The LX – Tvir relation in galaxy clusters: effects of radiative cooling and AGN heating
A&A, 532 (2011) A133
Published online: 2011-08-04
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey: The morphologies of clusters of galaxies
J. S. Sanders, Y. E. Bahar, E. Bulbul, V. Ghirardini, A. Liu, N. Clerc, M. E. Ramos-Ceja, T. H. Reiprich, F. Balzer, J. Comparat, M. Kluge, F. Pacaud and X. ZhangAstronomy & Astrophysics 695 A160 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452618
The first high-redshift cavity power measurements of cool-core galaxy clusters with the International LOFAR Telescope
R. Timmerman, R. J. van Weeren, A. Botteon, H. J. A. Röttgering, L. K. Morabito and F. SweijenAstronomy & Astrophysics 687 A31 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347974
The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey
K. Migkas, D. Kox, G. Schellenberger, A. Veronica, F. Pacaud, T. H. Reiprich, Y. E. Bahar, F. Balzer, E. Bulbul, J. Comparat, K. Dennerl, M. Freyberg, C. Garrel, V. Ghirardini, S. Grandis, M. Kluge, A. Liu, M. E. Ramos-Ceja, J. Sanders and X. ZhangAstronomy & Astrophysics 688 A107 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202349006
Halo scaling relations and hydrostatic mass bias in the simba simulation from realistic mock X-ray catalogues
Fred Jennings and Romeel DavéMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 526 (1) 1367 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2666
Measuring the X-ray luminosities of DESI groups from eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey – I. X-ray luminosity–halo mass scaling relation
Yun-Liang Zheng, Xiaohu Yang, Min He, Shi-Yin Shen, Qingyang Li and Xuejie LiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 523 (4) 4909 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1684
Non self-similar Luminosity–temperature relation and dynamical friction
Antonino Del Popolo, Morgan Le Delliou and Man Ho ChanPhysics of the Dark Universe 37 101110 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2022.101110
The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)
Vittorio Ghirardini, Y. Emre Bahar, Esra Bulbul, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 661 A12 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141639
Cosmological implications of the anisotropy of ten galaxy cluster scaling relations
K. Migkas, F. Pacaud, G. Schellenberger, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 649 A151 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140296
Scaling Properties of Galaxy Groups
Lorenzo Lovisari, Stefano Ettori, Massimo Gaspari and Paul A. GilesUniverse 7 (5) 139 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7050139
Systematic Perturbations of the Thermodynamic Properties in Cool Cores of HIFLUGCS Galaxy Clusters
Shutaro Ueda, Keiichi Umetsu, FanLam Ng, Yuto Ichinohe, Tetsu Kitayama and Sandor M. MolnarThe Astrophysical Journal 922 (1) 81 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1f16
Constraints on precipitation-limited hot haloes from massive galaxies to galaxy clusters
Priyanka Singh, G M Voit and Biman B NathMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501 (2) 2467 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3827
X-ray properties of the X-CLASS-redMaPPer galaxy cluster sample: the luminosity–temperature relation
Mona Molham, Nicolas Clerc, Ali Takey, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (1) 161 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa677
Probing cosmic isotropy with a new X-ray galaxy cluster sample through theLX–Tscaling relation
K. Migkas, G. Schellenberger, T. H. Reiprich, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 636 A15 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936602
Toward a characterization of X-ray galaxy clusters for cosmology
Florian Käfer, Alexis Finoguenov, Dominique Eckert, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 628 A43 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935124
The X-Ray Halo Scaling Relations of Supermassive Black Holes
M. Gaspari, D. Eckert, S. Ettori, P. Tozzi, L. Bassini, E. Rasia, F. Brighenti, M. Sun, S. Borgani, S. D. Johnson, G. R. Tremblay, J. M. Stone, P. Temi, H.-Y. K. Yang, F. Tombesi and M. CappiThe Astrophysical Journal 884 (2) 169 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3c5d
The 3XMM/SDSS Stripe 82 Galaxy Cluster Survey – II. X-ray and optical properties of the cluster sample
Adèle Plat, Mona Molham, Amael Ellien, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 486 (4) 4863 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1097
Anisotropy of the galaxy cluster X-ray luminosity–temperature relation
Konstantinos Migkas and Thomas H. ReiprichAstronomy & Astrophysics 611 A50 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731222
A study of spectral curvature in the radio relic in Abell 4038 using the uGMRT
Ruta Kale, Viral Parekh and K S DwarakanathMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 480 (4) 5352 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2227
The many lives of active galactic nuclei–II: The formation and evolution of radio jets and their impact on galaxy evolution
Mojtaba Raouf, Stanislav S. Shabala, Darren J. Croton, Habib G. Khosroshahi and Maksym BernykMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 471 (1) 658 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1598
Testing for X-Ray–SZ Differences and Redshift Evolution in the X-Ray Morphology of Galaxy Clusters
D. Nurgaliev, M. McDonald, B. A. Benson, L. Bleem, S. Bocquet, W. R. Forman, G. P. Garmire, N. Gupta, J. Hlavacek-Larrondo, J. J. Mohr, D. Nagai, D. Rapetti, A. A. Stark, C. W. Stubbs and A. VikhlininThe Astrophysical Journal 841 (1) 5 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6db4
Understanding ‘galaxy groups’ as a unique structure in the universe
S. Paul, R. S. John, P. Gupta and H. KumarMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 471 (1) 2 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1488
A relationship between halo mass, cooling, active galactic nuclei heating and the co-evolution of massive black holes
R. A. Main, B. R. McNamara, P. E. J. Nulsen, H. R. Russell and A. N. VantyghemMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 464 (4) 4360 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2644
