Cosmic shear covariance: the log-normal approximation
A&A, 536 (2011) A85
Published online: 2011-12-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
A theoretical approach to density-split clustering
Mathilde Pinon, Arnaud de Mattia, Étienne Burtin, Vanina Ruhlmann-Kleider, Sandrine Codis, Enrique Paillas and Carolina Cuesta-LazaroJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025 (05) 090 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/05/090
KiDS-SBI: Simulation-based inference analysis of KiDS-1000 cosmic shear
Maximilian von Wietersheim-Kramsta, Kiyam Lin, Nicolas Tessore, Benjamin Joachimi, Arthur Loureiro, Robert Reischke and Angus H. WrightAstronomy & Astrophysics 694 A223 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450487
Optimal neural summarization for full-field weak lensing cosmological implicit inference
Denise Lanzieri, Justine Zeghal, T. Lucas Makinen, Alexandre Boucaud, Jean-Luc Starck and François LanusseAstronomy & Astrophysics 697 A162 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451535
Fast generation of weak lensing maps with analytical point transformation functions
Kunhao Zhong, Gary Bernstein, Supranta S. Boruah, Bhuvnesh Jain and Sanjit KoblaPhysical Review D 111 (10) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.103507
Emission-line Stacking of 21 cm Intensity Maps with MeerKLASS: Inference Pipeline and Application to the L-band Deep-field Data
Zhaoting 兆庭 Chen 陈, Steven Cunnington, Alkistis Pourtsidou, Laura Wolz, Marta Spinelli, José Luis Bernal, Matilde Barberi-Squarotti, Stefano Camera, Isabella P. Carucci, José Fonseca, Keith Grainge, Melis O. Irfan, Mario G. Santos and Jingying 婧颖 Wang 王The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 279 (1) 19 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/add897
Euclid preparation
N. Tessore, B. Joachimi, A. Loureiro, A. Hall, G. Cañas-Herrera, I. Tutusaus, N. Jeffrey, K. Naidoo, J. D. McEwen, A. Amara, S. Andreon, N. Auricchio, C. Baccigalupi, M. Baldi, S. Bardelli, F. Bernardeau, D. Bonino, E. Branchini, M. Brescia, J. Brinchmann, A. Caillat, S. Camera, V. Capobianco, C. Carbone, V. F. Cardone, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 694 A141 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452018
C3NN: Cosmological Correlator Convolutional Neural Network an Interpretable Machine-learning Framework for Cosmological Analyses
Zhengyangguang Gong, Anik Halder, Annabelle Bohrdt, Stella Seitz and David GebauerThe Astrophysical Journal 971 (2) 156 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad582e
Dark energy survey year 3 results: cosmology from galaxy clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing in harmonic space
L Faga, F Andrade-Oliveira, H Camacho, R Rosenfeld, M Lima, C Doux, X Fang, J Prat, A Porredon, M Aguena, A Alarcon, S Allam, O Alves, A Amon, S Avila, D Bacon, K Bechtol, M R Becker, G M Bernstein, J Blazek, S Bocquet, D Brooks, E Buckley-Geer, A Campos, A Carnero Rosell, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 536 (2) 1586 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2654
Accurate field-level weak lensing inference for precision cosmology
Alan Junzhe Zhou, Xiangchong Li, Scott Dodelson and Rachel MandelbaumPhysical Review D 110 (2) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.023539
Cosmology from cross-correlation of ACT-DR4 CMB lensing and DES-Y3 cosmic shear
S Shaikh, I Harrison, A van Engelen, G A Marques, T M C Abbott, M Aguena, O Alves, A Amon, R An, D Bacon, N Battaglia, M R Becker, G M Bernstein, E Bertin, J Blazek, J R Bond, D Brooks, D L Burke, E Calabrese, A Carnero Rosell, J Carretero, R Cawthon, C Chang, R Chen, A Choi, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 528 (2) 2112 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3987
Fast and realistic large-scale structure from machine-learning-augmented random field simulations
Davide Piras, Benjamin Joachimi and Francisco Villaescusa-NavarroMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 520 (1) 668 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad052
Joint analysis of Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck . I. Construction of CMB lensing maps and modeling choices
Y. Omori, E. J. Baxter, C. Chang, et al.Physical Review D 107 (2) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.023529
Massive Galaxy Clusters Like El Gordo Hint at Primordial Quantum Diffusion
Jose María Ezquiaga, Juan García-Bellido and Vincent VenninPhysical Review Letters 130 (12) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.121003
KiDS-1000 cosmology: Constraints from density split statistics
Pierre A. Burger, Oliver Friedrich, Joachim Harnois-Déraps, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 669 A69 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244673
Euclid: Covariance of weak lensing pseudo-Cℓ estimates
