Table 2.
Light-curve model parameters for the two rTDEs.
| IAU ID | tpeak | lgLV,peak | t1/2, rise | t1/2, decline (f) | t1/2, decline(p) | lgTbb | lgRbb | lgLbb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| AT 2019azh.I | 53626
|
43.27
|
18.5
|
10.2
|
7.0
|
– | – | – |
| AT 2019azh.II | 58561±1 | 43.14 | 24.7
|
44.1
|
– | 4.46 | 14.80 | 44.31 |
| AT 2024pvu.I | 54019±6 | 43.25±0.05 | 27.8
|
33.6
|
23.5
|
4.29 ± 0.01 | 15.00 ± 0.02 | 44.03 ± 0.05 |
| AT 2024pvu.II | 60552±1 | 43.30±0.01 | 24.0
|
14.35
|
– | 4.33 ± 0.01 | 14.99 ± 0.01 | 44.14 ± 0.02 |
| Yao23.ZTF-TDEs | – | 42.33–44.55 | 6.4–51.8 | 5.2–86.5 | – | 3.96–4.58 | 14.45–15.56 | 42.99–45.44 |
Notes. (1): Peak time. (2): Peak V-band luminosity. (3): Rise timescale, expressed as t1/2, rise = 1.177σrise. (4),(5): Decline timescales assuming full TDE (p = −5/3) and partial TDE (p = −9/4) models, expressed as t1/2, decline = (2−1/p − 1)t0. (6)-(8): Blackbody temperature, radius, and luminosity at the peak time. For the two CRTS flares, we list the best-fitting GP model parameters, while the blackbody parameters for AT 2024pvu.I are from SED fitting results using the GALEX UV data. For AT 2024pvu.II, we list the best-fitting parameters from the model of van Velzen et al. (2021) and the parameters for AT 2019azh.II and ZTF TDEs are taken from Yao23. The lgLV,peak for all ZTF TDEs are inferred from the peak bolometric luminosity and the temperature at the peak time.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.











