Weighing simulated galaxy clusters using lensing and X-ray
A&A, 514 (2010) A93
Published online: 2010-05-27
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Variegate galaxy cluster gas content: Mean fraction, scatter, selection effects, and covariance with X-ray luminosity
S. Andreon, J. Wang, G. Trinchieri, A. Moretti and A. L. SerraAstronomy & Astrophysics 606 A24 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730722
The Frontier Fields lens modelling comparison project
M. Meneghetti, P. Natarajan, D. Coe, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 472 (3) 3177 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2064
Pressure of the hot gas in simulations of galaxy clusters
S. Planelles, D. Fabjan, S. Borgani, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 467 (4) 3827 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx318
CLUMP-3D: three-dimensional lensing and multi-probe analysis of MACS J1206.2−0847, a remarkably regular cluster
Mauro Sereno, Stefano Ettori, Massimo Meneghetti, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 467 (4) 3801 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx326
Calibrating the Planck Cluster Mass Scale with Cluster Velocity Dispersions
Stefania Amodeo, Simona Mei, Spencer A. Stanford, James G. Bartlett, Jean-Baptiste Melin, Charles R. Lawrence, Ranga-Ram Chary, Hyunjin Shim, Francine Marleau and Daniel SternThe Astrophysical Journal 844 (2) 101 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa7063
Next Generation Virgo Cluster Survey. XXI. The Weak Lensing Masses of the CFHTLS and NGVS RedGOLD Galaxy Clusters and Calibration of the Optical Richness
Carolina Parroni, Simona Mei, Thomas Erben, Ludovic Van Waerbeke, Anand Raichoor, Jes Ford, Rossella Licitra, Massimo Meneghetti, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Lance Miller, Patrick Côté, Giovanni Covone, Jean-Charles Cuillandre, Pierre-Alain Duc, Laura Ferrarese, Stephen D. J. Gwyn and Thomas H. PuziaThe Astrophysical Journal 848 (2) 114 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa8b6c
STACKING CAUSTIC MASSES FROM GALAXY CLUSTERS
Daniel Gifford, Nicholas Kern and Christopher J. MillerThe Astrophysical Journal 834 (2) 204 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/204
First Weak-lensing Results from “See Change”: Quantifying Dark Matter in the Two z ≳ 1.5 High-redshift Galaxy Clusters SPT-CL J2040–4451 and IDCS J1426+3508
M. James Jee, Jongwan Ko, Saul Perlmutter, Anthony Gonzalez, Mark Brodwin, Eric Linder and Peter EisenhardtThe Astrophysical Journal 847 (2) 117 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa88bc
The galaxy cluster concentration–mass scaling relation
A. M. Groener, D. M. Goldberg and M. SerenoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455 (1) 892 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2341
Reconstruction of the mass distribution of galaxy clusters from the inversion of the thermal Sunyaev–Zel'dovich effect
C. L. Majer, S. Meyer, S. Konrad, E. Sarli and M. BartelmannMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460 (1) 844 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw952
Mesh-free free-form lensing – I. Methodology and application to mass reconstruction
Julian MertenMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 461 (3) 2328 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1413
Comparison of weak lensing by NFW and Einasto halos and systematic errors
Mauro Sereno, Cosimo Fedeli and Lauro MoscardiniJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (01) 042 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/042
Covariance in the thermal SZ–weak lensing mass scaling relation of galaxy clusters
Masato Shirasaki, Daisuke Nagai and Erwin T. LauMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460 (4) 3913 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1263
A CHANDRA STUDY OF TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTIONS OF THE INTRACLUSTER MEDIUM IN 50 GALAXY CLUSTERS
Zhenghao Zhu, Haiguang Xu, Jingying Wang, Junhua Gu, Weitian Li, Dan Hu, Chenhao Zhang, Liyi Gu, Tao An, Chengze Liu, Zhongli Zhang, Jie Zhu and Xiang-Ping WuThe Astrophysical Journal 816 (2) 54 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/816/2/54
Selecting background galaxies in weak-lensing analysis of galaxy clusters
I. Formicola, M. Radovich, M. Meneghetti, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 458 (3) 2776 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw493
LoCuSS: weak-lensing mass calibration of galaxy clusters
Nobuhiro Okabe and Graham P. SmithMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 461 (4) 3794 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1539
Characterizing strong lensing galaxy clusters using the Millennium-XXL and moka simulations
Carlo Giocoli, Mario Bonamigo, Marceau Limousin, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 462 (1) 167 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1651
The XXL Survey
M. Lieu, G. P. Smith, P. A. Giles, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 592 A4 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526883
Planck2015 results