R. E. Upham, M. L. Brown, L. Whittaker, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 660 A114 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142908
A revised density split statistic model for general filters
Pierre Burger, Oliver Friedrich, Joachim Harnois-Déraps and Peter SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 661 A137 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141628
KaRMMa – kappa reconstruction for mass mapping
Pier Fiedorowicz, Eduardo Rozo, Supranta S Boruah, Chihway Chang and Marco GattiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 512 (1) 73 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac468
Non-Gaussian likelihood of weak lensing power spectra
Alex Hall and Andy TaylorPhysical Review D 105 (12) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123527
Dark energy survey year 3 results: High-precision measurement and modeling of galaxy-galaxy lensing
J. Prat, J. Blazek, C. Sánchez, et al.Physical Review D 105 (8) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.083528
Information entropy in cosmological inference problems
Ana Marta Pinho, Robert Reischke, Marie Teich and Björn Malte SchäferMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (1) 1187 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab561
The integrated three-point correlation function of cosmic shear
Anik Halder, Oliver Friedrich, Stella Seitz and Tamas N VargaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 506 (2) 2780 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1801
Nuw CDM cosmology from the weak-lensing convergence PDF
Aoife Boyle, Cora Uhlemann, Oliver Friedrich, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 505 (2) 2886 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1381
Sufficiency of a Gaussian power spectrum likelihood for accurate cosmology from upcoming weak lensing surveys
Robin E Upham, Michael L Brown and Lee WhittakerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (2) 1999 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab522
Mitigating contamination in LSS surveys: a comparison of methods
Noah Weaverdyck and Dragan HutererMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (4) 5061 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab709
Higher-order statistics of shear field via a machine learning approach
Carolina Parroni, Édouard Tollet, Vincenzo F. Cardone, Roberto Maoli and Roberto ScaramellaAstronomy & Astrophysics 645 A123 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038715
Testing extensions to ΛCDM on small scales with forthcoming cosmic shear surveys
Sam G Stafford, Ian G McCarthy, Juliana Kwan, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 508 (2) 2537 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2787
KiDS-1000 methodology: Modelling and inference for joint weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering analysis
B. Joachimi, C.-A. Lin, M. Asgari, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 646 A129 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038831
Dark Energy Survey year 3 results: covariance modelling and its impact on parameter estimation and quality of fit
O Friedrich, F Andrade-Oliveira, H Camacho, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 508 (3) 3125 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2384
Weak-lensing Mass Reconstruction of Galaxy Clusters with a Convolutional Neural Network
Sungwook E. 성욱 Hong 홍, Sangnam Park, M. James Jee, Dongsu Bak and Sangjun ChaThe Astrophysical Journal 923 (2) 266 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac3090
Primordial non-Gaussianity without tails – how to measure fNL with the bulk of the density PDF
Oliver Friedrich, Cora Uhlemann, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 498 (1) 464 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2160
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology with moments of weak lensing mass maps – validation on simulations
M Gatti, C Chang, O Friedrich, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 498 (3) 4060 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2680
Non-Gaussianity in the weak lensing correlation function likelihood – implications for cosmological parameter biases
Chien-Hao Lin, Joachim Harnois-Déraps, Tim Eifler, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499 (2) 2977 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2948
One-point probability distribution function from spherical collapse: early dark energy versus ΛCDM
Ankush Mandal and Sharvari Nadkarni-GhoshMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 498 (1) 355 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2073
A nulling strategy for modelling lensing convergence in cones with large deviation theory
