Cosmic ray modulation by different types of solar wind disturbances
A&A, 538 (2012) A28
Published online: 2012-01-27
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Empirical implications of location-dependent cosmic ray diurnal anisotropy on small-amplitude Forbush decreases
O. Okike and F. M. MentesoThe European Physical Journal Plus 139 (5) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05191-2
A performance appraisal of the global survey and the fully automated methods of Forbush event identification and timing using small-amplitude Forbush decreases
O Okike and F M MentesoRAS Techniques and Instruments 3 (1) 853 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/rasti/rzae057
Precursory Signs of Large Forbush Decreases in Relation to Cosmic Rays Equatorial Anisotropy Variation
Maria-Christina Papailiou, Maria Abunina, Helen Mavromichalaki, Nataly Shlyk, Semyon Belov, Artem Abunin, Maria Gerontidou, Anatoly Belov, Victor Yanke and Amalia TriantouAtmosphere 15 (7) 742 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15070742
A multifractal approach to understanding Forbush Decrease events: Correlations with geomagnetic storms and space weather phenomena
D. Sierra-PortaChaos, Solitons & Fractals 185 115089 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115089
Analysis of Cosmic Ray Fluxes at Different Stations during Geomagnetic Storms using Wavelet Based Approaches: Continuous Wavelet Transform and Multi-Resolution Analysis
Chali Idosa Uga, Binod Adhikari and Dessalegn TeferiGeomagnetism and Aeronomy 63 (6) 818 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793223600418
Statistical comparison of time profiles of Forbush decreases associated with coronal mass ejections and streams from coronal holes in solar cycles 23–24
A A Melkumyan, A V Belov, N S Shlyk, M A Abunina, A A Abunin, V A Oleneva and V G YankeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 521 (3) 4544 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad772
Development of Forbush Decreases Associated with Coronal Ejections from Active Regions and non-Active Regions
A. A. Melkumyan, A. V. Belov, M. A. Abunina, N. S. Shlyk, A. A. Abunin, V. A. Oleneva and V. G. YankeГеомагнетизм и аэрономия 63 (1) 43 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.31857/S0016794022060098
Variations of cosmic ray intensity with the solar flare index, coronal index, and geomagnetic indices: Wavelet and cross correlation approaches
C. Idosa, A. Giri, B. Adhikari, E. Mosisa and Ch. GashuPhysics of Plasmas 30 (8) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0157553
The role of extreme geomagnetic storms in the Forbush decrease profile observed by neutron monitors
Kalpesh Ghag, Prathmesh Tari, Anil Raghav, Zubair Shaikh, Omkar Dhamane, Utsav Panchal, Greg Hilbert, Mayuri Katvankar, Komal Choraghe, Digvijay Mishra and Kishor KumbharJournal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 252 106146 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2023.106146
Study of Forbush Decrease Recovery Times by the Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light-Nuclei Astrophysics (PAMELA) Experiment
I. A. Lagoida, S. A. Voronov, V. V. Mikhailov, et al.Solar Physics 298 (1) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-02097-z
Study of the radial dependence of Forbush decreases at 0.28–1 au using data from the Helios 1 and 2 spacecraft
Anatoly Belov, Nataly Shlyk, Maria Abunina, Artem Abunin, Athanasios Papaioannou, Ian G Richardson and David LarioMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 521 (3) 4652 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad732
New insights from cross-correlation studies between solar activity indices and cosmic-ray flux during Forbush decrease events
Mihailo Savić, Nikola Veselinović, Aleksandar Dragić, et al.Advances in Space Research 71 (4) 2006 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.09.057
Study of Cosmic Ray Intensity (CRI) along with Solar Wind Parameters and Geomagnetic Indices from Different Stations
Chali Idosa Uga and Binod AdhikariCosmic Research 61 (5) 364 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952523600026
Analytic modeling of recurrent Forbush decreases caused by corotating interaction regions
B. Vršnak, M. Dumbović, B. Heber and A. KirinAstronomy & Astrophysics 658 A186 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140846
Similarities and Differences between Forbush Decreases Associated with Streams from Coronal Holes, Filament Ejections, and Ejections from Active Regions
A. A. Melkumyan, A. V. Belov, M. A. Abunina, et al.Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 62 (3) 159 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222030112