P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 594 A24 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525833
Weak-lensing mass calibration of the Atacama Cosmology Telescope equatorial Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster sample with the Canada-France-Hawaii telescope stripe 82 survey
N. Battaglia, A. Leauthaud, H. Miyatake, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (08) 013 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/013
ON THE NATURE OF HYDROSTATIC EQUILIBRIUM IN GALAXY CLUSTERS
V. Biffi, S. Borgani, G. Murante, E. Rasia, S. Planelles, G. L. Granato, C. Ragone-Figueroa, A. M. Beck, M. Gaspari and K. DolagThe Astrophysical Journal 827 (2) 112 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/112
PICS: SIMULATIONS OF STRONG GRAVITATIONAL LENSING IN GALAXY CLUSTERS
Nan Li, Michael D. Gladders, Esteban M. Rangel, Michael K. Florian, Lindsey E. Bleem, Katrin Heitmann, Salman Habib and Patricia FaselThe Astrophysical Journal 828 (1) 54 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/54
CLASH: JOINT ANALYSIS OF STRONG-LENSING, WEAK-LENSING SHEAR, AND MAGNIFICATION DATA FOR 20 GALAXY CLUSTERS*
Keiichi Umetsu, Adi Zitrin, Daniel Gruen, Julian Merten, Megan Donahue and Marc PostmanThe Astrophysical Journal 821 (2) 116 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/116
Central mass profiles of the nearby cool-core galaxy clusters Hydra A and A478
N. Okabe, K. Umetsu, T. Tamura, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456 (4) 4475 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2916
Analytical model for non-thermal pressure in galaxy clusters – III. Removing the hydrostatic mass bias
Xun Shi, Eiichiro Komatsu, Daisuke Nagai and Erwin T. LauMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455 (3) 2936 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2504
The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: detailed study of systematics and updated weak lensing masses★
Henk Hoekstra, Ricardo Herbonnet, Adam Muzzin, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (1) 685 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv275
The mass–concentration relation in lensing clusters: the role of statistical biases and selection effects
Mauro Sereno, Carlo Giocoli, Stefano Ettori and Lauro MoscardiniMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (2) 2024 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv416
A weak lensing analysis of the PLCK G100.2-30.4 cluster
M. Radovich, I. Formicola, M. Meneghetti, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 579 A7 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425600
Automatic Selection of Multiple Images in the Frontier Field Clusters
Guillaume Mahler, Johan Richard, Benjamin Clément, David Lagattuta and Vera PatricioProceedings of the International Astronomical Union 11 (A29B) 779 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921316006797
ILLUMINATING A DARK LENS: A TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA MAGNIFIED BY THE FRONTIER FIELDS GALAXY CLUSTER ABELL 2744
Steven A. Rodney, Brandon Patel, Daniel Scolnic, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 811 (1) 70 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/811/1/70
CoMaLit – II. The scaling relation between mass and Sunyaev–Zel'dovich signal for Planck selected galaxy clusters
Mauro Sereno, Stefano Ettori and Lauro MoscardiniMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450 (4) 3649 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv809
Comparing masses in literature (CoMaLit) – I. Bias and scatter in weak lensing and X-ray mass estimates of clusters
Mauro Sereno and Stefano EttoriMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450 (4) 3633 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv810
Detection of universality of dark matter profile from Subaru weak lensing measurements of 50 massive clusters
Hiroko Niikura, Masahiro Takada, Nobuhiro Okabe, Rossella Martino and Ryuichi TakahashiPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 67 (6) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psv090
CHANDRAANDXMM-NEWTONOBSERVATIONS OF THE MERGING CLUSTER OF GALAXIES PLCK G036.7+14.9
B. Zhang, L. P. David, C. Jones, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 804 (2) 129 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/129
X-ray galaxy clusters abundance and mass temperature scaling
Stéphane Ilić, Alain Blanchard and Marian DouspisAstronomy & Astrophysics 582 A79 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526793
CoMaLit – III. Literature catalogues of weak lensing clusters of galaxies (LC2)
Mauro SerenoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450 (4) 3665 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2505
Making the observational parsimonious richness a working mass proxy
S. AndreonAstronomy & Astrophysics 582 A100 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526081
CFHTLenS: weak lensing calibrated scaling relations for low-mass clusters of galaxies
K. Kettula, S. Giodini, E. van Uitert, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 451 (2) 1460 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv923
