Dependence of cosmic shear covariances on cosmology - Impact on parameter estimation
A&A, 502 3 (2009) 721-731
Published online: 2009-06-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
KiDS-Legacy: Covariance validation and the unified OneCovariance framework for projected large-scale structure observables
Robert Reischke, Sandra Unruh, Marika Asgari, Andrej Dvornik, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Benjamin Joachimi, Lucas Porth, Maximilian von Wietersheim-Kramsta, Jan Luca van den Busch, Benjamin Stölzner, Angus H. Wright, Ziang Yan, Maciej Bilicki, Pierre Burger, Nora Elisa Chisari, Joachim Harnois-Déraps, Christos Georgiou, Catherine Heymans, Priyanka Jalan, Shahab Joudaki, Konrad Kuijken, Shun-Sheng Li, Laila Linke, Constance Mahony, Davide Sciotti, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 699 A124 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452592
KiDS-Legacy: Angular galaxy clustering from deep surveys with complex selection effects
Ziang Yan, Angus H. Wright, Nora Elisa Chisari, Christos Georgiou, Shahab Joudaki, Arthur Loureiro, Robert Reischke, Marika Asgari, Maciej Bilicki, Andrej Dvornik, Catherine Heymans, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Priyanka Jalan, Benjamin Joachimi, Giorgio Francesco Lesci, Shun-Sheng Li, Laila Linke, Constance Mahony, Lauro Moscardini, Nicola R. Napolitano, Benjamin Stölzner, Maximilian Von Wietersheim-Kramsta and Mijin YoonAstronomy & Astrophysics 694 A259 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452808
KiDS-SBI: Simulation-based inference analysis of KiDS-1000 cosmic shear
Maximilian von Wietersheim-Kramsta, Kiyam Lin, Nicolas Tessore, Benjamin Joachimi, Arthur Loureiro, Robert Reischke and Angus H. WrightAstronomy & Astrophysics 694 A223 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450487
Neural network based emulation of galaxy power spectrum covariances: A reanalysis of BOSS DR12 data
Joseph Adamo, Hung-Jin Huang and Tim EiflerPhysical Review D 110 (12) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123517
Cosmological constraints from the abundance, weak lensing, and clustering of galaxy clusters: Application to the SDSS
A. Fumagalli, M. Costanzi, A. Saro, T. Castro and S. BorganiAstronomy & Astrophysics 682 A148 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348296
The infall region as a complementary probe to cluster abundance
C T Mpetha, J E Taylor, Y Amoura and R HaggarMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 532 (2) 2521 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1637
Euclid preparation
A. Fumagalli, A. Saro, S. Borgani, T. Castro, M. Costanzi, P. Monaco, E. Munari, E. Sefusatti, A. M. C. Le Brun, N. Aghanim, N. Auricchio, M. Baldi, C. Bodendorf, D. Bonino, E. Branchini, M. Brescia, J. Brinchmann, S. Camera, V. Capobianco, C. Carbone, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, M. Castellano, S. Cavuoti, R. Cledassou, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 683 A253 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245540
Machine learning for observational cosmology
Kana Moriwaki, Takahiro Nishimichi and Naoki YoshidaReports on Progress in Physics 86 (7) 076901 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/acd2ea
KiDS-1000 cosmology: Constraints from density split statistics
Pierre A. Burger, Oliver Friedrich, Joachim Harnois-Déraps, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 669 A69 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244673
Towards a full wCDM map-based analysis for weak lensing surveys
D Zürcher, J Fluri, V Ajani, S Fischbacher, A Refregier and T KacprzakMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 525 (1) 761 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2212
Beyond Gaussian Noise: A Generalized Approach to Likelihood Analysis with Non-Gaussian Noise
Ronan Legin, Alexandre Adam, Yashar Hezaveh and Laurence Perreault-LevasseurThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 949 (2) L41 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acd645
Bayesian control variates for optimal covariance estimation with pairs of simulations and surrogates
Nicolas Chartier and Benjamin D WandeltMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 515 (1) 1296 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1837
A tomographic spherical mass map emulator of the KiDS-1000 survey using conditional generative adversarial networks
Timothy Wing Hei Yiu, Janis Fluri and Tomasz KacprzakJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2022 (12) 013 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/12/013
Kinematic lensing with the Roman Space Telescope
Jiachuan Xu, Tim Eifler, Eric Huff, R S Pranjal, Hung-Jin Huang, Spencer Everett and Elisabeth KrauseMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 519 (2) 2535 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3685
Evidence of galaxy assembly bias in SDSS DR7 galaxy samples from count statistics
