Limitations on shapelet-based weak-lensing measurements
A&A, 510 (2010) A75
Published online: 2010-02-12
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
PSZ2 G181.06+48.47. III. Weak-lensing Analysis and Merging Scenario Reconstruction of a Low-mass Cluster with Exceptionally Distant Radio Relics
Eunmo Ahn, Hyejeon Cho, M. James Jee, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 984 (1) 24 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adbc99
Euclid preparation
L. Leuzzi, M. Meneghetti, G. Angora, R. B. Metcalf, L. Moscardini, P. Rosati, P. Bergamini, F. Calura, B. Clément, R. Gavazzi, F. Gentile, M. Lochner, C. Grillo, G. Vernardos, N. Aghanim, A. Amara, L. Amendola, N. Auricchio, C. Bodendorf, D. Bonino, E. Branchini, M. Brescia, J. Brinchmann, S. Camera, V. Capobianco, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 681 A68 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347244
RadioLensfit: An HPC tool for accurate galaxy shape measurement with SKA
M. Rivi and L. MillerAstronomy and Computing 39 100574 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2022.100574
Cosmological inference from an emulator based halo model. II. Joint analysis of galaxy-galaxy weak lensing and galaxy clustering from HSC-Y1 and SDSS
Hironao Miyatake, Sunao Sugiyama, Masahiro Takada, et al.Physical Review D 106 (8) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.083520
SLITRONOMY: Towards a fully wavelet-based strong lensing inversion technique
A. Galan, A. Peel, R. Joseph, F. Courbin and J.-L. StarckAstronomy & Astrophysics 647 A176 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039363
KiDS-1000 catalogue: Weak gravitational lensing shear measurements
Benjamin Giblin, Catherine Heymans, Marika Asgari, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 645 A105 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038850
Shear measurement bias
Arnau Pujol, Florent Sureau, Jerome Bobin, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A164 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038657
Exponential shapelets: basis functions for data analysis of isolated features
Pierre Touboul, Quentin Baghi, Richard Massey and Joel BergéMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 486 (1) 544 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz787
Radio–optical galaxy shape and shear correlations in the COSMOS field using 3 GHz VLA observations
Tom Hillier, Michael L Brown, Ian Harrison and Lee WhittakerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (4) 5420 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2098
A Model-Independent Characterisation of Strong Gravitational Lensing by Observables
Jenny WagnerUniverse 5 (7) 177 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe5070177
Galaxy shape measurement with convolutional neural networks
Dezső Ribli, László Dobos and István CsabaiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 489 (4) 4847 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2374
Radio galaxy shape measurement with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo in the visibility domain
M Rivi, M Lochner, S T Balan, I Harrison and F B AbdallaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 482 (1) 1096 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2700
Weak lensing shear calibration with simulations of the HSC survey
Rachel Mandelbaum, François Lanusse, Alexie Leauthaud, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (3) 3170 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2420
The first-year shear catalog of the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Survey
Rachel Mandelbaum, Hironao Miyatake, Takashi Hamana, Masamune Oguri, Melanie Simet, Robert Armstrong, James Bosch, Ryoma Murata, François Lanusse, Alexie Leauthaud, Jean Coupon, Surhud More, Masahiro Takada, Satoshi Miyazaki, Joshua S Speagle, Masato Shirasaki, Cristóbal Sifón, Song Huang, Atsushi J Nishizawa, Elinor Medezinski, Yuki Okura, Nobuhiro Okabe, Nicole Czakon, Ryuichi Takahashi, William R Coulton, et al.Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 70 (SP1) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psx130
Radio weak lensing shear measurement in the visibility domain – II. Source extraction
M Rivi and L MillerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 476 (2) 2053 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty371
Weak Lensing for Precision Cosmology
Rachel MandelbaumAnnual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 56 (1) 393 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051928
Problems using ratios of galaxy shape moments in requirements for weak lensing surveys
H. Israel, T. D. Kitching, R. Massey and M. CropperAstronomy & Astrophysics 598 A46 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628394
Weak-lensing shear estimates with general adaptive moments, and studies of bias by pixellation, PSF distortions, and noise
Patrick Simon and Peter SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 604 A109 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629591
De-noising the galaxies in the Hubble XDF with EMPCA
Matteo MaturiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 471 (1) 750 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1380
Reconstruction of small-scale galaxy cluster substructure with lensing flexion
Benjamin Cain, Maruša Bradač and Rebecca LevinsonMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (4) 4287 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2270
Radio weak lensing shear measurement in the visibility domain – I. Methodology
M. Rivi, L. Miller, S. Makhathini and F. B. AbdallaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (2) 1881 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2041
The DES Science Verification weak lensing shear catalogues
M. Jarvis, E. Sheldon, J. Zuntz, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460 (2) 2245 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw990
The impact of cosmic variance on simulating weak lensing surveys
Arun Kannawadi, Rachel Mandelbaum and Claire LacknerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (4) 3597 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv520