Development of Forbush Decreases Associated with Coronal Ejections from Active Regions and non-Active Regions
A. A. Melkumyan, A. V. Belov, M. A. Abunina, et al.Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 62 (S1) S40 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222600394
Preliminary investigation of the multivariate relations between program-selected forbush decreases, worldwide lightning frequency, sunspot number and other solar-terrestrial drivers
O. Okike and J. A. AlhassanThe European Physical Journal Plus 137 (3) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02514-z
Features of the Behavior of Time Parameters of Forbush Decreases Associated with Different Types of Solar and Interplanetary Sources
A. A. Melkumyan, A. V. Belov, M. A. Abunina, et al.Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 62 (1-2) 17 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222010133
Generic profile of a long-lived corotating interaction region and associated recurrent Forbush decrease
M. Dumbović, B. Vršnak, M. Temmer, B. Heber and P. KühlAstronomy & Astrophysics 658 A187 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140861
Forbush decreases associated with coronal mass ejections from active and non-active regions: statistical comparison
A A Melkumyan, A V Belov, M A Abunina, A A Abunin, N S Shlyk, V A Oleneva and V G YankeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 515 (3) 4430 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2017
A comparison of catalogues of Forbush decreases identified from individual and a network of neutron monitors: a critical perspective
O Okike, J A Alhassan, E U Iyida and A E ChukwudeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (4) 5675 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab680
Study of the development and mechanism of large amplitude decreases in cosmic ray intensity during geomagnetic disturbances in the magnetosphere
B. Badruddin, O.P.M. Aslam, M. Derouich and S. QutubAdvances in Space Research 68 (11) 4702 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.08.019
Analytical and empirical modelling of the origin and heliospheric propagation of coronal mass ejections, and space weather applications
Bojan VršnakJournal of Space Weather and Space Climate 11 34 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2021012
Amplitude of the Observational Forbush Decreases in the Presence of Cosmic Ray Diurnal Anisotropy During High Solar Activity in 1972
O. Okike and J. A. AlhassanSolar Physics 296 (7) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01855-9
Study of the evolution of the geomagnetic disturbances during the passage of high-speed streams from coronal holes in solar cycle 2009-2016
Anand Kumar and B. BadruddinAstrophysics and Space Science 366 (2) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-03927-5
On the Rigidity Spectrum of Cosmic-Ray Variations within Propagating Interplanetary Disturbances: Neutron Monitor and SOHO/EPHIN Observations at ∼1–10 GV
Anatoly Belov, Athanasios Papaioannou, Maria Abunina, Mateja Dumbovic, Ian G. Richardson, Bernd Heber, Patrick Kuhl, Konstantin Herbst, Anastasios Anastasiadis, Angelos Vourlidas, Eugenia Eroshenko and Artem AbuninThe Astrophysical Journal 908 (1) 5 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abd724
Modulation Effectiveness of Coronal Mass Ejections with Different Structure of the Magnetic Field
A. V. Belov, M. A. Abunina, E. A. Eroshenko, et al.Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics 85 (10) 1183 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3103/S1062873821100075
Testing the impact of coronal mass ejections on cosmic-ray intensity modulation with algorithm selected Forbush decreases
O Okike, O C Nwuzor, F C Odo, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 502 (1) 300 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa4002
Study of transient modulation of galactic cosmic rays due to interplanetary manifestations of coronal mass ejections: 2010 - 2017
M. Fadaaq and B. BadruddinAstrophysics and Space Science 366 (1) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-03918-6
Investigation of the relation between space-weather parameters and Forbush decreases automatically selected from Moscow and Apatity cosmic ray stations during solar cycle 23
Jibrin Adejoh Alhassan, Ogbonnaya Okike and Augustine Ejikeme ChukwudeResearch in Astronomy and Astrophysics 21 (11) 273 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/21/11/273
Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections as the Driver of Non-recurrent Forbush Decreases