Kuan Wang, Yao-Yuan Mao, Andrew R Zentner, Hong Guo, Johannes U Lange, Frank C van den Bosch and Lorena MeziniMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 516 (3) 4003 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2465
Emulation of Cosmological Mass Maps with Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks
Nathanaël Perraudin, Sandro Marcon, Aurelien Lucchi and Tomasz KacprzakFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence 4 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.673062
Euclid : Effects of sample covariance on the number counts of galaxy clusters
A. Fumagalli, A. Saro, S. Borgani, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 652 A21 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140592
Dark Energy Survey year 3 results: covariance modelling and its impact on parameter estimation and quality of fit
O Friedrich, F Andrade-Oliveira, H Camacho, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 508 (3) 3125 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2384
Cosmology with the Roman Space Telescope: synergies with the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time
Tim Eifler, Melanie Simet, Elisabeth Krause, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 507 (1) 1514 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab533
Flow-based likelihoods for non-Gaussian inference
Ana Diaz Rivero and Cora DvorkinPhysical Review D 102 (10) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103507
Beware of commonly used approximations. Part I. Errors in forecasts
Nicola Bellomo, José Luis Bernal, Giulio Scelfo, Alvise Raccanelli and Licia VerdeJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (10) 016 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/016
Non-Gaussianity in the weak lensing correlation function likelihood – implications for cosmological parameter biases
Chien-Hao Lin, Joachim Harnois-Déraps, Tim Eifler, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499 (2) 2977 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2948
Cosmological model parameter dependence of the matter power spectrum covariance from the DEUS-PUR Cosmo simulations
Linda Blot, Pier-Stefano Corasaniti, Yann Rasera and Shankar AgarwalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 500 (2) 2532 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3444
Blinding multiprobe cosmological experiments
J Muir, G M Bernstein, D Huterer, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (3) 4454 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa965
Model-independent Reconstruction of f(T) Gravity from Gaussian Processes
Yi-Fu Cai, Martiros Khurshudyan and Emmanuel N. SaridakisThe Astrophysical Journal 888 (2) 62 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab5a7f
Hybrid-basis inference for large-scale galaxy clustering: combining spherical and Cartesian Fourier analyses
M.S. Wang, S. Avila, D. Bianchi, R. Crittenden and W.J. PercivalJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (10) 022 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/022
Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear two-point correlation functions with HSC survey first-year data
Takashi Hamana, Masato Shirasaki, Satoshi Miyazaki, Chiaki Hikage, Masamune Oguri, Surhud More, Robert Armstrong, Alexie Leauthaud, Rachel Mandelbaum, Hironao Miyatake, Atsushi J Nishizawa, Melanie Simet, Masahiro Takada, Hiroaki Aihara, James Bosch, Yutaka Komiyama, Robert Lupton, Hitoshi Murayama, Michael A Strauss and Masayuki TanakaPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 72 (1) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psz138
Cosmological consequences of intrinsic alignments supersample covariance
Saeed Ansarifard and S M S MovahedMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499 (4) 6094 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3214
Cosmological constraints from BOSS with analytic covariance matrices
Digvijay Wadekar, Mikhail M. Ivanov and Roman ScoccimarroPhysical Review D 102 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123521
Photo-z outlier self-calibration in weak lensing surveys
Emmanuel Schaan, Simone Ferraro and Uros SeljakJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (12) 001 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/001
Modelling baryonic physics in future weak lensing surveys
Scott Dodelson, Rachel Mandelbaum, Tim Eifler and Hung-Jin HuangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (2) 1652 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1714
The matter fluctuation amplitude inferred from the weak lensing power spectrum and correlation function in CFHTLenS data
Tianhuan Lu and Zoltán HaimanMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (4) 5033 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2931
Likelihood non-Gaussianity in large-scale structure analyses
ChangHoon Hahn, Florian Beutler, Manodeep Sinha, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485 (2) 2956 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz558