HIERARCHICAL PROBABILISTIC INFERENCE OF COSMIC SHEAR
Michael D. Schneider, David W. Hogg, Philip J. Marshall, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 807 (1) 87 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/87
GREAT3 results – I. Systematic errors in shear estimation and the impact of real galaxy morphology
Rachel Mandelbaum, Barnaby Rowe, Robert Armstrong, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450 (3) 2963 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv781
Galaxy Alignments: Observations and Impact on Cosmology
Donnacha Kirk, Michael L. Brown, Henk Hoekstra, et al.Space Science Reviews 193 (1-4) 139 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0213-4
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Martin KilbingerReports on Progress in Physics 78 (8) 086901 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901
GalSim: The modular galaxy image simulation toolkit
B.T.P. Rowe, M. Jarvis, R. Mandelbaum, et al.Astronomy and Computing 10 121 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2015.02.002
On the probability distributions of ellipticity
M. Viola, T. D. Kitching and B. JoachimiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 439 (2) 1909 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu071
THE THIRD GRAVITATIONAL LENSING ACCURACY TESTING (GREAT3) CHALLENGE HANDBOOK
Rachel Mandelbaum, Barnaby Rowe, James Bosch, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 212 (1) 5 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/5
Seeing in the dark – I. Multi-epoch alchemy
Eric M. Huff, Christopher M. Hirata, Rachel Mandelbaum, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 440 (2) 1296 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu144
im3shape: a maximum likelihood galaxy shear measurement code for cosmic gravitational lensing
Joe Zuntz, Tomasz Kacprzak, Lisa Voigt, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 434 (2) 1604 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1125
Interpolating point spread function anisotropy
M. Gentile, F. Courbin and G. MeylanAstronomy & Astrophysics 549 A1 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219739
DETECTING ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI USING MULTI-FILTER IMAGING DATA. II. INCORPORATING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
X. Y. Dong and M. M. De RobertisThe Astronomical Journal 146 (4) 87 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/146/4/87
The impact of galaxy colour gradients on cosmic shear measurement
L. M. Voigt, S. L. Bridle, A. Amara, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 421 (2) 1385 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20395.x
A NEW TOOL FOR IMAGE ANALYSIS BASED ON CHEBYSHEV RATIONAL FUNCTIONS: CHEF FUNCTIONS
Y. Jiménez-Teja and N. BenítezThe Astrophysical Journal 745 (2) 150 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/150
Measurement and calibration of noise bias in weak lensing galaxy shape estimation
T. Kacprzak, J. Zuntz, B. Rowe, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 427 (4) 2711 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21622.x
Three-dimensional shapelets and an automated classification scheme for dark matter haloes1★
C. J. Fluke, A. L. Malec, P. D. Lasky and B. R. BarsdellMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 421 (2) 1499 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20407.x
Noise bias in weak lensing shape measurements
Alexandre Refregier, Tomasz Kacprzak, Adam Amara, Sarah Bridle and Barnaby RoweMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 425 (3) 1951 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21483.x
Means of confusion: how pixel noise affects shear estimates for weak gravitational lensing
P. Melchior and M. ViolaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 424 (4) 2757 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21381.x
Precision simulation of ground-based lensing data using observations from space
Rachel Mandelbaum, Christopher M. Hirata, Alexie Leauthaud, Richard J. Massey and Jason RhodesMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 420 (2) 1518 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20138.x
MEASURING GRAVITATIONAL LENSING FLEXION IN A1689 USING AN ANALYTIC IMAGE MODEL
Benjamin Cain, Paul L. Schechter and M.W. BautzThe Astrophysical Journal 736 (1) 43 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/43
Weak gravitational lensing with deimos
P. Melchior, M. Viola, B. M. Schäfer and M. BartelmannMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 412 (3) 1552 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17875.x
Parametrizing arbitrary galaxy morphologies: potentials and pitfalls
René Andrae, Knud Jahnke and Peter MelchiorMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 411 (1) 385 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17690.x
Biases in, and corrections to, KSB shear measurements
M. Viola, P. Melchior and M. BartelmannMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 410 (4) 2156 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17589.x
Only marginal alignment of disc galaxies
René Andrae and Knud JahnkeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 418 (3) 2014 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19620.x
Quantifying galaxy shapes: sérsiclets and beyond
René Andrae, Peter Melchior and Knud JahnkeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 417 (4) 2465 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19348.x
Soft clustering analysis of galaxy morphologies: a worked example with SDSS
R. Andrae, P. Melchior and M. BartelmannAstronomy & Astrophysics 522 A21 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014169
Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients
Gary M. BernsteinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 406 (4) 2793 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16883.x
GALAXY MODELING WITH COMPOUND ELLIPTICAL SHAPELETS
James BoschThe Astronomical Journal 140 (3) 870 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/140/3/870