Athanasios Papaioannou, Anatoly Belov, Maria Abunina, Eugenia Eroshenko, Artem Abunin, Anastasios Anastasiadis, Spiros Patsourakos and Helen MavromichalakiThe Astrophysical Journal 890 (2) 101 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab6bd1
What determines the observational magnitudes of Forbush events on Earth: A critique of the traditional manual method
O OkikeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 491 (3) 3793 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3123
Solar wind temperature–velocity relationship over the last five solar cycles and Forbush decreases associated with different types of interplanetary disturbance
A A Melkumyan, A V Belov, M A Abunina, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 500 (3) 2786 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3366
A New Method to Model Magnetic Cloud-driven Forbush Decreases: The 2016 August 2 Event
Simone Benella, Monica Laurenza, Rami Vainio, Catia Grimani, Giuseppe Consolini, Qiang Hu and Alexandr AfanasievThe Astrophysical Journal 901 (1) 21 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abac59
On the Interaction of Galactic Cosmic Rays with Heliospheric Shocks During Forbush Decreases
Anamarija Kirin, Bojan Vršnak, Mateja Dumbović and Bernd HeberSolar Physics 295 (2) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-1593-5
Evolution of Coronal Mass Ejections and the Corresponding Forbush Decreases: Modeling vs. Multi-Spacecraft Observations
Mateja Dumbović, Bojan Vršnak, Jingnan Guo, et al.Solar Physics 295 (7) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01671-7
Exploring the common origins of the Forbush decrease phenomenon caused by the interplanetary counterpart of coronal mass ejections or corotating interaction regions
Anil Raghav, Zubair Shaikh, Disha Misal, et al.Physical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.062003
Investigation of the rigidity and sensitivity dependence of neutron monitors for cosmic ray modulation using algorithm-selected Forbush decreases
O C Nwuzor and O OkikeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (2) 1948 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa370
Recurrent and sporadic Forbush decreases during solar cycles 23–24
Viktor Yanke, Виктор Янке, Viktoria Oleneva, et al.Solar-Terrestrial Physics 5 (1) 28 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-51201904
Image of Forbush Decrease in a Magnetic Cloud by Three Moments of Cosmic Ray Distribution Function
A. S. Petukhova, I. S. Petukhov and S. I. PetukhovJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 124 (1) 19 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025964
On recurrent Forbush Decreases
A Melkumyan, A Belov, M Abunina, et al.Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1181 012009 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1181/1/012009
A Statistical Classifier for Historical Geomagnetic Storm Drivers Derived Solely From Ground‐Based Magnetic Field Measurements
Leonie Pick, Frederic Effenberger, Irina Zhelavskaya and Monika KorteEarth and Space Science 6 (10) 2000 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000726
Recurrent and sporadic Forbush decreases during solar cycles 23–24
Viktor Yanke, Виктор Янке, Viktoria Oleneva, et al.Solnechno-Zemnaya Fizika 5 (1) 39 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.12737/szf-51201904
An Extended Study of the Precursory Signs of Forbush Decreases: New Findings over the Years 2008 – 2016
D. Lingri, H. Mavromichalaki, A. Belov, et al.Solar Physics 294 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1461-3
Comparison between statistical properties of Forbush decreases caused by solar wind disturbances from coronal mass ejections and coronal holes
A.A. Melkumyan, A.V. Belov, M.A. Abunina, et al.Advances in Space Research 63 (2) 1100 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.10.009
An Analytical Diffusion–Expansion Model for Forbush Decreases Caused by Flux Ropes
Mateja Dumbović, Bernd Heber, Bojan Vršnak, Manuela Temmer and Anamarija KirinThe Astrophysical Journal 860 (1) 71 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aac2de
The Identification of a Planar Magnetic Structure within the ICME Shock Sheath and Its influence on Galactic Cosmic-Ray Flux
Zubair I. Shaikh, Anil N. Raghav, Geeta Vichare, Ankush Bhaskar and Wageesh MishraThe Astrophysical Journal 866 (2) 118 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae1b1
Main Properties of Forbush Effects Related to High-Speed Streams from Coronal Holes
A. A. Melkumyan, A. V. Belov, M. A. Abunina, et al.Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 58 (2) 154 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793218020159