Analytical model for non-thermal pressure in galaxy clusters – II. Comparison with cosmological hydrodynamics simulation
Xun Shi, Eiichiro Komatsu, Kaylea Nelson and Daisuke NagaiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 448 (1) 1020 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv036
A MULTI-WAVELENGTH MASS ANALYSIS OF RCS2 J232727.6-020437, A ∼3 × 1015M⊙GALAXY CLUSTER ATz= 0.7
K. Sharon, M. D. Gladders, D. P. Marrone, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 814 (1) 21 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/21
LoCuSS: Testing hydrostatic equilibrium in galaxy clusters
G. P. Smith, P. Mazzotta, N. Okabe, F. Ziparo, S. L. Mulroy, A. Babul, A. Finoguenov, I. G. McCarthy, M. Lieu, Y. M. Bahé, H. Bourdin, A. E. Evrard, T. Futamase, C. P. Haines, M. Jauzac, D. P. Marrone, R. Martino, P. E. May, J. E. Taylor and K. UmetsuMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 456 (1) L74 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slv175
Low X-ray luminosity galaxy clusters – III. Weak lensing mass determination at 0.18
Elizabeth Johana Gonzalez, Gael Foëx, José Luis Nilo Castellón, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 452 (3) 2225 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv787
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 452 (3) 2225 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv787
The X-ray properties of weak-lensing-selected galaxy clusters
P. A. Giles, B. J. Maughan, T. Hamana, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 447 (4) 3044 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2679
CLASH: THE CONCENTRATION-MASS RELATION OF GALAXY CLUSTERS
J. Merten, M. Meneghetti, M. Postman, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 806 (1) 4 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/4
Probing the diffuse baryon distribution with the lensing-tSZ cross-correlation
Yin-Zhe Ma, Ludovic Van Waerbeke, Gary Hinshaw, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (09) 046 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/046
Magnetorotational instability in cool cores of galaxy clusters
Carlo Nipoti, L. Posti, S. Ettori and M. BianconiJournal of Plasma Physics 81 (5) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377815000781
LoCuSS: hydrostatic mass measurements of the high-LX cluster sample – cross-calibration of Chandra and XMM–Newton
Rossella Martino, Pasquale Mazzotta, Hervé Bourdin, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 443 (3) 2342 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1267
CLASH: A CENSUS OF MAGNIFIED STAR-FORMING GALAXIES ATz∼ 6-8
L. D. Bradley, A. Zitrin, D. Coe, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 792 (1) 76 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/76
THE MUSIC OF CLASH: PREDICTIONS ON THE CONCENTRATION-MASS RELATION
M. Meneghetti, E. Rasia, J. Vega, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 797 (1) 34 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/34
Weighing the Giants – I. Weak-lensing masses for 51 massive galaxy clusters: project overview, data analysis methods and cluster images
Anja von der Linden, Mark T. Allen, Douglas E. Applegate, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 439 (1) 2 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1945
WEIGHING GALAXY CLUSTERS WITH GAS. II. ON THE ORIGIN OF HYDROSTATIC MASS BIAS IN ΛCDM GALAXY CLUSTERS
Kaylea Nelson, Erwin T. Lau, Daisuke Nagai, Douglas H. Rudd and Liang YuThe Astrophysical Journal 782 (2) 107 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/107
WEIGHING “EL GORDO” WITH A PRECISION SCALE:HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPEWEAK-LENSING ANALYSIS OF THE MERGING GALAXY CLUSTER ACT-CL J0102–4915 ATz= 0.87
M. James Jee, John P. Hughes, Felipe Menanteau, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 785 (1) 20 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/20
A RIGOROUS FREE-FORM LENS MODEL OF A2744 TO MEET THE HUBBLE FRONTIER FIELDS CHALLENGE
Daniel Lam, Tom Broadhurst, Jose M. Diego, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 797 (2) 98 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/98
Mass and concentration estimates from weak and strong gravitational lensing: a systematic study
Carlo Giocoli, Massimo Meneghetti, R. Benton Metcalf, Stefano Ettori and Lauro MoscardiniMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 440 (2) 1899 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu303
LoCuSS: the near-infrared luminosity and weak-lensing mass scaling relation of galaxy clusters
Sarah L. Mulroy, Graham P. Smith, Chris P. Haines, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 443 (4) 3309 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1387
TEMPERATURE STRUCTURE OF THE INTRACLUSTER MEDIUM FROM SMOOTHED-PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS AND ADAPTIVE-MESH REFINEMENT SIMULATIONS
Elena Rasia, Erwin T. Lau, Stefano Borgani, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 791 (2) 96 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/96
The extended ROSAT-ESO Flux Limited X-ray Galaxy Cluster Survey (REFLEX II)