Cosmic shear covariance matrix in wCDM: Cosmology matters
J. Harnois-Déraps, B. Giblin and B. JoachimiAstronomy & Astrophysics 631 A160 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935912
Multi-component Decomposition of Cosmic Infrared Background Fluctuations
Chang Feng, Asantha Cooray, Jamie Bock, Tzu-Ching Chang, Olivier Doré, Mario G. Santos, Marta B. Silva and Michael ZemcovThe Astrophysical Journal 875 (2) 86 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0d8e
Constraints on Cosmology and Baryonic Feedback with the Deep Lens Survey Using Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Mass Power Spectra
Mijin Yoon, M. James Jee, J. Anthony Tyson, Samuel Schmidt, David Wittman and Ami ChoiThe Astrophysical Journal 870 (2) 111 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3a9
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Methodology and projections for joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
E. J. Baxter, Y. Omori, C. Chang, et al.Physical Review D 99 (2) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.023508
Cosmological inference from galaxy-clustering power spectrum: Gaussianization and covariance decomposition
Mike (Shengbo) Wang, Will J Percival, Santiago Avila, Robert Crittenden and Davide BianchiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 486 (1) 951 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz829
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
T. M. C. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, A. Alarcon, et al.Physical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043526
KiDS-450: cosmological constraints from weak-lensing peak statistics – II: Inference from shear peaks using N-body simulations
Nicolas Martinet, Peter Schneider, Hendrik Hildebrandt, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 474 (1) 712 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2793
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
M. A. Troxel, N. MacCrann, J. Zuntz, et al.Physical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043528
KiDS-450: enhancing cosmic shear with clipping transformations
Benjamin Giblin, Catherine Heymans, Joachim Harnois-Déraps, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 480 (4) 5529 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2271
k -cut cosmic shear: Tunable power spectrum sensitivity to test gravity
Peter L. Taylor, Francis Bernardeau and Thomas D. KitchingPhysical Review D 98 (8) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083514
Weak Lensing for Precision Cosmology
Rachel MandelbaumAnnual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 56 (1) 393 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051928
KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, and angular clustering
Edo van Uitert, Benjamin Joachimi, Shahab Joudaki, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 476 (4) 4662 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty551
Robustness of the covariance matrix for galaxy clustering measurements
Falk Baumgarten and Chia-Hsun ChuangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 480 (2) 2535 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1971
Precision matrix expansion – efficient use of numerical simulations in estimating errors on cosmological parameters
Oliver Friedrich and Tim EiflerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 473 (3) 4150 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2566
CFHTLenS revisited: assessing concordance with Planck including astrophysical systematics
Shahab Joudaki, Chris Blake, Catherine Heymans, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (2) 2033 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2665
Response approach to the matter power spectrum covariance
Alexandre Barreira and Fabian SchmidtJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (11) 051 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/11/051
Variations of cosmic large-scale structure covariance matrices across parameter space
Robert Reischke, Alina Kiessling and Björn Malte SchäferMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (4) 4016 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2976
Looking through the same lens: Shear calibration for LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST with stage 4 CMB lensing
Emmanuel Schaan, Elisabeth Krause, Tim Eifler, et al.Physical Review D 95 (12) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.123512
cosmolike – cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys
Elisabeth Krause and Tim EiflerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 470 (2) 2100 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1261
KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
H. Hildebrandt, M. Viola, C. Heymans, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (2) 1454 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2805
Will kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich measurements enhance the science return from galaxy redshift surveys?