The challenging task of determining star formation rates: the case of a massive stellar burst in the brightest cluster galaxy of Phoenix galaxy cluster
Rupal Mittal, M. McDonald, John T. Whelan and Gustavo BruzualMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (3) 3143 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2915
Chandrameasurements of a complete sample of X-ray luminous galaxy clusters: the luminosity–mass relation
P. A. Giles, B. J. Maughan, H. Dahle, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (1) 858 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2621
Abell 315: reconciling cluster mass estimates from kinematics, X-ray, and lensing
A. Biviano, P. Popesso, J. P. Dietrich, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 602 A20 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629471
HICOSMO – cosmology with a complete sample of galaxy clusters – I. Data analysis, sample selection and luminosity–mass scaling relation
G. Schellenberger and T. H. ReiprichMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 469 (3) 3738 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1022
SZ/X-ray scaling relations using X-ray data andPlanckNominal maps
I. De Martino and F. Atrio-BarandelaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 461 (3) 3222 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1493
High significance detection of the tSZ effect relativistic corrections
G. HurierAstronomy & Astrophysics 596 A61 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629726
Investigating the cores of fossil systems withChandra
V. Bharadwaj, T. H. Reiprich, J. S. Sanders and G. SchellenbergerAstronomy & Astrophysics 585 A125 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525824
THE MASSIVE SURVEY. IV. THE X-RAY HALOS OF THE MOST MASSIVE EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES IN THE NEARBY UNIVERSE
Andy D. Goulding, Jenny E. Greene, Chung-Pei Ma, Melanie Veale, Akos Bogdan, Kristina Nyland, John P. Blakeslee, Nicholas J. McConnell and Jens ThomasThe Astrophysical Journal 826 (2) 167 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/167
Extending theLX–Trelation from clusters to groups
V. Bharadwaj, T. H. Reiprich, L. Lovisari and H. J. EckmillerAstronomy & Astrophysics 573 A75 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424586
Scaling properties of a complete X-ray selected galaxy group sample
L. Lovisari, T. H. Reiprich and G. SchellenbergerAstronomy & Astrophysics 573 A118 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423954
X-RAY-SELECTED GALAXY GROUPS IN BOÖTES
Bruna Vajgel, Christine Jones, Paulo A. A. Lopes, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 794 (1) 88 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/88
The XMM-LSS survey: the Class 1 cluster sample over the extended 11 deg2 and its spatial distribution
N. Clerc, C. Adami, M. Lieu, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 444 (3) 2723 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1625
Extragalactic jets as probes of distant clusters of galaxies and the clusters occupied by bent radio AGN (COBRA) survey
Elizabeth L. Blanton, Rachel Paterno-Mahler, Joshua D. Wing, et al.Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 10 (S313) 315 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921315002410
Intracluster medium cooling, AGN feedback, and brightest cluster galaxy properties of galaxy groups
V. Bharadwaj, T. H. Reiprich, G. Schellenberger, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 572 A46 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322684
A comparative study of local galaxy clusters – II. X-ray and SZ scaling relations
E. Rozo, A. E. Evrard, E. S. Rykoff and J. G. BartlettMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 438 (1) 62 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2160
Investigating the velocity structure and X-ray observable properties of simulated galaxy clusters with PHOX
V. Biffi, K. Dolag and H. BöhringerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 428 (2) 1395 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts120
JOINT ANALYSIS OF CLUSTER OBSERVATIONS. II. CHANDRA/XMM-NEWTON X-RAY AND WEAK LENSING SCALING RELATIONS FOR A SAMPLE OF 50 RICH CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES
Andisheh Mahdavi, Henk Hoekstra, Arif Babul, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 767 (2) 116 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/116
Scaling Relations for Galaxy Clusters: Properties and Evolution
S. Giodini, L. Lovisari, E. Pointecouteau, et al.Space Science Reviews 177 (1-4) 247 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-9994-5
The 2XMMi/SDSS Galaxy Cluster Survey
A. Takey, A. Schwope and G. LamerAstronomy & Astrophysics 558 A75 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220213
The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys - II. Application of the CR-HR method to the XMM archive
N. Clerc, T. Sadibekova, M. Pierre, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 423 (4) 3561 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21153.x
The XMM Cluster Survey: the interplay between the brightest cluster galaxy and the intracluster medium via AGN feedback
John P. Stott, Ryan C. Hickox, Alastair C. Edge, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 422 (3) 2213 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20764.x
Self-similar scaling and evolution in the galaxy cluster X-ray luminosity-temperature relation
B. J. Maughan, P. A. Giles, S. W. Randall, C. Jones and W. R. FormanMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 421 (2) 1583 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20419.x
The X-ray cluster survey with : forecasts for cosmology, cluster physics and primordial non-Gaussianity
Annalisa Pillepich, Cristiano Porciani and Thomas H. ReiprichMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 422 (1) 44 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20443.x
Testing the low-mass end of X-ray scaling relations with a sample ofChandragalaxy groups
H. J. Eckmiller, D. S. Hudson and T. H. ReiprichAstronomy & Astrophysics 535 A105 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201116734