A Barthelemy, S Codis, C Uhlemann, F Bernardeau and R GavazziMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 492 (3) 3420 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa053
Euclid: The reduced shear approximation and magnification bias for Stage IV cosmic shear experiments
A. C. Deshpande, T. D. Kitching, V. F. Cardone, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 636 A95 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937323
Fisher for complements: extracting cosmology and neutrino mass from the counts-in-cells PDF
Sandrine Codis, Arka Banerjee, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, Oliver Friedrich and Cora UhlemannMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 495 (4) 4006 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1155
Non-perturbative probability distribution function for cosmological counts in cells
Mikhail M. Ivanov, Alexander A. Kaurov and Sergey SibiryakovJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (03) 009 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/03/009
Cosmic shear: Inference from forward models
Peter L. Taylor, Thomas D. Kitching, Justing Alsing, et al.Physical Review D 100 (2) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.023519
Constraints on Cosmology and Baryonic Feedback with the Deep Lens Survey Using Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Mass Power Spectra
Mijin Yoon, M. James Jee, J. Anthony Tyson, Samuel Schmidt, David Wittman and Ami ChoiThe Astrophysical Journal 870 (2) 111 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3a9
Precision matrix expansion – efficient use of numerical simulations in estimating errors on cosmological parameters
Oliver Friedrich and Tim EiflerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 473 (3) 4150 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2566
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
M. A. Troxel, N. MacCrann, J. Zuntz, et al.Physical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043528
Cylinders out of a top hat: counts-in-cells for projected densities
Cora Uhlemann, Christophe Pichon, Sandrine Codis, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 477 (2) 2772 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty664
The effect of baryons in the cosmological lensing PDFs
Tiago Castro, Miguel Quartin, Carlo Giocoli, Stefano Borgani and Klaus DolagMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 478 (1) 1305 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1117
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy-galaxy lensing
J. Prat, C. Sánchez, Y. Fang, et al.Physical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.042005
Density split statistics: Joint model of counts and lensing in cells
O. Friedrich, D. Gruen, J. DeRose, et al.Physical Review D 98 (2) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023508
Cosmological simulations for combined-probe analyses: covariance and neighbour-exclusion bias
J Harnois-Déraps, A Amon, A Choi, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (1) 1337 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2319
Lensing is low: cosmology, galaxy formation or new physics?
Alexie Leauthaud, Shun Saito, Stefan Hilbert, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 467 (3) 3024 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx258
Testing the lognormality of the galaxy and weak lensing convergence distributions from Dark Energy Survey maps
L. Clerkin, D. Kirk, M. Manera, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 466 (2) 1444 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2106
Variations of cosmic large-scale structure covariance matrices across parameter space
Robert Reischke, Alina Kiessling and Björn Malte SchäferMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (4) 4016 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2976
Non-linear shrinkage estimation of large-scale structure covariance
Benjamin JoachimiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 466 (1) L83 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slw240
Intrinsic alignments of galaxies in the Illustris simulation
Stefan Hilbert, Dandan Xu, Peter Schneider, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 468 (1) 790 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx482
Bayesian weak lensing tomography: Reconstructing the 3D large-scale distribution of matter with a lognormal prior
Vanessa Böhm, Stefan Hilbert, Maksim Greiner and Torsten A. EnßlinPhysical Review D 96 (12) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.123510
Inference from the small scales of cosmic shear with current and future Dark Energy Survey data
N. MacCrann, J. Aleksić, A. Amara, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (3) 2567 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2849
What does the N-point function hierarchy of the cosmological matter density field really measure?
