WeiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (3) 4436 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab733
Dark Energy Survey Y3 results: blending shear and redshift biases in image simulations
N MacCrann, M R Becker, J McCullough, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 509 (3) 3371 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2870
Mitigating the effects of undersampling in weak lensing shear estimation with metacalibration
Arun Kannawadi, Erik Rosenberg and Henk HoekstraMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 502 (3) 4048 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab211
Shear measurement bias
Arnau Pujol, Jerome Bobin, Florent Sureau, Axel Guinot and Martin KilbingerAstronomy & Astrophysics 643 A158 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038658
Mitigating Shear-dependent Object Detection Biases with Metacalibration
Erin S. Sheldon, Matthew R. Becker, Niall MacCrann and Michael JarvisThe Astrophysical Journal 902 (2) 138 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb595
Shear measurement bias
Arnau Pujol, Florent Sureau, Jerome Bobin, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A164 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038657
Constraining the masses of high-redshift clusters with weak lensing: Revised shape calibration testing for the impact of stronger shears and increased blending
B. Hernández-Martín, T. Schrabback, H. Hoekstra, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 640 A117 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037844
Euclid preparation
N. Martinet, T. Schrabback, H. Hoekstra, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 627 A59 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935187
Testing Shear Recovery with Field Distortion
Jun Zhang, Fuyu Dong, Hekun Li, Xiangchong Li, Yingke Li, Dezi Liu, Wentao Luo, Liping Fu, Guoliang Li and Zuhui FanThe Astrophysical Journal 875 (1) 48 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1080
Galaxy shape measurement with convolutional neural networks
Dezső Ribli, László Dobos and István CsabaiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 489 (4) 4847 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2374
Weak-lensing shear measurement with machine learning
M. Tewes, T. Kuntzer, R. Nakajima, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 621 A36 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833775
Towards emulating cosmic shear data: revisiting the calibration of the shear measurements for the Kilo-Degree Survey
Arun Kannawadi, Henk Hoekstra, Lance Miller, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 624 A92 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834819