Hans Böhringer, Gayoung Chon and Chris A. CollinsAstronomy & Astrophysics 570 A31 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201323155
Comparison of strong gravitational lens model software I. Redshift and model dependence of time delay and mass calculations
A.T. Lefor and T. FutamaseAstronomy and Computing 6 28 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2014.04.006
SARCS strong-lensing galaxy groups
G. Foëx, V. Motta, E. Jullo, M. Limousin and T. VerdugoAstronomy & Astrophysics 572 A19 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424706
Analytical model for non-thermal pressure in galaxy clusters
Xun Shi and Eiichiro KomatsuMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 442 (1) 521 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu858
CLASH: WEAK-LENSING SHEAR-AND-MAGNIFICATION ANALYSIS OF 20 GALAXY CLUSTERS
Keiichi Umetsu, Elinor Medezinski, Mario Nonino, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 795 (2) 163 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/163
Weighing the Giants – III. Methods and measurements of accurate galaxy cluster weak-lensing masses
Douglas E. Applegate, Anja von der Linden, Patrick L. Kelly, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 439 (1) 48 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2129
A comparative study of local galaxy clusters – I. Derived X-ray observables
E. Rozo, E. S. Rykoff, J. G. Bartlett and A. EvrardMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 438 (1) 49 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2091
Some like it triaxial: the universality of dark matter halo shapes and their evolution along the cosmic time
Giulia Despali, Carlo Giocoli and Giuseppe TormenMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 443 (4) 3208 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1393
Reconstructing the projected gravitational potential of galaxy clusters from galaxy kinematics
Eleonora Sarli, Sven Meyer, Massimo Meneghetti, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 570 A9 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321748
The MUSIC of galaxy clusters – II. X-ray global properties and scaling relations
V. Biffi, F. Sembolini, M. De Petris, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 439 (1) 588 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu018
Planck2013 results. XX. Cosmology from Sunyaev–Zeldovich cluster counts
P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 571 A20 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321521
THREE GRAVITATIONALLY LENSED SUPERNOVAE BEHIND CLASH GALAXY CLUSTERS
Brandon Patel, Curtis McCully, Saurabh W. Jha, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 786 (1) 9 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/9
Masses of Galaxy Clusters from Gravitational Lensing
Henk Hoekstra, Matthias Bartelmann, Håkon Dahle, et al.Space Science Reviews 177 (1-4) 75 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-9978-5
Mass, shape and thermal properties of Abell 1689 using a multiwavelength X-ray, lensing and Sunyaev–Zel'dovich analysis
Mauro Sereno, Stefano Ettori, Keiichi Umetsu and Alessandro BaldiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 428 (3) 2241 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts186
Mass Profiles of Galaxy Clusters from X-ray Analysis
Stefano Ettori, Annamaria Donnarumma, Etienne Pointecouteau, et al.Space Science Reviews 177 (1-4) 119 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-9976-7
The astrophysics of the intracluster plasma
Alfonso Cavaliere and Andrea LapiPhysics Reports 533 (3) 69 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2013.08.001
Outskirts of Galaxy Clusters
Thomas H. Reiprich, Kaustuv Basu, Stefano Ettori, et al.Space Science Reviews 177 (1-4) 195 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-9983-8
Observational probes of cosmic acceleration
David H. Weinberg, Michael J. Mortonson, Daniel J. Eisenstein, et al.Physics Reports 530 (2) 87 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001
Studying the properties of galaxy cluster morphology estimators
A. Weißmann, H. Böhringer, R. Šuhada and S. AmeglioAstronomy & Astrophysics 549 A19 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219333
CLASH: COMPLETE LENSING ANALYSIS OF THE LARGEST COSMIC LENS MACS J0717.5+3745 AND SURROUNDING STRUCTURES
Elinor Medezinski, Keiichi Umetsu, Mario Nonino, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 777 (1) 43 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/43
The mass–concentration relation in massive galaxy clusters at redshift ∼1
Mauro Sereno and Giovanni CovoneMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 434 (1) 878 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1086
Gas rotation in galaxy clusters: signatures and detectability in X-rays
Matteo Bianconi, Stefano Ettori and Carlo NipotiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 434 (2) 1565 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1112
Order statistics applied to the most massive and most distant galaxy clusters
