The galaxy stellar mass function of X-ray detected groups - Environmental dependence of galaxy evolution in the COSMOS survey
A&A, 538 (2012) A104
Published online: 2012-02-13
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Simba-C: the evolution of the thermal and chemical properties in the intragroup medium
Renier T Hough, Zhiwei Shao, Weiguang Cui, S Ilani Loubser, Arif Babul, Romeel Davé, Douglas Rennehan and Chiaki KobayashiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 532 (1) 476 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1435
A systematic search for galaxy protocluster cores at the transition epoch of their star formation activity
Makoto Ando, Kazuhiro Shimasaku, Rieko Momose, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 513 (3) 3252 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1049
From Clusters to Proto-Clusters: The Infrared Perspective on Environmental Galaxy Evolution
Stacey Alberts and Allison NobleUniverse 8 (11) 554 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8110554
Satellite quenching was not important for z ∼ 1 clusters: most quenching occurred during infall
S V Werner, N A Hatch, A Muzzin, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 510 (1) 674 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3484
The GOGREEN survey: dependence of galaxy properties on halo mass at z > 1 and implications for environmental quenching
Andrew M M Reeves, Michael L Balogh, Remco F J van der Burg, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 506 (3) 3364 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1955
The clustering of X-ray AGN at 0.5 < z < 4.5: host galaxies dictate dark matter halo mass
Vivienne Wild, Hyewon Suh, Dale Kocevski, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (2) 1693 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa815
Brightest group galaxies – II: the relative contribution of BGGs to the total baryon content of groups at z < 1.3
Ghassem Gozaliasl, Alexis Finoguenov, Habib G Khosroshahi, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 475 (2) 2787 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty003
The Effects of Environment on the Evolution of the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function
Casey Papovich, Lalitwadee Kawinwanichakij, Ryan F. Quadri, Karl Glazebrook, Ivo Labbé, Kim-Vy H. Tran, Ben Forrest, Glenn G. Kacprzak, Lee R. Spitler, Caroline M. S. Straatman and Adam R. TomczakThe Astrophysical Journal 854 (1) 30 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaa766
First results on the cluster galaxy population from the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam survey. I. The role of group or cluster environment in star formation quenching from z = 0.2 to 1.1
Hung-Yu Jian, Lihwai Lin, Masamune Oguri, Atsushi J Nishizawa, Masahiro Takada, Surhud More, Yusei Koyama, Masayuki Tanaka and Yutaka KomiyamaPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 70 (SP1) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psx096
The XXL Survey
V. Guglielmo, B. M. Poggianti, B. Vulcani, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 620 A7 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730709
Glimpsing the imprint of local environment on the galaxy stellar mass function
Adam R. Tomczak, Brian C. Lemaux, Lori M. Lubin, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 472 (3) 3512 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2245
Gas distribution and clumpiness in the galaxy group NGC 2563
Andrea Morandi, Ming Sun, John Mulchaey, Daisuke Nagai and Massimiliano BonamenteMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 469 (2) 2423 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1031
Reconstructing the galaxy density field with photometric redshifts – II. Environment-dependent galaxy evolution since z ≃ 3
Nicola Malavasi, Lucia Pozzetti, Olga Cucciati, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 470 (2) 1274 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1323
The growth and enrichment of intragroup gas
Lichen Liang, Fabrice Durier, Arif Babul, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456 (4) 4266 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2840
The nature of Hβ+[O iii] and [O ii] emitters toz∼ 5 with HiZELS: stellar mass functions and the evolution of EWs
A. A. Khostovan, D. Sobral, B. Mobasher, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (3) 2363 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2174
THE X-RAY ZURICH ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (X-ZENS). II. X-RAY OBSERVATIONS OF THE DIFFUSE INTRAGROUP MEDIUM IN GALAXY GROUPS
Francesco Miniati, Alexis Finoguenov, John D. Silverman, Marcella Carollo, Anna Cibinel, Simon J. Lilly and Kevin SchawinskiThe Astrophysical Journal 819 (1) 26 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/26
Brightest group galaxies: stellar mass and star formation rate (paper I)
Ghassem Gozaliasl, Alexis Finoguenov, Habib G. Khosroshahi, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 458 (3) 2762 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw448
The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS)
I. Davidzon, O. Cucciati, M. Bolzonella, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 586 A23 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527129