Naonori S. Sugiyama, Teppei Okumura and David N. SpergelJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (01) 057 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/057
THE VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION OF GALAXY CLUSTERS AS A COSMOLOGICAL PROBE
M. Ntampaka, H. Trac, J. Cisewski and L. C. PriceThe Astrophysical Journal 835 (1) 106 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/106
Probing Cosmic Dark Matter and Dark Energy with Weak Gravitational Lensing Statistics
Masato ShirasakiSpringer Theses, Probing Cosmic Dark Matter and Dark Energy with Weak Gravitational Lensing Statistics 53 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-796-3_4
Cosmic shear as a probe of galaxy formation physics
Simon Foreman, Matthew R. Becker and Risa H. WechslerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (3) 3326 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2189
Performance of internal covariance estimators for cosmic shear correlation functions
O. Friedrich, S. Seitz, T. F. Eifler and D. GruenMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456 (3) 2662 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2833
Fast generation of weak lensing maps by the inverse-Gaussianization method
Yu Yu, Pengjie Zhang and Yipeng JingPhysical Review D 94 (8) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.083520
Joint analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering: Methodology and forecasts for Dark Energy Survey
Y. Park, E. Krause, S. Dodelson, et al.Physical Review D 94 (6) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.063533
The impact of intrinsic alignment on current and future cosmic shear surveys
Elisabeth Krause, Tim Eifler and Jonathan BlazekMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456 (1) 207 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2615
Probing cosmology with weak lensing selected clusters. II. Dark energy and f(R) gravity models
Masato Shirasaki, Takashi Hamana and Naoki YoshidaPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 68 (1) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psv105
Integrated approach to cosmology: Combining CMB, large-scale structure, and weak lensing
Andrina Nicola, Alexandre Refregier and Adam AmaraPhysical Review D 94 (8) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.083517
Cosmology from cosmic shear with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
T. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, S. Allam, et al.Physical Review D 94 (2) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.022001
Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
T. Kacprzak, D. Kirk, O. Friedrich, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (4) 3653 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2070
Accounting for baryonic effects in cosmic shear tomography: determining a minimal set of nuisance parameters using PCA
Tim Eifler, Elisabeth Krause, Scott Dodelson, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 454 (3) 2451 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2000
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Martin KilbingerReports on Progress in Physics 78 (8) 086901 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901
IMPACT OF BARYONIC PROCESSES ON WEAK-LENSING COSMOLOGY: POWER SPECTRUM, NONLOCAL STATISTICS, AND PARAMETER BIAS
Ken Osato, Masato Shirasaki and Naoki YoshidaThe Astrophysical Journal 806 (2) 186 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/186
Including parameter dependence in the data and covariance for cosmological inference
Martin White and Nikhil PadmanabhanJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (12) 058 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/12/058
CFHTLenS: a Gaussian likelihood is a sufficient approximation for a cosmological analysis of third-order cosmic shear statistics
P. Simon, E. Semboloni, L. van Waerbeke, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (2) 1505 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv339
A new model to predict weak-lensing peak counts
Chieh-An Lin and Martin KilbingerAstronomy & Astrophysics 583 A70 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526659
Seeing in the dark – II. Cosmic shear in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Eric M. Huff, Tim Eifler, Christopher M. Hirata, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 440 (2) 1322 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu145
Weighing the light gravitino mass with weak lensing surveys
Ayuki Kamada, Masato Shirasaki and Naoki YoshidaJournal of High Energy Physics 2014 (6) (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2014)162
CFHTLenS: cosmological constraints from a combination of cosmic shear two-point and three-point correlations
L. Fu, M. Kilbinger, T. Erben, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 441 (3) 2725 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu754
Detection of thermal SZ-CMB lensing cross-correlation in Planck nominal mission data
J. Colin Hill and David N. SpergelJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (02) 030 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/030
STATISTICAL AND SYSTEMATIC ERRORS IN THE MEASUREMENT OF WEAK-LENSING MINKOWSKI FUNCTIONALS: APPLICATION TO THE CANADA-FRANCE-HAWAII LENSING SURVEY
Masato Shirasaki and Naoki YoshidaThe Astrophysical Journal 786 (1) 43 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/43