J. Carron and I. SzapudiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 469 (3) 2855 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1038
KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
H. Hildebrandt, M. Viola, C. Heymans, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (2) 1454 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2805
Cosmological parameters, shear maps and power spectra from CFHTLenS using Bayesian hierarchical inference
Justin Alsing, Alan Heavens and Andrew H. JaffeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 466 (3) 3272 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw3161
Fast weak-lensing simulations with halo model
Carlo Giocoli, Sandra Di Meo, Massimo Meneghetti, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 470 (3) 3574 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1399
COSMIC SHEAR RESULTS FROM THE DEEP LENS SURVEY. II. FULL COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER CONSTRAINTS FROM TOMOGRAPHY
M. James Jee, J. Anthony Tyson, Stefan Hilbert, Michael D. Schneider, Samuel Schmidt and David WittmanThe Astrophysical Journal 824 (2) 77 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/77
Performance of internal covariance estimators for cosmic shear correlation functions
O. Friedrich, S. Seitz, T. F. Eifler and D. GruenMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456 (3) 2662 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2833
Astrophysical Applications of Gravitational Lensing
Peter SchneiderAstrophysical Applications of Gravitational Lensing 141 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139940306.006
Improving lognormal models for cosmological fields
Henrique S. Xavier, Filipe B. Abdalla and Benjamin JoachimiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 459 (4) 3693 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw874
Ray-tracing simulations of coupled dark energy models
Francesco Pace, Marco Baldi, Lauro Moscardini, David Bacon and Robert CrittendenMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 447 (1) 858 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2513
Cosmological constraints from the CFHTLenS shear measurements using a new, accurate, and flexible way of predicting non-linear mass clustering
Raul E. Angulo and Stefan HilbertMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 448 (1) 364 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv050
A new data compression method and its application to cosmic shear analysis
Marika Asgari and Peter SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 578 A50 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424905
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Martin KilbingerReports on Progress in Physics 78 (8) 086901 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901
Estimating cosmological parameter covariance
A. Taylor and B. JoachimiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 442 (3) 2728 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu996
An optimal survey geometry of weak lensing survey: minimizing supersample covariance
Ryuichi Takahashi, Shunji Soma, Masahiro Takada and Issha KayoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 444 (4) 3473 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1693
Tomography and weak lensing statistics
Dipak Munshi, Peter Coles and Martin KilbingerJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (04) 004 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/04/004
Putting the precision in precision cosmology: How accurate should your data covariance matrix be?
A. Taylor, B. Joachimi and T. KitchingMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 432 (3) 1928 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt270
Accurate weak lensing of standard candles. I. Flexible cosmological fits
Valerio Marra, Miguel Quartin and Luca AmendolaPhysical Review D 88 (6) (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.063004
Gravitational lensing effects on submillimetre galaxy counts
Xinzhong Er, Guoliang Li, Shude Mao and Liang CaoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 430 (2) 1423 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt012
CFHTLenS: combined probe cosmological model comparison using 2D weak gravitational lensing
Martin Kilbinger, Liping Fu, Catherine Heymans, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 430 (3) 2200 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt041
CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing cosmological parameter constraints: Mitigating the impact of intrinsic galaxy alignments
Catherine Heymans, Emma Grocutt, Alan Heavens, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 432 (3) 2433 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt601
COSMIC SHEAR RESULTS FROM THE DEEP LENS SURVEY. I. JOINT CONSTRAINTS ON ΩMAND σ8WITH A TWO-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
M. James Jee, J. Anthony Tyson, Michael D. Schneider, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 765 (1) 74 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/74
Retrieving the three-dimensional matter power spectrum and galaxy biasing parameters from lensing tomography
P. SimonAstronomy & Astrophysics 543 A2 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118224
Measuring primordial non-Gaussianity with weak lensing surveys
Stefan Hilbert, Laura Marian, Robert E. Smith and Vincent DesjacquesMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 426 (4) 2870 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21841.x
The bispectrum covariance beyond Gaussianity
S. Martin, P. Schneider and P. SimonAstronomy & Astrophysics 540 A9 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118020
Gravitational lensing simulations - I. Covariance matrices and halo catalogues
Joachim Harnois-Déraps, Sanaz Vafaei and Ludovic Van WaerbekeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 426 (2) 1262 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21624.x
Cosmic shear tomography and efficient data compression using COSEBIs
M. Asgari, P. Schneider and P. SimonAstronomy & Astrophysics 542 A122 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201218828
ON THE INADEQUACY OFN-POINT CORRELATION FUNCTIONS TO DESCRIBE NONLINEAR COSMOLOGICAL FIELDS: EXPLICIT EXAMPLES AND CONNECTION TO SIMULATIONS
Julien Carron and Mark C. NeyrinckThe Astrophysical Journal 750 (1) 28 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/28