Ultra-deep catalog of X-ray groups in the ExtendedChandraDeep Field South
A. Finoguenov, M. Tanaka, M. Cooper, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 576 A130 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201323053
BRIGHTEST X-RAY CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES IN THE CFHTLS WIDE FIELDS: CATALOG AND OPTICAL MASS ESTIMATOR
M. Mirkazemi, A. Finoguenov, M. J. Pereira, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 799 (1) 60 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/60
Network analysis of cosmic structures: network centrality and topological environment
Sungryong Hong and Arjun DeyMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450 (2) 1999 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv722
The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups
G. Erfanianfar, P. Popesso, A. Finoguenov, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 445 (3) 2725 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1883
On the origin of the faint-end of the red sequence in high-density environments
Alessandro Boselli and Giuseppe GavazziThe Astronomy and Astrophysics Review 22 (1) (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-014-0074-y
THE PAN-STARRS1 MEDIUM-DEEP SURVEY: THE ROLE OF GALAXY GROUP ENVIRONMENT IN THE STAR FORMATION RATE VERSUS STELLAR MASS RELATION AND QUIESCENT FRACTION OUT TOz∼ 0.8
Lihwai Lin, Hung-Yu Jian, Sebastien Foucaud, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 782 (1) 33 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/33
CLASH-VLT: The stellar mass function and stellar mass density profile of thez= 0.44 cluster of galaxies MACS J1206.2-0847
M. Annunziatella, A. Biviano, A. Mercurio, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 571 A80 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424102
Evolution of the galaxy luminosity function in progenitors of fossil groups
G. Gozaliasl, H. G. Khosroshahi, A. A. Dariush, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 571 A49 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424075
Star formation and environmental quenching of GEEC2 group galaxies at z ∼ 1
Angus Mok, Michael L. Balogh, Sean L. McGee, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 438 (4) 3070 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2419
Herschel-ATLAS/GAMA: How does the far-IR luminosity function depend on galaxy group properties?
Qi Guo, Cedric Lacey, Peder Norberg, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 442 (3) 2253 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu962
THE ZURICH ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY OF GALAXIES IN GROUPS ALONG THE COSMIC WEB. III. GALAXY PHOTOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS AND THE SPATIALLY RESOLVED COLOR PROPERTIES OF EARLY- AND LATE-TYPE SATELLITES IN DIVERSE ENVIRONMENTS
A. Cibinel, C. M. Carollo, S. J. Lilly, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 777 (2) 116 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/116
Efficient satellite quenching at z∼1 from the GEEC2 spectroscopic survey of galaxy groups
Angus Mok, Michael L. Balogh, Sean L. McGee, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 431 (2) 1090 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt251
On the evolution and environmental dependence of the star formation rate versus stellar mass relation since z ∼ 2
Yusei Koyama, Ian Smail, Jaron Kurk, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 434 (1) 423 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1035
Do group dynamics play a role in the evolution of member galaxies?
Annie Hou, Laura C. Parker, Michael L. Balogh, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435 (2) 1715 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1410
The environmental dependence of the stellar mass function atz~ 1
R. F. J. van der Burg, A. Muzzin, H. Hoekstra, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 557 A15 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321237
The impact of global environment on galaxy mass functions at low redshift
Rosa Calvi, Bianca M. Poggianti, Benedetta Vulcani and Giovanni FasanoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 432 (4) 3141 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt667
GALAXY CLUSTER BARYON FRACTIONS REVISITED
Anthony H. Gonzalez, Suresh Sivanandam, Ann I. Zabludoff and Dennis ZaritskyThe Astrophysical Journal 778 (1) 14 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/14
The evolution of the mass–size relation for early-type galaxies from z ∼ 1 to the present: dependence on environment, mass range and detailed morphology
M. Huertas-Company, S. Mei, F. Shankar, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 428 (2) 1715 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts150
GREEN GALAXIES IN THE COSMOS FIELD
Zhizheng Pan, Xu Kong and Lulu FanThe Astrophysical Journal 776 (1) 14 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/14
The role of stellar mass and environment for cluster blue fraction, AGN fraction and star formation indicators from a targeted analysis of Abell 1691
Kevin A. Pimbblet and Peter C. JensenMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 426 (2) 1632 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21855.x