DESI and other Dark Energy experiments in the era of neutrino mass measurements
Andreu Font-Ribera, Patrick McDonald, Nick Mostek, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (05) 023 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/023
Combining probes of large-scale structure with CosmoLike
Tim Eifler, Elisabeth Krause, Peter Schneider and Klaus HonscheidMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 440 (2) 1379 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu251
On the assumption of Gaussianity for cosmological two-point statistics and parameter dependent covariance matrices
J. CarronAstronomy & Astrophysics 551 A88 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220538
LIKELIHOOD OF THE POWER SPECTRUM IN COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER ESTIMATION
Lei Sun, Qiao Wang and Hu ZhanThe Astrophysical Journal 777 (1) 75 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/75
On estimating cosmology-dependent covariance matrices
Christopher B Morrison and Michael D SchneiderJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2013 (11) 009 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/009
CFHTLenS: combined probe cosmological model comparison using 2D weak gravitational lensing
Martin Kilbinger, Liping Fu, Catherine Heymans, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 430 (3) 2200 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt041
CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing cosmological parameter constraints: Mitigating the impact of intrinsic galaxy alignments
Catherine Heymans, Emma Grocutt, Alan Heavens, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 432 (3) 2433 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt601
COSMIC SHEAR RESULTS FROM THE DEEP LENS SURVEY. I. JOINT CONSTRAINTS ON ΩMAND σ8WITH A TWO-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
M. James Jee, J. Anthony Tyson, Michael D. Schneider, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 765 (1) 74 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/74
Gravitational lensing simulations - I. Covariance matrices and halo catalogues
Joachim Harnois-Déraps, Sanaz Vafaei and Ludovic Van WaerbekeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 426 (2) 1262 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21624.x
PROBING PRIMORDIAL NON-GAUSSIANITY WITH WEAK-LENSING MINKOWSKI FUNCTIONALS
Masato Shirasaki, Naoki Yoshida, Takashi Hamana and Takahiro NishimichiThe Astrophysical Journal 760 (1) 45 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/45
Cosmic shear covariance: the log-normal approximation
S. Hilbert, J. Hartlap and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 536 A85 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117294
Weak lensing from space: first cosmological constraints from three-point shear statistics★
Elisabetta Semboloni, Tim Schrabback, Ludovic van Waerbeke, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 410 (1) 143 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17430.x
NON-GAUSSIAN ERROR CONTRIBUTION TO LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS OF THE MATTER POWER SPECTRUM
Ryuichi Takahashi, Naoki Yoshida, Masahiro Takada, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 726 (1) 7 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/7
SIMULATIONS OF WIDE-FIELD WEAK-LENSING SURVEYS. II. COVARIANCE MATRIX OF REAL-SPACE CORRELATION FUNCTIONS
Masanori Sato, Masahiro Takada, Takashi Hamana and Takahiko MatsubaraThe Astrophysical Journal 734 (2) 76 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/76
Constraints on intrinsic alignment contamination of weak lensing surveys using the MegaZ-LRG sample
B. Joachimi, R. Mandelbaum, F. B. Abdalla and S. L. BridleAstronomy & Astrophysics 527 A26 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015621
Weak-lensing statistics from the Coyote Universe
Tim EiflerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 418 (1) 536 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19502.x
A bias in cosmic shear from galaxy selection: results from ray-tracing simulations
J. Hartlap, S. Hilbert, P. Schneider and H. HildebrandtAstronomy & Astrophysics 528 A51 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015850
Evidence of the accelerated expansion of the Universe from weak lensing tomography with COSMOS
T. Schrabback, J. Hartlap, B. Joachimi, et al.Astronomy and Astrophysics 516 A63 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913577
COSEBIs: Extracting the full E-/B-mode information from cosmic shear correlation functions
P. Schneider, T. Eifler and E. KrauseAstronomy and Astrophysics 520 A116 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014235
Measuring cosmic shear with the ring statistics
T. Eifler, P. Schneider and E. KrauseAstronomy and Astrophysics 510 A7 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912888
Intrinsic alignment boosting
B. Joachimi and P. SchneiderAstronomy and Astrophysics 517 A4 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014482
The removal of shear-ellipticity correlations from the cosmic shear signal
B. Joachimi and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 507 (1) 105 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912420
The non-Gaussianity of the cosmic shear likelihood or how odd is theChandraDeep Field South?
J. Hartlap, T. Schrabback, P. Simon and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 504 (3) 689 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200911697