J.-C. Waizmann, S. Ettori and M. BartelmannMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 432 (2) 914 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt460
Internal Cluster Structure
Matthias Bartelmann, Marceau Limousin, Massimo Meneghetti and Robert SchmidtSpace Science Reviews 177 (1-4) 3 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-9977-6
Planckintermediate results
P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 550 A129 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219398
Planckintermediate results
P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 554 A140 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220247
ON THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEORETICAL AND X-RAY CONCENTRATION-MASS RELATIONS FOR GALAXY CLUSTERS
E. Rasia, S. Borgani, S. Ettori, P. Mazzotta and M. MeneghettiThe Astrophysical Journal 776 (1) 39 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/39
Cluster mass profiles from X‐ray observations: Present constraints and limitations
S. EttoriAstronomische Nachrichten 334 (4-5) 354 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.201211856
A SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF CAUSTIC METHODS FOR GALAXY CLUSTER MASSES
Daniel Gifford, Christopher Miller and Nicholas KernThe Astrophysical Journal 773 (2) 116 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/116
WEIGHING GALAXY CLUSTERS WITH GAS. I. ON THE METHODS OF COMPUTING HYDROSTATIC MASS BIAS
Erwin T. Lau, Daisuke Nagai and Kaylea NelsonThe Astrophysical Journal 777 (2) 151 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/151
THE DENSITY PROFILES OF MASSIVE, RELAXED GALAXY CLUSTERS. I. THE TOTAL DENSITY OVER THREE DECADES IN RADIUS
Andrew B. Newman, Tommaso Treu, Richard S. Ellis, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 765 (1) 24 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/24
Arc Statistics
M. Meneghetti, M. Bartelmann, H. Dahle and M. LimousinSpace Science Reviews 177 (1-4) 31 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-9981-x
JOINT ANALYSIS OF CLUSTER OBSERVATIONS. II. CHANDRA/XMM-NEWTON X-RAY AND WEAK LENSING SCALING RELATIONS FOR A SAMPLE OF 50 RICH CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES
Andisheh Mahdavi, Henk Hoekstra, Arif Babul, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 767 (2) 116 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/116
Cosmology in two dimensions: the concentration-mass relation for galaxy clusters
Carlo Giocoli, Massimo Meneghetti, Stefano Ettori and Lauro MoscardiniMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 426 (2) 1558 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21743.x
moka: a new tool for strong lensing studies
Carlo Giocoli, Massimo Meneghetti, Matthias Bartelmann, Lauro Moscardini and Michele BoldrinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 421 (4) 3343 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20558.x
X-ray, lensing and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich triaxial analysis of Abell 1835 out to R200
Andrea Morandi, Marceau Limousin, Jack Sayers, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 425 (3) 2069 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21196.x
TESTING HYDROSTATIC EQUILIBRIUM IN GALAXY CLUSTER MS 2137
I-Non Tim Chiu and Sandor M. MolnarThe Astrophysical Journal 756 (1) 1 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/1
LoCuSS: THE SUNYAEV–ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT AND WEAK-LENSING MASS SCALING RELATION
Daniel P. Marrone, Graham P. Smith, Nobuhiro Okabe, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 754 (2) 119 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/119
EVOLUTION OF THE MERGER-INDUCED HYDROSTATIC MASS BIAS IN GALAXY CLUSTERS
Kaylea Nelson, Douglas H. Rudd, Laurie Shaw and Daisuke NagaiThe Astrophysical Journal 751 (2) 121 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/121
The dark matter distribution inz ~ 0.5 clusters of galaxies
G. Foëx, G. Soucail, E. Pointecouteau, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 546 A106 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201218973
Detailed Sunyaev-Zel'dovich study with AMI of 19 LoCuSS galaxy clusters: masses and temperatures out to the virial radius
Carmen Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, Timothy W. Shimwell, Matthew L. Davies, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 425 (1) 162 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21419.x
Lensing and x-ray mass estimates of clusters (simulations)
E Rasia, M Meneghetti, R Martino, et al.New Journal of Physics 14 (5) 055018 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/055018
Triaxiality, principal axis orientation and non-thermal pressure in Abell 383
Andrea Morandi and Marceau LimousinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 421 (4) 3147 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20537.x
Mock weak lensing analysis of simulated galaxy clusters: bias and scatter in mass and concentration
Yannick M. Bahé, Ian G. McCarthy and Lindsay J. KingMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 421 (2) 1073 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20364.x