Table 1.
Comparison of best-fit parameters for models A, B, and C.
| Parameter | Model A | Model B | Model C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuum | |||
| Γ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| norm (10−5) | 120 ± 20 | 41 ± 3 | ![]() |
| Broad Gaussian emission | |||
| E (keV) | − | 6.2 ± 0.3 | − |
| σ (keV) | − | ![]() |
− |
| EW (keV) | − | 1.4 ± 0.4 | − |
| norm (10−6) | − | ![]() |
− |
| Relativistic reflection | |||
| a | − | − | ![]() |
| i (deg) | − | − | ![]() |
| log ξ | − | − | 3.8 ± 0.1 |
| AFe | − | − | ![]() |
| Rrefl | − | − | > 46 |
| Ionized absorber 1 | |||
| NH (1023 cm−2) | ![]() |
![]() |
> 15 |
| log ξ (erg cm/s) | 3.2 ± 0.04 | ![]() |
![]() |
| vturb (km/s) | > 25 400 | ![]() |
> 28 100 |
| vout (c) | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 |
| Ionized absorber 2 | |||
| NH (1023 cm−2) | ![]() |
> 171 | − |
| log ξ (erg cm/s) | 3.1 ± 0.1 | ![]() |
− |
| vturb (km/s) | > 28 400 | > 24 700 | − |
| vout (c) | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | − |
| χ2/d.o.f | 253.85/212 | 207.29/209 | 204.71/211 |
Notes. Missing parameters are indicated by −. Models A and B use two photoionized outflowing components. Model C needs just one UFO and includes a relxill reflection component. For model C, continuum parameters (Γ, norm) refer to the intrinsic power law, while the reflection parameters describe the reprocessed component; both are computed self-consistently within relxill.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.