Study of the Geoeffectiveness and Galactic Cosmic-Ray Response of VarSITI-ISEST Campaign Events in Solar Cycle 24
O. P. M. Aslam and BadruddinSolar Physics 292 (9) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1160-x
The Presence of Turbulent and Ordered Local Structure within the ICME Shock-sheath and Its Contribution to Forbush Decrease
Zubair Shaikh, Anil Raghav and Ankush BhaskarThe Astrophysical Journal 844 (2) 121 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa729f
Earth-affecting Solar Transients
O. P. M. Aslam and BadruddinEarth-affecting Solar Transients 347 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1570-4_16
Earth-affecting Solar Transients
Bojan Vršnak, Mateja Dumbović, Jaša Čalogović, Giuliana Verbanac and Ivana Poljanǐć–BeljanEarth-affecting Solar Transients 577 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1570-4_26
Geomagnetic Effects of Corotating Interaction Regions
Bojan Vršnak, Mateja Dumbović, Jaša Čalogović, Giuliana Verbanac and Ivana Poljanǐć–BeljanSolar Physics 292 (9) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1165-5
Passage of the high-speed solar wind streams, their plasma/field properties, and resulting geomagnetic disturbances
F. Mustajab and BadruddinAdvances in Space Research 60 (1) 144 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.04.004
Forbush Decrease: A New Perspective with Classification
Anil Raghav, Zubair Shaikh, Ankush Bhaskar, Gauri Datar and Geeta VichareSolar Physics 292 (8) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1121-4
Extreme Geomagnetic Storms – 1868 – 2010
S. Vennerstrom, L. Lefevre, M. Dumbović, et al.Solar Physics 291 (5) 1447 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0897-y
Role of solar wind speed and interplanetary magnetic field during two-step Forbush decreases caused by Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections
Ankush Bhaskar, Geeta Vichare, K. P. Arunbabu and Anil RaghavAstrophysics and Space Science 361 (7) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-016-2827-8
Forbush Decrease Prediction Based on Remote Solar Observations
M. Dumbović, B. Vršnak and J. ČalogovićSolar Physics 291 (1) 285 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0819-4
Study of the Cosmic-Ray Modulation During the Passage of ICMEs and CIRs
Badruddin and Anand KumarSolar Physics 291 (2) 559 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0843-4
RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION OF THE MAGNETIC FIELD BARRIER AND SOLAR WIND SPEED IN ICME-ASSOCIATED FORBUSH DECREASES
Ankush Bhaskar, Prasad Subramanian and Geeta VichareThe Astrophysical Journal 828 (2) 104 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/828/2/104
How are Forbush decreases related to interplanetary magnetic field enhancements?
K. P. Arunbabu, H. M. Antia, S. R. Dugad, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 580 A41 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425115
Short-term variability of the Sun-Earth system: an overview of progress made during the CAWSES-II period
Nat Gopalswamy, Bruce Tsurutani and Yihua YanProgress in Earth and Planetary Science 2 (1) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-015-0043-8
Study of the Forbush Decreases, Geomagnetic Storms, and Ground-Level Enhancements in Selected Intervals and Their Space Weather Implications
Badruddin and Anand KumarSolar Physics 290 (4) 1271 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0665-4
Kinematics of Interacting ICMEs and Related Forbush Decrease: Case Study
D. Maričić, B. Vršnak, M. Dumbović, et al.Solar Physics 289 (1) 351 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0314-8
Cosmic-Ray Modulation due to High-Speed Solar-Wind Streams of Different Sources, Speed, and Duration
Anand Kumar and BadruddinSolar Physics 289 (11) 4267 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0565-z
Coronal Mass Ejections and Non-recurrent Forbush Decreases
A. Belov, A. Abunin, M. Abunina, et al.Solar Physics 289 (10) 3949 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0534-6
Do Inner Planets Modulate the Space Environment of the Earth?
Jung-Hee Kim and Heon-Young ChangJournal of Astronomy and Space Sciences 31 (1) 7 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2014.31.1.7
Composite analysis with Monte Carlo methods: an example with cosmic rays and clouds
B.A. Laken and J. ČalogovićJournal of Space Weather and Space Climate 3 A29 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2013051
A cosmic ray-climate link and cloud observations
Benjamin A. Laken, Enric Pallé, Jaša Čalogović and Eimear M. DunneJournal of Space Weather and Space Climate 2 A18 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2012018